Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Argumentation 2/2008

01-05-2008

Douglas Walton, Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation

John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 2007, 307 pp

Author: C. Andone

Published in: Argumentation | Issue 2/2008

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Excerpt

Douglas Walton’s latest book, Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation, brings together many of the ideas this prominent author has developed during the last 30 years. In its attempt to offer solutions to major issues such as the description, analysis and evaluation of argumentation, the book raises problems of concern to most argumentation scholars. The author provides not just an account of different aspects of argumentation theory, but also indicates how these aspects can benefit the developments in artificial intelligence. …

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Krabbe, E.C.W. 2001. The problem of retraction in critical discussion. Synthese 127: 141–159.CrossRef Krabbe, E.C.W. 2001. The problem of retraction in critical discussion. Synthese 127: 141–159.CrossRef
go back to reference van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference van Eemeren, F.H., and P. Houtlosser. 2007. The contextuality of fallacies. Informal Logic 27(1): 59–67. van Eemeren, F.H., and P. Houtlosser. 2007. The contextuality of fallacies. Informal Logic 27(1): 59–67.
go back to reference Walton D.N., and E.C.W. Krabbe. 1995. Commitment in dialogue. Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. Albany: State University of New York Press. Walton D.N., and E.C.W. Krabbe. 1995. Commitment in dialogue. Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Metadata
Title
Douglas Walton, Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation
John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 2007, 307 pp
Author
C. Andone
Publication date
01-05-2008
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Argumentation / Issue 2/2008
Print ISSN: 0920-427X
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8374
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-008-9081-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2008

Argumentation 2/2008 Go to the issue

Premium Partner