Skip to main content
Top

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

5. Corporate Governance and Innovation

Authors : J. P. Sharma, Shital Jhunjhunwala, Shweta Sharda

Published in: Flexible Strategies in VUCA Markets

Publisher: Springer Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Innovation is the key source of growth and sustainability of a nation as it determines the competitive performance of country as well as firms. The innovation activities carried out by the corporate sector in India are the outcome of strategic investment decisions made by top management. Directors play pivotal role in innovation with the greatest power to select Research & Development project and evaluate its effectiveness, which is crucial for efficient utilization of resources. However, the uncertainty in the expected results of Research & Development activities makes the attitude of manager towards risk an important determinant in corporate innovation. The board may deviate towards short-term investments to reduce risks associated with long-term Research & Development investments; thus, their decisions need to be monitored through corporate governance oversight mechanisms. The chapter examines the role of corporate governance in enhancing the level of Research & Development activities in firms, and it was found that the role of independent director is pivotal in the decision-making of firm, especially through their active participation in board meetings.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Fourth Report of the Committee to Review Taxation of Development Centres and the IT sector accessed on 08 August 2016 at http://​www.​taxlawsonline.​com/​news/​Fourth%20​Report.​pdf.
 
2
Bhattacharya, Sujit & Lal, Kashmiri, (2008). Industrial R&D in India: Contemporary Scenario. India, Science and Technology accessed on 10 August 2016 at http://​www.​nistads.​res.​in/​indiasnt2008/​t4industry/​t4ind4.​htm.
 
Literature
go back to reference Abidin, Z. Z., Kamal, N. M., & Jusoff, K. (2009). Board structure and corporate performance in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 1(1), 150.CrossRef Abidin, Z. Z., Kamal, N. M., & Jusoff, K. (2009). Board structure and corporate performance in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 1(1), 150.CrossRef
go back to reference Aghion, P., Van Reenen, J., & Zingales, L. (2009). Innovation and institutional ownership, In: CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP7195. Aghion, P., Van Reenen, J., & Zingales, L. (2009). Innovation and institutional ownership, In: CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP7195.
go back to reference Alhazaimeh, A., Palaniappan, R., & Almsafir, M. (2014). The impact of corporate governance and ownership structure on voluntary disclosure in annual reports among listed Jordanian companies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 129, 341–348.CrossRef Alhazaimeh, A., Palaniappan, R., & Almsafir, M. (2014). The impact of corporate governance and ownership structure on voluntary disclosure in annual reports among listed Jordanian companies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 129, 341–348.CrossRef
go back to reference Alladi, A., Pillutla, R.S., & Divi, S. (2015). Stakeholder engagement methodology in the context of innovation management. In Sushil, K. T. Bhal, & S. P. Singh (Eds.), Managing flexibility: People, process, technology and business (pp. 223–238). New Delhi: Flexible Systems Management, Springer. Alladi, A., Pillutla, R.S., & Divi, S. (2015). Stakeholder engagement methodology in the context of innovation management. In Sushil, K. T. Bhal, & S. P. Singh (Eds.), Managing flexibility: People, process, technology and business (pp. 223–238). New Delhi: Flexible Systems Management, Springer.
go back to reference Al-Manaseer, M. F. A., Al-Hindawi, R. M., Al-Dahiyat, M. A., & Sartawi, I. I. (2012). The impact of corporate governance on the performance of Jordanian Banks. European Journal of Scientific Research, 67(3), 349–359. Al-Manaseer, M. F. A., Al-Hindawi, R. M., Al-Dahiyat, M. A., & Sartawi, I. I. (2012). The impact of corporate governance on the performance of Jordanian Banks. European Journal of Scientific Research, 67(3), 349–359.
go back to reference Alshimmiri, T. (2004). Board composition, executive remuneration and corporate performance: The case of REITS. Corporate Ownership and Control, 2(1), 104–118.CrossRef Alshimmiri, T. (2004). Board composition, executive remuneration and corporate performance: The case of REITS. Corporate Ownership and Control, 2(1), 104–118.CrossRef
go back to reference Atanassov, J. (2013). Corporate governance, non-financial stakeholders, and innovation: Evidence from a natural experiment (June 30, 2013). Atanassov, J. (2013). Corporate governance, non-financial stakeholders, and innovation: Evidence from a natural experiment (June 30, 2013).
go back to reference Bargeron, L. L., Lehn, K. M., & Zutter, C. J. (2010). Sarbanes-Oxley and corporate risk-taking. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(1), 34–52.CrossRef Bargeron, L. L., Lehn, K. M., & Zutter, C. J. (2010). Sarbanes-Oxley and corporate risk-taking. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(1), 34–52.CrossRef
go back to reference Baysinger, B. D., Kosnik, R. D., & Turk, T. A. (1991). Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 205–214. Baysinger, B. D., Kosnik, R. D., & Turk, T. A. (1991). Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 205–214.
go back to reference Becker-Blease, J. (2011). Governance and innovation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(4), 947–958.CrossRef Becker-Blease, J. (2011). Governance and innovation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(4), 947–958.CrossRef
go back to reference Ben, P. J., & Dwivedi, N. (2013). The role of corporate governance: A hurdle or steroid in the commercialization of innovations? Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 6(1), 18–31.CrossRef Ben, P. J., & Dwivedi, N. (2013). The role of corporate governance: A hurdle or steroid in the commercialization of innovations? Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 6(1), 18–31.CrossRef
go back to reference Bhat, J. S. A. (2010). Managing innovation: Understanding how continuity and change are interlinked. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 11(1&2), 63–74.CrossRef Bhat, J. S. A. (2010). Managing innovation: Understanding how continuity and change are interlinked. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 11(1&2), 63–74.CrossRef
go back to reference Bhat, J. S. A., Sushil, & Jain, P. K. (2011). Innovation by harmonizing continuity and change. Journal of Business Strategy (Emerald), 32(2), 38–49.CrossRef Bhat, J. S. A., Sushil, & Jain, P. K. (2011). Innovation by harmonizing continuity and change. Journal of Business Strategy (Emerald), 32(2), 38–49.CrossRef
go back to reference Castro, C. B., La Concha, D., Dominguez, M., Gravel, J. V., & Periñan, M. M. V. (2009). Does the team leverage the board’s decisions? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(6), 744–761.CrossRef Castro, C. B., La Concha, D., Dominguez, M., Gravel, J. V., & Periñan, M. M. V. (2009). Does the team leverage the board’s decisions? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(6), 744–761.CrossRef
go back to reference Chang, C. S., Yu, S. W., & Hung, C. H. (2015). Firm risk and performance: The role of corporate governance. Review of Managerial Science, 9(1), 141–173.CrossRef Chang, C. S., Yu, S. W., & Hung, C. H. (2015). Firm risk and performance: The role of corporate governance. Review of Managerial Science, 9(1), 141–173.CrossRef
go back to reference Chen, H. L., & Hsu, W. T. (2009). Family ownership, board independence, and R&D investment. Family Business Review, 22(4), 347–362.CrossRef Chen, H. L., & Hsu, W. T. (2009). Family ownership, board independence, and R&D investment. Family Business Review, 22(4), 347–362.CrossRef
go back to reference Chung, K. H., Wright, P., & Kedia, B. (2003). Corporate governance and market valuation of capital and R&D investments. Review of Financial Economics, 12(2), 161–172.CrossRef Chung, K. H., Wright, P., & Kedia, B. (2003). Corporate governance and market valuation of capital and R&D investments. Review of Financial Economics, 12(2), 161–172.CrossRef
go back to reference Cohen, D., Deys, A., & Lys, T. (2009). The Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002: Implications for compensation contracts and managerial risk-taking. In: Working Paper Available at SSRN 1027448. Cohen, D., Deys, A., & Lys, T. (2009). The Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002: Implications for compensation contracts and managerial risk-taking. In: Working Paper Available at SSRN 1027448.
go back to reference De Andres, P., Azofra, V., & Lopez, F. (2005). Corporate boards in OECD countries: Size, composition, functioning and effectiveness. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(2), 197–210.CrossRef De Andres, P., Azofra, V., & Lopez, F. (2005). Corporate boards in OECD countries: Size, composition, functioning and effectiveness. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(2), 197–210.CrossRef
go back to reference Dhir, S., & Dhir, S. (2017a). Adoption of open-source software versus proprietary software: An exploratory study. Strategic Change, 26(4), 363–371.CrossRef Dhir, S., & Dhir, S. (2017a). Adoption of open-source software versus proprietary software: An exploratory study. Strategic Change, 26(4), 363–371.CrossRef
go back to reference Dhir, S., Mital, A., & Chaurasia, S. (2014). Balanced scorecard on top performing Indian firms. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 9(1), 89–100.CrossRef Dhir, S., Mital, A., & Chaurasia, S. (2014). Balanced scorecard on top performing Indian firms. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 9(1), 89–100.CrossRef
go back to reference Driver, C., & Guedes, M. J. C. (2012). Research and development, cash flow, agency and governance: UK large companies. Research Policy, 41(9), 1565–1577.CrossRef Driver, C., & Guedes, M. J. C. (2012). Research and development, cash flow, agency and governance: UK large companies. Research Policy, 41(9), 1565–1577.CrossRef
go back to reference Dwivedi, N., & Jain, A. K. (2005). Corporate governance and performance of Indian firms: The effect of board size and ownership. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17(3), 161–172.CrossRef Dwivedi, N., & Jain, A. K. (2005). Corporate governance and performance of Indian firms: The effect of board size and ownership. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17(3), 161–172.CrossRef
go back to reference Faleye, O., Hoitash, R., & Hoitash, U. (2011). The costs of intense board monitoring. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(1), 160–181.CrossRef Faleye, O., Hoitash, R., & Hoitash, U. (2011). The costs of intense board monitoring. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(1), 160–181.CrossRef
go back to reference Fich, E. M., & Shivdasani, A. (2004). Are busy boards effective monitors? In ECGI-Finance Working Paper, (55). Fich, E. M., & Shivdasani, A. (2004). Are busy boards effective monitors? In ECGI-Finance Working Paper, (55).
go back to reference Galasso, A., & Simcoe, T. S. (2011). CEO overconfidence and innovation. Management Science, 57(8), 1469–1484.CrossRef Galasso, A., & Simcoe, T. S. (2011). CEO overconfidence and innovation. Management Science, 57(8), 1469–1484.CrossRef
go back to reference Garg, A. K. (2007). Influence of board size and independence on firm performance: A study of Indian companies. Vikalpa, 32(3), 39–60. Garg, A. K. (2007). Influence of board size and independence on firm performance: A study of Indian companies. Vikalpa, 32(3), 39–60.
go back to reference Ghosh, S. (2006). Do board characteristics affect corporate performance? Firm-level evidence for India. Applied Economics Letters, 13(7), 435–443.CrossRef Ghosh, S. (2006). Do board characteristics affect corporate performance? Firm-level evidence for India. Applied Economics Letters, 13(7), 435–443.CrossRef
go back to reference Goodstein, J., Gautam, K., & Boeker, W. (1994). The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 15(3), 241–250.CrossRef Goodstein, J., Gautam, K., & Boeker, W. (1994). The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 15(3), 241–250.CrossRef
go back to reference Griffith, R., Redding, S., & Van Reenen, J. (2004). Mapping the two faces of R&D: Productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(4), 883–895.CrossRef Griffith, R., Redding, S., & Van Reenen, J. (2004). Mapping the two faces of R&D: Productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(4), 883–895.CrossRef
go back to reference Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey (No. w3301). National Bureau of Economic Research. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey (No. w3301). National Bureau of Economic Research.
go back to reference Gugnani, R. (2013). Corporate governance and financial performance of Indian firms. Gugnani, R. (2013). Corporate governance and financial performance of Indian firms.
go back to reference Hill, C. W., & Snell, S. A. (1988). External control, corporate strategy, and firm performance in research-intensive industries. Strategic Management Journal, 9(6), 577–590.CrossRef Hill, C. W., & Snell, S. A. (1988). External control, corporate strategy, and firm performance in research-intensive industries. Strategic Management Journal, 9(6), 577–590.CrossRef
go back to reference Hirshleifer, D., Low, A., & Teoh, S. H. (2012). Are overconfident CEOs better innovators? Journal of Finance, 67(4), 1457–1498.CrossRef Hirshleifer, D., Low, A., & Teoh, S. H. (2012). Are overconfident CEOs better innovators? Journal of Finance, 67(4), 1457–1498.CrossRef
go back to reference Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Johnson, R. A., & Grossman, W. (2002). Conflicting voices, the effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 697–716. Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Johnson, R. A., & Grossman, W. (2002). Conflicting voices, the effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 697–716.
go back to reference Hung, H., & Mondejar, R. (2005). Corporate directors and entrepreneurial innovation an empirical study. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 117–129.CrossRef Hung, H., & Mondejar, R. (2005). Corporate directors and entrepreneurial innovation an empirical study. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 117–129.CrossRef
go back to reference Jackling, B., & Johl, S. (2009). Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from India’s top companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 492–509.CrossRef Jackling, B., & Johl, S. (2009). Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from India’s top companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 492–509.CrossRef
go back to reference Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880.CrossRef Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880.CrossRef
go back to reference Jiraporn, P., Davidson, W. N., DaDalt, P., & Ning, Y. (2009). Too busy to show up? An analysis of directors’ absences. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 49(3), 1159–1171.CrossRef Jiraporn, P., Davidson, W. N., DaDalt, P., & Ning, Y. (2009). Too busy to show up? An analysis of directors’ absences. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 49(3), 1159–1171.CrossRef
go back to reference Kaur, P., & Gill, S. (2008). The effects of ownership structure on corporate governance and performance: An empirical assessment in India, Research Project, NFCG 2007–2008, available at www.nfcgindia.org/pdf/UBS.pdf. Retrieved on March 11, 2011. Kaur, P., & Gill, S. (2008). The effects of ownership structure on corporate governance and performance: An empirical assessment in India, Research Project, NFCG 2007–2008, available at www.​nfcgindia.​org/​pdf/​UBS.​pdf. Retrieved on March 11, 2011.
go back to reference Kim, B., Burns, M. L., & Prescott, J. E. (2009). The strategic role of the board: The impact of board structure on top management team strategic action capability. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(6), 728–743.CrossRef Kim, B., Burns, M. L., & Prescott, J. E. (2009). The strategic role of the board: The impact of board structure on top management team strategic action capability. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(6), 728–743.CrossRef
go back to reference Kor, Y. Y. (2006). Direct and interaction effects of top management team and board compositions on R&D investment strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1081–1099.CrossRef Kor, Y. Y. (2006). Direct and interaction effects of top management team and board compositions on R&D investment strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1081–1099.CrossRef
go back to reference Kota, H. B., & Tomar, S. (2010). Corporate governance practices in Indian firms. Journal of Management & Organization, 16(2), 266–279.CrossRef Kota, H. B., & Tomar, S. (2010). Corporate governance practices in Indian firms. Journal of Management & Organization, 16(2), 266–279.CrossRef
go back to reference Kyereboah-Coleman, A., & Biekpe, N. (2007). On the determinants of board size and its composition: Additional evidence from Ghana. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 3(1), 68–77.CrossRef Kyereboah-Coleman, A., & Biekpe, N. (2007). On the determinants of board size and its composition: Additional evidence from Ghana. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 3(1), 68–77.CrossRef
go back to reference Lacetera, N. (2001). Corporate governance and the governance of innovation: The case of pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Management and Governance, 5(1), 29–59.CrossRef Lacetera, N. (2001). Corporate governance and the governance of innovation: The case of pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Management and Governance, 5(1), 29–59.CrossRef
go back to reference Lee, P. M., & O’neill, H. M. (2003). Ownership structures and R&D investments of US and Japanese firms: Agency and stewardship perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 212–225. Lee, P. M., & O’neill, H. M. (2003). Ownership structures and R&D investments of US and Japanese firms: Agency and stewardship perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 212–225.
go back to reference Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. The Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59–77. Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. The Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59–77.
go back to reference Munari, F., Oriani, R., & Sobrero, M. (2010). The effects of owner identity and external governance systems on R&D investments: A study of Western European firms. Research Policy, 39(8), 1093–1105.CrossRef Munari, F., Oriani, R., & Sobrero, M. (2010). The effects of owner identity and external governance systems on R&D investments: A study of Western European firms. Research Policy, 39(8), 1093–1105.CrossRef
go back to reference O’Brien, J. P. (2003). The capital structure implications of pursuing a strategy of innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 415–431.CrossRef O’Brien, J. P. (2003). The capital structure implications of pursuing a strategy of innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 415–431.CrossRef
go back to reference Parameswar, N., Dhir, S., & Dhir, S. (2017). Banking on innovation, innovation in banking at ICICI bank. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 36(2), 6–16.CrossRef Parameswar, N., Dhir, S., & Dhir, S. (2017). Banking on innovation, innovation in banking at ICICI bank. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 36(2), 6–16.CrossRef
go back to reference Pearce, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. (1992). Board Composition from a strategic contingency perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 29(4), 411–438.CrossRef Pearce, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. (1992). Board Composition from a strategic contingency perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 29(4), 411–438.CrossRef
go back to reference Rabi, N. M., Zulkafli, A. H., & Haat, M. H. C. (2010). Corporate governance, innovation investment and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian public listed companies. Economia. Seria Management, 13(2), 225–239. Rabi, N. M., Zulkafli, A. H., & Haat, M. H. C. (2010). Corporate governance, innovation investment and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian public listed companies. Economia. Seria Management, 13(2), 225–239.
go back to reference Shapiro, D., Tang, Y., Wang, M., & Zhang, W. (2015). The effects of corporate governance and ownership on the innovation performance of Chinese SMEs. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 13(4), 311–335.CrossRef Shapiro, D., Tang, Y., Wang, M., & Zhang, W. (2015). The effects of corporate governance and ownership on the innovation performance of Chinese SMEs. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 13(4), 311–335.CrossRef
go back to reference Van den Berghe, L. A., & Levrau, A. (2004). Evaluating boards of directors: What constitutes a good corporate board? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4), 461–478.CrossRef Van den Berghe, L. A., & Levrau, A. (2004). Evaluating boards of directors: What constitutes a good corporate board? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4), 461–478.CrossRef
go back to reference World Bank. (2007). Unleashing India’s innovation: Towards sustainable and inclusive growth. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. World Bank. (2007). Unleashing India’s innovation: Towards sustainable and inclusive growth. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
go back to reference World Economic Forum. (2008). Global Competitiveness Report 2008–09, Geneva. World Economic Forum. (2008). Global Competitiveness Report 2008–09, Geneva.
go back to reference Wright, P., Kroll, M., & Elenkov, D. (2002). Acquisition returns, increase in firm size, and chief executive officer compensation: The moderating role of monitoring. Academic Management Journal, 45(2), 599–608. Wright, P., Kroll, M., & Elenkov, D. (2002). Acquisition returns, increase in firm size, and chief executive officer compensation: The moderating role of monitoring. Academic Management Journal, 45(2), 599–608.
go back to reference Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185–211.CrossRef Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185–211.CrossRef
go back to reference Zahra, S. A. (1996). Governance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact of industry technological opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1713–1735. Zahra, S. A. (1996). Governance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact of industry technological opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1713–1735.
go back to reference Zona, F. (2016). Agency models in different stages of CEO tenure: The effects of stock options and board independence on R&D investment. Research Policy, 45(2), 560–575.CrossRef Zona, F. (2016). Agency models in different stages of CEO tenure: The effects of stock options and board independence on R&D investment. Research Policy, 45(2), 560–575.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Corporate Governance and Innovation
Authors
J. P. Sharma
Shital Jhunjhunwala
Shweta Sharda
Copyright Year
2018
Publisher
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8926-8_5

Premium Partner