Skip to main content
Top

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Dealing with Adverse Weather Conditions by Enhanced Collaborative Decision Making in a TAM APOC

Authors : F. Piekert, N. Carstengerdes, R. Suikat, S. Schier

Published in: Air Traffic Management and Systems IV

Publisher: Springer Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper will provide an insight into enhanced collaborative decision making being conducted in adverse weather conditions in a simulated Oslo airport environment. This simulation is part of the Total Airport Management (TAM) research in the Single European Sky ATM Research program (SESAR 2020) as project PJ.04. SESAR2020 is operated in two defined program waves, wave 1 covering the years 2016–2019 and wave 2 following until 2022. This paper will focus on a set of two out of seven V2 level validation exercises that are conducted in wave 1 of PJ.04′s Solution 2 (PJ.04–02), addressing concepts for Collaborative Airport Performance Management. The key objective of PJ.04–02 is to develop multi-stakeholder decision support for airport management stakeholders especially in adverse conditions (e.g. bad weather, union strikes or unforeseen events such as runway blockages). In the Oslo airport environment winter conditions are a major reason for performance degradation of airport operations. An enhanced integration of stakeholder actions and collaborative operations planning is expected to provide performance benefits. The philosophy of collaborative decision making advocated by SESAR 2020 is that of ‘consensus’ building amongst the different airport stakeholders through a common impact assessment and a structured solution finding process resulting in mutually agreed actions. The objective is to raise situation awareness and introduce a collaborative problem solving approach leading to better, earlier and therefore more stable solutions. Orchestrated by a moderator, the so-called airport operations center supervisor, the global impact assessment is supported by each stakeholder evaluating the consequences for their own operations, documented in an electronic impact and corresponding solution message. The validation and assessment of the underlying conceptual approach to collaborative airport performance management in adverse conditions requests for an artificial airport environment. In contrast to a real airport the simulated environment allows for any necessary changes in weather situation, traffic patterns or support system composition while keeping the operators in the loop. The target level for the validation experiments is V2 (referring to the European operational concept validation methodology), requiring the simulator to allow for an operational concept feasibility assessment while providing emulation of all airport processes and working positions of the airport management. The objective assessment of benefits credited to specific operational improvements under consideration of the validation exercises PJ.04–02.V2.04 and PJ.04–02.V2.09 requires a stepwise approach in which the functionality and system complexity is consecutively enhanced. The baseline was represented by the results achieved by SESAR 1, providing an airport operations center (APOC), basic processes and support system functionality. The functionality of the V2.04 setup reflected the SESAR2020 solution regarding advanced decision support, providing dynamic demand and capacity balancing alongside a guided enhanced collaborative decision making process and enhanced meteorological forecasts by weather alerts. The V2.09 solution setup provides additional information support by a performance dashboard, taking into account probabilities for additional diverted traffic. Two exercise simulation runs were executed for each setup, subjecting the Oslo operators with different meteorological phenomena and resulting operational challenges. The PJ.04–02 validation objectives were broken down into exercise specific objectives, allowing for an impartial feasibility assessment based on objective metrics and qualitative human performance criteria. Preliminary exercise analysis results indicate a well-received conceptual approach, the stepwise functionality enhancement complying with benefit increase expectations.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference H. Hartmann, Final report of preliminary study total airport management, CARE Action "Innovation", DLR (Braunschweig, Germany, 2001), p. 33 H. Hartmann, Final report of preliminary study total airport management, CARE Action "Innovation", DLR (Braunschweig, Germany, 2001), p. 33
2.
go back to reference Y. Günther, A. Inard, B. Werther, M. Bonnier, G. Spies, A. Marsden, M. Temme, D. Böhme, R. Lane, H. Niederstraßer, Total airport management-operational concept and logical architecture, DLR, (Braunschweig, Germany, 2006), pp. 44 Y. Günther, A. Inard, B. Werther, M. Bonnier, G. Spies, A. Marsden, M. Temme, D. Böhme, R. Lane, H. Niederstraßer, Total airport management-operational concept and logical architecture, DLR, (Braunschweig, Germany, 2006), pp. 44
3.
go back to reference G. Spies, F. Piekert, A. Marsden, R. Suikat, C. Meier, P. Eriksen, Operational concept for an airport operations center to enable total airport management. in: ed. by I. Grant, 26th Congress of International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS) (Alaska, USA, 2008) G. Spies, F. Piekert, A. Marsden, R. Suikat, C. Meier, P. Eriksen, Operational concept for an airport operations center to enable total airport management. in: ed. by I. Grant, 26th Congress of International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS) (Alaska, USA, 2008)
4.
go back to reference F. Piekert, A. van Dongen, Total airport management negotiation of airport performance parameters. in 7th EUROCONTROL Experimental Center INO Workshop, EUROCONTROL, Brétigny sur Orge (France, 2008), pp. 7 F. Piekert, A. van Dongen, Total airport management negotiation of airport performance parameters. in 7th EUROCONTROL Experimental Center INO Workshop, EUROCONTROL, Brétigny sur Orge (France, 2008), pp. 7
5.
go back to reference T.A.M.S. Partners, Gesamtvorhabensbeschreibung Leuchtturmprojekt TAMS-Total Airport Management Suite (Nürnberg, Germany, TAMS Partners, 2011), p. 56 T.A.M.S. Partners, Gesamtvorhabensbeschreibung Leuchtturmprojekt TAMS-Total Airport Management Suite (Nürnberg, Germany, TAMS Partners, 2011), p. 56
6.
go back to reference F. Depenbrock, B. Urban, A. Temme, Y. Günther, M. Schaper, S. Helm, TAMS Operational Concept Document (Braunschweig, Germany, DLR, 2012), p. 73 F. Depenbrock, B. Urban, A. Temme, Y. Günther, M. Schaper, S. Helm, TAMS Operational Concept Document (Braunschweig, Germany, DLR, 2012), p. 73
7.
go back to reference S. Helm, A.B. Claßen, F. Rudolph, C. Werner, B. Urban, Integration of landside processes into the concept of total airport management. in Air Transport Research Society 2012 World Conference (Tainan, Taiwan, 2012) S. Helm, A.B. Claßen, F. Rudolph, C. Werner, B. Urban, Integration of landside processes into the concept of total airport management. in Air Transport Research Society 2012 World Conference (Tainan, Taiwan, 2012)
8.
go back to reference SESAR Consortium, SESAR Concept of Operations, (SESAR Consortium, Brussels, Belgium, 2007), p. 214 SESAR Consortium, SESAR Concept of Operations, (SESAR Consortium, Brussels, Belgium, 2007), p. 214
9.
go back to reference SESAR Consortium, D6—Work Programme for 2008–2013, SESAR Definition Phase-Air Transport Framework, (SESAR Consortium, Brussels, Belgium, 2008), p. 124. SESAR Consortium, D6—Work Programme for 2008–2013, SESAR Definition Phase-Air Transport Framework, (SESAR Consortium, Brussels, Belgium, 2008), p. 124.
10.
go back to reference SESAR Joint Undertaking, Total Airport Management in: SESAR Joint Undertaking (Ed.) CALL: SESAR2020 IR-VLD WAVE1, (European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 2015) SESAR Joint Undertaking, Total Airport Management in: SESAR Joint Undertaking (Ed.) CALL: SESAR2020 IR-VLD WAVE1, (European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 2015)
11.
go back to reference R. Suikat, A. Deutschmann, Total airport simulation supporting research for future airport management concepts. in AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit, (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 2008) R. Suikat, A. Deutschmann, Total airport simulation supporting research for future airport management concepts. in AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit, (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 2008)
12.
go back to reference M. Jipp, F. Depenbrock, R. Suikat, M. Schaper, A. Papenfuß, S. Kaltenhäuser, Validation of multi-objective optimization for total airport management in 8th Asian Control Conference, ASCC Kaohsiung (Taiwan, 2011) M. Jipp, F. Depenbrock, R. Suikat, M. Schaper, A. Papenfuß, S. Kaltenhäuser, Validation of multi-objective optimization for total airport management in 8th Asian Control Conference, ASCC Kaohsiung (Taiwan, 2011)
13.
go back to reference P. Förster, A discrete event modelling and simulation environment for applications in the TAM context, 60. Deutscher Luft-und Raumfahrtkongress 2011, (Bremen, Germany, 2011) P. Förster, A discrete event modelling and simulation environment for applications in the TAM context, 60. Deutscher Luft-und Raumfahrtkongress 2011, (Bremen, Germany, 2011)
14.
go back to reference N. Carstengerdes, M. Jipp, F. Piekert, A. Reinholz, R. Suikat, Validation of the total airport management suite-research report, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR), Institut für Flugführung, (Braunschweig, Germany, 2012), p. 153 N. Carstengerdes, M. Jipp, F. Piekert, A. Reinholz, R. Suikat, Validation of the total airport management suite-research report, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR), Institut für Flugführung, (Braunschweig, Germany, 2012), p. 153
15.
go back to reference R. Suikat, TAMS Simulation Concept Document (Braunschweig, Germany, DLR, 2012), p. 29 R. Suikat, TAMS Simulation Concept Document (Braunschweig, Germany, DLR, 2012), p. 29
16.
go back to reference A. Deutschmann, understanding the dynamic system airport. in World Conference on Transport Research, WCTR, (Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 2013), p. 6 A. Deutschmann, understanding the dynamic system airport. in World Conference on Transport Research, WCTR, (Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 2013), p. 6
17.
go back to reference S. Schier, F. Timmermann, T. Pett, Airport management in the box–a human-in-the-loop simulation for Acdm and airport management Deutscher Luft-und Raumfahrt Kongress 2016, (Braunschweig, Germany, 2016) S. Schier, F. Timmermann, T. Pett, Airport management in the box–a human-in-the-loop simulation for Acdm and airport management Deutscher Luft-und Raumfahrt Kongress 2016, (Braunschweig, Germany, 2016)
18.
go back to reference S. Schier, T. Pett, O.K. Mohr, S.J. Yeo, Design and evaluation of user interfaces for an airport management simulation. in AIAA Aviation Modelling and Simulation Conference (Washington, D.C., USA, 2016) S. Schier, T. Pett, O.K. Mohr, S.J. Yeo, Design and evaluation of user interfaces for an airport management simulation. in AIAA Aviation Modelling and Simulation Conference (Washington, D.C., USA, 2016)
19.
go back to reference S. Schier, A. Duensing, Sparring partners for human-in-the-loop simulations-the potential of virtual agents in air traffic simulations, Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrt Kongres 2017, (München, Deutschland, 2017), p. 10. S. Schier, A. Duensing, Sparring partners for human-in-the-loop simulations-the potential of virtual agents in air traffic simulations, Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrt Kongres 2017, (München, Deutschland, 2017), p. 10.
20.
go back to reference S. Schier, L. Rosenau, M. Freese, Trainieren mit CLAUDI–Das Potential kognitiver Agenten für Simulationen und Planspiele, 6. Interdisziplinärer Workshop Kognitive SystemeMünchen, (Deutschland, 2017) S. Schier, L. Rosenau, M. Freese, Trainieren mit CLAUDI–Das Potential kognitiver Agenten für Simulationen und Planspiele, 6. Interdisziplinärer Workshop Kognitive SystemeMünchen, (Deutschland, 2017)
21.
go back to reference F. Piekert, A. Marsden, O. Delain, Europe’s next Step in Airport Performance Management Research, EIWAC 2017 (ENRI, Tokyo, Japan, 2017). F. Piekert, A. Marsden, O. Delain, Europe’s next Step in Airport Performance Management Research, EIWAC 2017 (ENRI, Tokyo, Japan, 2017).
22.
go back to reference E. Commission, COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 409/2013 of 3 May 2013 on the definition of common projects, the establishment of governance and the identification of incentives supporting the implementation of the European air traffic management master plan (Text with EEA relevance), in L 123/1. ed. by E. Commission (European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 2013), p. 7 E. Commission, COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 409/2013 of 3 May 2013 on the definition of common projects, the establishment of governance and the identification of incentives supporting the implementation of the European air traffic management master plan (Text with EEA relevance), in L 123/1. ed. by E. Commission (European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 2013), p. 7
23.
go back to reference E. Council, COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 219/2007 of 27 February 2007 on the establishment of a joint undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system (SESAR), in European Council. ed. by E. Council (Belgium, Brussels, 2007), p. 18 E. Council, COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 219/2007 of 27 February 2007 on the establishment of a joint undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system (SESAR), in European Council. ed. by E. Council (Belgium, Brussels, 2007), p. 18
24.
go back to reference E. Council, COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 1361/2008 of 16 December 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 219/2007 on the establishment of a joint undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system (SESAR), in European Council. ed. by E. Council (Belgium, Brussels, 2008), p. 6 E. Council, COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 1361/2008 of 16 December 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 219/2007 on the establishment of a joint undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system (SESAR), in European Council. ed. by E. Council (Belgium, Brussels, 2008), p. 6
25.
go back to reference EUROCONTROL, E-OCVM Version 3.0, in EUROCONTROL (Ed.) European Operational Concept Validation Methodology, (EUROCONTROL, Brussels, Belgium, 2010), p. 76. EUROCONTROL, E-OCVM Version 3.0, in EUROCONTROL (Ed.) European Operational Concept Validation Methodology, (EUROCONTROL, Brussels, Belgium, 2010), p. 76.
26.
go back to reference EUROCONTROL, E-OCVM Version 3.0 Annexes, in EUROCONTROL (Ed.) European Operational Concept Validation Methodology, (EUROCONTROL, Brussels, Belgium, 2010), p. 144. EUROCONTROL, E-OCVM Version 3.0 Annexes, in EUROCONTROL (Ed.) European Operational Concept Validation Methodology, (EUROCONTROL, Brussels, Belgium, 2010), p. 144.
27.
go back to reference F. Piekert, O. Delain, E. Martin Dominguez, A. Marsden, Europe’s next step in total airport management research, ATRS 2017 (ATRS, Antwerp, Belgium, 2017), p. 32 F. Piekert, O. Delain, E. Martin Dominguez, A. Marsden, Europe’s next step in total airport management research, ATRS 2017 (ATRS, Antwerp, Belgium, 2017), p. 32
28.
go back to reference C. Rahatoka, S. Busoni, B. Desart, R. Suikat, A. Marsden, D. Defourny, E. Miklos, P. Nechaj, F. Piekert, SESAR Solution PJ04-02: V2 Validation Plan (VALP)-Part I (Braunschweig, Germany, DLR, 2019), p. 178 C. Rahatoka, S. Busoni, B. Desart, R. Suikat, A. Marsden, D. Defourny, E. Miklos, P. Nechaj, F. Piekert, SESAR Solution PJ04-02: V2 Validation Plan (VALP)-Part I (Braunschweig, Germany, DLR, 2019), p. 178
29.
go back to reference R. Suikat, S. Kaltenhäuser, J. Hampe, F. Timmermann, B. Weber, ACCES-A gaming and simulation platform for advanced airport operations concepts. in AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 2010 R. Suikat, S. Kaltenhäuser, J. Hampe, F. Timmermann, B. Weber, ACCES-A gaming and simulation platform for advanced airport operations concepts. in AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 2010
30.
go back to reference F. Piekert, N. Carstengerdes, S. Schier, R. Suikat, A. Marsden, A high-fidelity artificial airport environment for sesar APOC validation experiments, in The 19th ATRS World Conference Singapore (2015), p. 16 F. Piekert, N. Carstengerdes, S. Schier, R. Suikat, A. Marsden, A high-fidelity artificial airport environment for sesar APOC validation experiments, in The 19th ATRS World Conference Singapore (2015), p. 16
31.
go back to reference S. Schier, Y. Günther, S. Lorenz, R. Suikat, F. Piekert, Ein Flug durch Raum und Zeit–Entwurf und Evaluation einer Simulationsdynamik für das Flughafenmanagement, Simulation technischer Systeme inklusive der Grundlagen und Methoden in Modellbildung und SimulationUlm, Germany, 2017, p. 6 S. Schier, Y. Günther, S. Lorenz, R. Suikat, F. Piekert, Ein Flug durch Raum und Zeit–Entwurf und Evaluation einer Simulationsdynamik für das Flughafenmanagement, Simulation technischer Systeme inklusive der Grundlagen und Methoden in Modellbildung und SimulationUlm, Germany, 2017, p. 6
32.
go back to reference F. Piekert, N. Carstengerdes, S. Schier, R. Suikat, A. Marsden, A high-fidelity artificial airport environment for sesar apoc validation experiments. J. Air Transp. Stud. 8, 20 (2017)CrossRef F. Piekert, N. Carstengerdes, S. Schier, R. Suikat, A. Marsden, A high-fidelity artificial airport environment for sesar apoc validation experiments. J. Air Transp. Stud. 8, 20 (2017)CrossRef
33.
go back to reference J. Busink, E. Derogee, B. Desart, A. Grimm, R. Grosmann, Y. Günther, F. Hølvold, A. Inard, L. Lapteva, I. Larsson, G. Marrazzo, A. Marsden, E. Miklos, P. Nechaj, T. Robinson, M. Sinen, D. Skoglund, T. Verhoogt, Sesar Solution PJ.04–02 SPR-INTEROP/OSED for V2-Part I, DLR, (Braunschweig, Germany, 2019), p. 353 J. Busink, E. Derogee, B. Desart, A. Grimm, R. Grosmann, Y. Günther, F. Hølvold, A. Inard, L. Lapteva, I. Larsson, G. Marrazzo, A. Marsden, E. Miklos, P. Nechaj, T. Robinson, M. Sinen, D. Skoglund, T. Verhoogt, Sesar Solution PJ.04–02 SPR-INTEROP/OSED for V2-Part I, DLR, (Braunschweig, Germany, 2019), p. 353
34.
go back to reference EUROCONTROL, Airport CDM Operational Concept Document, EUROCONTROL, (Brussels, Belgium, 2006), p. 54 EUROCONTROL, Airport CDM Operational Concept Document, EUROCONTROL, (Brussels, Belgium, 2006), p. 54
35.
go back to reference EUROCONTROL, Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM), EUROCONTROL, (Brussels, Belgium, 2015) EUROCONTROL, Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM), EUROCONTROL, (Brussels, Belgium, 2015)
36.
go back to reference M. Linde, A. Marsden, E. Goni Modrego, F. Vormer, O. Delain, E. Callejo Tamayo, J.L.M. Sánchez, T. Verhoogt, D02-AOP Update Concept Document, SESAR WP 6.5, (SJU SESAR Joint Undertaking, Brussels, Belgium, 2011), p. 37. M. Linde, A. Marsden, E. Goni Modrego, F. Vormer, O. Delain, E. Callejo Tamayo, J.L.M. Sánchez, T. Verhoogt, D02-AOP Update Concept Document, SESAR WP 6.5, (SJU SESAR Joint Undertaking, Brussels, Belgium, 2011), p. 37.
37.
go back to reference H. Bogers, M. Linde, J.R. Matas Sebatia, I. Álvarez Escotto, J.I. Martin Espinosa, B. Ciprián Tejero, C. Druce, A. Knight, A. Von Eckartsberg, D. Bourguignat, O. Delain, R. Ten Hove, R. Grosmann, R. Wyss, A. Marsden, A. Wennerberg, N. Halwachs, D. Fuchs, A. Arvidsson, R. Dekker, R. Breuer, S. Foetsch, E. Goni Modrego, J.A. Ubeda Torres, D16-OFA 05.01.01 Consolidated OSED, Part 1, SESAR Consortium, (Brussels, Belgium, 2015), p. 608 H. Bogers, M. Linde, J.R. Matas Sebatia, I. Álvarez Escotto, J.I. Martin Espinosa, B. Ciprián Tejero, C. Druce, A. Knight, A. Von Eckartsberg, D. Bourguignat, O. Delain, R. Ten Hove, R. Grosmann, R. Wyss, A. Marsden, A. Wennerberg, N. Halwachs, D. Fuchs, A. Arvidsson, R. Dekker, R. Breuer, S. Foetsch, E. Goni Modrego, J.A. Ubeda Torres, D16-OFA 05.01.01 Consolidated OSED, Part 1, SESAR Consortium, (Brussels, Belgium, 2015), p. 608
38.
go back to reference H. Bogers, M. Linde, J.R. Matas Sebatia, I. Álvarez Escotto, J.I. Martin Espinosa, B. Ciprián Tejero, C. Druce, A. Knight, A. Von Eckartsberg, D. Bourguignat, O. Delain, R. Ten Hove, R. Grosmann, R. Wyss, A. Marsden, A. Wennerberg, N. Halwachs, D. Fuchs, A. Arvidsson, R. Dekker, R. Breuer, S. Foetsch, E. Goni Modrego, J.A. Ubeda Torres, D16 - OFA 05.01.01 Consolidated OSED, Part 2, SESAR Consortium, (Brussels, Belgium, 2015), p. 244. H. Bogers, M. Linde, J.R. Matas Sebatia, I. Álvarez Escotto, J.I. Martin Espinosa, B. Ciprián Tejero, C. Druce, A. Knight, A. Von Eckartsberg, D. Bourguignat, O. Delain, R. Ten Hove, R. Grosmann, R. Wyss, A. Marsden, A. Wennerberg, N. Halwachs, D. Fuchs, A. Arvidsson, R. Dekker, R. Breuer, S. Foetsch, E. Goni Modrego, J.A. Ubeda Torres, D16 - OFA 05.01.01 Consolidated OSED, Part 2, SESAR Consortium, (Brussels, Belgium, 2015), p. 244.
39.
go back to reference D.M. Dehn, Assessing the impact of automation on the air traffic controller: the SHAPE questionnaires. Air Traffic Control Quarter 16, 127–146 (2008)CrossRef D.M. Dehn, Assessing the impact of automation on the air traffic controller: the SHAPE questionnaires. Air Traffic Control Quarter 16, 127–146 (2008)CrossRef
40.
go back to reference J. Brooke, SUS: a retrospective. J. Usabil. Stud. 8, 29–40 (2013) J. Brooke, SUS: a retrospective. J. Usabil. Stud. 8, 29–40 (2013)
41.
go back to reference F. Rousseau, B. Desart, A. Marsden, E. Miklos, C. Lopez, C. Rahatoka, R. Salomon, R. Suikat, SESAR Solution PJ04-02: Validation Report (VALR) (Braunschweig, Germany, DLR, 2019), p. 284 F. Rousseau, B. Desart, A. Marsden, E. Miklos, C. Lopez, C. Rahatoka, R. Salomon, R. Suikat, SESAR Solution PJ04-02: Validation Report (VALR) (Braunschweig, Germany, DLR, 2019), p. 284
42.
go back to reference SESAR Joint Undertaking, SESAR 2020 Membership Reflects Growing Europe-Wide Commitment to ATM Modernisation (SESAR Joint Undertaking, Brussels, Belgium, 2016). SESAR Joint Undertaking, SESAR 2020 Membership Reflects Growing Europe-Wide Commitment to ATM Modernisation (SESAR Joint Undertaking, Brussels, Belgium, 2016).
Metadata
Title
Dealing with Adverse Weather Conditions by Enhanced Collaborative Decision Making in a TAM APOC
Authors
F. Piekert
N. Carstengerdes
R. Suikat
S. Schier
Copyright Year
2021
Publisher
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4669-7_8