Top

Published in:

2024 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

2. Database Introduction

Authors : Federico Moretta, Giulia Bozzano

Published in: Mathematical and Statistical Approaches for Anaerobic Digestion Feedstock Optimization

Publisher: Springer Nature Switzerland

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Statistical methods should always be applied in the presence of enough amount of data. In this book, the data used have been taken gathering a conspicuous amount of information from the literature, and resumed in the work of Moretta et al. (J Clean Prod 375:134140, 2022). Then, these have been collected in a single database, which structure and content are described in the next sections.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Substrate General Characteristics

next chapter Statistical Analysis

Moretta F, Goracci A, Manenti F, Bozzano G (2022) Data-driven model for feedstock blending optimization of anaerobic co-digestion by BMP maximization. J Clean Prod 375:134140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134140CrossRef

Jr SV (2014) Analytical techniques for the chemical analysis of plant biomass and biomass products. Anal Methods 6(20):8094–8105. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4AY00388H

Karimi K, Taherzadeh MJ (2016) A critical review of analytical methods in pretreatment of lignocelluloses: composition, imaging, and crystallinity. Bioresour Technol 200:1008–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.022CrossRef

Achinas S, Euverink GJW (2016) Theoretical analysis of biogas potential prediction from agricultural waste. Resour Effic Technol 2(3):143–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reffit.2016.08.001CrossRef

Cluster Centroid: an overview|ScienceDirect Topics. Consultato: 19 luglio 2023. Disponibile su: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/cluster-centroid

Page DI, Hickey KL, Narula R, Main AL, Grimberg SJ (2008) Modeling anaerobic digestion of dairy manure using the IWA anaerobic digestion model no. 1 (ADM1). Water Sci Technol 58(3):689–695. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.678CrossRef

Murto M, Björnsson L, Mattiasson B (2004) Impact of food industrial waste on anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and pig manure. J Environ Manage 70(2):101–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.11.001CrossRef

Steffen R, Szolar O, Braun R (1998) Feedstocks for anaerobic digestion. Inst Agrobiotechnol Tulin Univ Agric Sci Vienna, pp 1–29

Bywater A, Kusch-Brandt S (2022) Exploring farm anaerobic digester economic viability in a time of policy change in the UK. Processes 10(2):2. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10020212CrossRef

10.

US EPA O (2023) Anaerobic digestion on poultry farms. Consultato: 19 luglio 2023. Disponibile su: https://www.epa.gov/agstar/anaerobic-digestion-poultry-farms

11.

Li Y, Achinas S, Zhao J, Geurkink B, Krooneman J, Euverink GJW (2020) Co-digestion of cow and sheep manure: performance evaluation and relative microbial activity. Renew Energy 153:553–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.041CrossRef

12.

Kainthola J, Kalamdhad AS, Goud VV (2020) Optimization of process parameters for accelerated methane yield from anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and food waste. Renew Energy 149:1352–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.124CrossRef

13.

Li D et al (2015) Effects of feedstock ratio and organic loading rate on the anaerobic mesophilic co-digestion of rice straw and cow manure. Bioresour Technol 189:319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.033CrossRef

14.

Wang X, Yang G, Feng Y, Ren G, Han X (2012) Optimizing feeding composition and carbon–nitrogen ratios for improved methane yield during anaerobic co-digestion of dairy, chicken manure and wheat straw. Bioresour Technol 120:78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.058CrossRef

15.

Jabeen M, Zeshan S, Yousaf S, Haider MR, Malik RN (2015) High-solids anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and rice husk at different organic loading rates. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 102:149–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.03.023CrossRef

16.

Anaerobic digestion of sugar beet pulp after acid thermal and alkali thermal pretreatments|SpringerLink. Consultato: 19 luglio 2023. Disponibile su: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00539-6

17.

Koch K, Lübken M, Gehring T, Wichern M, Horn H (2010) Biogas from grass silage: measurements and modeling with ADM1. Bioresour Technol 101(21):8158–8165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.009CrossRef

18.

Croce S, Wei Q, D’Imporzano G, Dong R, Adani F (2016) Anaerobic digestion of straw and corn stover: the effect of biological process optimization and pre-treatment on total bio-methane yield and energy performance. Biotechnol Adv 34(8):1289–1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.09.004CrossRef

19.

Gupta P, Singh RS, Sachan A, Vidyarthi AS, Gupta A (2012) Study on biogas production by anaerobic digestion of garden-waste. Fuel 95:495–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.11.006CrossRef

20.

Li L et al (2015) Anaerobic digestion performance of vinegar residue in continuously stirred tank reactor. Bioresour Technol 186:338–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.03.086CrossRef

21.

Xu F, Li Y, Ge X, Yang L, Li Y (2018) Anaerobic digestion of food waste: challenges and opportunities. Bioresour Technol 247:1047–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.020CrossRef

22.

Ahmadi-Pirlou M, Ebrahimi-Nik M, Khojastehpour M, Ebrahimi SH (2017) Mesophilic co-digestion of municipal solid waste and sewage sludge: effect of mixing ratio, total solids, and alkaline pretreatment. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 125:97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.09.004CrossRef

23.

Jain S, Jain S, Wolf IT, Lee J, Tong YW (2015) A comprehensive review on operating parameters and different pretreatment methodologies for anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:142–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.091CrossRef

24.

Bücker F et al (2020) Fish waste: an efficient alternative to biogas and methane production in an anaerobic mono-digestion system. Renew Energy 147:798–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.140CrossRef

25.

Selormey GK, Barnes B, Kemausuor F, Darkwah L (2021) A review of anaerobic digestion of slaughterhouse waste: effect of selected operational and environmental parameters on anaerobic biodegradability. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 20(4):1073–1086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-021-09596-8CrossRef

26.

Energies|Free Full-Text|Anaerobic digestion of blood from slaughtered livestock: a review. Consultato: 19 luglio 2023. Disponibile su: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/18/5666

27.

Naveen CC et al (2022) Effects of different parameters and co-digestion options on anaerobic digestion of parboiled rice mill wastewater: a review. BioEnergy Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-022-10522-1

28.

Kazemi-Bonchenari M, Alizadeh A, Javadi L, Zohrevand M, Odongo NE, Salem AZM (2017) Use of poultry pre-cooked slaughterhouse waste as ruminant feed to prevent environmental pollution. J Clean Prod 145:151–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.066CrossRef

29.

Carnevale E, Molari G, Vittuari M (2017) Used cooking oils in the biogas chain: a technical and economic assessment. Energies 10:192. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10020192CrossRef

30.

Yan W, Vadivelu V, Maspolim Y, Zhou Y (2021) In-situ alkaline enhanced two-stage anaerobic digestion system for waste cooking oil and sewage sludge co-digestion. Waste Manag 120:221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.11.047CrossRef

31.

Tamborrino A, Catalano F, Leone A, Bianchi B (2021) A real case study of a full-scale anaerobic digestion plant powered by olive by-products. Foods 10(8):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10081946CrossRef

Title: Database Introduction
Authors: Federico Moretta
Giulia Bozzano
Publisher: Springer Nature Switzerland
Book: Mathematical and Statistical Approaches for Anaerobic Digestion Feedstock Optimization
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-56459-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-56460-4

Copyright Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56460-4_2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"