Skip to main content
Top

2013 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

7. Deliberation and Engagement

Author : Jeffrey Roy

Published in: From Machinery to Mobility

Publisher: Springer New York

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In parallel to more open and participative governance movements associated with mobility, there has been widening interest in linking the Internet with new forms of democracy. Underpinned by the wider canvas of the democratization of information across societies, proponents of reform and critics of the status quo have thus sought to foster an alternative paradigm less rooted in historical foundations and increments of change and more aligned with more virtual realities. Fueled by the widening capacities for spontaneous and grassroots mobilization, any such reform project nonetheless faces stiff head winds stemming from tensions between machinery and mobility. At the core of such tensions in terms of democratic processes is the challenge of deliberation.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Indeed, going forward in this book, we will not distinguish between engagement and empowerment, viewing the space in between these two levels as the essence of “participation and engagement” as discussed and titled in this chapter.
 
2
Such a definition is in keeping with and largely stems from the “spectrum of public participation” created by the International Association for Public Participation:
 
3
As discussed further below, such a basis for more direct and less partisan involvement already exists in many jurisdictions at the local level—where not coincidentally governments are leading in the embracement of digital experimentation aimed at wider and more direct and collaborative forms of citizen engagement with both appointed and elected officials. Although the local scene is far from a nirvana of democratic renewal, and while its structuring and conduct is shaped by national institutions and cultures, it nonetheless provides a more feasible laboratory and window upon current incremental changes that may yield more insight into prospects and conditions for more widespread change and reform as democracies and public administration adapts more fully to a still-nascent mobility era.
 
5
See, for example, the Toronto City Council Social Media Report Card as one compilation of such practices by elected officials: http://​campaignimpossib​le.​blogspot.​ca/​
 
6
Summarized from the following source, a research consultancy having gathered such policies and guidelines from numerous municipalities across the Province and elsewhere: http://​www.​redbrick.​ca/​assets/​file/​resource/​City-of-Guelph---Social-Media---Guiding-Principles-for-City-Spokespeople.​pdf
 
Literature
go back to reference Carr-West, J. (2009). From e-democracy to ‘here comes everybody’ a short history of government and the internet. In A. Sawford (Ed.), Local government 3.0: How councils can respond to the new web agenda (pp. 4–9). London: Local Government Information Unit. Carr-West, J. (2009). From e-democracy to ‘here comes everybody’ a short history of government and the internet. In A. Sawford (Ed.), Local government 3.0: How councils can respond to the new web agenda (pp. 4–9). London: Local Government Information Unit.
go back to reference Charalabidis, Y., Kleinfeld,, R., & Loukis, E. (2012). Towards a rationalisation of social media exploitation in government policy-making processes. European Journal of ePractice 16. Charalabidis, Y., Kleinfeld,, R., & Loukis, E. (2012). Towards a rationalisation of social media exploitation in government policy-making processes. European Journal of ePractice 16.
go back to reference Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22, 147–162.CrossRef Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22, 147–162.CrossRef
go back to reference Dutil, P., Howard, C., Langford, J., & Roy, J. (2010). The service state—Rhetoric, reality, and promise (Governance series). Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa Press. Dutil, P., Howard, C., Langford, J., & Roy, J. (2010). The service state—Rhetoric, reality, and promise (Governance series). Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa Press.
go back to reference Fatland, E. (2007). Democratic interfaces: Decision-making tools for online communities. MA thesis, Media Lab University of Arts and Design, Helsinki. Fatland, E. (2007). Democratic interfaces: Decision-making tools for online communities. MA thesis, Media Lab University of Arts and Design, Helsinki.
go back to reference Hull, R. T. (1979). The varieties of ethical theories. Buffalo, NY: Buffalo Psychiatric Centre. Hull, R. T. (1979). The varieties of ethical theories. Buffalo, NY: Buffalo Psychiatric Centre.
go back to reference Kernaghan, K., & Langford, J. (1990). The responsible public servant. Toronto, ON: Institute for Public Administration of Canada. Kernaghan, K., & Langford, J. (1990). The responsible public servant. Toronto, ON: Institute for Public Administration of Canada.
go back to reference Kettl, D. (2005). The next government of the United States: Challenges for performance in the 21st century. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government. Kettl, D. (2005). The next government of the United States: Challenges for performance in the 21st century. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
go back to reference Kingwell, M. (2010). The shout doctrine. Walrus magazine. Toronto, ON: Walrus Foundation. Kingwell, M. (2010). The shout doctrine. Walrus magazine. Toronto, ON: Walrus Foundation.
go back to reference Kostakis, V. (2011). The advent of open source democracy and wikipolitics: Challenges, threats and opportunities for democratic discourse. An Interdisciplinary Journal on Human in ICT Environment, 7(1), 9–29. Kostakis, V. (2011). The advent of open source democracy and wikipolitics: Challenges, threats and opportunities for democratic discourse. An Interdisciplinary Journal on Human in ICT Environment, 7(1), 9–29.
go back to reference Kotsiopoulos, I. (2009). Bringing together and accelerating eGovernment research in the EU: eDemocracy report. ICT for Government and Public Services Unit, European Commission. Kotsiopoulos, I. (2009). Bringing together and accelerating eGovernment research in the EU: eDemocracy report. ICT for Government and Public Services Unit, European Commission.
go back to reference Lacigova, O., Maizite, A., & Cave, B. (2012). eParticipation and social media: A symbiotic relationship? European Journal of ePractice, 16 Lacigova, O., Maizite, A., & Cave, B. (2012). eParticipation and social media: A symbiotic relationship? European Journal of ePractice, 16
go back to reference Lips, M. (2012). E-government is dead: Long live public adminstration 2.0. Information Polity, 17(2012), 239–250. Lips, M. (2012). E-government is dead: Long live public adminstration 2.0. Information Polity, 17(2012), 239–250.
go back to reference Macintosh, A. (2003). Using Information and Communications Technologies to Enhance Citizen Engagement in the Policy Process. Promise and Problems of E-Democracy: Challenges of Online Engagement. Paris: OECD. Macintosh, A. (2003). Using Information and Communications Technologies to Enhance Citizen Engagement in the Policy Process. Promise and Problems of E-Democracy: Challenges of Online Engagement. Paris: OECD.
go back to reference McNutt, K. (2009). Citizen engagement through online consultation a comment on public involvement and e-consultation: A new era of democratic governance in Canada. Montreal, QC: IRPP. McNutt, K. (2009). Citizen engagement through online consultation a comment on public involvement and e-consultation: A new era of democratic governance in Canada. Montreal, QC: IRPP.
go back to reference Mergel, I. (2012a). Working the network: A manager’s guide for using twitter in government. Washington, DC: IBM Center for The Business of Government. Mergel, I. (2012a). Working the network: A manager’s guide for using twitter in government. Washington, DC: IBM Center for The Business of Government.
go back to reference Mergel, I. (2012b). A manager’s guide to designing a social media strategy. Washington, DC: IBM Center for The Business of Government. Mergel, I. (2012b). A manager’s guide to designing a social media strategy. Washington, DC: IBM Center for The Business of Government.
go back to reference Mindus, P., Greppi, A., & Cuono, M. (2011). Legitimacy 2.0—E-democracy and public opinion in the digital age (p. 182). Frankfurt am Main: Goethe University Press. Mindus, P., Greppi, A., & Cuono, M. (2011). Legitimacy 2.0—E-democracy and public opinion in the digital age (p. 182). Frankfurt am Main: Goethe University Press.
go back to reference Mossberger, K., & Wu, Y. (2012). Civic engagement and local e-government: Social networking comes of age. Chicago, IL: UIC Institute for Policy and Civic Engagement. Mossberger, K., & Wu, Y. (2012). Civic engagement and local e-government: Social networking comes of age. Chicago, IL: UIC Institute for Policy and Civic Engagement.
go back to reference Mota, J. C., & Santinha, G. (2012). Social media and civic engagement: Discussing the case of Aveiro Portugal. European Journal of ePractice, 16. Mota, J. C., & Santinha, G. (2012). Social media and civic engagement: Discussing the case of Aveiro Portugal. European Journal of ePractice, 16.
go back to reference Nabatchi, T. (2010). Addressing the citizenship and democratic deficits: The potential of deliberative democracy for public administration. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(4), 376–399.CrossRef Nabatchi, T. (2010). Addressing the citizenship and democratic deficits: The potential of deliberative democracy for public administration. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(4), 376–399.CrossRef
go back to reference Orr, A. (2010). Blogging, deliberation and the public sphere. University of New South Wales, School of Social Science and International Studies. Orr, A. (2010). Blogging, deliberation and the public sphere. University of New South Wales, School of Social Science and International Studies.
go back to reference Pole, A. (2011). Blogging the political: Politics and participation in a networked. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 290–293. Pole, A. (2011). Blogging the political: Politics and participation in a networked. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 290–293.
go back to reference Public Policy Forum. (2012). Building youth engagement through civic collaboration. Ottawa, ON: Public Policy Forum. Public Policy Forum. (2012). Building youth engagement through civic collaboration. Ottawa, ON: Public Policy Forum.
go back to reference Reddick, C. G., & Aikins, S. K. (Eds.). (2012). 2.0 technologies and democratic governance: Political, policy and management implications. New York: Springer. Reddick, C. G., & Aikins, S. K. (Eds.). (2012). 2.0 technologies and democratic governance: Political, policy and management implications. New York: Springer.
go back to reference Rogers, B. (2005). From membership to management? The future of political parties as democratic organizations. Parliamentary Affairs, 58(3), 600–610.CrossRef Rogers, B. (2005). From membership to management? The future of political parties as democratic organizations. Parliamentary Affairs, 58(3), 600–610.CrossRef
go back to reference Roy, J. (2006). E-government in Canada: Transformation for the digital age (Governance Series). Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa Press. Roy, J. (2006). E-government in Canada: Transformation for the digital age (Governance Series). Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa Press.
go back to reference Roy, J. (2008). Beyond Westminster governance: Bringing politics and public service into the network era. Canadian Public Administration, 5(4), 541–568.CrossRef Roy, J. (2008). Beyond Westminster governance: Bringing politics and public service into the network era. Canadian Public Administration, 5(4), 541–568.CrossRef
go back to reference Roy, J. (2011). Bridging the great divide: Piliticians and the public. Montreal, QC: IRPP. Roy, J. (2011). Bridging the great divide: Piliticians and the public. Montreal, QC: IRPP.
go back to reference Roy, J. (2012c). Secrecy versus openness: Democratic adaptation in a Web 2.0 era. In C. G. Reddick & S. K. Aikins (Eds.), Web 2.0 technologies and democratic governance: Political, policy and management implications. New York: Springer. Roy, J. (2012c). Secrecy versus openness: Democratic adaptation in a Web 2.0 era. In C. G. Reddick & S. K. Aikins (Eds.), Web 2.0 technologies and democratic governance: Political, policy and management implications. New York: Springer.
go back to reference Samara. (2010). It’s my party: Parliamentary dysfunction reconsidered. The third in a series of reports exploring political leadership in Canada. Toronto, ON: Samara Research Institute. Samara. (2010). It’s my party: Parliamentary dysfunction reconsidered. The third in a series of reports exploring political leadership in Canada. Toronto, ON: Samara Research Institute.
go back to reference Shane, P. M. (Ed.). (2004). Democracy online: The prospects for political renewal through the internet. London: Routledge. Shane, P. M. (Ed.). (2004). Democracy online: The prospects for political renewal through the internet. London: Routledge.
go back to reference Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin Group. Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin Group.
go back to reference Sloam, J. (2007). Rebooting democracy: Youth participation in politics in the UK. Parliamentary Affairs, 60, 548–567.CrossRef Sloam, J. (2007). Rebooting democracy: Youth participation in politics in the UK. Parliamentary Affairs, 60, 548–567.CrossRef
go back to reference Sommer, L., & Cullen, R. (2009). Participation 2.0: A case study of e-participation within the New Zealand Government. 42nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Hawaii: Systems Sciences 2009, pp. 1–10. Sommer, L., & Cullen, R. (2009). Participation 2.0: A case study of e-participation within the New Zealand Government. 42nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Hawaii: Systems Sciences 2009, pp. 1–10.
go back to reference Stoker, G. (2005). Public value management—A new narrative for networked governance? American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41–57. Stoker, G. (2005). Public value management—A new narrative for networked governance? American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41–57.
go back to reference Viitanen, J. (2010). Does transparency erode trust? The Guardian. Viitanen, J. (2010). Does transparency erode trust? The Guardian.
go back to reference Williamson, A. (2011). Disruption and empowerment. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 3(1), 22–32. Williamson, A. (2011). Disruption and empowerment. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 3(1), 22–32.
go back to reference World Economic Forum. (2011). The future of government: Lessons learned from around the World. World Economic Forum: Global Agenda Council on the Future of Government. World Economic Forum. (2011). The future of government: Lessons learned from around the World. World Economic Forum: Global Agenda Council on the Future of Government.
go back to reference Wyld, D. (2007). The blogging revolution: Government in the age of Web 2.0. Washington, DC: IBM Endowment for The Business of Government. Wyld, D. (2007). The blogging revolution: Government in the age of Web 2.0. Washington, DC: IBM Endowment for The Business of Government.
Metadata
Title
Deliberation and Engagement
Author
Jeffrey Roy
Copyright Year
2013
Publisher
Springer New York
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7221-6_7

Premium Partner