Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Science and Society. Assessment of Research Read chapter Read first chapter

2016 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

6. Concluding Remarks

Author : Nikolay K. Vitanov

Published in: Science Dynamics and Research Production

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this chapter, several concluding remarks are provided about the importance of science for society and about general characteristics of research systems. The importance of statistical laws for research systems is emphasized, and we stress the usefulness of mathematical models and methods for the study and understanding of the dynamics of science and scientific production.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Selected Models for Dynamics of Research Organizations and Research Production
Literature
1.
P. Vinkler, The Evaluation of Research by Scientometric Indicators (Chandos, Oxford, 2010)CrossRef
2.
T. Kealey, The Economic Laws of Scientific Research (Macmillan, Houndmills, 1996)CrossRef
3.
A. Scharnhorst. Constructing knowledge landscapes within the framework of geometrically oriented evolutionary theories, in Integrative Systems Approaches to Natural and Social Dynamics ed. by M. Matthies, H. Malchow, J. Kriz (Springer, Berlin, 2001) pp. 505–515
4.
R. Klavans, K.W. Boyack, Using global mapping to create more accurate document-level maps of research fields. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 62, 1–18 (2011)CrossRef
5.
K.W. Boyack, R. Klavans, K. Börner, Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics 64, 351–374 (2005)CrossRef
6.
R.M. Shiffrin, K. Börner, Mapping knowledge domains. PNAS 101, 5183–5185 (2004)CrossRef
7.
K. Börner, L. Dall’Asta, W. Ke, A. Vespignani, Studying the emerging global brain: analyzing and visualizing the impact of co-authorship teams. Complexity 10, 57–67 (2005)CrossRef
8.
A. Skupin, A cartographic approach to visualizing conference abstracts. Comput. Graphics Appl. 22, 50–58 (2002)CrossRef
9.
D. Hakken, The Knowledge Landscapes of Cyberspace (Routledge, London, 2004)
10.
E. Bruckner, W. Ebeling, A. Scharnhorst, The application of evolution models in scientometrics. Scientometrics 18, 21–41 (1990)CrossRef
11.
E. Bruckner, W. Ebeling, M.A. Jimenez Montano, A. Scharnhorst. Hyperselection and innovation described by a stochastic model of technological evolution, in Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory. New directions in Technology Studies ed. by L. Leydesdorff, P. van den Besselaar (St. Martin’s Press, 1994) pp. 79–90
12.
E. Bruckner, W. Ebeling, M.A. Jimenez, Montano, A. Scharnhorst. Nonlinear stochastic effects of substitution—an evolutionary approach. J. Evol. Econ. 6, 1–30 (1996)
13.
E. Bruckner, W. Ebeling, A. Scharnhorst, Stochastic dynamics of instabilities in evolutionary systems. Sys. Dyn. Rev. 5, 176–191 (1989)CrossRef
14.
W. Ebeling, Karmeshu, A. Scharnhorst. Dynamics of economic and technological search processes in complex adaptive landscapes. Adv. Complex Syst. 4, 71–88 (2001)
15.
W. Ebeling, A. Scharnhorst, Selforganization models for field mobility of physicists. Czech J. Phys. 36, 43–46 (1986)CrossRef
16.
W. Ebeling, A. Scharnhorst, M.A.J. Montano, Karmeshchu. Evolutions-und Innovationsdynamik als Suchprozeß in Komplexe Systeme und Nichtlineare Dynamik in Natur und Gesellschaft: Komplexitätsforschung in Deutschland auf dem Weg ins nächste Jahrhundert ed. by K. Mainzer (Springer, Berlin, 1999)
17.
D. Helbing, Quantitative Sociodynamics: Stochastic Methods and Models of Social Interaction Processes (Springer, Berlin, 2010)CrossRefMATH
18.
F. Schweitzer, Brownian Agents and Active Particles: Collective Dynamics in the Natural and Social Sciences (Springer, Berlin, 2003)
19.
F. Schweitzer (ed.), Self-Organization of Complex Structures: From Individual to Collective Dynamics (Gordon and Breach, Australia, 1997)MATH
20.
21.
M. Matthies, H. Malchow, J. Kriz (eds.), Integrative Systems Approaches to Natural and Social Dynamics (Springer, Berlin, 2001)
22.
J. Klüver. The dynamics and evolution of social systems, in New Foundations of a Mathematical Sociology (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2000)
23.
N.B. Tuma, M.T. Hannan. Social Dynamics. Models and Methods (Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1984)
24.
A. Bejan, W. Merkx, Constructal Theory of Social Dynamics (Springer, New York, 2007)
25.
G. Naldi, L. Pareshi, G. Toscani (eds.), Mathematical Modeling of Collective Behavior in Socio-Economic and Life Sciences (Springer, New York, 2010)MATH
26.
P. Doreian, F.N. Stokman (eds.), Evolution of Social Networks (Routledge, Amsterdam, 2013)MATH
27.
S. de Marchi, Computational and Mathematical Modeling in the Social Sciences (Cambridge Iniversity Press, Cambridge, 2005)CrossRef
28.
G.A. Marsan, N. Bellomo, A. Tosin. Complex Systems and Society. Modeling and Simulation. (Springer, Berlin, 2013)
29.
N. Bellomo. Modeling Complex Living Systems. A Kinetic Theory and Stochastic Game Approach. (Birkhäuser, Boston, 2008)
30.
J. Lorenz, H. Rauhut, F. Schweitzer, D. Helbing, How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect. PNAS 108, 9020–9025 (2011)CrossRef
31.
L.M.A. Bettencourt, J. Lobo, D. Helbing, C. Kühnert, G.B. West, Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. PNAS 104, 7301–7306 (2007)CrossRef
32.
J.A. Holyst, K. Kacperski, F. Schweitzer. Social impact models of opinion dynamics, in Annual reviews of Computationsl Physics IX ed. by D. Stauffer (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001)
33.
D. Helbing, P. Molnar, Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 51, 4282–4286 (1995)CrossRef
34.
D. Helbing, Verkehrsdynamik: neue physikalische Modellierungskonzepte (Springer, Berlin, 2013)
35.
D. Helbing, J. Keltsch, P. Molnar, Modelling the evolution of human trail systems. Nature 388(6637), 47–50 (1997)CrossRef
36.
F. Schweitzer, J. Steinbrink, Estimation of megacity growth: simple rules versus complex phenomena. Appl. Geogr. 18, 69–81 (1998)CrossRef
37.
F. Schweitzer, W. Ebeling, H. Rose, O. Weiss, Optimization of road networks using evolutionary strategies. Evol. Comput. 5, 419–438 (1997)CrossRef
38.
F. Schweitzer (ed.), Modeling Complexity in Economic and Social Systems (World Scientific, Singapore, 2002)MATH
39.
F. Schweitzer, R. Mach. The epidemics of donations: logistic growth and power-laws. PLos One 3, e 1458 (2008)
40.
F. Schweitzer, L. Behera, Nonlinear voter models: the transition from invasion to coexistence. Eur. J. Phys. B 67, 301–318 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
41.
D. Lucio-Arias, A. Scharnhorst. Mathematical approaches to modeling science from an algorithmic-historiography perspective, in Models of Science Dynamics ed. by A. Scharnhorst, K.Börner, P. van den Besselaar (Springer, Berlin, 2012), pp. 23–66
42.
D. Crouch, J. Irvine, B.R. Martin. Bibliometric analysis for science policy: an evaluation of the United Kingdom’s research performance in ocean currents and protein crystallography. Scientometrics 9, 239–267 (1986)
43.
N. Payette. Agent-based models of science, in Models of Science Dynamics ed. by A. Scharnhorst, K. Börner, P. van den Besselaar (Springer, Berlin, 2012) pp. 127–157
44.
M. Hanauske. Evolutionary game theory and complex network of scientific information. Models of Science Dynamics ed. by A. Scharnhorst, K. Börner, P. van den Besselaar (Springer, Berlin, 2012), pp. 159–191
45.
J.M. Russel, R. Rousseau. Bibliometrics and institutional evaluation, in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). Part 19.3: Science and Technology Policy ed. by In R. Arvantis (EOLSS Publishers, Oxford, UK, 2002), pp. 1–20
46.
D.J. de Solla, Price. A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. 27, 292–306 (1976)CrossRef
47.
J. Enders, R. Whitley, J. Glser (eds.), The Changing Governance of the Sciences. The Advent of Research Evaluation Systems. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook (Springer, Dordrecht, 2007)
48.
L. Leydesdorff, L. Bornmann, R. Mutz, T. Opthof, Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: principles for comparing sets of documents. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 62, 1370–1381 (2011)CrossRef
49.
O. Amsterdamska, L. Leydesdorff, Citations: indicators of significance? Scientometrics 15, 449–471 (1989)CrossRef
50.
E.C.M. Noyons, H.F. Moed, M. Luwel, Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: a bibliometric study. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. 50, 115–131 (1999)CrossRef
51.
C. Oppenheim, S.P. Renn, Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. 29, 225–231 (1978)CrossRef
52.
H. Small, E. Sweeney, Clustering the science citation index using co-citations i: a comparison of methods. Scientometrics 7, 391–409 (1985)CrossRef
53.
H. Small, E. Sweeney, E. Greenlee, Clustering the science citation index using co-citations. ii: mapping science. Scientometrics 8, 321–340 (1985)CrossRef
54.
R. Rousseau, A. Zuccala, A classification of author co-citations: definitions and search strategies. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 55, 513–529 (2004)CrossRef
55.
H. Small, Macro-level changes in the structure of co-citation clusters: 1983–1989. Scientometrics 26, 5–20 (1993)CrossRef
56.
L. Leydesdorff, On the normalization and visualization of author co-citation data: Salton’s cosine versus the Jaccard index. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 59, 77–85 (2008)CrossRef
57.
H.D. White, K.W. McCain, Vizualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. 49, 327–355 (1998)CrossRef
58.
M. Zitt, E. Bassecoulard, Development of a method for detection and trend analysis of research fronts built by lexical or cocitation analysis. Scientometrics 30, 333–351 (1994)CrossRef
59.
H.D. White, B.C. Griffith, Author cocitation: a literature measure of intellectual structure. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. 32, 163–171 (1981)CrossRef
60.
Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, D. Wolfram (eds.), Measuring Scholarly Impact Methods and Practice (Springer, Chaim, 2014)
61.
N.J. van Eck, L. Waltman, Vizualizing bibliometric networks, in Measuring Scholarly Impact Methods and Practice ed. by Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, D. Wolfram (Springer, Chaim, 2014), pp. 285–320
62.
K. Börner, Atlas of Science: Visualizing What We Know (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2010)
63.
K. Börner, C. Chen, K.W. Boyack, Visualizing knowledge domains. Annu. Rev. Inform. Sci. Technol. 37(1), 179–255 (2003)CrossRef
64.
W.D. Nooy, A. Mrvar, Y.V. Batageli, Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek, 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)CrossRef
65.
M. Bastian, S. Heymann, M. Jacomy. Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. in Proceedings of the Third International ICWSM Conference (2009), pp. 361–362
66.
67.
K. Börner, D.E. Polley. Replicable science of science, in Measuring Scholarly Impact Methods and Practic, ed. by Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, D. Wolfram (Springer, Chaim, 2014), pp. 321–341
68.
N.J. van Eck, L. Waltman, Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84, 523–538 (2010)CrossRef
69.
M. Rosvall, C.T. Bergstrom, Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 105, 1118–1123 (2008)CrossRef
70.
M. Rosvall, C.T. Bergstrom, Mapping change in large networks. PLoS ONE 5, e8694 (2010)CrossRef
71.
L. Bohlin, D. Edler, A. Lancichinetti, M. Rosval, Community detection and visualization of networks with the map equation framework, in Measuring Scholarly Impact ed. by Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, D. Wolfram (Springer, Chaim, 2014)
72.
K.M. Carley, Computational and mathematical organization theory: Perspective and directions. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 1, 39–56 (1995)CrossRef
73.
74.
A.W. Bausch, Evolving intergroup cooperation. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 20, 369–393 (2014)CrossRef
75.
N. Nan, R. Zmund, E. Yatgin, A complex adaptive systems perspective of innovation diffusion: an integrated theory and validated virtual laboratory. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 20, 52–88 (2014)CrossRef
76.
N. Hoser, Public funding in the academic field of nanotechnology: a multi-agent based model. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 19, 253–281 (2013)CrossRef
77.
Z.-S. Jiang, Y.-H. Hao, Game analysis of technology innovation alliance stability based on knowledge transfer. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 19, 403–421 (2013)CrossRef
78.
L.A. Costa, J.A. de Matos, Attitude change in arbitrary large organizations. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 20, 219–251 (2014)
79.
C.M. Schlick, S. Duckwitz, S. Schneider, Project dynamics and emergent complexity. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 19, 480–515 (2013)CrossRef
80.
A.L. Osipian, Corrupt organizations: modeling educators’ misconduct with cellular automata. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 19, 1–24 (2013)CrossRef
81.
K. Hansson, P. Karlström, A. Larsson, H. Verhagen, Reputation, inequality and meeting techniques: visualising user hierarchy to support collaboration. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 20, 155–175 (2014)CrossRef
82.
Y. Zhang, Y. Wu, How behaviors spread in dynamic social networks. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 18, 419–444 (2012)CrossRef
83.
L. Chen, G.G. Gable, H. Hu, Communication and organizational social networks: a simulation model. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 19, 460–479 (2013)CrossRef
84.
C. Cioffi-Revilla, Simplicity and reality in computational modeling of politics. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 15, 26–46 (2009)
Metadata
Title
Concluding Remarks
Author
Nikolay K. Vitanov
Copyright Year
2016
Book
Science Dynamics and Research Production

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41629-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-41631-1

Copyright Year: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41631-1_6

Premium Partner

    Image Credits