Top

International Journal of Material Forming

Published in:

21-08-2015 | Original Research

Comparison of different yield criteria in various deep drawn cups

Authors: Ferah Cogun, Haluk Darendeliler

Published in: International Journal of Material Forming | Issue 1/2017

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The aim of the study is to evaluate the performance of three recent yield criteria namely; BBC2008-8p, Yld2003-8p, Hu2003 through the simulation of the hemispherical, cylindrical and square cup drawing processes by comparing the results with the ones obtained by using the von Mises criterion for the isotropic, kinematic and combined hardening and the Hill’48 criterion. For this purpose, two different sheet materials, SS304 stainless steel and DKP6112 steel, and various punch travels were used in the simulations and experimental phases of this study. The BBC2008-8p, Yld2003-8p and Hu2003 models were implemented to the ABAQUS software through the user material subroutine VUMAT. The thickness strain distributions obtained from the simulations were compared with the experimental results to analyze the validity of the three aforementioned criteria. Compared with the other models, the material behavior in deep drawing cases of this study is better predicted with more recent models, namely BBC2008-8p, Yld2003-8p and Hu2003, which include anisotropy parameters found from uniaxial and biaxial tension tests.

previous article Finite element analysis of combined forming processes by means of rate dependent ductile damage modelling

next article The stribeck curve in cold flat rolling

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Hill R (1979) Theoretical plasticity of textured aggregates. Math Proc Camb Philos Soc 85:179–191MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

Barlat F, Lian J (1989) Plastic behavior and stretchability of sheet metals, Part I: a yield function for orthotropic sheets under plane stress conditions. Int J Plast 5:51–66CrossRef

Hill R (1990) Constitutive modeling of orthotropic plasticity in sheet metals. J Mech Phys Solids 38:405–417MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

Barlat F, Lege DJ, Brem JC (1991) A six-component yield function for anisotropic materials. Int J Plast 7:693–712CrossRef

Hill R (1993) A user-friendly theory of orthotropic plasticity in sheet metals. Int J Mech Sci 35:19–25CrossRefMATH

Karafillis AP, Boyce MC (1993) A general anisotropic yield criterion using bounds and a transformation weighting tensor. J Mech Phys Solids 41:1859–1886CrossRefMATH

Ferron G, Makkouk R, Morreale J (1994) A parametric description of orthotropic plasticity in metal sheets. Int J Plast 10:431–449CrossRefMATH

Barlat F, Becker RC, Hayashida Y, Maeda Y, Yanagawa M, Chung K, Brem JC, Lege DJ, Matsui K, Murtha SJ, Hattori S (1997) Yielding description for solution strengthened aluminum alloys. Int J Plast 13:385–401CrossRef

Barlat F, Brem JC, Yoon JW, Chung K, Dick RE, Choi SH, Pourboghrat F, Chu E, Lege DJ (2003) Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets. Int J Plast 19:1297–1319CrossRefMATH

10.

Banabic D, Aretz H, Comsa DS, Paraianu L (2005) An improved analytical description of orthotropy in metallic sheets. Int J Plast 21:493–512CrossRefMATH

11.

Barlat F, Aretz H, Yoon JW, Karabin ME, Brem JC, Dick RE (2005) Linear transformation based anisotropic yield functions. Int J Plast 21:1009–1039CrossRefMATH

12.

Moreira LP, Ferron G, Ferran G (2000) Experimental and numerical analysis of the cup drawing test for orthotropic metal sheets. J Mat Proc Technol 108:78–86CrossRef

13.

Hill R (1948) A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proc Roy Soc Lond A 193:281–297MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

14.

Wu HC (2002) Anisotropic plasticity for sheet metals using the concept of combined isotropic-kinematic. Int J Plast 18:1661–1682CrossRefMATH

15.

Hu W (2003) Characterized behaviors and corresponding yield criterion of anisotropic sheet metals. Mat Sci Eng A 345(1):139–144CrossRef

16.

Hosford WF (1979) On yield loci of anisotropic cubic metals. Proc. 7th North American Metalworking Conf., SME, Dearborn, 191–197

17.

Choi Y (2003) Modeling evolution of anisotropy and hardening for sheet metals. Dissertation, Ohio State University

18.

Banabic D, Kuwabara T, Balan T, Comsa DS (2004) An anisotropic yield criterion for sheet metals. J Mat Proc Technol 157–158:462–465CrossRefMATH

19.

Kuwabara T, Bael AV (1999) Measurement and analysis of yield locus of sheet aluminum alloy 6XXX. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. and Workshop on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Forming Processes, Numisheet 1999, Besancon, 85–90

20.

Kuwabara T, Ikeda S, Kuroda K (1998) Measurement and analysis of differential work hardening in cold-rolled steel sheet under biaxial tension. J Mat Proc Technol 80(8):517–523CrossRef

21.

Banabic D, Balan T, Comsa DS (2000) A new yield criterion for orthotropic sheet metals under plane–stress conditions. The 7th Conf. “TPR2000”, Cluj Napoca, 217–224

22.

Banabic D, Balan T, Comsa DS (2000) Yield criterion for orthotropic sheet metals. Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Metal Forming 2000, Krakow, 755–761

23.

Aretz H (2005) A non-quadratic plane stress yield function for orthotropic sheet metals. J Mat Proc Technol 168:1–9CrossRef

24.

Yoon JW, Hong SH (2006) Modeling of Aluminum Alloy Sheets Based on New Anisotropic Yield Functions. J Mat Proc Technol 177:134–137CrossRef

25.

Mattiasson K, Sigvant M (2008) An evaluation of some recent yield criteria for industrial simulations of sheet forming processes. Int J Mech Sci 50:774–787CrossRefMATH

26.

Soare S, Yoon JW, Cazacu O (2008) On the use of homogeneous polynomials to develop anisotropic yield functions with applications to sheet forming. Int J Plast 24:915–944CrossRefMATH

27.

Xu L, Barlat F, Ahn DC (2009) Constitutive modelling of ferritic stainless steel sheets. Int J Mat Form 2:391–394CrossRef

28.

Comsa DS, Banabic D (2008) Plane-stress yield criterion for highly-anisotropic sheet metals. Proc. 7th Int. Conf. and Workshop on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Metal Forming Processes, Numisheet 2008, Interlaken, 43–48

29.

Vrh M, Halilovic M, Starman B, Štok B, Comsa DS, Banabic D (2011) Earing prediction in cup drawing using the BBC2008 yield criterion. Proc. 8th Int. Conf. and Workshop on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Metal Forming Processes, Numisheet 2011, Seoul, 142–149.

30.

Vrh M, Halilovic M, Starman B, Štok B, Comsa DS, Banabic D (2014) Capability of the BBC2008 yield criterion in predicting the earing profile in cup deep drawing simulations. Eur J Mech A Solids 45:59–74MathSciNetCrossRef

31.

Butuc MC, Teodosiu C, Barlat F, Gracio JJ (2011) Analysis of sheet metal formability through isotropic and kinematic hardening models. Eur J Mech A Solids 30:532–546CrossRefMATH

32.

Teodosiu C, Hu Z (1995) Evolution of the intragranular microstructure at moderate and large strains: modelling and computational significance. Proc. of NUMIFORM’95, Rotterdam, 173–182

33.

Swift HW (1952) Plastic instability under plane stress. J Mech Phys Solids 1:11–16CrossRef

34.

Voce E (1955) A practical strain-hardening function. Metallurgica 51:219–220

35.

Dasappa P, Inal K, Mishra R (2012) The effects of anisotropic yield functions and their material parameters on prediction of forming limit diagrams. Int J Solids Struct 49:3528–3550CrossRef

36.

Plunkett B, Cazacu O, Barlat F (2008) Orthotropic yield criteria for description of the anisotropy in tension and compression of sheet metals. Int J Plast 24:847–866CrossRefMATH

37.

Aretz H, Barlat F (2013) New convex yield functions for orthotropic metal plasticity. Int J Non Linear Mech 51:97–111CrossRef

38.

Ucan M, Darendeliler H (2013) Comparison of different constitutive models in sheet metal forming. Key Eng Mat 554–557:1203–1216. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.1203 CrossRef

39.

Barlat F, Lian J (1989) Plastic behaviour of stretchability of sheet metals (Part I): a yield function for orthotropic sheet under plane stress conditions. Int J Plast 5:51–56CrossRef

40.

Banabic D (2010) Sheet Metal forming processes: constitutive modelling and numerical simulation. Springer, BerlinCrossRef

41.

Barlat F, Richmond O (1987) Prediction of tricomponent plane stress yield surfaces and associated flow and failure behavior of strongly textured fcc polycrystalline sheets. Mat Sci Eng 95:15–29CrossRef

42.

Vrh M, Halilovic M, Štok B (2010) Improved explicit integration in plasticity. Int J Numer Methods Eng 81(7):910–938MathSciNetMATH

43.

Hu W (2005) An orthotropic yield criterion in a 3-D general stress state. Int J Plast 21:1771–1796CrossRefMATH

44.

Lademo O-G, Hopperstad OS, Langseth M (1999) An evaluation of yield criteria and flow rules for aluminium alloys. Int J Plast 15:191–208CrossRefMATH

45.

Banabic D, Muller W, Pohlandt K (1998) Determination of yield loci from cross tensile tests assuming various kinds of yield criteria, sheet metal forming beyond 2000, Brussels, 343–349

46.

Lazarescu L, Ciobanu I, Nicodim IP, Comsa DS, Banabic D (2013) Effect of the mechanical parameters used as input data in the yield criteria on the accuracy of the finite element simulation of sheet metal forming processes. Key Eng Mat 554–557:204–209CrossRef

Title: Comparison of different yield criteria in various deep drawn cups
Authors: Ferah Cogun
Haluk Darendeliler
Publication date: 21-08-2015
Publisher: Springer Paris
Published in: International Journal of Material Forming / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1960-6206
Electronic ISSN: 1960-6214
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-015-1258-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Investigation of the effect of temper rolling on the texture evolution and mechanical behavior of IF steels using multiscale simulation

Finite element analysis of combined forming processes by means of rate dependent ductile damage modelling

Editorial for thematic issues: computational methods in manufacturing

Resin infusion-based processes simulation : coupled Stokes-Darcy flows in orthotropic preforms undergoing finite strain

Numerical simulation and experimental validation of a multi-step deep drawing process

On the numerical simulation of sheet metal blanking process

Premium Partners