Top

Transportation in Developing Economies

Published in:

01-06-2024 | Original Article

Driving Behavior and Customer Handling of Urban Public Transportation Drivers and Operators Before and After the COVID-19 Outbreak in Ethiopia, 2022

Author: Kassa Moges Tareke

Published in: Transportation in Developing Economies | Issue 1/2024

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Globally, COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on human life, every aspect of social and economic sectors including transportation system and operations. This study examined the driving and customer handling behavior of public transportation operators before and during the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia. Mixed research, pre-/post-study design, protection motivation theory, and binary logistic regression models were used to guide the development, quantification, and analysis of the causal relationships of pandemic-related constructs on driving and customer handling behaviors. Driving behaviors were examined in terms of harsh speeding and braking concerning the time period before and during the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak in both Hawassa and Addis Ababa city. The level of friendly handling and care of public transportation operators to customers could operationalize and measure customer handling. Data were collected through surveys and interviews with various modes of public transportation operators. Accordingly, it is found that factors related to new COVID-19 pandemic and response measure mainly infection risk fear; transport restrictions were the most significant factors impacting driving behavior during the pandemic. During the pandemic, driving frequencies and intentions, as well as driving decisions, were significantly influenced and reduced, compared to pre-pandemic scenario. Harsh driving behaviors such as harsh speeding, harsh braking, and wrong-side driving became more frequent but customer handling behaviors were also predominantly unfriendly. The performance of protection motivation theory was relevant to inform, guide the study, and understand the actual impacts. Thus, policymakers must learn from the harsh lessons of COVID-19 pandemic and make bold investments in preparedness, prevention, and response, including adaptive and pandemic-sensitive strategies and customer-oriented strategies.

previous article Exploring Business Networks Along the Mumbai–Ahmedabad High-Speed Rail Corridor: A Study on Identifying City Linkages

next article Experiment, Simulation and Calibration of Parameters of Laboratory Evacuation

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Ahmed MM, Khan MN, Das A, Dadvar SE (2022) Global lessons learned from naturalistic driving studies to advance traffic safety and operation research: a systematic review. Accid Anal Prev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106568CrossRef

Aletta F, Brinchi S, Carrese S, Gemma A, Guattari C, Mannini L, Patella SM (2020) Analyzing urban trafc volumes and mapping noise emissions in Rome (Italy) in the context of containment measures for the COVID-19 disease. Noise Mapp 7(1):114–122CrossRef

Aloi A, Alonso B, Benavente J, Cordera R, Echániz E, González F, Ladisa C, Lezama-Romanelli R, López-Parra Á, Mazzei V, Perrucci L, Prieto-Quintana D, Rodríguez AG, Sañudo R (2020) Effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on urban mobility: empirical evidence from the city of Santander (Spain). Sustainability 12(9):3870. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093870CrossRef

Awad-Núñez S, Julio R, Gómez J, Moya-Gómez B, González JL (2021) Post-COVID-19 travel behaviour patterns: impact on the willingness to pay of users of public transport and shared mobility services in Spain. Eur Transp Res Rev. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-021-00476-4CrossRef

Bärgman J (2016) Methods for analysis of naturalistic driving data in driver behavior research. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Methods-for-Analysis-of-Naturalistic-Driving-Data-B%C3%A4rgman/e7edd55fc2e26fc8d7a6ba2a9a1ea6f847aa6353

Betteley C (2020) Mask wearing “risks isolating” deaf people. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-52659083

Bifulco GN, Galante F, Pariota L, Spena MT, Del Gais P (2014) Data collection for traffic and drivers’ behaviour studies: a large-scale survey. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 111:721–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.106CrossRef

Boer H, Seydel ER (2005) Protection motivation theory. In: Conner M, Norman P (eds) Predicting health behaviour, 2nd edn. Open University Press, Maidenhead, pp 81–126

Bucsky P (2020) Modal share changes due to COVID-19: the case of Budapest. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100141CrossRef

10.

Carter D (2020) Effects of COVID-19 shutdown on crashes and travel in NC

11.

Chen A, Lu Y (2021) Protective behavior in ride-sharing through the lens of protection motivation theory and usage situation theory. Int J Inf Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102402CrossRef

12.

Cox DN, Koster A, Russell CG (2004) Predicting intentions to consume functional foods and supplements to offset memory loss using an adaptation of protection motivation theory. Appetite 43:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2004.02.003CrossRef

13.

Davis JD, Babulal GM, Papandonatos GD, Burke EM, Rosnick CB, Ott BR, Roe CM (2020) Evaluation of naturalistic driving behavior using in-vehicle monitoring technology in preclinical and early Alzheimer’s disease. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.596257CrossRef

14.

Dong X, Xie K, Yang H (2022) How did COVID-19 impact driving behaviors and crash Severity? A multi-group structural equation modeling. Accid Anal Prev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106687CrossRef

15.

de Haas M, Faber R, Hamersma M (2020) How COVID-19 and the Dutch ‘intelligent lockdown’ change activities, work and travel behaviour: evidence from longitudinal data in the Netherlands. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100150CrossRef

16.

Dutta B, Vasudevan V (2020) Insight into driver behavior during overtaking maneuvers in disorderly traffic: an instrumented vehicle study. Transp Res Procedia 48:719–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.074CrossRef

17.

Eby DW (2004) Driving, risky. In: Elsevier eBooks, p 627–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/b0-12-657410-3/00697-8

18.

Eby DW, Charlton JL, Eby DW, Bogard SE, Langford JW, Koppel SN, Kolenic GE, Marshall S, Man-Son-Hing M (2013) Self-regulation of driving by older adults: comparison of self-report and objective driving data. Transp Res Part F-Traffic Psychol Behav 20:29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2013.05.001CrossRef

19.

Gao J, Davis GA (2017) Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver’s brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation. J Saf Res 63:195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2017.10.012CrossRef

20.

Gao J, An Z, Bai X (2019) A new representation method for probability distributions of multimodal and irregular data based on uniform mixture model. Ann Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03236-9CrossRef

21.

Hale T, Angrist N, Goldszmidt R, Kira B, Petherick A, Phillips T, Webster S, Cameron-Blake E, Hallas L, Majumdar S, Tatlow H (2021) A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker). Nat Hum Behav 5:529–538. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8CrossRef

22.

Harbeck E, Glendon I, Hine T (2018) Young driver perceived risk and risky driving: A theoretical approach to the “fatal five.” Transport Res F: Traffic Psychol Behav 58:392–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.018CrossRef

23.

Heath R, Mansuri Gh, Rijkers B, Seitz WH, Sharma D (2020) Measuring employment: experimental evidence from Urban Ghana. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 9263. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3616472

24.

Hotle S, Murray-Tuite P, Singh K (2020) Influenza risk perception and travel-related health protection behavior in the US: insights for the aftermath of the COVID-19 outbreak. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect 5:100127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100127CrossRef

25.

Howard GS (1980) Response-shift bias: a problem in evaluating interventions with pre/post-self-reports. Eval Rev 4(1):93–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X8000400105MathSciNetCrossRef

26.

Katrakazas C, Michelaraki E, Sekadakis M, Yannis G (2020) A descriptive analysis of the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on driving behavior and road safety. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100186CrossRef

27.

Katrakazas C, Michelaraki E, Sekadakis M, Ziakopoulos A, Kontaxi A, Yannis G (2021) Identifying the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on driving behavior using naturalistic driving data and time series forecasting. J Saf Res 78:189–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.04.007CrossRef

28.

Kim K (2021) Impacts of COVID-19 on transportation: SUMMARY and synthesis of interdisciplinary research. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100305CrossRef

29.

Klatt J, Taylor-Powell E (2005) Using the retrospective post-then-pre design. Quick tips, #27. University of Wisconsin-Extension, Madison

30.

Klauer SG, Neale VL, Dingus TA, Ramsey D, Sudweeks J (2005) Driver inattention: a contributing factor to crashes and near-crashes. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet 49(22):1922–1926. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120504902208CrossRef

31.

Lee J, Porr A, Miller H (2020) Evidence of increased vehicle speeding in Ohio’s major cities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Findings. https://doi.org/10.32866/001c.12988CrossRef

32.

Lei Z, Ukkusuri SV (2022) Understanding the recovery of On-Demand Mobility Services in the COVID-19 era. J Big Data Anal Transp 4(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42421-022-00051-wCrossRef

33.

Liang L, Wu G (2022) Effects of COVID-19 on customer service experience: Can employees wearing facemasks enhance customer-perceived service quality? J Hosp Tour Manag 50:10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.12.004CrossRef

34.

Linares-Rendón F, Garrido-Cumbrera M (2021) Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on urban mobility: a systematic review of the literature. J Transp Health 22:101225CrossRef

35.

Lisheng J, Baicang G, Yuying J, Qiang H (2021) Analysis on the influencing factors of driving behaviours based on theory of planned behaviour. Adv Civ Eng 2021:6687674. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6687674CrossRef

36.

Mao H, Guo F, Deng X, Doerzaph ZR (2021) Decision-adjusted driver risk predictive models using kinematics information. Accid Anal Prev 156:106088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106088CrossRef

37.

Masello L, Castignani G, Sheehan B, Guillen M, Murphy F (2023) Using contextual data to predict risky driving events: a novel methodology from explainable artificial intelligence. Accid Anal Prev 184:106997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.106997CrossRef

38.

Mashrur SM, Wang K, Loa P, Hossain S, Habib KN (2022) Application of protection motivation theory to quantify the impact of pandemic fear on anticipated postpandemic public transportation usage. Transp Res Rec. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211065439CrossRef

39.

Michelaraki E, Sekadakis M, Katrakazas C, Ziakopoulos A, Yannis G (2021) A four-country comparative overview of the impact of COVID-19 on traffic safety behavior. In: 10th international Congress on Transportation Research, Rhodes, Greece

40.

Ozbilen B, Slagle KM, Akar G (2021) Perceived risk of infection while traveling during the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from Columbus, OH. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect 10:100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100326CrossRef

41.

Parady G, Taniguchi A, Takami K (2020) Travel behavior changes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: analyzing the effects of risk perception and social influence on going-out self-restriction. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect 7:100181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100181CrossRef

42.

Przybyłowski A, Stelmak S, Suchanek M (2021) Mobility behaviour in view of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic—public transport users in Gdansk case study. Sustainability 13(1):364. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010364CrossRef

43.

Rivera D (2004) The use of a proposed modified model of planned behavior to predict the beef consumption of young adult college students. https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/items/d69e1b31-406e-464a-8e58-167772a3bcc1

44.

Rogers RW (1975) A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. J Psychol 91(1):93–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803CrossRef

45.

Rogers RW (1983) Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: a revised theory of protection motivation. In: Cacioppo JT, Petty RE (eds) Social psychophysiology: a sourcebook. Guilford Press, New York, pp 153–176

46.

Saladié Ò, Bustamante E, Gutiérrez A (2020) COVID-19 lockdown and reduction of traffic accidents in Tarragona province, Spain. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100218CrossRef

47.

Seacrist T, Sahani R, Chingas G, Douglas EC, Graci V, Loeb H (2020) Efficacy of automatic emergency braking among risky drivers using counterfactual simulations from the SHRP 2 naturalistic driving study. Saf Sci 128:104746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104746CrossRef

48.

Sekadakis M, Katrakazas C, Michelaraki E, Kehagia F, Yannis G (2021) Analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on collisions, fatalities and injuries using time series forecasting: the case of Greece. Accid Anal Prev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106391CrossRef

49.

Sekadakis M, Katrakazas C, Michelaraki E, Ζιακόπουλος Α, Yannis G (2023) COVID-19 and driving behavior: Which were the most crucial influencing factors? Data Sci Transp. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42421-023-00078-7CrossRef

50.

Shannon K, Crago AL, Baral S, Bekker L, Kerrigan D, Decker MR, Poteat T, Wirtz AL, Weir BW, Boily M, Butler J, Strathdee SA, Beyrer C (2018) The global response and unmet actions for HIV and sex workers. Lancet 392(10148):698–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31439-9CrossRef

51.

Sharif A, Reza Khavarian-Garmsir A (2020) The COVID-19 pandemic: impacts on cities and major lessons for urban planning, design, and management. Sci Total Environ 749:1–3

52.

Shilling F, Waetjen D (2020) Impact of COVID19 mitigation on numbers and costs of California Traffic Crashes

53.

Simons-Morton BG, Klauer SG, Ouimet MC, Guo F, Albert PS, Lee SE, Ehsani JP, Pradhan AK, Dingus TA (2015) Naturalistic teenage driving study: findings and lessons learned. J Saf Res 54:41.e29-41.e44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2015.06.010CrossRef

54.

Singh H, Kathuria A (2021) Analyzing driver behavior under naturalistic driving conditions: A review. Accid Anal Prev 150:105908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105908CrossRef

55.

Sudman S, Bradburn N, Schwarz N (1996) Thinking about answers: The application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA

56.

Tareke KM (2023) How the driving behaviors and customer handling of public transportation operators have been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: the perspective of protection motivation theory? Front Sustain Cities. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2023.1140838CrossRef

57.

Tenenhaus M, Vinzi VE, Chatelin Y-M, Lauro C (2005) Pls path modeling. Comput Stat Data Anal 48(1):159–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005MathSciNetCrossRef

58.

Train K (2003) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511753930CrossRef

59.

United Nation Development Program, UNDP (2020) COVID-19 pandemic. UNDP, s.l.

60.

van Schagen I, Sagberg F (2012) The potential benefits of naturalistic driving for road safety research: theoretical and empirical considerations and challenges for the future. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 48:692–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1047CrossRef

61.

Vanlaar WGM, Woods-Fry H, Barrett H, Lyon C, Brown S, Wicklund C, Robertson RD (2021) The impact of COVID-19 on road safety in Canada and the United States. Accid Anal Prev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106324CrossRef

62.

Wagner E (2020) Examination of the traffic safety environment during the second quarter of 2020: Special report. rosap.ntl.bts.gov. https://doi.org/10.21949/1525982

63.

Wang K, Liu Y, Mashrur SM, Loa P, Habib KN (2021) COVID-19 influenced households’ interrupted travel schedules (COVHITS) survey: lessons from the Fall 2020 cycle. Transp Policy 112:43–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.08.009CrossRef

64.

World Bank (2015) Enhancing Urban Resilience: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Available online at: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/559781468196153638/pdf/Addis-Ababa-Enhancing-Urban-Resilience-city-strength-resilient-cities-program.pdf (accessed April 16, 2022)

65.

World Health Organization, WHO (2020) Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Infodemic Management, s.l.

66.

Wu G, Liang L, Gursoy D (2021) Effects of the new COVID-19 normal on customer satisfaction: Can facemasks level off the playing field between average-looking and attractive-looking employees? Int J Hosp Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102996CrossRef

67.

Yadegaridehkordi E, Nizam MH, Nasir N, Noor FBM, Shuib L, Badie N (2018) Predicting the adoption of cloud-based technology using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and structural equation modelling approaches. Appl Soft Comput 66:77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.12.051CrossRef

68.

Zheng D, Luo Q, Ritchie BW (2021) Afraid to travel after COVID-19? self-protection, coping and resilience against pandemic ‘travel fear.’ Tour Manage 83:104261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104261CrossRef

69.

Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, Zhao X, Huang B, Shi W, Lu R, Niu P, Zhan F, Ma X, Wang D, Xu W, Wu G, Gao GF, Tan W (2020) A novel Coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med 382(8):727–733CrossRef

Title: Driving Behavior and Customer Handling of Urban Public Transportation Drivers and Operators Before and After the COVID-19 Outbreak in Ethiopia, 2022
Author: Kassa Moges Tareke
Publication date: 01-06-2024
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Published in: Transportation in Developing Economies / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 2199-9287
Electronic ISSN: 2199-9295
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-023-00190-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

A Qualitative Study on Covid-19 Effects on Logistics and Road Freight Transport: The Case of Cold Chain Transportation Companies in Turkey

Study of Vehicle Specific Speed Profiles at Merging and Diverging Sections of Toll Plaza Using UAV Data

Experiment, Simulation and Calibration of Parameters of Laboratory Evacuation

Evolution of Sustainable and Resilient Pervious Concrete Pavement Technologies in India

Exploring India's Intermediate Public Transport: A Comprehensive Overview

Analysis of Street Vendor Effects on Urban Arterial Road

Premium Partner