Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering 4/2021

01-12-2021 | Original Paper

Effect of Clayey Fine Content on Cyclic Deformative Pullout Behavior of PET Geogrid Embedded in Pure Sand

Authors: Ali Mahigir, Alireza Ardakani, Mahmoud Hassanlourad

Published in: International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering | Issue 4/2021

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Several monotonic and multistage pullout tests were conducted by means of a large pullout device to investigate the effect of cyclic loading on the peak post-cyclic pullout interaction coefficient and deformative behavior of uniaxial polyester geogrid tested in pure sand and sand including 10% or 20% clay. An experimental approach was employed to study the influence of the cyclic load amplitude and frequency, number of load cycles, and normal stress on the displacement of a geogrid during the cyclic stage. The results showed that, at a normal stress of 20 kPa, the applied load amplitude caused a reduction in the post-cyclic peak pullout interaction coefficient of the geogrid when compared to similar monotonic pullout tests. The head displacement of the geogrid increased as the normal stress and load amplitude increased at normal stresses of 20, 40, and 60 kPa. However, an increase in the frequency of the load decreased head displacement of the geogrid in pure sand and 20% clayey sand at a normal stress of 40 kPa. Under similar applied load amplitudes, the head displacement of 20% clayey sand was lower than those measured in pure sand due to the higher placement density. Increasing the number of load cycles from 30 to 100 slowed the rate of increase in head displacement, indicating the existence of a stable soil–geogrid interface.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Palmeira EM (2009) Soil–geosynthetic interaction: Modelling and analysis. Geotext Geomembr 27(5):368–390CrossRef Palmeira EM (2009) Soil–geosynthetic interaction: Modelling and analysis. Geotext Geomembr 27(5):368–390CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Abdi M, Arjomand M (2011) Pullout tests conducted on clay reinforced with geogrid encapsulated in thin layers of sand. Geotext Geomembr 29(6):588–595CrossRef Abdi M, Arjomand M (2011) Pullout tests conducted on clay reinforced with geogrid encapsulated in thin layers of sand. Geotext Geomembr 29(6):588–595CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bathurst R, Ezzein F (2016) Geogrid pullout load–strain behaviour and modelling using a transparent granular soil. Geosynth Int 23(4):271–286CrossRef Bathurst R, Ezzein F (2016) Geogrid pullout load–strain behaviour and modelling using a transparent granular soil. Geosynth Int 23(4):271–286CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ferreira F, Vieira C, Lopes M, Carlos D (2016) Experimental investigation on the pullout behaviour of geosynthetics embedded in a granite residual soil. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 20(9):1147–1180CrossRef Ferreira F, Vieira C, Lopes M, Carlos D (2016) Experimental investigation on the pullout behaviour of geosynthetics embedded in a granite residual soil. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 20(9):1147–1180CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Namjoo AM, Soltani F, Toufigh V (2021) Effects of moisture on the mechanical behavior of sand–geogrid: an experimental investigation. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 7(1):1–13CrossRef Namjoo AM, Soltani F, Toufigh V (2021) Effects of moisture on the mechanical behavior of sand–geogrid: an experimental investigation. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 7(1):1–13CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Karnamprabhakara BK, Balunaini U, Arulrajah A, Evans R (2021) Axial pullout resistance and interface direct shear properties of geogrids in pond ash. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 7(2):1–14CrossRef Karnamprabhakara BK, Balunaini U, Arulrajah A, Evans R (2021) Axial pullout resistance and interface direct shear properties of geogrids in pond ash. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 7(2):1–14CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Moraci N, Recalcati P (2006) Factors affecting the pullout behaviour of extruded geogrids embedded in a compacted granular soil. Geotext Geomembr 24(4):220–242CrossRef Moraci N, Recalcati P (2006) Factors affecting the pullout behaviour of extruded geogrids embedded in a compacted granular soil. Geotext Geomembr 24(4):220–242CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Jewell RA, Milligan GWE, Sarsby RW, Dubois D (1984) Interaction between soil and geogrids. In: Telford T (ed) Proceedings of the conference on polymer grid reinforcement in civil engineering, pp 18–30 Jewell RA, Milligan GWE, Sarsby RW, Dubois D (1984) Interaction between soil and geogrids. In: Telford T (ed) Proceedings of the conference on polymer grid reinforcement in civil engineering, pp 18–30
9.
go back to reference Vieira CS, Ferreira FB, Pereira PM, de Lurdes LM (2020) Pullout behaviour of geosynthetics in a recycled construction and demolition material—effects of cyclic loading. Transp Geotech 23:100346CrossRef Vieira CS, Ferreira FB, Pereira PM, de Lurdes LM (2020) Pullout behaviour of geosynthetics in a recycled construction and demolition material—effects of cyclic loading. Transp Geotech 23:100346CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ferreira F, Vieira C, Lopes M, Ferreira P (2020) HDPE geogrid-residual soil interaction under monotonic and cyclic pullout loading. Geosynth Int 27(1):79–96CrossRef Ferreira F, Vieira C, Lopes M, Ferreira P (2020) HDPE geogrid-residual soil interaction under monotonic and cyclic pullout loading. Geosynth Int 27(1):79–96CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cardile G, Pisano M, Moraci N (2019) The influence of a cyclic loading history on soil–geogrid interaction under pullout condition. Geotext Geomembr 47(4):552–565CrossRef Cardile G, Pisano M, Moraci N (2019) The influence of a cyclic loading history on soil–geogrid interaction under pullout condition. Geotext Geomembr 47(4):552–565CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Moraci N, Cardile G (2009) Influence of cyclic tensile loading on pullout resistance of geogrids embedded in a compacted granular soil. Geotext Geomembr 27(6):475–487CrossRef Moraci N, Cardile G (2009) Influence of cyclic tensile loading on pullout resistance of geogrids embedded in a compacted granular soil. Geotext Geomembr 27(6):475–487CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Moraci N, Cardile G (2012) Deformative behaviour of different geogrids embedded in a granular soil under monotonic and cyclic pullout loads. Geotext Geomembr 32:104–110CrossRef Moraci N, Cardile G (2012) Deformative behaviour of different geogrids embedded in a granular soil under monotonic and cyclic pullout loads. Geotext Geomembr 32:104–110CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Razzazan S, Keshavarz A, Mosallanezhad M (2018) Pullout behavior of polymeric strip in compacted dry granular soil under cyclic tensile load conditions. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 10(5):968–976CrossRef Razzazan S, Keshavarz A, Mosallanezhad M (2018) Pullout behavior of polymeric strip in compacted dry granular soil under cyclic tensile load conditions. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 10(5):968–976CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Koshy N, Unnikrishnan N (2016) Geosynthetics under cyclic pullout and post-cyclic monotonic loading. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 2(2):13CrossRef Koshy N, Unnikrishnan N (2016) Geosynthetics under cyclic pullout and post-cyclic monotonic loading. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 2(2):13CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pavanello P, Carrubba P, Moraci N (2018) Dynamic friction and the seismic performance of geosynthetic interfaces. Geotext Geomembr 46(6):715–725CrossRef Pavanello P, Carrubba P, Moraci N (2018) Dynamic friction and the seismic performance of geosynthetic interfaces. Geotext Geomembr 46(6):715–725CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Anubhav BPK (2010) Modeling of soil–woven geotextile interface behavior from direct shear test results. Geotext Geomembr 28(4):403–408CrossRef Anubhav BPK (2010) Modeling of soil–woven geotextile interface behavior from direct shear test results. Geotext Geomembr 28(4):403–408CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Esmaili D, Hatami K, Miller GA (2014) Influence of matric suction on geotextile reinforcement-marginal soil interface strength. Geotext Geomembr 42(2):139–153CrossRef Esmaili D, Hatami K, Miller GA (2014) Influence of matric suction on geotextile reinforcement-marginal soil interface strength. Geotext Geomembr 42(2):139–153CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hatami K, Esmaili D, Chan E, Miller G (2014) Laboratory performance of reduced-scale reinforced embankments at different moisture contents. Int J Geotech Eng 8(3):260–276CrossRef Hatami K, Esmaili D, Chan E, Miller G (2014) Laboratory performance of reduced-scale reinforced embankments at different moisture contents. Int J Geotech Eng 8(3):260–276CrossRef
20.
go back to reference AASHTO (2002) Standard specifications for highway bridges, 17th edn. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC AASHTO (2002) Standard specifications for highway bridges, 17th edn. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC
21.
go back to reference NCMA (2002) Design manual for segmental retaining walls, 2nd edn. National Concrete Masonry Association, Herndon NCMA (2002) Design manual for segmental retaining walls, 2nd edn. National Concrete Masonry Association, Herndon
22.
go back to reference Christopher BR, Stulgis RP (2005) Low permeable backfill soils in geosynthetic reinforced soil walls: state-of-the-practice in North America. In: Proceedings of North American geo-synthetics conference (NAGS 2005), p 14–16 Christopher BR, Stulgis RP (2005) Low permeable backfill soils in geosynthetic reinforced soil walls: state-of-the-practice in North America. In: Proceedings of North American geo-synthetics conference (NAGS 2005), p 14–16
23.
go back to reference Balakrishnan S, Viswanadham B (2016) Performance evaluation of geogrid reinforced soil walls with marginal backfills through centrifuge model tests. Geotext Geomembr 44(1):95–108CrossRef Balakrishnan S, Viswanadham B (2016) Performance evaluation of geogrid reinforced soil walls with marginal backfills through centrifuge model tests. Geotext Geomembr 44(1):95–108CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Mahigir A, Ardakani A, Hassanlourad M (2021) Comparison between monotonic, cyclic and post-cyclic pullout behavior of a PET geogrid embedded in clean sand and clayey sand. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 7(1):1–15CrossRef Mahigir A, Ardakani A, Hassanlourad M (2021) Comparison between monotonic, cyclic and post-cyclic pullout behavior of a PET geogrid embedded in clean sand and clayey sand. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 7(1):1–15CrossRef
25.
go back to reference ASTMD6637 (2015) Standard test method for determining tensile properties of geogrids by the single or multi-rib tensile method. ASTM International, West Conshohocken ASTMD6637 (2015) Standard test method for determining tensile properties of geogrids by the single or multi-rib tensile method. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
26.
go back to reference ASTMD6706-01 (2013) Standard test method for measuring geosynthetic pullout resistance in soil. ASTM International, West Conshohocken ASTMD6706-01 (2013) Standard test method for measuring geosynthetic pullout resistance in soil. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
27.
go back to reference Allen T, Bathurst R (2002) Observed long-term performance of geosynthetic walls and implications for design. Geosynth Int 9(5–6):567–606CrossRef Allen T, Bathurst R (2002) Observed long-term performance of geosynthetic walls and implications for design. Geosynth Int 9(5–6):567–606CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Sukmak K, Sukmak P, Horpibulsuk S, Han J, Shen S-L, Arulrajah A (2015) Effect of fine content on the pullout resistance mechanism of bearing reinforcement embedded in cohesive–frictional soils. Geotext Geomembr 43(2):107–117CrossRef Sukmak K, Sukmak P, Horpibulsuk S, Han J, Shen S-L, Arulrajah A (2015) Effect of fine content on the pullout resistance mechanism of bearing reinforcement embedded in cohesive–frictional soils. Geotext Geomembr 43(2):107–117CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effect of Clayey Fine Content on Cyclic Deformative Pullout Behavior of PET Geogrid Embedded in Pure Sand
Authors
Ali Mahigir
Alireza Ardakani
Mahmoud Hassanlourad
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 2199-9260
Electronic ISSN: 2199-9279
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-021-00330-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering 4/2021 Go to the issue