Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 11/2017

25-03-2017 | Original Article

Design and test of a Microsoft Kinect-based system for delivering adaptive visual feedback to stroke patients during training of upper limb movement

Authors: Daniel Simonsen, Mirjana B. Popovic, Erika G. Spaich, Ole Kæseler Andersen

Published in: Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing | Issue 11/2017

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The present paper describes the design and test of a low-cost Microsoft Kinect-based system for delivering adaptive visual feedback to stroke patients during the execution of an upper limb exercise. Eleven sub-acute stroke patients with varying degrees of upper limb function were recruited. Each subject participated in a control session (repeated twice) and a feedback session (repeated twice). In each session, the subjects were presented with a rectangular pattern displayed on a vertical mounted monitor embedded in the table in front of the patient. The subjects were asked to move a marker inside the rectangular pattern by using their most affected hand. During the feedback session, the thickness of the rectangular pattern was changed according to the performance of the subject, and the color of the marker changed according to its position, thereby guiding the subject’s movements. In the control session, the thickness of the rectangular pattern and the color of the marker did not change. The results showed that the movement similarity and smoothness was higher in the feedback session than in the control session while the duration of the movement was longer. The present study showed that adaptive visual feedback delivered by use of the Kinect sensor can increase the similarity and smoothness of upper limb movement in stroke patients.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
2.
go back to reference Cirstea CM, Ptito A, Levin MF (2006) Feedback and cognition in arm motor skill reacquisition after stroke. Stroke 37:1237–1242CrossRefPubMed Cirstea CM, Ptito A, Levin MF (2006) Feedback and cognition in arm motor skill reacquisition after stroke. Stroke 37:1237–1242CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Dancause N, Ptito A, Levin MF (2002) Error correction strategies for motor behavior after unilateral brain damage: short-term motor learning processes. Neuropsychologia 40:1313–1323CrossRefPubMed Dancause N, Ptito A, Levin MF (2002) Error correction strategies for motor behavior after unilateral brain damage: short-term motor learning processes. Neuropsychologia 40:1313–1323CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference DeJong SL, Schaefer SY, Lang CE (2012) The need for speed: better movement quality during faster task performance after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 26(362):373. doi:10.1177/1545968311425926 DeJong SL, Schaefer SY, Lang CE (2012) The need for speed: better movement quality during faster task performance after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 26(362):373. doi:10.​1177/​1545968311425926​
7.
go back to reference Heller A, Wade DT, Wood VA, Sunderland A, Hewer R, Ward E (1987) Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 50:714–719CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Heller A, Wade DT, Wood VA, Sunderland A, Hewer R, Ward E (1987) Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 50:714–719CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Jang SH, You SH, Hallett M, Cho YW, Park CM, Cho SH, Lee HY, Kim TH (2005) Cortical reorganization and associated functional motor recovery after virtual reality in patients with chronic stroke: an experimenter-blind preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:2218–2223CrossRefPubMed Jang SH, You SH, Hallett M, Cho YW, Park CM, Cho SH, Lee HY, Kim TH (2005) Cortical reorganization and associated functional motor recovery after virtual reality in patients with chronic stroke: an experimenter-blind preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:2218–2223CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kleim JA, Jones TA (2008) Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res 51:225–239CrossRef Kleim JA, Jones TA (2008) Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res 51:225–239CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL (2009) What do motor ‘recovery’ and ‘compensation’ mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 23:313–319CrossRefPubMed Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL (2009) What do motor ‘recovery’ and ‘compensation’ mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 23:313–319CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lyle RC (1981) A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res 4:483–492CrossRefPubMed Lyle RC (1981) A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res 4:483–492CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Kashman N, Volland G (1985) Adult norms for the nine hole peg test of finger dexterity. Occup Ther J Res 5:24–38CrossRef Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Kashman N, Volland G (1985) Adult norms for the nine hole peg test of finger dexterity. Occup Ther J Res 5:24–38CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Maulucci RA, Eckhouse RH (2001) Retraining reaching in chronic stroke with real-time auditory feedback. NeuroRehabilitation 16:171–182PubMed Maulucci RA, Eckhouse RH (2001) Retraining reaching in chronic stroke with real-time auditory feedback. NeuroRehabilitation 16:171–182PubMed
16.
go back to reference Müller M (2007) Dynamic time warping. In: Information retrieval for music and motion, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 69–84 Müller M (2007) Dynamic time warping. In: Information retrieval for music and motion, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 69–84
17.
go back to reference Nakayama H, Jørgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS (1994) Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75:394–398CrossRefPubMed Nakayama H, Jørgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS (1994) Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75:394–398CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Piron L, Tonin P, Piccione F, Iaia V, Trivello E, Dam M (2005) Virtual environment training therapy for arm motor rehabilitation. Presence 14:732–740CrossRef Piron L, Tonin P, Piccione F, Iaia V, Trivello E, Dam M (2005) Virtual environment training therapy for arm motor rehabilitation. Presence 14:732–740CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rohrer B, Fasoli S, Krebs HI, Hughes R, Volpe B, Frontera WR, Stein J, Hogan N (2002) Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery. J Neurosci 22:8297–8304PubMed Rohrer B, Fasoli S, Krebs HI, Hughes R, Volpe B, Frontera WR, Stein J, Hogan N (2002) Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery. J Neurosci 22:8297–8304PubMed
20.
go back to reference Subramanian SK, Massie CL, Malcolm MP, Levin MF (2010) Does provision of extrinsic feedback result in improved motor learning in the upper limb poststroke? A systematic review of the evidence. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24:113–124. doi:10.1177/1545968309349941 CrossRefPubMed Subramanian SK, Massie CL, Malcolm MP, Levin MF (2010) Does provision of extrinsic feedback result in improved motor learning in the upper limb poststroke? A systematic review of the evidence. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24:113–124. doi:10.​1177/​1545968309349941​ CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Sunderland A, Tinson D, Bradley L, Hewer R (1989) Arm function after stroke. An evaluation of grip strength as a measure of recovery and a prognostic indicator. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 52:1267–1272CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sunderland A, Tinson D, Bradley L, Hewer R (1989) Arm function after stroke. An evaluation of grip strength as a measure of recovery and a prognostic indicator. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 52:1267–1272CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Takeuchi N, Izumi SI (2012) Maladaptive plasticity for motor recovery after stroke: mechanisms and approaches. Neural Plast 2012:1–9. doi:10.1155/2012/359728 Takeuchi N, Izumi SI (2012) Maladaptive plasticity for motor recovery after stroke: mechanisms and approaches. Neural Plast 2012:1–9. doi:10.​1155/​2012/​359728
25.
go back to reference Winstein CJ (1991) Knowledge of results and motor learning- implications for physical therapy. Phys Ther 71:140–149CrossRefPubMed Winstein CJ (1991) Knowledge of results and motor learning- implications for physical therapy. Phys Ther 71:140–149CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Wulf G, Höß M, Prinz W (1998) Instructions for motor learning: differential effects of internal versus external focus of attention. J Mot Behav 30:169–179CrossRefPubMed Wulf G, Höß M, Prinz W (1998) Instructions for motor learning: differential effects of internal versus external focus of attention. J Mot Behav 30:169–179CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Design and test of a Microsoft Kinect-based system for delivering adaptive visual feedback to stroke patients during training of upper limb movement
Authors
Daniel Simonsen
Mirjana B. Popovic
Erika G. Spaich
Ole Kæseler Andersen
Publication date
25-03-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing / Issue 11/2017
Print ISSN: 0140-0118
Electronic ISSN: 1741-0444
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-017-1640-z

Other articles of this Issue 11/2017

Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 11/2017 Go to the issue

Premium Partner