Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare 2/2022

26-11-2021 | Correction

Correction to: Weighted scoring elections: is Borda best?

Authors: D. Marc Kilgour, Jean-Charles Grégoire, Angèle M. Foley

Published in: Social Choice and Welfare | Issue 2/2022

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Excerpt

In the original publication of the article, some of the data in Tables 5 and 7 were wrong. The correct Tables 5 and 7 should read as given below.
Table 5
Condorcet efficiency of Borda variants
Case
I3
I2
L3
I
L2
Cv
I/2
L
I/3
L/2
L/3
3-IAC
88.57
89.49
90.25
92.27
92.27
92.53
91.48
91.48
85.90
81.83
76.47
3-IC
78.51
79.06
80.90
85.81
85.81
88.76
91.12
91.12
87.69
85.57
82.46
3-Spa
62.50
66.03
71.20
80.86
80.86
87.86
83.44
83.44
66.84
59.66
53.66
4-IAC
75.43
77.64
83.06
84.27
86.55
88.21
88.02
87.80
84.00
78.20
71.73
4-IC
67.32
70.10
76.81
78.78
82.10
85.59
86.31
87.01
84.38
80.84
76.33
4-Spa
46.33
50.53
62.97
68.66
76.75
87.37
88.04
87.19
80.03
74.99
73.68
5-IAC
63.08
66.30
77.13
76.23
82.54
85.04
84.27
85.41
83.05
77.88
70.76
5-IC
60.12
63.79
74.97
74.48
80.93
84.49
84.03
86.31
83.68
79.63
73.63
5-Spa
35.47
39.63
56.75
58.16
72.57
82.36
82.35
76.84
80.09
58.35
54.32
6-IAC
53.70
57.81
72.40
69.76
78.65
82.74
81.33
84.10
81.52
76.28
68.61
6-IC
53.84
57.70
73.26
69.77
79.56
83.01
81.43
84.52
81.53
77.29
70.27
6-Spa
29.22
32.62
52.03
49.70
70.73
82.89
75.99
80.09
80.63
66.17
63.73
Table 7
Standard Borda versus Cervone
   
Standard Borda (L)
Cervone (Cv)
Case
F
G
CE
E[D]
PMax
G
CE
E[D]
PMax
3-IAC
94.05
86.04
91.48
0.1603
91.98
87.00
92.53
0.142
92.98
3-IC
91.80
83.65
91.12
0.1631
91.85
81.06
88.76
0.206
89.74
3-Spa
100
83.44
83.44
0.3312
83.44
87.86
87.86
0.251
87.86
4-IAC
83.77
73.55
87.80
0.2261
89.17
73.86
88.21
0.222
89.50
4-IC
82.69
71.95
87.01
0.2402
88.48
70.72
85.59
0.276
87.11
4-Spa
100
87.19
87.19
0.2562
87.19
87.37
87.37
0.294
87.37
5-IAC
76.68
65.49
85.41
0.2952
86.49
65.10
85.04
0.312
85.91
5-IC
75.22
64.92
86.31
0.2809
87.15
63.29
84.49
0.326
85.49
5-Spa
100
76.84
76.84
0.5189
76.84
82.36
82.36
0.435
82.36
6-IAC
67.69
56.93
84.10
0.3522
84.63
55.99
82.74
0.391
83.33
6-IC
68.43
57.84
84.53
0.3413
85.18
56.81
83.01
0.389
83.60
6-Spa
100
80.09
80.10
0.4543
80.10
82.89
82.89
0.437
82.89
F Probability C* exists, G (Unconditional) Probability Winner is C*. All probabilities in %

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Metadata
Title
Correction to: Weighted scoring elections: is Borda best?
Authors
D. Marc Kilgour
Jean-Charles Grégoire
Angèle M. Foley
Publication date
26-11-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Social Choice and Welfare / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0176-1714
Electronic ISSN: 1432-217X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-021-01378-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Social Choice and Welfare 2/2022 Go to the issue