Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Energy Efficiency 6/2017

29-05-2017 | Original Article

Does feedback usage lead to electricity savings? Analysis of goals for usage, feedback seeking, and consumption behavior

Author: Sebastian Gölz

Published in: Energy Efficiency | Issue 6/2017

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Findings from smart metering trials throughout the European Union in the last 5 years suggest that feedback on electricity consumption does not result in the expected increase in electricity savings of 10%. Instead, a smaller reduction in electricity consumption between 1.5 and 4% is typically recorded. In this paper, we aim to analyze knowledge and motivation gained from feedback usage and the resulting effects on behavior. For this purpose, we introduce a theoretical framework describing the process of feedback use in the Rubicon model (Heckhausen and Gollwitzer in Motivation and Emotion, 11, 101–120, 1987) and the transition from gained knowledge into motivation, and subsequent adaptation of consumption behavior, by applying the Feedback Intervention Theory (FIT, Kluger and DeNisi in Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284, 1996). Using log-files on usage behavior of a web-based feedback system, survey data and energy consumption data from a 1-year trial of smart metering systems and feedback with more than 600 consumers, we identify six patterns distinguishing how users interact with feedback systems (i.e., measured by the quantity of log-ins and clicks for different features) and are able to make inferences on their knowledge gains. Moreover, we examine whether any feedback usage pattern could be related to a stronger agreement with any goals. Finally, we compare the impact of these different usage patterns onto energy consumption in order to uncover which knowledge gains could be associated with energy conservation. Results show that feedback usage can be differentiated along several specific seeking strategies which are associated with individual goals. The only strategy of feedback usage found to be successful for saving electricity is actually the one showing the least evidence for long-term knowledge being gained. Possible explanations for these findings are discussed within the context of assumptions for the FIT.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
The trial was implemented in the German towns of Celle, Hassfurt, Kaiserslautern, Krefeld, Münster, Oelde, Schwerte, and Ulm, and in the Austrian city of Linz.
 
Literature
go back to reference Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 273–291.CrossRef Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 273–291.CrossRef
go back to reference Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. L. (1983). Feedback as an individual resource: personal strategies of creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 370–398.CrossRef Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. L. (1983). Feedback as an individual resource: personal strategies of creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 370–398.CrossRef
go back to reference Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. L. (1985). Proactive feedback seeking: the instrumental use of the information environment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58, 67–79.CrossRef Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. L. (1985). Proactive feedback seeking: the instrumental use of the information environment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58, 67–79.CrossRef
go back to reference Bamberg, S. (2013a). Applying the stage model of self-regulated behavioral change in a car use reduction intervention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33, 68–75.CrossRef Bamberg, S. (2013a). Applying the stage model of self-regulated behavioral change in a car use reduction intervention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33, 68–75.CrossRef
go back to reference Bamberg, S. (2013b). Changing environmentally harmful behaviors: a stage model of self-regulated behavioral change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 151–159.CrossRef Bamberg, S. (2013b). Changing environmentally harmful behaviors: a stage model of self-regulated behavioral change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 151–159.CrossRef
go back to reference Buchanan, K., Russo, R., & Anderson, B. (2015). The question of energy reduction: the problem (s) with feedback. Energy Policy, 77, 89–96.CrossRef Buchanan, K., Russo, R., & Anderson, B. (2015). The question of energy reduction: the problem (s) with feedback. Energy Policy, 77, 89–96.CrossRef
go back to reference CEC (2006). Directive 2006/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006, on energy end-use efficiency and energy services. Official Journal of the European Union, L 114, 64, 27.4.2006. CEC (2006). Directive 2006/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006, on energy end-use efficiency and energy services. Official Journal of the European Union, L 114, 64, 27.4.2006.
go back to reference CEC (2012). Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012, on energy efficiency. Official Journal of the European Union, L 135, 55, 14.11.2012. CEC (2012). Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012, on energy efficiency. Official Journal of the European Union, L 135, 55, 14.11.2012.
go back to reference CER (2011). Smart Metering Customer Behaviour Trials (CBT) Findings Report (part 1) (CER/11/080a), The Commission for Energy Regulation CER, Dublin, Ireland. CER (2011). Smart Metering Customer Behaviour Trials (CBT) Findings Report (part 1) (CER/11/080a), The Commission for Energy Regulation CER, Dublin, Ireland.
go back to reference Christiansen, E., & Kanstrup, A.M. (2009). “Nice to Know”—metering and informative feedback—stipulating an information space. Paper presented at the 5th International conference on energy efficiency in domestic appliances and lighting (EEDAL’09), Berlin. Christiansen, E., & Kanstrup, A.M. (2009). “Nice to Know”—metering and informative feedback—stipulating an information space. Paper presented at the 5th International conference on energy efficiency in domestic appliances and lighting (EEDAL’09), Berlin.
go back to reference Delmas, M., Fischlein, M., & Asensio, O. (2013). Information strategies and energy conservation behavior: a meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012. Energy Policy, 61, 729–739.CrossRef Delmas, M., Fischlein, M., & Asensio, O. (2013). Information strategies and energy conservation behavior: a meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012. Energy Policy, 61, 729–739.CrossRef
go back to reference Ehrhardt-Martinez, K., Donnelly, K.A., & Laitner, J.P. (2010). Advanced metering initiatives and residential feedback programs: a meta-review for household electricity-saving opportunities. Report no. E105, American council for an energy-efficient economy, Washington, D.C. Ehrhardt-Martinez, K., Donnelly, K.A., & Laitner, J.P. (2010). Advanced metering initiatives and residential feedback programs: a meta-review for household electricity-saving opportunities. Report no. E105, American council for an energy-efficient economy, Washington, D.C.
go back to reference Foulds, C., Robison, R. A., & Macrorie, R. (2017). Energy monitoring as a practice: investigating use of the iMeasure online energy feedback tool. Energy Policy, 104, 194–202.CrossRef Foulds, C., Robison, R. A., & Macrorie, R. (2017). Energy monitoring as a practice: investigating use of the iMeasure online energy feedback tool. Energy Policy, 104, 194–202.CrossRef
go back to reference Goldbach, K., Gölz, S., (2014). Urban energy efficiency with decision support systems: services and user engagement. In: VDE kongress smart cities. VDE Verlag GmbH, Berlin, 1–6. Goldbach, K., Gölz, S., (2014). Urban energy efficiency with decision support systems: services and user engagement. In: VDE kongress smart cities. VDE Verlag GmbH, Berlin, 1–6.
go back to reference Goldbach, K., & Gölz, S. (2015). Shaping new opportunities for smart energy efficiency services by engaging users. 10th Conference on sustainable development of energy, water and environment systems SWEDES, September 27–October 2, 2015, Dubrovnik, Croatia. Goldbach, K., & Gölz, S. (2015). Shaping new opportunities for smart energy efficiency services by engaging users. 10th Conference on sustainable development of energy, water and environment systems SWEDES, September 27–October 2, 2015, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
go back to reference Gollwitzer, P. M. (1990). Action phases and mind-sets. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 53–92). New York: Guilford. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1990). Action phases and mind-sets. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 53–92). New York: Guilford.
go back to reference Gölz, S., & Götz, K., (2009). Smart metering—a means to increase sustainable energy consumption? Socio-technical research and development on feedback-systems. In: Paper Presented at the Fifth international conference on energy efficiency in domestic appliances and lighting (EEDAL’09), Berlin, Germany. Gölz, S., & Götz, K., (2009). Smart metering—a means to increase sustainable energy consumption? Socio-technical research and development on feedback-systems. In: Paper Presented at the Fifth international conference on energy efficiency in domestic appliances and lighting (EEDAL’09), Berlin, Germany.
go back to reference Gölz, S., & Hahnel, U. J. J. (2016). What motivates people to use energy feedback systems? A multiple goal approach to predict long-term usage in daily life. Energy Research and Social Science, 21, 155–166.CrossRef Gölz, S., & Hahnel, U. J. J. (2016). What motivates people to use energy feedback systems? A multiple goal approach to predict long-term usage in daily life. Energy Research and Social Science, 21, 155–166.CrossRef
go back to reference Hargreaves, T., Nye, M., & Burgess, J. (2013). Keeping energy visible? Exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term. Energy Policy, 52, 126–134.CrossRef Hargreaves, T., Nye, M., & Burgess, J. (2013). Keeping energy visible? Exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term. Energy Policy, 52, 126–134.CrossRef
go back to reference Heckhausen, H., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1987). Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind. Motivation and Emotion, 11, 101–120.CrossRef Heckhausen, H., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1987). Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind. Motivation and Emotion, 11, 101–120.CrossRef
go back to reference Heiskanen, E., Johnson, M., & Vadovics, E. (2013). Learning about and involving users in energy saving on the local level. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 241–249.CrossRef Heiskanen, E., Johnson, M., & Vadovics, E. (2013). Learning about and involving users in energy saving on the local level. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 241–249.CrossRef
go back to reference Imbens, G. W. (2004). Non parametric estimation of treatment effects under exogeneity: a review. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 4–29.CrossRef Imbens, G. W. (2004). Non parametric estimation of treatment effects under exogeneity: a review. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 4–29.CrossRef
go back to reference Jain, R., Taylor, J., & Peschiera, G. (2012). Assessing eco-feedback interface usage and design to drive energy efficiency in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 48, 8–17.CrossRef Jain, R., Taylor, J., & Peschiera, G. (2012). Assessing eco-feedback interface usage and design to drive energy efficiency in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 48, 8–17.CrossRef
go back to reference Karlin, B., Zinger, J. F., & Ford, R. (2015). The effects of feedback on energy conservation: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(6), 1205–1227.CrossRef Karlin, B., Zinger, J. F., & Ford, R. (2015). The effects of feedback on energy conservation: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(6), 1205–1227.CrossRef
go back to reference Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.CrossRef Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.CrossRef
go back to reference Lancieri, L., & Durand, N. (2006). Internet user behavior: compared study of the access traces and application to the discovery of communities. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 36(1), 208–219.CrossRef Lancieri, L., & Durand, N. (2006). Internet user behavior: compared study of the access traces and application to the discovery of communities. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 36(1), 208–219.CrossRef
go back to reference Matthies, E. (2005). Wie können PsychologInnen ihr Wissen besser an die PraktikerIn bringen? Vorschlag eines neuen, integrativen Einflussschemas umwelt- gerechten Alltagshandelns. [How can psychologists improve their outreach towards practitioners? A suggestion for a new, integrative model of environmentally sound everyday practice]. Umweltpsychologie, 9(1), 62–81. Matthies, E. (2005). Wie können PsychologInnen ihr Wissen besser an die PraktikerIn bringen? Vorschlag eines neuen, integrativen Einflussschemas umwelt- gerechten Alltagshandelns. [How can psychologists improve their outreach towards practitioners? A suggestion for a new, integrative model of environmentally sound everyday practice]. Umweltpsychologie, 9(1), 62–81.
go back to reference Murtagh, N., Gatersleben, B., & Uzzell, D. (2014). 20∶60∶20-Differences in energy behaviour and conservation between and within households with electricity monitors. PloS One, 9(3), e92019.CrossRef Murtagh, N., Gatersleben, B., & Uzzell, D. (2014). 20∶60∶20-Differences in energy behaviour and conservation between and within households with electricity monitors. PloS One, 9(3), e92019.CrossRef
go back to reference Nachreiner, M., Mack, B., Matthies, E., & Tampe-Mai, K. (2015). An analysis of smart metering information systems: a psychological model of self-regulated behavioural change. Energy Research & Social Science, 9, 85–97.CrossRef Nachreiner, M., Mack, B., Matthies, E., & Tampe-Mai, K. (2015). An analysis of smart metering information systems: a psychological model of self-regulated behavioural change. Energy Research & Social Science, 9, 85–97.CrossRef
go back to reference Schleich, J., Klobasa, M., Brunner, M., Gölz, S., Götz, K., & Sunderer G. (2011). Smart metering in Germany—results of providing feedback information in a field trial. Proceedings of the ECEEE 2011 Summer Study, 1667–1674. Schleich, J., Klobasa, M., Brunner, M., Gölz, S., Götz, K., & Sunderer G. (2011). Smart metering in Germany—results of providing feedback information in a field trial. Proceedings of the ECEEE 2011 Summer Study, 1667–1674.
go back to reference Schwartz, S. H., & Howard, J. A. (1981). A normative decision-making model of altruism. In J. P. Rushton & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior (pp. 189–211). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Schwartz, S. H., & Howard, J. A. (1981). A normative decision-making model of altruism. In J. P. Rushton & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior (pp. 189–211). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
go back to reference Snow, S., Buys, L., Roe, P., & Brereton, M. (2013). Curiosity to cupboard: self reported disengagement with energy use feedback over time. In Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration (pp. 245–254). ACM. Snow, S., Buys, L., Roe, P., & Brereton, M. (2013). Curiosity to cupboard: self reported disengagement with energy use feedback over time. In Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration (pp. 245–254). ACM.
go back to reference Steg, L., Van den Berg, A. E., & De Groot, J. (2013). Environmental psychology: an introduction. London: BPS Blackwell. Steg, L., Van den Berg, A. E., & De Groot, J. (2013). Environmental psychology: an introduction. London: BPS Blackwell.
go back to reference Sunderer, G., Götz, K., & Gölz, S. (2012). The evaluation of feedback instruments in the context of electricity consumption. In R. Defila, A. Di Giulio, & R. Kaufmann-Hayoz (Eds.), The nature of sustainable consumption and how to achieve it. Results from the focal topic “from knowledge to action—new paths towards sustainable consumption” (pp. 367–382). Munich: Oekom-Verlag. Sunderer, G., Götz, K., & Gölz, S. (2012). The evaluation of feedback instruments in the context of electricity consumption. In R. Defila, A. Di Giulio, & R. Kaufmann-Hayoz (Eds.), The nature of sustainable consumption and how to achieve it. Results from the focal topic “from knowledge to action—new paths towards sustainable consumption” (pp. 367–382). Munich: Oekom-Verlag.
go back to reference Webb, T. L., Benn, Y., & Chang, B. P. I. (2014). Antecedents and consequences of monitoring domestic electricity consumption. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 228–238.CrossRef Webb, T. L., Benn, Y., & Chang, B. P. I. (2014). Antecedents and consequences of monitoring domestic electricity consumption. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 228–238.CrossRef
go back to reference Wilhite, H., & Ling, R. (1995). Measured energy savings from a more informative energy bill. Energy and Buildings, 22, 145–155.CrossRef Wilhite, H., & Ling, R. (1995). Measured energy savings from a more informative energy bill. Energy and Buildings, 22, 145–155.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Does feedback usage lead to electricity savings? Analysis of goals for usage, feedback seeking, and consumption behavior
Author
Sebastian Gölz
Publication date
29-05-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Energy Efficiency / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 1570-646X
Electronic ISSN: 1570-6478
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-017-9531-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

Energy Efficiency 6/2017 Go to the issue