Skip to main content
Top

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

2. Corporate Boards

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter aims to set the ground, providing a brief definition of the corporate governance according to worldwide practices and focusing on the role and the functions of the board of directors. To reach this goal, a punctual review of the different theoretical frameworks coping with this topic is provided, putting in evidence the main differences as well as the principal points in common. Specifically, the agency theory, the stakeholder theory, the stewardship theory, the resource dependence theory, and the institutional theory are analysed. Moreover, the role of BoDs is analysed together with the features and the overview of “good” corporate governance practices according to existing literature and practice.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Abrams, F. W. (1951). Management’s responsibilities in a complex world. Harvard Business Review, 29(5), 29–34. Abrams, F. W. (1951). Management’s responsibilities in a complex world. Harvard Business Review, 29(5), 29–34.
go back to reference Adams, R. B., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), 58–107.CrossRef Adams, R. B., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), 58–107.CrossRef
go back to reference Aggarwal, R., Erel, I., Stulz, R., & Williamson, R. (2009). Differences in governance practices between U.S. and foreign firms: Measurement, causes, and consequences. Review of Financial Studies, 22(8), 3131–3169. Aggarwal, R., Erel, I., Stulz, R., & Williamson, R. (2009). Differences in governance practices between U.S. and foreign firms: Measurement, causes, and consequences. Review of Financial Studies, 22(8), 3131–3169.
go back to reference Argote, L., & Greve, H. R. (2007). A behavioral theory of the firm: 40 years and counting. Organizational Science, 18(3), 337–349.CrossRef Argote, L., & Greve, H. R. (2007). A behavioral theory of the firm: 40 years and counting. Organizational Science, 18(3), 337–349.CrossRef
go back to reference Baysinger, B., & Hoskisson, R. E. (1990). The composition of boards of directors and strategic control: Effects on corporate strategy. Academy of Management Review, 5(1), 72–87.CrossRef Baysinger, B., & Hoskisson, R. E. (1990). The composition of boards of directors and strategic control: Effects on corporate strategy. Academy of Management Review, 5(1), 72–87.CrossRef
go back to reference Beasley, M. S. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. Accounting Review, 71(4), 443–465. Beasley, M. S. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. Accounting Review, 71(4), 443–465.
go back to reference Bebchuk, L. A., & Fried, J. M. (2003). Executive compensation as an agency problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3), 71–92.CrossRef Bebchuk, L. A., & Fried, J. M. (2003). Executive compensation as an agency problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3), 71–92.CrossRef
go back to reference Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York: The Macmillan Company. Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York: The Macmillan Company.
go back to reference Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (1999). The uncertain relationship between board composition and firm performance. Business Lawyer, 54, 921–963. Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (1999). The uncertain relationship between board composition and firm performance. Business Lawyer, 54, 921–963.
go back to reference Bhagat, S., & Bolton, B. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 257–273.CrossRef Bhagat, S., & Bolton, B. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 257–273.CrossRef
go back to reference Blair, M. M. (1995). Rethinking assumptions behind corporate governance. Challenge, 38(6), 12–17.CrossRef Blair, M. M. (1995). Rethinking assumptions behind corporate governance. Challenge, 38(6), 12–17.CrossRef
go back to reference Brickley, J. A., Coles, J. L., & Jarrell, G. (1997). Leadership structure: Separating the CEO and chairman of the board. Journal of Corporate Finance, 3(3), 189–220.CrossRef Brickley, J. A., Coles, J. L., & Jarrell, G. (1997). Leadership structure: Separating the CEO and chairman of the board. Journal of Corporate Finance, 3(3), 189–220.CrossRef
go back to reference Burt, R. S. (1983). Corporate profits and cooptation. New York: Academic Press. Burt, R. S. (1983). Corporate profits and cooptation. New York: Academic Press.
go back to reference Byrd, J. W., & Hickman, K. A. (1992). Do outside directors monitor managers? Evidence from tender offer bids. Journal of Financial Economics, 32(2), 195–221.CrossRef Byrd, J. W., & Hickman, K. A. (1992). Do outside directors monitor managers? Evidence from tender offer bids. Journal of Financial Economics, 32(2), 195–221.CrossRef
go back to reference Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.CrossRef Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.CrossRef
go back to reference Casciaro, T., & Piskorski, M. J. (2005). Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint Absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2), 167–199.CrossRef Casciaro, T., & Piskorski, M. J. (2005). Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint Absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2), 167–199.CrossRef
go back to reference Clarke, T. (2007). International corporate governance: A comparative approach. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRef Clarke, T. (2007). International corporate governance: A comparative approach. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRef
go back to reference Cotter, J. F., Shivdasani, A., & Zenner, M. (1997). Do independent directors enhance target shareholder wealth during tender offers? Journal of Financial Economics, 43(2), 195–218.CrossRef Cotter, J. F., Shivdasani, A., & Zenner, M. (1997). Do independent directors enhance target shareholder wealth during tender offers? Journal of Financial Economics, 43(2), 195–218.CrossRef
go back to reference Dahya, J., Dimitrov, O., & McConnell, J. J. (2008). Dominant shareholders, corporate boards, and corporate value: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 73–100.CrossRef Dahya, J., Dimitrov, O., & McConnell, J. J. (2008). Dominant shareholders, corporate boards, and corporate value: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 73–100.CrossRef
go back to reference Daily, C. M. (1995). The relationship between board composition and leadership structure and bankruptcy reorganization outcomes. Journal of Management, 21(6), 1041–1056.CrossRef Daily, C. M. (1995). The relationship between board composition and leadership structure and bankruptcy reorganization outcomes. Journal of Management, 21(6), 1041–1056.CrossRef
go back to reference Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (1992). The relationship between governance structure and corporate performance in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(5), 375–386.CrossRef Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (1992). The relationship between governance structure and corporate performance in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(5), 375–386.CrossRef
go back to reference Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1999). Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 674–686.CrossRef Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1999). Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 674–686.CrossRef
go back to reference Dalton, D. R., Hitt, M. A., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, C. M. (2007). Chapter 1: The fundamental agency problem and its mitigation. The Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 1–64. Dalton, D. R., Hitt, M. A., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, C. M. (2007). Chapter 1: The fundamental agency problem and its mitigation. The Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 1–64.
go back to reference Davis, G. F., & Cobb, J. A. (2010). Resource dependence theory: Past and future. In F. Dobbin & C. B. Schoonhoven (Eds.), Stanford’s organization theory renaissance, 1970–2000 (pp. 21–42). Bingley, NY: Emerald group.CrossRef Davis, G. F., & Cobb, J. A. (2010). Resource dependence theory: Past and future. In F. Dobbin & C. B. Schoonhoven (Eds.), Stanford’s organization theory renaissance, 1970–2000 (pp. 21–42). Bingley, NY: Emerald group.CrossRef
go back to reference Davis, J. H., Allen, M. R., & Hayes, H. D. (2010). Is blood thicker than water? A study of stewardship perceptions in family business. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34(6), 1093–1116. Davis, J. H., Allen, M. R., & Hayes, H. D. (2010). Is blood thicker than water? A study of stewardship perceptions in family business. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34(6), 1093–1116.
go back to reference Davis, J. H., Frankforter, S., Vollrath, D., & Hill, V. (2007). An empirical test of stewardship theory. Journal of Business and Leadership: Research, Practice, and Teaching, 3(1), 40–50. Davis, J. H., Frankforter, S., Vollrath, D., & Hill, V. (2007). An empirical test of stewardship theory. Journal of Business and Leadership: Research, Practice, and Teaching, 3(1), 40–50.
go back to reference Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.CrossRef Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.CrossRef
go back to reference Deakins, D., O’Neill, E., & Mileham, P. (2000). The role and influence of external directors in small, entrepreneurial companies: Some evidence on VC and non-VC appointed external directors. Venture Capital, 2(2), 111–127.CrossRef Deakins, D., O’Neill, E., & Mileham, P. (2000). The role and influence of external directors in small, entrepreneurial companies: Some evidence on VC and non-VC appointed external directors. Venture Capital, 2(2), 111–127.CrossRef
go back to reference Denis, D. K., & McConnell, J. J. (2003). International corporate governance. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1), 1–36.CrossRef Denis, D. K., & McConnell, J. J. (2003). International corporate governance. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1), 1–36.CrossRef
go back to reference DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 47–160.CrossRef DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 47–160.CrossRef
go back to reference Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64.CrossRef Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64.CrossRef
go back to reference Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.CrossRef Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.CrossRef
go back to reference Duchin, R., Matsusaka, J. G., & Ozbas, O. (2010). When are outside directors effective? Journal of Financial Economics, 96(2), 195–214.CrossRef Duchin, R., Matsusaka, J. G., & Ozbas, O. (2010). When are outside directors effective? Journal of Financial Economics, 96(2), 195–214.CrossRef
go back to reference Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996). Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 7(2), 136–150.CrossRef Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996). Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 7(2), 136–150.CrossRef
go back to reference Faccio, M., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65(3), 365–395.CrossRef Faccio, M., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65(3), 365–395.CrossRef
go back to reference Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.CrossRef Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.CrossRef
go back to reference Financial Reporting Council. (2018). The UK corporate governance code. London: FRC. Financial Reporting Council. (2018). The UK corporate governance code. London: FRC.
go back to reference Ferris, S. P., Jagannathan, M., & Pritchard, A. C. (2003). Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1087–1111.CrossRef Ferris, S. P., Jagannathan, M., & Pritchard, A. C. (2003). Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1087–1111.CrossRef
go back to reference Fields, M. A., & Keys, P. Y. (2003). The emergence of corporate governance from wall St. to Main St.: Outside directors, board diversity, earnings management, and managerial incentives to bear risk. Financial Review, 38(1), 1–24. Fields, M. A., & Keys, P. Y. (2003). The emergence of corporate governance from wall St. to Main St.: Outside directors, board diversity, earnings management, and managerial incentives to bear risk. Financial Review, 38(1), 1–24.
go back to reference Freeman, E. R. (1988). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T. L. Beauchamp & N. E. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business (pp. 66–76). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Freeman, E. R. (1988). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T. L. Beauchamp & N. E. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business (pp. 66–76). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
go back to reference Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. New York: Pitman Publishing. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. New York: Pitman Publishing.
go back to reference Gales, L. M., & Kesner, I. F. (1994). An analysis of board of director size and composition in bankrupt organizations. Journal of Business Research, 30(3), 271–282.CrossRef Gales, L. M., & Kesner, I. F. (1994). An analysis of board of director size and composition in bankrupt organizations. Journal of Business Research, 30(3), 271–282.CrossRef
go back to reference Geletkanycz, M. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 654–681.CrossRef Geletkanycz, M. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 654–681.CrossRef
go back to reference Goh, L., & Gupta, A. (2016). Remuneration of non-executive directors: Evidence from the UK. British Accounting Review, 48(3), 379–399.CrossRef Goh, L., & Gupta, A. (2016). Remuneration of non-executive directors: Evidence from the UK. British Accounting Review, 48(3), 379–399.CrossRef
go back to reference Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & de Castro, J. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653–707.CrossRef Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & de Castro, J. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653–707.CrossRef
go back to reference Gordon, J. N. (2007). The rise of independent directors in the United States, 1950–2005: Of shareholder value and stock market prices. Stanford Law Review., 59(6), 1465–1568. Gordon, J. N. (2007). The rise of independent directors in the United States, 1950–2005: Of shareholder value and stock market prices. Stanford Law Review., 59(6), 1465–1568.
go back to reference Greenbury, R. (1995). Report of committee on executive remuneration. London: Gee. Greenbury, R. (1995). Report of committee on executive remuneration. London: Gee.
go back to reference Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Hampel, R. (1998). Committee on corporate governance: Final report. London: Gee. Hampel, R. (1998). Committee on corporate governance: Final report. London: Gee.
go back to reference Hanson, R. C., & Song, M. H. (2006). Corporate governance and asset sales: The effect of internal and external control mechanisms. The Financial Review, 41, 361–386.CrossRef Hanson, R. C., & Song, M. H. (2006). Corporate governance and asset sales: The effect of internal and external control mechanisms. The Financial Review, 41, 361–386.CrossRef
go back to reference Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1988). The determinants of board composition. The Rand Journal of Economics, 19(4), 589–606.CrossRef Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1988). The determinants of board composition. The Rand Journal of Economics, 19(4), 589–606.CrossRef
go back to reference Hermalin, B., & Weisbach, M. (2003). Board of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 7–26. Hermalin, B., & Weisbach, M. (2003). Board of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 7–26.
go back to reference Higgs, D. (2003). Review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors. London: Department of Trade and Industry. Higgs, D. (2003). Review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors. London: Department of Trade and Industry.
go back to reference Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396.CrossRef Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396.CrossRef
go back to reference Hom, C. L., Samson, D., Cebon, P. B., & Cregan, C. (2019). Inside the black box: An investigation of non-executive director activity through the lens of dynamic capability. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36(4), 1–39. Hom, C. L., Samson, D., Cebon, P. B., & Cregan, C. (2019). Inside the black box: An investigation of non-executive director activity through the lens of dynamic capability. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36(4), 1–39.
go back to reference Hung, H. (1998). A typology of the theories of the roles of governing boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 6(2), 1010–1111. Hung, H. (1998). A typology of the theories of the roles of governing boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 6(2), 1010–1111.
go back to reference Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880.CrossRef Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880.CrossRef
go back to reference Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(1), 305–360.CrossRef Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(1), 305–360.CrossRef
go back to reference Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1996). Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22(3), 409–438.CrossRef Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1996). Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22(3), 409–438.CrossRef
go back to reference Johnson, S. A., Ryan, H. E., & Tian, Y. S. (2009). Managerial incentives and corporate fraud: The sources of incentives matter. Review of Finance, 13(1), 115–145.CrossRef Johnson, S. A., Ryan, H. E., & Tian, Y. S. (2009). Managerial incentives and corporate fraud: The sources of incentives matter. Review of Finance, 13(1), 115–145.CrossRef
go back to reference Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. The Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437.CrossRef Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. The Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437.CrossRef
go back to reference Judge, W. Q., & Zeithaml, C. P. (1992). Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board involvement in the strategic decision process. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 766–794.CrossRef Judge, W. Q., & Zeithaml, C. P. (1992). Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board involvement in the strategic decision process. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 766–794.CrossRef
go back to reference Klettner, A. (2017). Corporate governance regulation: The changing roles and responsibilities of boards of directors. Oxon: Routledge. Klettner, A. (2017). Corporate governance regulation: The changing roles and responsibilities of boards of directors. Oxon: Routledge.
go back to reference Kumar, P., & Sivaramakrishnan, K. (2008). Who monitors the monitor? The effect of board independence on executive compensation and firm value. Review of Financial Studies, 21(3), 1371–1401.CrossRef Kumar, P., & Sivaramakrishnan, K. (2008). Who monitors the monitor? The effect of board independence on executive compensation and firm value. Review of Financial Studies, 21(3), 1371–1401.CrossRef
go back to reference Kumar, P., & Zattoni, A. (2015). Ownership structure, corporate governance and firm performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 3(6), 469–471.CrossRef Kumar, P., & Zattoni, A. (2015). Ownership structure, corporate governance and firm performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 3(6), 469–471.CrossRef
go back to reference La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517.CrossRef La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517.CrossRef
go back to reference Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1152–1189.CrossRef Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1152–1189.CrossRef
go back to reference Larcker, D. F., & Tayan, B. (2008). Models of corporate governance: Who’s the fairest of them all? Stanford Graduate School of Business, Case No. CG-11. Larcker, D. F., & Tayan, B. (2008). Models of corporate governance: Who’s the fairest of them all? Stanford Graduate School of Business, Case No. CG-11.
go back to reference Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance: Business source. Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59–77. Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance: Business source. Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59–77.
go back to reference Loebbecke, J. K., Eining, M. M., & Willingham, J. J. (1989). Auditors’ experience with material irregularities: Frequency, nature, and detectability. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 9(1), 1–28. Loebbecke, J. K., Eining, M. M., & Willingham, J. J. (1989). Auditors’ experience with material irregularities: Frequency, nature, and detectability. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 9(1), 1–28.
go back to reference Lynall, M. D., Golden, B. R., & Hillman, A. J. (2003). Board composition from adolescence to maturity: A multitheoretic view. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 416–431.CrossRef Lynall, M. D., Golden, B. R., & Hillman, A. J. (2003). Board composition from adolescence to maturity: A multitheoretic view. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 416–431.CrossRef
go back to reference Mace, M. L. (1971). Directors: Myth and reality. Boston: Graduate School of Business Administration. Mace, M. L. (1971). Directors: Myth and reality. Boston: Graduate School of Business Administration.
go back to reference Magnanelli, B. S. (2012). The Role of corporate governance in financial statement frauds. Riga: Lambert Academic Publishing. Magnanelli, B. S. (2012). The Role of corporate governance in financial statement frauds. Riga: Lambert Academic Publishing.
go back to reference Magnanelli, B. S., Pirolo, L., & Nasta, L. (2017). Preventing financial statement frauds through better corporate governance. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(3), 271–285.CrossRef Magnanelli, B. S., Pirolo, L., & Nasta, L. (2017). Preventing financial statement frauds through better corporate governance. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(3), 271–285.CrossRef
go back to reference Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRef Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRef
go back to reference Minichilli, A., Gabrielsson, J., & Huse, M. (2007). Board evaluations: Making a fit between the purpose and the system. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(4), 609–622.CrossRef Minichilli, A., Gabrielsson, J., & Huse, M. (2007). Board evaluations: Making a fit between the purpose and the system. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(4), 609–622.CrossRef
go back to reference Mizruchi, M. S. (2004). Berle and Means revisited: The governance and power of large U.S. corporations. Theory and Society, 33(5), 579–617. Mizruchi, M. S. (2004). Berle and Means revisited: The governance and power of large U.S. corporations. Theory and Society, 33(5), 579–617.
go back to reference Mizruchi, M. S., & Stearns, L. B. (1988). A longitudinal study of the formation of interlocking directorates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(2), 194–210.CrossRef Mizruchi, M. S., & Stearns, L. B. (1988). A longitudinal study of the formation of interlocking directorates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(2), 194–210.CrossRef
go back to reference Mizruchi, M. S., & Stearns, L. B. (1994). A longitudinal study of borrowing by large american corporations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 118–140.CrossRef Mizruchi, M. S., & Stearns, L. B. (1994). A longitudinal study of borrowing by large american corporations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 118–140.CrossRef
go back to reference Nestor, S. S., & Thompson, J. K. (2001). Corporate governance patterns in OECD economies: Is convergence under way. In Corporate Governance in Asia: A Comparative Perspective (pp. 19–41). Paris: OECD. Nestor, S. S., & Thompson, J. K. (2001). Corporate governance patterns in OECD economies: Is convergence under way. In Corporate Governance in Asia: A Comparative Perspective (pp. 19–41). Paris: OECD.
go back to reference Nicholson, G., Kiel, G., & Tunny, J. A. (2012). Board evaluations: Contemporary thinking and practice. In T. Clark & D. Branson (Eds.), Handbook of corporate governance. London: Sage. Nicholson, G., Kiel, G., & Tunny, J. A. (2012). Board evaluations: Contemporary thinking and practice. In T. Clark & D. Branson (Eds.), Handbook of corporate governance. London: Sage.
go back to reference North, D. C. (1990). A transaction cost theory of politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(4), 355–367.CrossRef North, D. C. (1990). A transaction cost theory of politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(4), 355–367.CrossRef
go back to reference Paniagua, J., Rivelles, R., & Sapena, J. (2018). Corporate governance and financial performance: The role of ownership and board structure. Journal of Business Research, 89(2), 229–234.CrossRef Paniagua, J., Rivelles, R., & Sapena, J. (2018). Corporate governance and financial performance: The role of ownership and board structure. Journal of Business Research, 89(2), 229–234.CrossRef
go back to reference Pearce, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. (1992). Board composition from a strategic contingency perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 29(4), 411–438.CrossRef Pearce, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. (1992). Board composition from a strategic contingency perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 29(4), 411–438.CrossRef
go back to reference Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 218–228.CrossRef Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 218–228.CrossRef
go back to reference Pfeffer, J. (1973). Size, composition, and function of hospital boards of directors: A study of organization-environment linkage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18(3), 349–364.CrossRef Pfeffer, J. (1973). Size, composition, and function of hospital boards of directors: A study of organization-environment linkage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18(3), 349–364.CrossRef
go back to reference Pfeffer, J. (1991). Organization theory and structural perspectives on management. Journal of Management, 17(4), 789–803.CrossRef Pfeffer, J. (1991). Organization theory and structural perspectives on management. Journal of Management, 17(4), 789–803.CrossRef
go back to reference Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence approach. New York: Harper & Row. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence approach. New York: Harper & Row.
go back to reference Provan, K. G. (1980). Board power and organizational effectiveness among human service agencies. Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management, 23(2), 221–236. Provan, K. G. (1980). Board power and organizational effectiveness among human service agencies. Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management, 23(2), 221–236.
go back to reference Rappaport, A. (1986). Creating shareholder value. New York: Free Press. Rappaport, A. (1986). Creating shareholder value. New York: Free Press.
go back to reference Sanders, W. G., & Carpenter, M. A. (1998). Internationalization and firm governance: The roles of CEO compensation, top team composition, and board structure. Academy of Management Journal, 41(2), 158–178.CrossRef Sanders, W. G., & Carpenter, M. A. (1998). Internationalization and firm governance: The roles of CEO compensation, top team composition, and board structure. Academy of Management Journal, 41(2), 158–178.CrossRef
go back to reference Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 84(3), 461–488.CrossRef Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 84(3), 461–488.CrossRef
go back to reference Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.CrossRef Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.CrossRef
go back to reference Smallman, C. (2004). Exploring theoretical paradigms in corporate governance. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1(1), 78–94.CrossRef Smallman, C. (2004). Exploring theoretical paradigms in corporate governance. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1(1), 78–94.CrossRef
go back to reference Stout, L. A. (2012). New thinking on “shareholder primacy”. Accounting, Economics and Law, 2(2) (Law-Econ Research Paper No. 11-04). School of Law, UCLA. Stout, L. A. (2012). New thinking on “shareholder primacy”. Accounting, Economics and Law, 2(2) (Law-Econ Research Paper No. 11-04). School of Law, UCLA.
go back to reference Terjesen, S., Aguilera, R. V., & Lorenz, R. (2015). Legislating a woman’s seat on the board: Institutional factors driving gender quotas for boards of directors. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(2), 233–251.CrossRef Terjesen, S., Aguilera, R. V., & Lorenz, R. (2015). Legislating a woman’s seat on the board: Institutional factors driving gender quotas for boards of directors. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(2), 233–251.CrossRef
go back to reference The Cadbury Code. (1992). Report of the committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance: The code of best practice. London: Gee Professional Publishing. The Cadbury Code. (1992). Report of the committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance: The code of best practice. London: Gee Professional Publishing.
go back to reference Thomsen, S., Pedersen, T., & Kvist, H. K. (2006). Blockholder ownership: Effects on firm value in market and control based governance systems. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(2), 246–269.CrossRef Thomsen, S., Pedersen, T., & Kvist, H. K. (2006). Blockholder ownership: Effects on firm value in market and control based governance systems. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(2), 246–269.CrossRef
go back to reference Tricker, R. I. (2009). Corporate governance: Principles, policies, and practices. New York: Oxford University Press. Tricker, R. I. (2009). Corporate governance: Principles, policies, and practices. New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Vallejo, M. C. (2009). The effects of commitment of non-family employees of family firms from the perspective of stewardship theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(3), 379–390.CrossRef Vallejo, M. C. (2009). The effects of commitment of non-family employees of family firms from the perspective of stewardship theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(3), 379–390.CrossRef
go back to reference Westphal, J. D. (1999). Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 7–24.CrossRef Westphal, J. D. (1999). Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 7–24.CrossRef
go back to reference Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185–211.CrossRef Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185–211.CrossRef
go back to reference Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291–334.CrossRef Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291–334.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Corporate Boards
Author
Luca Pirolo
Copyright Year
2021
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56120-8_2