Skip to main content
Top

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

11. Disposal of Water for Hydraulic Fracturing: Case Study on the U.S.

Authors : Romany Webb, Katherine R. Zodrow

Published in: Regulating Water Security in Unconventional Oil and Gas

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In 2012, the U.S. oil and gas industry produced approximately 3.4 × 109 cubic meters (m3) of water, equivalent to 9.1 × 106 m3 per day and greater than six times the amount of water treated by the City of Houston, Texas. This “produced water” consists of drilling or completion fluids that exit a well shortly after it is brought into production, along with water occurring naturally in the rock formation that exits with the oil and/or gas. Produced water can be contaminated by hydrocarbons, metals, radioactive material, and salts, which can make recycling and disposal difficult. In this chapter, we will discuss two aspects of produced water handling—regulation and technology—specifically focusing on five U.S. regions—the Permian, Eagle Ford, Bakken, Marcellus, and Niobrara. We will explore various disposal practices used in each region and consider how the regulatory framework influences those practices. The focus will be on regulations in six states – Texas, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Colorado, and Wyoming – with jurisdiction over the above regions. Just as the regions have remarkably different geology, and therefore different quality of produced water, these six states also have different regulatory frameworks. To illustrate these differences, we undertake a detailed exploration of the regulations in Texas and Pennsylvania and compare other states’ regulations where appropriate. The analysis highlights the complexity of produced water regulation, treatment, and disposal within the United States.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
A water’s pH is an indicator of its acidity. Water with a lower pH value is acidic, while water with a higher pH value is basic. Neutral pH is 7.0. For reference, lemon juice has a pH of about 2, while an ammonia solution has a pH of about 11.
 
2
TSS can be expressed using the unit “mg/L” referring to milligrams per liter. Therefore, there may be as much as 1000 mg or 1 g of suspended solid particles in 1 liter of produced water.
 
3
Section 2(27) of the RCRA (42 U.S.C. § 6903(27)) defines “solid waste” to mean any “discarded material, including solid, liquid, semisolid, or contained gaseous material resulting from industrial, commercial, mining, and agricultural operations, and from community activities.”
 
4
The term “other wastes” encompasses waste material intrinsically derived from primary field operations associated with oil and gas exploration, development, or production, such as materials produced from a well in conjunction with oil or gas (EPA 2002).
 
5
The Director may issue a permit on an area basis, rather than for each well individually, in certain circumstances (40 C.F.R. § 144.33).
 
6
Uncontaminated storm water discharges associated with oil and gas construction and field operation activities are exempt from the permitting requirements in the Clean Water Act (Kundis Craig 2013).
 
7
Permits issued under the NPDES Program include limits on the maximum concentration of pollutants in the discharge, which are set based on the available treatment technologies, as well as the desired quality of the receiving water. Procedures for establishing those limits are set out in regulations adopted under the Clean Water Act (40 C.F.R. Pt. 131).
 
8
The 98th meridian runs through North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas.
 
9
“Onshore facilities” are those located landward of the inner boundary of the territorial sea (40 C.F.R. § 435.30).
 
10
Clean Water Act regulations define “pass-through” as occurring where a pollutant is not removed through treatment at the POTW (40 C.F.R. § 403.3(p)).
 
11
Clean Water Act regulations define “interference” as occurring where a pollutant inhibits or disrupts the POTW, its treatment processes or operations, or its sludge processes, use, or disposal, resulting in a violation of the POTW’s NPDES permit, or certain statutory provisions (40 C.F.R. § 403.3(k)).
 
12
VOCs include benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene.
 
13
The density of a material is its mass divided by its volume. For example, water has a density of approximately 1 g/cm3.
 
14
The specific gravity of a material is its density divided by the density of a reference material. The reference material often used for solids and liquids is water.
 
15
The PDEP is authorized to issue general permits under 25 Pa. Code § 287.612.
 
16
Oil and gas liquid waste is defined to include “liquid wastes from the drilling, development and operation of oil and gas wells and transmission facilities” (PDEP 2012, p. 2).
 
Literature
go back to reference American Petroleum Institute (API) (1988) Production waste survey. American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, DC American Petroleum Institute (API) (1988) Production waste survey. American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, DC
go back to reference Ashaghi SK, Ebrahimi M, Czermak P (2007) Ceramic ultra- and nanofiltration membranes for oilfield produced water treatment: a mini review. Open Environ Sci 1:1–8CrossRef Ashaghi SK, Ebrahimi M, Czermak P (2007) Ceramic ultra- and nanofiltration membranes for oilfield produced water treatment: a mini review. Open Environ Sci 1:1–8CrossRef
go back to reference Clark CE, Veil JA (2009) Produced water volumes and management practices in the United States (No. ANL/EVS/R-09-1). Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Washington, DCCrossRef Clark CE, Veil JA (2009) Produced water volumes and management practices in the United States (No. ANL/EVS/R-09-1). Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Washington, DCCrossRef
go back to reference Coday BD, Xu P, Beaudry EG, Herron J, Lampi K, Hancock NT, Cath TY (2014) The sweet spot of forward osmosis: treatment of produced water, drilling wastewater, and other complex and difficult liquid streams. Desalination 333(1):23–35CrossRef Coday BD, Xu P, Beaudry EG, Herron J, Lampi K, Hancock NT, Cath TY (2014) The sweet spot of forward osmosis: treatment of produced water, drilling wastewater, and other complex and difficult liquid streams. Desalination 333(1):23–35CrossRef
go back to reference Cook M, Huber K, Webber M (2015) Who regulates it? Water policy and hydraulic fracturing in Texas. Texas Water J 6(1):45–63 Cook M, Huber K, Webber M (2015) Who regulates it? Water policy and hydraulic fracturing in Texas. Texas Water J 6(1):45–63
go back to reference Duong HC, Chivas AR, Nelemans B, Duke M, Gray S, Cath TY, Nghiem LD (2015) Treatment of RO brine from CSG produced water by spiral-wound air gap membrane distillation—a pilot study. Desalination 366:121–129CrossRef Duong HC, Chivas AR, Nelemans B, Duke M, Gray S, Cath TY, Nghiem LD (2015) Treatment of RO brine from CSG produced water by spiral-wound air gap membrane distillation—a pilot study. Desalination 366:121–129CrossRef
go back to reference Fakhru’l-Razi A, Pendashteh A, Abdullah LC, Biak DR, Madaeni SS, Abidin ZZ (2009) Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment. J Hazard Mater 170(2–3):530–551 Fakhru’l-Razi A, Pendashteh A, Abdullah LC, Biak DR, Madaeni SS, Abidin ZZ (2009) Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment. J Hazard Mater 170(2–3):530–551
go back to reference Federal Water Pollution Control Act; 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq Federal Water Pollution Control Act; 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq
go back to reference Hayes T, Arthur D (2004) Overview of emerging produced water treatment technologies. In: The 11th annual international petroleum environmental conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA Hayes T, Arthur D (2004) Overview of emerging produced water treatment technologies. In: The 11th annual international petroleum environmental conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
go back to reference Igunno ET, Chen GZ (2014) Produced water treatment technologies. Int J Low Carbon Technol Adv Access 9:157–177 Igunno ET, Chen GZ (2014) Produced water treatment technologies. Int J Low Carbon Technol Adv Access 9:157–177
go back to reference Kundis Craig R (2013) Hydraulic fracturing (fracking), federalism, and the water-energy Nexus. Idaho Law Review 49:241–264 Kundis Craig R (2013) Hydraulic fracturing (fracking), federalism, and the water-energy Nexus. Idaho Law Review 49:241–264
go back to reference Nicot J (2013) Hydraulic fracturing and water resources: a Texas study. Gulf Coast Assoc Geol Soc Trans 63:359–368 Nicot J (2013) Hydraulic fracturing and water resources: a Texas study. Gulf Coast Assoc Geol Soc Trans 63:359–368
go back to reference Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; 42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; 42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq
go back to reference Safe Drinking Water Act; 42 U.S.C. § 399f et seq Safe Drinking Water Act; 42 U.S.C. § 399f et seq
go back to reference Shaffer DL, Arias Chavez LH, Ben-Sasson M, Romero-Vargas Castrillón S, Yip NY, Elimelech M (2013) Desalination and reuse of high-salinity shale gas produced water: drivers, technologies, and future directions. Environ Sci Technol 47(17):9569–9583CrossRef Shaffer DL, Arias Chavez LH, Ben-Sasson M, Romero-Vargas Castrillón S, Yip NY, Elimelech M (2013) Desalination and reuse of high-salinity shale gas produced water: drivers, technologies, and future directions. Environ Sci Technol 47(17):9569–9583CrossRef
go back to reference Stewart M, Arnold K (2011) Produced water treatment field manual. Gulf Professional Publishing, Waltham Stewart M, Arnold K (2011) Produced water treatment field manual. Gulf Professional Publishing, Waltham
go back to reference Veil J (2015) US produced water volumes and management practices in 2012. Report prepared for the Ground Water Protection Council Veil J (2015) US produced water volumes and management practices in 2012. Report prepared for the Ground Water Protection Council
Metadata
Title
Disposal of Water for Hydraulic Fracturing: Case Study on the U.S.
Authors
Romany Webb
Katherine R. Zodrow
Copyright Year
2020
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18342-4_11