Skip to main content
Top

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Computational Thinking and Flipped Classroom Model for Upper-Division Computer Science Majors

Authors : Antonio-Angel L. Medel, Anthony C. Bianchi, Alberto C. Cruz

Published in: Advances in Software Engineering, Education, and e-Learning

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Graduation rates are generally low among undergraduate Computer Science (CS) majors, so we are motivated to employ flipped classroom model at CSUB to improve 4-year graduation rates. There is a plethora of literature supporting improved information retention using the flipped classroom model. However, its impact on upper-division core CS courses has been understudied. An active learning environment using Just-in-Time-Teaching (JiTT), pair instruction, and computational thinking has been implemented in this study. This flipped classroom model was applied to two upper-division CS courses, Computer Architecture II and Artificial Intelligence. A year-long study measured the impact on performance through surveys, performance on group activities, and class performance such as test scores, with comparison to a control population (non-flipped classroom class) normalized for a specific instructor. An increased student performance and ultimately better graduation rates among the 40 flipped classroom model students is anticipated.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference National Science Foundation, Science and Engineering Indicators Report (2014) National Science Foundation, Science and Engineering Indicators Report (2014)
3.
go back to reference M.N. Giannakos, J. Krogstie, Reviewing the flipped classroom research: Reflections for computer science education, in CSERC '14: Proceedings of the Computer Science Education Research Conference, (2014) M.N. Giannakos, J. Krogstie, Reviewing the flipped classroom research: Reflections for computer science education, in CSERC '14: Proceedings of the Computer Science Education Research Conference, (2014)
4.
go back to reference A. Roehl, S.L. Reddy, G.J. Shannon, The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. J. Fam. Consum Sci 105(2), 44–49 (2013)CrossRef A. Roehl, S.L. Reddy, G.J. Shannon, The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. J. Fam. Consum Sci 105(2), 44–49 (2013)CrossRef
5.
go back to reference J.M. Wing, Computational Thinking (Microsoft Research Asia Faculty Summit, Tianjin, 2012) J.M. Wing, Computational Thinking (Microsoft Research Asia Faculty Summit, Tianjin, 2012)
6.
go back to reference N. Nagappan, L. Williams, M. Ferzli, E. Wiebe, K. Yang, C. Miller, S. Balik, Improving the CS1 experience with pair programming. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 35(1), 359–362 (2003)CrossRef N. Nagappan, L. Williams, M. Ferzli, E. Wiebe, K. Yang, C. Miller, S. Balik, Improving the CS1 experience with pair programming. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 35(1), 359–362 (2003)CrossRef
7.
go back to reference S.Y. Lye, J.H.L. Koh, Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Comp. Hum. Behav. 41, 51–61 (2014)CrossRef S.Y. Lye, J.H.L. Koh, Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Comp. Hum. Behav. 41, 51–61 (2014)CrossRef
8.
go back to reference I. Corradini, L. Michael, E. Nardelli, Computational thinking in Italian schools: Quantitative data and teachers’ sentiment analysis after two years of Programma il Futuro, in 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, p. 2017 I. Corradini, L. Michael, E. Nardelli, Computational thinking in Italian schools: Quantitative data and teachers’ sentiment analysis after two years of Programma il Futuro, in 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, p. 2017
10.
go back to reference G.M. Novak, Just-in-time teaching. New Dir. Teach. Learn. 128, 63–73 (2011)CrossRef G.M. Novak, Just-in-time teaching. New Dir. Teach. Learn. 128, 63–73 (2011)CrossRef
11.
go back to reference S. Lehesvuori, J. Viiri, H. Rasku-Puttonen, Introducing dialogic teaching to science student teachers. J. Sci. Teach. Educ. 22(8), 705–727 (2011)CrossRef S. Lehesvuori, J. Viiri, H. Rasku-Puttonen, Introducing dialogic teaching to science student teachers. J. Sci. Teach. Educ. 22(8), 705–727 (2011)CrossRef
13.
go back to reference C.B. Lee, S. Garcia, L. Porter, Can peer instruction be effective in upper-division computer science courses? ACM Trans Comp Educ (TOCE) 13(3) (2013) C.B. Lee, S. Garcia, L. Porter, Can peer instruction be effective in upper-division computer science courses? ACM Trans Comp Educ (TOCE) 13(3) (2013)
14.
go back to reference K.M. Lui, Pair programming productivity: Novice–novice vs. expert–expert. Int. J. Hum–Comp. Stud. 64(9), 915–925 (2006)CrossRef K.M. Lui, Pair programming productivity: Novice–novice vs. expert–expert. Int. J. Hum–Comp. Stud. 64(9), 915–925 (2006)CrossRef
15.
go back to reference J. Wertsch, The zone of proximal development: Some conceptual issues. New Dir. Child Adolesc. Dev. 23, 7–18 (1984)CrossRef J. Wertsch, The zone of proximal development: Some conceptual issues. New Dir. Child Adolesc. Dev. 23, 7–18 (1984)CrossRef
16.
go back to reference J. Grusec, Social learning theory and developmental psychology: The legacies of Robert Sears and Albert Bandura. Dev. Psychol. 28(5), 776–786 (1992)CrossRef J. Grusec, Social learning theory and developmental psychology: The legacies of Robert Sears and Albert Bandura. Dev. Psychol. 28(5), 776–786 (1992)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Computational Thinking and Flipped Classroom Model for Upper-Division Computer Science Majors
Authors
Antonio-Angel L. Medel
Anthony C. Bianchi
Alberto C. Cruz
Copyright Year
2021
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70873-3_15