Skip to main content
Top

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

2. Countering Biases in Risk Analysis

Author : Stefan Hunziker

Published in: Enterprise Risk Management

Publisher: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Many risk management programmes in companies are not as effective as they could or should be. This is due to a number of frequently overlooked factors, such as motivational and cognitive biases. The topic of biases, although much theoretical and empirical literature exists, is still rarely addressed in relation to enterprise risk management. Many studies explicitly show that mistakes made in risk identification and risk assessment significantly distort results and decisions drawn from the risk management process. In the following, some of the most important biases in risk analysis and corresponding debiasing strategies are discussed.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Al-Shammari, M., & Masri, H. (2016). Ethical and Social Perspectives on Global Business Interaction in Emerging Markets. Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global.CrossRef Al-Shammari, M., & Masri, H. (2016). Ethical and Social Perspectives on Global Business Interaction in Emerging Markets. Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global.CrossRef
go back to reference Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70 (9), 1–70.CrossRef Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70 (9), 1–70.CrossRef
go back to reference Barnes, J. H. (1984). Cognitive Biases and Their Impact on Strategic Planning. Strategic Management Journal, 5 (2), 129–137.CrossRef Barnes, J. H. (1984). Cognitive Biases and Their Impact on Strategic Planning. Strategic Management Journal, 5 (2), 129–137.CrossRef
go back to reference Cassotti, M., Habib, M., Poirel, N., Aïte, A., Houdé, O., & Moutier, S. (2012). Positive emotional context eliminates the framing effect in decision-making. Emotion, 12 (5), 926–931. Cassotti, M., Habib, M., Poirel, N., Aïte, A., Houdé, O., & Moutier, S. (2012). Positive emotional context eliminates the framing effect in decision-making. Emotion, 12 (5), 926–931.
go back to reference Celati, L. (2004). The Dark Side of Risk Management: How People Frame Decisions in Financial Markets. London: Prentice Hall. Celati, L. (2004). The Dark Side of Risk Management: How People Frame Decisions in Financial Markets. London: Prentice Hall.
go back to reference Clayton, M. (2011). Risk Happen: Managing risk and avoiding failure in buisness projects. London: Marshall Cavendish International. Clayton, M. (2011). Risk Happen: Managing risk and avoiding failure in buisness projects. London: Marshall Cavendish International.
go back to reference de Bono, E. (1999). Six thinking hats. Boston: Back Bay Book. de Bono, E. (1999). Six thinking hats. Boston: Back Bay Book.
go back to reference Dobelli, R. (2018). Die Kunst des klaren Denkens. 52 Denkfehler, die Sie besser anderen überlassen. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch-Verlag. Dobelli, R. (2018). Die Kunst des klaren Denkens. 52 Denkfehler, die Sie besser anderen überlassen. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch-Verlag.
go back to reference Edwards, W. (1982). Conservatism in Human Information Processing (excerpted). In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Edwards, W. (1982). Conservatism in Human Information Processing (excerpted). In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Emmons, D. L., Mazzuchi, T. A., Sarkani, S., & Larsen, C. E. (2018). Mitigating cognitive biases in risk identification: Practitioner checklist for the aerospace sector. Defense Acquisition Research Journal, 25 (1), 52–93.CrossRef Emmons, D. L., Mazzuchi, T. A., Sarkani, S., & Larsen, C. E. (2018). Mitigating cognitive biases in risk identification: Practitioner checklist for the aerospace sector. Defense Acquisition Research Journal, 25 (1), 52–93.CrossRef
go back to reference Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13 (1), 1–17.CrossRef Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13 (1), 1–17.CrossRef
go back to reference Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1978). Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 330–344. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1978). Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 330–344.
go back to reference Gleißner, W. (2017). Grundlagen des Risikomanagements. Mit fundierten Informationen zu besseren Entscheidungen (3rd Ed.). München: Verlag Franz Vahlen.CrossRef Gleißner, W. (2017). Grundlagen des Risikomanagements. Mit fundierten Informationen zu besseren Entscheidungen (3rd Ed.). München: Verlag Franz Vahlen.CrossRef
go back to reference Grinnell, R. M., & Unrau, Y. A. (2018). Social Work Research and Evaluation. Foundations of Evidence-Based Practice (11th Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. Grinnell, R. M., & Unrau, Y. A. (2018). Social Work Research and Evaluation. Foundations of Evidence-Based Practice (11th Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Hubbard, D. W. (2009). The failure of risk management. Why it’s broken and how to fix it. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc. Hubbard, D. W. (2009). The failure of risk management. Why it’s broken and how to fix it. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
go back to reference Kaba, A., Wishart, I., Fraser, K., Coderre, S., & McLaughlin, K. (2016). Are we at risk of groupthink in our approach to teamwork interventions in health care? Medical Education, 50 (4), 400–408.CrossRef Kaba, A., Wishart, I., Fraser, K., Coderre, S., & McLaughlin, K. (2016). Are we at risk of groupthink in our approach to teamwork interventions in health care? Medical Education, 50 (4), 400–408.CrossRef
go back to reference Kahneman, D. (2012). Schnelles Denken, langsames Denken (3rd Ed.). München: Siedler Verlag. Kahneman, D. (2012). Schnelles Denken, langsames Denken (3rd Ed.). München: Siedler Verlag.
go back to reference Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgement. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgement. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1997). The effects of group cohesiveness on social loafing and social compensation. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 156–168.CrossRef Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1997). The effects of group cohesiveness on social loafing and social compensation. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 156–168.CrossRef
go back to reference Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 51–60.CrossRef Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 51–60.CrossRef
go back to reference Kent Baker, H., & Puttonen, V. (2017). Investment Traps Exposed: Navigating Investor Mistakes and Behavioral Biases. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.CrossRef Kent Baker, H., & Puttonen, V. (2017). Investment Traps Exposed: Navigating Investor Mistakes and Behavioral Biases. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.CrossRef
go back to reference Manktelow, J. (2005). Mind Tools. Essential skills for an excellent career (4th Ed.). Swindon, UK: Mind Tools Ltd. Manktelow, J. (2005). Mind Tools. Essential skills for an excellent career (4th Ed.). Swindon, UK: Mind Tools Ltd.
go back to reference Memon, A. A., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2003). Psychology and Law: Truthfulness, Accuracy and Credibility (2nd Ed.). Chichester: Wiley. Memon, A. A., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2003). Psychology and Law: Truthfulness, Accuracy and Credibility (2nd Ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
go back to reference Milgram, S. (1965). Some Conditions of Obedience and Disobedience to Authority. Human Relations, 18 (1), 57–76.CrossRef Milgram, S. (1965). Some Conditions of Obedience and Disobedience to Authority. Human Relations, 18 (1), 57–76.CrossRef
go back to reference Montibeller, G., & von Winterfeldt, D. (2015). Cognitive and motivational biases in decision and risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 35 (7), 1230–1251.CrossRef Montibeller, G., & von Winterfeldt, D. (2015). Cognitive and motivational biases in decision and risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 35 (7), 1230–1251.CrossRef
go back to reference Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12 (2), 125–135.CrossRef Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12 (2), 125–135.CrossRef
go back to reference Rees, M. (2015). Business Risk and Simulation Modelling in Practice: Using Excel, VBA and @RISK. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRef Rees, M. (2015). Business Risk and Simulation Modelling in Practice: Using Excel, VBA and @RISK. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRef
go back to reference Scherrer, M. (2018). Menschlicher Faktor im Risikomanagement. Bachelor Thesis, Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts. Scherrer, M. (2018). Menschlicher Faktor im Risikomanagement. Bachelor Thesis, Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts.
go back to reference Sharot, T. (2011). The optimism bias. Current Biology, 21 (23), R941–R945.CrossRef Sharot, T. (2011). The optimism bias. Current Biology, 21 (23), R941–R945.CrossRef
go back to reference Shefrin, H. (2016). Behavioral Risk Management. Managing the Psychology That Drives Decisions and Influences Operational Risk. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Shefrin, H. (2016). Behavioral Risk Management. Managing the Psychology That Drives Decisions and Influences Operational Risk. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference Smith, E. D., & Bahill, A. T. (2009). Attribute Substitution in Systems Engineering. Systems Engineering (January 2009), 1–19. Smith, E. D., & Bahill, A. T. (2009). Attribute Substitution in Systems Engineering. Systems Engineering (January 2009), 1–19.
go back to reference Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 (6), 1467–1478.CrossRef Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 (6), 1467–1478.CrossRef
go back to reference Sun, Y., & Wang, H. (2010). Gambler’s fallacy, hot hand belief, and the time of patterns. Judgment and Decision Making, 5 (2), 124–132. Sun, Y., & Wang, H. (2010). Gambler’s fallacy, hot hand belief, and the time of patterns. Judgment and Decision Making, 5 (2), 124–132.
go back to reference Tentori, K., Crupi, V., & Russo, S. (2013). On the determinants of the conjunction fallacy: probability versus inductive confirmation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 142 (1), 235–255.CrossRef Tentori, K., Crupi, V., & Russo, S. (2013). On the determinants of the conjunction fallacy: probability versus inductive confirmation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 142 (1), 235–255.CrossRef
go back to reference Tetlock, P. E., & Gardner, D. (2015). Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction. New York: Crown Publishers. Tetlock, P. E., & Gardner, D. (2015). Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction. New York: Crown Publishers.
go back to reference Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5 (2), 207–232.CrossRef Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5 (2), 207–232.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Countering Biases in Risk Analysis
Author
Stefan Hunziker
Copyright Year
2019
Publisher
Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25357-8_2