Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 4/2024

01-04-2024 | Original article

Effect of different forms of capital on the adoption of multiple climate-smart agriculture strategies by smallholder farmers in Assam, India

Authors: Jigyasa Sandilya, Kishor Goswami

Published in: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change | Issue 4/2024

Login to get access

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Agricultural production is affected by the threats of climate change, such as changes in the frequency of extreme events (such as flood and drought), changes in rainfall patterns, and increased pest attacks and diseases. As a result, the farmers face huge socio-economic losses in the form of loss of lives, loss of cultivable lands, loss in crop yield, and loss to infrastructure. The smallholder farmers who primarily depend on rainfed agriculture for a living bear major crop losses and threats to food security due to climate change. In order to enable the farmers to cope with the challenges associated with climate change, climate-smart agricultural (CSA) practices were introduced. It must be noted that CSA practices depend on economic, environmental, and social attributes; hence, location-specific studies are required to identify the determinants of CSA adoption. The present study aims to identify the factors influencing smallholder farmers’ adoption of CSA strategies in the highly vulnerable Nagaon district of India. Our study has incorporated six forms of capital: physical capital, social capital, human capital, financial capital, natural capital, and institutional capital in its analytical framework. The influence of these capitals is examined on the farmers’ adoption decision. We use a mixed-method approach to conduct the analysis. A multivariate probit model is used for the quantitative analysis, and excerpts from focus group discussions are presented as qualitative information gathered from field surveys. Three unique variables are included in the present study: the use of agricultural applications by smallholder farmers, the application of indigenous technical knowledge, and access to government-provided seeds. Each of the three variables was found to be statistically significant. Further, the study found the variables under social capital, physical capital, and institutional capital to be critical determinants affecting CSA adoption by smallholder farmers.
Literature
go back to reference Borah A, Devi S, Medhi M (2012) Impact of climate change on marginalized women - an exploratory study across 6 districts in Assam. Centre for Environment, Social and Policy Research (CESPR), and Rashtriya Gramin Vikas Nidhi (RGVN) with the Indian Network on Ethics and Climate Change (INECC). Guwahati Borah A, Devi S, Medhi M (2012) Impact of climate change on marginalized women - an exploratory study across 6 districts in Assam. Centre for Environment, Social and Policy Research (CESPR), and Rashtriya Gramin Vikas Nidhi (RGVN) with the Indian Network on Ethics and Climate Change (INECC). Guwahati
go back to reference FAO (2006) Module 2 Agrobiodiversity management from a sustainable livelihoods’ perspective. In Building on gender, agrobiodiversity and local knowledge: a training manual. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/3/y5956e/Y5956E04.htm. Accessed 19 Dec 2023 FAO (2006) Module 2 Agrobiodiversity management from a sustainable livelihoods’ perspective. In Building on gender, agrobiodiversity and local knowledge: a training manual. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. Retrieved from https://​www.​fao.​org/​3/​y5956e/​Y5956E04.​htm. Accessed 19 Dec 2023
go back to reference Government of India (2015b) Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India. http://pmksy.gov.in/. Accessed 6 Jan 2024 Government of India (2015b) Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India. http://​pmksy.​gov.​in/​. Accessed 6 Jan 2024
go back to reference Gupta A, Pathak H (2016) Climate change and agriculture in India: a thematic report of National Mission on Strategic Knowledge for Climate Change (NMSKCC) under National Action Plan on Climate Change. Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of India, p 68 Gupta A, Pathak H (2016) Climate change and agriculture in India: a thematic report of National Mission on Strategic Knowledge for Climate Change (NMSKCC) under National Action Plan on Climate Change. Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of India, p 68
go back to reference Gupta A, Ponticelli J, Tesei A (2022) Language barriers, technology adoption and productivity: evidence from agriculture in India. Working Paper 27192. National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w27192. Accessed 11 Jan 2024 Gupta A, Ponticelli J, Tesei A (2022) Language barriers, technology adoption and productivity: evidence from agriculture in India. Working Paper 27192. National Bureau of Economic Research. http://​www.​nber.​org/​papers/​w27192. Accessed 11 Jan 2024
go back to reference INCCA (2010) Climate change and India: a 4 x 4 assessment—a sectoral and regional analysis for 2030. Ministry of Environment and Forests INCCA (2010) Climate change and India: a 4 x 4 assessment—a sectoral and regional analysis for 2030. Ministry of Environment and Forests
go back to reference Lipper L, Zilberman D (2018) A short history of the evolution of the climate smart agriculture approach and its links to climate change and sustainable agriculture debates. In: Lipper L, McCarthy N, Zilberman D, Asfaw S, Branca G (eds) Climate smart agriculture, Natural Resource Management and Policy 52. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61194-5_2CrossRef Lipper L, Zilberman D (2018) A short history of the evolution of the climate smart agriculture approach and its links to climate change and sustainable agriculture debates. In: Lipper L, McCarthy N, Zilberman D, Asfaw S, Branca G (eds) Climate smart agriculture, Natural Resource Management and Policy 52. Springer Cham. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-61194-5_​2CrossRef
go back to reference Nyasimi M, Radeny M, Kimeli P, Mungai C, Sayula G, Kinyangi J (2016) Uptake and dissemination pathways for climate-smart agriculture technologies and practices in Lushoto, Tanzania. CCAFS Working Paper No. 173. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10568/73374 Nyasimi M, Radeny M, Kimeli P, Mungai C, Sayula G, Kinyangi J (2016) Uptake and dissemination pathways for climate-smart agriculture technologies and practices in Lushoto, Tanzania. CCAFS Working Paper No. 173. Retrieved from https://​hdl.​handle.​net/​10568/​73374
go back to reference Vera TS, Wiliams CE, Justin CO (2017) Understanding the factors affecting adoption of subpackages of CSA in Southern Malawi. Int J Agric Econ Ext 5(2):259–265 Vera TS, Wiliams CE, Justin CO (2017) Understanding the factors affecting adoption of subpackages of CSA in Southern Malawi. Int J Agric Econ Ext 5(2):259–265
go back to reference Vijayan I, Viswanathan PK (2018) India’s initiative on climate resilient agriculture: a preliminary assessment. Int J Pure Appl Math 118(9):491–497 Vijayan I, Viswanathan PK (2018) India’s initiative on climate resilient agriculture: a preliminary assessment. Int J Pure Appl Math 118(9):491–497
Metadata
Title
Effect of different forms of capital on the adoption of multiple climate-smart agriculture strategies by smallholder farmers in Assam, India
Authors
Jigyasa Sandilya
Kishor Goswami
Publication date
01-04-2024
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change / Issue 4/2024
Print ISSN: 1381-2386
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1596
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-024-10112-w

Other articles of this Issue 4/2024

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 4/2024 Go to the issue