Skip to main content
Top

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

6. Conclusion: Tocqueville’s Penal Reform and Today’s Penal Problems

Author : Emily Katherine Ferkaluk

Published in: Tocqueville’s Moderate Penal Reform

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Ferkaluk concludes her work on Tocqueville’s penal reform by noting two important questions that remain and briefly reflecting on the implications that a study of On the Penitentiary System has for the present. First, Ferkaluk notes that the question of evaluating Tocqueville’s penal reform in relation to his work in the Algerian colonization project needs further study. A second important question that emerges from this work is how do the themes of On the Penitentiary System compare to Tocqueville’s larger works, especially Democracy in America, which followed so closely in publication? Finally, Ferkaluk argues that Tocqueville’s moderate penal reform enables readers to navigate the relationship between crime and social mores, address multiple causes of crime, and understand the proper objects of the contemporary penal system in a moderate way.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
In other words, the conclusions of the four studies conducted by Avramenko, Boesche, Gingerich, and Wolin need to be understood in light of the idea of human nature presented in On the Penitentiary System.
 
2
For an interesting discussion of how distinctively American attributes (such as love of democracy, Protestant religiosity, procedural fairness, and the ideal of equality) originally described by Tocqueville influence the current incarceration state’s harshness, see Whitman 2007.
 
3
See, for example, Tocqueville 1984a, pp. 207–218, 227–247, 262–266.
 
4
Tocqueville 1984a, p. 237. Remember that for Tocqueville, “mores” comprises “the whole moral and intellectual state of a people,” including their notions, opinions, and ideas that shape habits (Tocqueville 2000, p. 275). Maletz notes that Tocqueville does not think ancient customs contribute to mores; in that sense, Tocqueville draws more from Montesquieu’s notion of a “spirit” behind the laws than from Cicero’s understanding for his definition (2005, p. 4).
 
5
Davis v. Ayala, 576 US (2015) (Kennedy A. concurring opinion).
 
6
United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary 2012.
 
7
Fleming 2016; Fry 2017; Pew 2015.
 
Literature
go back to reference Beaumont, Gustave de, and Alexis de Tocqueville. 1833. On the Penitentiary System in the United States and Its Application in France, with an Appendix on Penal Colonies and also Statistical Notes, trans. Francis Lieber. Philadelphia: Carey, Lea & Blanchard. Beaumont, Gustave de, and Alexis de Tocqueville. 1833. On the Penitentiary System in the United States and Its Application in France, with an Appendix on Penal Colonies and also Statistical Notes, trans. Francis Lieber. Philadelphia: Carey, Lea & Blanchard.
go back to reference Maletz, Donald. 2005. Tocqueville on Mores and the Preservation of Republics. American Journal of Political Science 49 (1): 1–15.CrossRef Maletz, Donald. 2005. Tocqueville on Mores and the Preservation of Republics. American Journal of Political Science 49 (1): 1–15.CrossRef
go back to reference Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1984a. Œuvres Complètes: Écrits sur le système pénitentiaire en France et à l’étranger, Tome IV, Vol. 1, ed. Michelle Perrot. Paris: Gallimard. Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1984a. Œuvres Complètes: Écrits sur le système pénitentiaire en France et à l’étranger, Tome IV, Vol. 1, ed. Michelle Perrot. Paris: Gallimard.
go back to reference ———. 1984b. Œuvres Complètes: Écrits sur le système pénitentiaire en France et à l’étranger, Tome IV, Vol. 2, ed. Michelle Perrot. Paris: Gallimard. ———. 1984b. Œuvres Complètes: Écrits sur le système pénitentiaire en France et à l’étranger, Tome IV, Vol. 2, ed. Michelle Perrot. Paris: Gallimard.
go back to reference ———. 2000. Democracy in America, ed. and trans. Harvey Mansfield and Delba Winthrop. Chicago: University of Chicago. ———. 2000. Democracy in America, ed. and trans. Harvey Mansfield and Delba Winthrop. Chicago: University of Chicago.
go back to reference Whitman, James Q. 2007. What Happened to Tocqueville’s America? Social Research 74 (2): 251–268. Whitman, James Q. 2007. What Happened to Tocqueville’s America? Social Research 74 (2): 251–268.
Metadata
Title
Conclusion: Tocqueville’s Penal Reform and Today’s Penal Problems
Author
Emily Katherine Ferkaluk
Copyright Year
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75577-9_6