Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Economic Change and Restructuring 2/2024

01-04-2024

Does energy technology R&D save energy in OECD countries?

Authors: Masako Ikegami, Zijian Wang

Published in: Economic Change and Restructuring | Issue 2/2024

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The relationship between energy technology R&D and energy consumption has remained an unsettled empirical issue. This study investigates whether accumulative energy technology R&D investments have contributed to decreases in final energy and fossil fuel consumption in 19 OECD countries over the period 1975–2020. We ask whether an increase in energy technology R&D stocks has contributed to decreases in final energy and fossil fuel consumption and hence may effect energy savings. Methodologically, we treat the accumulation and depreciation of energy technology R&D investments as R&D stocks, and we use state-of-the-art estimation methods for dealing with cross-sectional dependence, nonstationarity, heterogeneity and time-varying coefficients that often plague panel-time-series models. Across our heterogeneous dynamic models, we find those estimators that properly account for cross-sectional dependence yield negative and significant coefficients on energy technology R&D stocks. Our time-varying estimates on energy technology R&D stocks confirm the above findings and feature two turning points—i.e., the 1979 oil shock, the Fukushima accident—in effecting energy savings. These two turning points provide strong evidence that the sample countries are subject to common shocks. The evidence we present supports the environmental sustainability orientated view that energy technology R&D is playing a prominent role in making energy savings.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK, and the USA.
 
2
The Kuznets curve specification is not appropriate for panel-time-series models, because powers of integrated processes are themselves not integrated processes (Wagner 2015). If variable time series are integrated (nonstationary), then the panel implementations of nonlinearity in the Kuznets curve (squared GDP per capita terms) are invalid, because the transformed variable is not defined in the (co-)integration framework.
 
3
The IEA data report expenditures on demonstration activities in a very vague and sparse manner. It is almost impossible to sort out those expenditures from the rest in the annual energy technology R&D budgets.
 
4
In this study, we assume that the annual energy technology R&D stock depreciation rate is 10%. We estimated the same models using R&D stocks based on different depreciation rates (i.e., 5% and 15%). The results (unreported) remained qualitatively the same.
 
5
Unreported CIPS tests with the first differences of the panel variables indicate that the null hypothesis is strongly rejected. The results are available on request.
 
6
The findings of Eberhardt et al. (2013) are comparable—the estimate for the R&D capital stock drops substantially in magnitude and is no longer statistically significant when spillovers in the form of cross-sectional dependence are accounted for in their dynamic models.
 
7
We would also like to consider using the time-varying interactive fixed-effects estimation (Casas et al. 2021)—a semiparametric extension of Pesaran (2006)—if that procedure did not break down following the removal of the problematic R-package phtt (Panel data analysis with heterogeneous time trends) from the CRAN repository.
 
8
Table 3 column (1) of that article reported near-zero, insignificant estimates for the lagged dependent variable and insignificant estimates for the current and once-lagged levels of R&D spending, yet the long-run coefficient on R&D spending was significant at the 10% level.
 
9
See Figs. 1 and 2 of that article.
 
10
See Table 3 column (1) of that article.
 
11
See Footnote 9. Gao et al. (2021) utilized the same energy price index.
 
Literature
go back to reference Anadon LD, Baker E, Bosetti V, Reis LA (2016) Expert views–and disagreements–about the potential of energy technology R&D. Clim Chg 136(3–4):677–691CrossRef Anadon LD, Baker E, Bosetti V, Reis LA (2016) Expert views–and disagreements–about the potential of energy technology R&D. Clim Chg 136(3–4):677–691CrossRef
go back to reference Bailey N, Kapetanios G, Pesaran MH (2016) Exponent of cross-sectional dependence: estimation and inference. J Appl Econ 31(6):929–960CrossRef Bailey N, Kapetanios G, Pesaran MH (2016) Exponent of cross-sectional dependence: estimation and inference. J Appl Econ 31(6):929–960CrossRef
go back to reference Bersvendsen T, Ditzen J (2021) Testing for slope heterogeneity in Stata. Stata J 210(1):51–80CrossRef Bersvendsen T, Ditzen J (2021) Testing for slope heterogeneity in Stata. Stata J 210(1):51–80CrossRef
go back to reference Blomquist J, Westerlund J (2013) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels with serial correlation. Econ Lett 121(3):374–378CrossRef Blomquist J, Westerlund J (2013) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels with serial correlation. Econ Lett 121(3):374–378CrossRef
go back to reference Bointner R (2014) Innovation in the energy sector: lessons learnt from R&D expenditures and patents in selected IEA countries. Energy Pol 73(C):733–747CrossRef Bointner R (2014) Innovation in the energy sector: lessons learnt from R&D expenditures and patents in selected IEA countries. Energy Pol 73(C):733–747CrossRef
go back to reference Bointner R, Pezzutto S, Sparber W (2016) Scenarios of public energy research and development expenditures: financing energy innovation in Europe. WIREs Energy Environ 5(4):470–488CrossRef Bointner R, Pezzutto S, Sparber W (2016) Scenarios of public energy research and development expenditures: financing energy innovation in Europe. WIREs Energy Environ 5(4):470–488CrossRef
go back to reference Casas I, Gao J, Peng B, Xie S (2021) Time-varying income elasticities of healthcare expenditure for the OECD and Eurozone. J Appl Econ 36(3):328–345CrossRef Casas I, Gao J, Peng B, Xie S (2021) Time-varying income elasticities of healthcare expenditure for the OECD and Eurozone. J Appl Econ 36(3):328–345CrossRef
go back to reference Chudik A, Pesaran MH (2015) Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressions. J Econ 188(2):393–420CrossRef Chudik A, Pesaran MH (2015) Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressions. J Econ 188(2):393–420CrossRef
go back to reference Chudik A, Mohaddes K, Pesaran MH, Raissi M (2016) Long-run effects in large heterogeneous panel data models with cross-sectionally correlated errors. In: Hill CR, González-Rivera G, Lee TH (eds) Essays in honor of Aman Ullah (Advances in econometrics 36). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, Bingley, pp 85–135 Chudik A, Mohaddes K, Pesaran MH, Raissi M (2016) Long-run effects in large heterogeneous panel data models with cross-sectionally correlated errors. In: Hill CR, González-Rivera G, Lee TH (eds) Essays in honor of Aman Ullah (Advances in econometrics 36). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, Bingley, pp 85–135
go back to reference Churchill SA, Inekwe J, Ivanovski K (2021) R&D expenditure and energy consumption in OECD nations. Energy Econ 100(C):105376CrossRef Churchill SA, Inekwe J, Ivanovski K (2021) R&D expenditure and energy consumption in OECD nations. Energy Econ 100(C):105376CrossRef
go back to reference Cuddington J, Dagher L (2015) Estimating short and long-run demand elasticities: a primer with energy-sector applications. Energy J 36(1):185–209CrossRef Cuddington J, Dagher L (2015) Estimating short and long-run demand elasticities: a primer with energy-sector applications. Energy J 36(1):185–209CrossRef
go back to reference Eberhardt M, Helmers C, Strauss H (2013) Do spillovers matter when estimating private returns to R&D? Rev Econ Stat 95(2):436–448CrossRef Eberhardt M, Helmers C, Strauss H (2013) Do spillovers matter when estimating private returns to R&D? Rev Econ Stat 95(2):436–448CrossRef
go back to reference Fan J, Liao Y, Yao J (2015) Power enhancement in high-dimensional cross-section tests. Econometrica 83(4):1497–1541CrossRef Fan J, Liao Y, Yao J (2015) Power enhancement in high-dimensional cross-section tests. Econometrica 83(4):1497–1541CrossRef
go back to reference Gallagher KS, Anadon LD, Kempener R, Wilson C (2011) Trends in investments in global energy research, development, and demonstration. WIREs Clim Chg 2(3):373–396CrossRef Gallagher KS, Anadon LD, Kempener R, Wilson C (2011) Trends in investments in global energy research, development, and demonstration. WIREs Clim Chg 2(3):373–396CrossRef
go back to reference Gao J, Peng B, Russell S (2021) On income and price elasticities for energy demand: a panel data study. Energy Econ 96(C):105168CrossRef Gao J, Peng B, Russell S (2021) On income and price elasticities for energy demand: a panel data study. Energy Econ 96(C):105168CrossRef
go back to reference Ikegami M, Wang Z (2020) The suppressive effect of renewables on nuclear energy: implications for OECD countries. Environ Econ Pol Stud 22(2):247–265CrossRef Ikegami M, Wang Z (2020) The suppressive effect of renewables on nuclear energy: implications for OECD countries. Environ Econ Pol Stud 22(2):247–265CrossRef
go back to reference Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115(1):53–74CrossRef Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115(1):53–74CrossRef
go back to reference Juodis A (2022) A regularization approach to common correlated effects estimation. J Appl Econ 37(4):788–810CrossRef Juodis A (2022) A regularization approach to common correlated effects estimation. J Appl Econ 37(4):788–810CrossRef
go back to reference Juodis A, Reese S (2022) The incidental parameters problem in testing for remaining cross-section correlation. J Bus Econ Stat 40(3):1191–1203CrossRef Juodis A, Reese S (2022) The incidental parameters problem in testing for remaining cross-section correlation. J Bus Econ Stat 40(3):1191–1203CrossRef
go back to reference Kong J, Phillips PCB, Sul D (2019) Weak σ-convergence: theory and applications. J Econ 209(2):185–207CrossRef Kong J, Phillips PCB, Sul D (2019) Weak σ-convergence: theory and applications. J Econ 209(2):185–207CrossRef
go back to reference Pesaran MH (2006) Estimation and inference in large heterogenous panels with multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74(4):967–1012CrossRef Pesaran MH (2006) Estimation and inference in large heterogenous panels with multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74(4):967–1012CrossRef
go back to reference Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence. J Appl Econ 22(2):265–312CrossRef Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence. J Appl Econ 22(2):265–312CrossRef
go back to reference Pesaran MH (2015) Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econ Rev 34(6–10):1089–1117CrossRef Pesaran MH (2015) Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econ Rev 34(6–10):1089–1117CrossRef
go back to reference Pesaran MH, Smith R (1995) Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. J Econ 68(1):79–113CrossRef Pesaran MH, Smith R (1995) Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. J Econ 68(1):79–113CrossRef
go back to reference Pesaran MH, Yamagata T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econ 142(1):50–93CrossRef Pesaran MH, Yamagata T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econ 142(1):50–93CrossRef
go back to reference Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith R (1999) Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. J Am Stat Assoc 94(446):621–634CrossRef Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith R (1999) Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. J Am Stat Assoc 94(446):621–634CrossRef
go back to reference Phillips PCB, Sul D (2007) Transition modeling and econometric convergence tests. Econometrica 75(6):1771–1855CrossRef Phillips PCB, Sul D (2007) Transition modeling and econometric convergence tests. Econometrica 75(6):1771–1855CrossRef
go back to reference Sun Y, Carroll RJ, Li D (2009) Semiparametric estimation of fixed-effects panel data varying coefficient models. In: Li Q, Racine JS (eds) Nonparametric econometric methods (Advances in econometrics 25). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, Bingley, pp 101–129CrossRef Sun Y, Carroll RJ, Li D (2009) Semiparametric estimation of fixed-effects panel data varying coefficient models. In: Li Q, Racine JS (eds) Nonparametric econometric methods (Advances in econometrics 25). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, Bingley, pp 101–129CrossRef
go back to reference van Benthem A (2015) Energy leapfrogging. J Assoc Environ Resc Economists 2(1):93–132 van Benthem A (2015) Energy leapfrogging. J Assoc Environ Resc Economists 2(1):93–132
go back to reference Wagner M (2015) The environmental Kuznets curve, cointegration and nonlinearity. J Appl Econ 30(6):948–967CrossRef Wagner M (2015) The environmental Kuznets curve, cointegration and nonlinearity. J Appl Econ 30(6):948–967CrossRef
go back to reference Wurlod J-D, Noailly J (2018) The impact of green innovation on energy intensity: an empirical analysis for 14 industrial sectors in OECD countries. Energy Econ 71(C):47–61CrossRef Wurlod J-D, Noailly J (2018) The impact of green innovation on energy intensity: an empirical analysis for 14 industrial sectors in OECD countries. Energy Econ 71(C):47–61CrossRef
go back to reference Zhu Z, Liao H, Liu L (2021) The role of public energy R&D in energy conservation and transition: experiences from IEA countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 143(C):110978CrossRef Zhu Z, Liao H, Liu L (2021) The role of public energy R&D in energy conservation and transition: experiences from IEA countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 143(C):110978CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Does energy technology R&D save energy in OECD countries?
Authors
Masako Ikegami
Zijian Wang
Publication date
01-04-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Economic Change and Restructuring / Issue 2/2024
Print ISSN: 1573-9414
Electronic ISSN: 1574-0277
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-024-09588-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2024

Economic Change and Restructuring 2/2024 Go to the issue