Skip to main content
Top

2024 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

11. Diffraction and Reciprocal Space

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter introduces the concept of diffraction as a way of linking measurable macroscopic phenomena to microscopic ones.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Fraunhofer diffraction is the type of diffraction that occurs when the Fresnel number, F = a2/Lλ << 1. Under this condition, the diffraction pattern is independent of the distance to the screen and depends only on the angles (θ) to the screen from the aperture (i.e., only its apparent magnification can be altered by adjusting L).
 
2
Recall that \( \left(\frac{\sin \left(2\upbeta \right)}{2\ \sin \left(\upbeta \right)}\right)=\cos \left(\upbeta \right) \).
 
3
Recall that the lattice points (and therefore atoms) in successive lattice planes need not align on top of each other.
 
4
Bragg made the connection between diffraction and reflection by observing the elliptical shape of diffraction spots, which he noticed was also characteristic of the reflections of beams of light from a mirror.
 
5
It often seems that this convention is “more honor’d in the breach than the observance.” Indeed, it is astonishing how many publishing scientists are not aware of the difference between Miller indices and Laue indices, and even most diffraction texts seem to completely side-step the issue. One particularly venerated text only adds to the confusion by using (hkl) in the text body but hkl in the figures!
 
6
Curiously, Thomson studiously avoided the word “electron,” which had been coined by G.J. Stoney in 1891 (more on that in Chap. 13).
 
7
Of course, they were both right!
 
8
Recall that eix = cos x + i sin x
 
9
Note that ∣F∣ is the modulus of the complex F, that is, its magnitude on the Argand diagram. If F = A + iB, then ∣F∣ = A2 + B2 = (A + iB)(AiB).
 
10
The possibility of double diffraction is dependent upon the curvature of the Ewald sphere, which is λ; therefore, the curvature for 200 kV electrons (λ = 0.025 Å) is ~62 times larger than that for CuKα1 x-rays λ = 1.540562 Å)!
 
11
In this context, “formal” means that this notation has the form of a determinant, but does not strictly adhere to the definition. It is merely a convenient way to express the expansion of the cross product.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference W. F. a. P. K. Max von Laue, “Eine quantitative Prüfung der Theorie für die Interferenz-Erscheinungen bei Röntgenstrahlen,” Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, pp. 363–373, 1912. W. F. a. P. K. Max von Laue, “Eine quantitative Prüfung der Theorie für die Interferenz-Erscheinungen bei Röntgenstrahlen,” Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, pp. 363–373, 1912.
2.
go back to reference W. K. a. G. Möllenstedt, “Elektroneninterferenzen im konvergenten Bündel,” Annalen der Physik, vol. 428, no. 2, pp. 113–140, 1939.CrossRef W. K. a. G. Möllenstedt, “Elektroneninterferenzen im konvergenten Bündel,” Annalen der Physik, vol. 428, no. 2, pp. 113–140, 1939.CrossRef
3.
4.
go back to reference H. E. Armstrong, “Hydrolysis, Hydrolation and Hydronation as Determinants of the Properties of Aqueous Solutions,” Proceedings of the Royal Society, vol. A81, pp. 80–95, 1908. H. E. Armstrong, “Hydrolysis, Hydrolation and Hydronation as Determinants of the Properties of Aqueous Solutions,” Proceedings of the Royal Society, vol. A81, pp. 80–95, 1908.
Metadata
Title
Diffraction and Reciprocal Space
Author
Rick Ubic
Copyright Year
2024
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49752-0_11

Premium Partners