Skip to main content
Top

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

8. Conclusion

Author : Maja Kluger Dionigi

Published in: Lobbying in the European Parliament

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter offers a comparative analysis of the case studies and examines the scope conditions for interest group influence. I show that business is likely to prevail over policy outcomes in instances when there is unity within the business community, business groups are faced with low salience issues, and mainstream committees are in charge of dossiers. While the corporate world may, in some abstract sense, be regarded as representing a capitalist class interest, this notion is a platitude of little analytical and empirical value. This is because business is faced with countervailing forces which cap its influence—most notably, noisy politics, unsympathetic committees, and rifts within the business sector itself. Business often finds itself battling not labour unions or non-governmental organisations (NGOs), but itself.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Baumgartner, F.R. & Jones, B.D. (Eds.) (2002). Policy Dynamics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Baumgartner, F.R. & Jones, B.D. (Eds.) (2002). Policy Dynamics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Burns, C., & Carter, N. (2010). Is co-decision good for the environment? An analysis of the European Parliament’s green credentials. Political Studies, 58(1), 123–142.Burns, C., Carter, N.T., Davis, G., & Worsfold, N.T. (2013). Still Saving the Earth? The European Parliament's environmental record. Environmental Politics, 22(6), 935-954 Burns, C., & Carter, N. (2010). Is co-decision good for the environment? An analysis of the European Parliament’s green credentials. Political Studies, 58(1), 123–142.Burns, C., Carter, N.T., Davis, G., & Worsfold, N.T. (2013). Still Saving the Earth? The European Parliament's environmental record. Environmental Politics, 22(6), 935-954
go back to reference Corell, E., & Betsill, M. M. (2001). A comparative look at NGO influence in international environmental negotiations: Desertification and climate change. Global Environmental Politics, 1(4), 86–107.CrossRef Corell, E., & Betsill, M. M. (2001). A comparative look at NGO influence in international environmental negotiations: Desertification and climate change. Global Environmental Politics, 1(4), 86–107.CrossRef
go back to reference Costello, R. (2011). Does bicameralism promote stability? Inter-institutional relations and coalition formation in the European Parliament. West European Politics, 34(1), 122–144.CrossRef Costello, R. (2011). Does bicameralism promote stability? Inter-institutional relations and coalition formation in the European Parliament. West European Politics, 34(1), 122–144.CrossRef
go back to reference Falkner, R. (2009). Business power and conflict in international environmental politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Falkner, R. (2009). Business power and conflict in international environmental politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference Gilligan, T. W., & Krehbiel, K. (1997). Specialization decisions within committee. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 13(2), 366–386.CrossRef Gilligan, T. W., & Krehbiel, K. (1997). Specialization decisions within committee. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 13(2), 366–386.CrossRef
go back to reference Grant, W. (1989). Pressure groups, politics and democracy in Britain. Hempstead: Phillip Allan. Grant, W. (1989). Pressure groups, politics and democracy in Britain. Hempstead: Phillip Allan.
go back to reference Hix, S., & Høyland, B. (2011). The political system of the European Union (3rd ed.). London: Palgrave. Hix, S., & Høyland, B. (2011). The political system of the European Union (3rd ed.). London: Palgrave.
go back to reference Kreppel, A. (2008). Legislatures. In D. Caramani (Ed.), Comparative politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kreppel, A. (2008). Legislatures. In D. Caramani (Ed.), Comparative politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Lodge, M., & Wegrich, K. (2012). Managing regulation. Regulatory analysis, politics and policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Lodge, M., & Wegrich, K. (2012). Managing regulation. Regulatory analysis, politics and policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference Marshall, D. (2010). Who to lobby and when. Institutional determinants of interest group strategies in European Parliament committees European Union Politics, 11(4), 553–575. Marshall, D. (2010). Who to lobby and when. Institutional determinants of interest group strategies in European Parliament committees European Union Politics, 11(4), 553–575.
go back to reference Neuhold, C. (2001). The 'Legislative Backbone' keeping the Institution upright? The Role of European Parliament Committees in the EU Policy-Making Process. European Integration online Papers (EIoP), 5(10), 1-27. Neuhold, C. (2001). The 'Legislative Backbone' keeping the Institution upright? The Role of European Parliament Committees in the EU Policy-Making Process. European Integration online Papers (EIoP), 5(10), 1-27.
go back to reference McElroy, G. (2006). Committee representation in the European Parliament. European Union Politics, 7(1), 5–29.CrossRef McElroy, G. (2006). Committee representation in the European Parliament. European Union Politics, 7(1), 5–29.CrossRef
go back to reference National Democratic Institute for International Affairs. (1996). Committees in legislatures: A division of labor. Washington, DC: National Democratic Institute for International Affairs. National Democratic Institute for International Affairs. (1996). Committees in legislatures: A division of labor. Washington, DC: National Democratic Institute for International Affairs.
go back to reference Princen, S., & Kerremans, B. (2008). Opportunity structures in the EU multi-level system. West European Politics, 31(6), 519–538.CrossRef Princen, S., & Kerremans, B. (2008). Opportunity structures in the EU multi-level system. West European Politics, 31(6), 519–538.CrossRef
go back to reference Rasmussen, A., & Alexandrova, P. (2012). Foreign interests lobbying Brussels: Participation of non-EU members in the European Commission consultations. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(4), 614–631. Rasmussen, A., & Alexandrova, P. (2012). Foreign interests lobbying Brussels: Participation of non-EU members in the European Commission consultations. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(4), 614–631.
go back to reference Rasmussen, M.K. (2012). Is the European Parliament still a policy entrepreneur for environmental interests?. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 1(2), 239-259. Rasmussen, M.K. (2012). Is the European Parliament still a policy entrepreneur for environmental interests?. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 1(2), 239-259.
go back to reference Shackleton, M. (2000). The politics of codecision. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(2), 325–342.CrossRef Shackleton, M. (2000). The politics of codecision. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(2), 325–342.CrossRef
go back to reference Shepsle, K. A., & Weingast, B. R. (1987). The institutional foundations of committee power. The American Political Science Review, 81(1), 85–104.CrossRef Shepsle, K. A., & Weingast, B. R. (1987). The institutional foundations of committee power. The American Political Science Review, 81(1), 85–104.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith, R. A. (1984). Advocacy, interpretation, and influence in the US Congress. The American Political Science Review, 78(1), 44–63.CrossRef Smith, R. A. (1984). Advocacy, interpretation, and influence in the US Congress. The American Political Science Review, 78(1), 44–63.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith, M. P. (2008). All access points are created equal: Explaining the fate of diffuse interests in the EU. British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 10(1), 64–83.CrossRef Smith, M. P. (2008). All access points are created equal: Explaining the fate of diffuse interests in the EU. British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 10(1), 64–83.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Conclusion
Author
Maja Kluger Dionigi
Copyright Year
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42688-4_8