Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Steel Structures 2/2024

23-03-2024

Effect of Strut Stiffness on Seismic Performance of Fully Integral Steel Bridge with a Strut-Braced Pier

Authors: Byung H. Choi, Jaeyoung Kwak, Hung Thanh Diep

Published in: International Journal of Steel Structures | Issue 2/2024

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Recently, the fully integral bridge system that integrates the entire superstructures and substructures together to form a monolithic rigid frame has been presented, since it is anticipated that this approach will lead to improvements in aesthetics, economic efficiency, and seismic performance of a bridge system. This study is related to a fully integral steel bridge with struts installed in-between the piers at the middle of the bridge span, which is called a strut-braced pier. Thus, it is expected that the strut-braced pier mainly prevents horizontal loads like earthquake load or vehicle braking load. In this study, the seismic performance of the fully integral steel bridge was evaluated in accordance with Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria which involves displacement criteria, displacement ductility capacity requirement, and member force criteria. The capacities of the member forces and the displacement were determined through nonlinear static pushover analysis using OpenSees. As a result, the fully integral steel bridge met the seismic performance criteria specified in Caltrans with a great margin. A parametric study was conducted to investigate the effect of strut stiffness on the seismic capacities and effects from the horizontal load of the fully integral steel bridge. The results show that the displacement capacity and displacement ductility capacity of the fully integral steel bridge have a slight change when the strut stiffness increases. The member force capacity is primarily affected by the strut-braced pier and increases significantly along with the strut stiffness. The lateral displacement and the sectional member forces are well controlled to a converging value by a proper application of the strut stiffness. Therefore, it was found that the minimum stiffness required for the struts can be defined to sufficiently resist design seismic loads, and thus, the sectional properties of all intermediate piers can be reasonably adjusted by varying only the stiffness of the struts connected to the braced piers. It has a great significance in that such results lead to the feasibility of various economical designs of bridge substructure including piers suitable for each situation.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2020). AASHTO Load and resistance factor design (LRFD) specifications. D. C., USA. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2020). AASHTO Load and resistance factor design (LRFD) specifications. D. C., USA.
go back to reference Attarchian, N., Kalantari, A., and Moghaddam, A. S. (2014). Cyclic behavior modeling of rectangular rc bridge pies using opensees. 4th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2286–2295. Attarchian, N., Kalantari, A., and Moghaddam, A. S. (2014). Cyclic behavior modeling of rectangular rc bridge pies using opensees. 4th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2286–2295.
go back to reference Caltrans (2013). Caltrans seismic design criteria, version 1.6. California Department of Transportation. Caltrans (2013). Caltrans seismic design criteria, version 1.6. California Department of Transportation.
go back to reference Choi, B. H., Kwak, J. Y., Kim, T. G., & Lim, C. S. (2018). Load distribution characteristics and construction stage analysis of a fully integral railroad bridge with end-restraining abutment. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 18(2), 261–270. Choi, B. H., Kwak, J. Y., Kim, T. G., & Lim, C. S. (2018). Load distribution characteristics and construction stage analysis of a fully integral railroad bridge with end-restraining abutment. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 18(2), 261–270.
go back to reference Choi, B. H., Moreno, L. B., Lim, C. S., Nguyen, D. D., and Lee, T. H. (2019). Seismic performance evaluation of a fully integral concrete bridge with end-restraining abutments. Advances in Civil Engineering, 1–12. Choi, B. H., Moreno, L. B., Lim, C. S., Nguyen, D. D., and Lee, T. H. (2019). Seismic performance evaluation of a fully integral concrete bridge with end-restraining abutments. Advances in Civil Engineering, 1–12.
go back to reference Erhan, S., & Dicleli, M. (2014). Comparative assessment of the seismic performance of integral and conventional bridges with respect to the differences at the abutments. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 13(2), 653–677.CrossRef Erhan, S., & Dicleli, M. (2014). Comparative assessment of the seismic performance of integral and conventional bridges with respect to the differences at the abutments. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 13(2), 653–677.CrossRef
go back to reference Far, N. E., Maleki, S., & Barghian, M. (2015). Design of integral abutment bridges for combined thermal and seismic loads. Earthquake and Structures, 9(2), 415–430.CrossRef Far, N. E., Maleki, S., & Barghian, M. (2015). Design of integral abutment bridges for combined thermal and seismic loads. Earthquake and Structures, 9(2), 415–430.CrossRef
go back to reference Faraji, S., Ting, J. M., Crovo, D. S., & Ernst, H. (2001). Nonlinear analysis of integral bridges: Finite-element model. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 127(5), 454–461.CrossRef Faraji, S., Ting, J. M., Crovo, D. S., & Ernst, H. (2001). Nonlinear analysis of integral bridges: Finite-element model. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 127(5), 454–461.CrossRef
go back to reference Greimann, L. F., Yang, P., & Wolde-Tinsae, A. M. (1986). Nonlinear analysis of integral abutment bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 112(10), 2263–2280.CrossRef Greimann, L. F., Yang, P., & Wolde-Tinsae, A. M. (1986). Nonlinear analysis of integral abutment bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 112(10), 2263–2280.CrossRef
go back to reference Kent, D. C., & Park, R. (1971). Flexural members with confined concrete. ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, 97(7), 1969–1990.CrossRef Kent, D. C., & Park, R. (1971). Flexural members with confined concrete. ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, 97(7), 1969–1990.CrossRef
go back to reference Korean Construction Standards Center (KDS 24 17 11) (2018). Guidelines for the Bridge Seismic Design Standard (LSD). Korean Construction Standards Center (KDS 24 17 11) (2018). Guidelines for the Bridge Seismic Design Standard (LSD).
go back to reference Kozak, D. L., LaFave, J. M., & Fahnestock, L. A. (2014). Seismic modeling of integral abutment bridges in Illinois. Engineering Structures, 165(15), 170–183. Kozak, D. L., LaFave, J. M., & Fahnestock, L. A. (2014). Seismic modeling of integral abutment bridges in Illinois. Engineering Structures, 165(15), 170–183.
go back to reference Lee, T. H., & Nguyen, D. D. (2018). Seismic vulnerability assessment of a continuous steel box girder bridge considering influence of LRB properties. Sadhana, 43(1), 14.CrossRef Lee, T. H., & Nguyen, D. D. (2018). Seismic vulnerability assessment of a continuous steel box girder bridge considering influence of LRB properties. Sadhana, 43(1), 14.CrossRef
go back to reference Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N., & Park, R. (1988). Theoretical stress–strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 114(8), 1804–1826.CrossRef Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N., & Park, R. (1988). Theoretical stress–strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 114(8), 1804–1826.CrossRef
go back to reference Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M. H., & Fenves, G. L. (2007). OpenSees command language manual. University of California Berkeley USA. Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M. H., & Fenves, G. L. (2007). OpenSees command language manual. University of California Berkeley USA.
go back to reference Menegotto, M., & Pinto, P. E. (1973). Method of analysis for cyclically loaded reinforced concrete plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending. IABSE Symposium of Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well-Defined Repeated Loads, Lisbon, Portugal, 13, 15–22. Menegotto, M., & Pinto, P. E. (1973). Method of analysis for cyclically loaded reinforced concrete plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending. IABSE Symposium of Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well-Defined Repeated Loads, Lisbon, Portugal, 13, 15–22.
go back to reference Paraschos, A. and Amde, A. M. (2011). A survey on the status of use, problems, and costs associated with Integral Abutment Bridges. Better Roads, 1–20. Paraschos, A. and Amde, A. M. (2011). A survey on the status of use, problems, and costs associated with Integral Abutment Bridges. Better Roads, 1–20.
go back to reference Priestly, M. J. N., Seible, F., & Calvi, G. M. (1996). Seismic design and retrofit of bridges (pp. 265–456). Wiley.CrossRef Priestly, M. J. N., Seible, F., & Calvi, G. M. (1996). Seismic design and retrofit of bridges (pp. 265–456). Wiley.CrossRef
go back to reference White, H. (2007). Integral abutment bridges: Comparison of current practice between European countries and the united states of America. New York State Department of Transportation. New York, NY, USA. White, H. (2007). Integral abutment bridges: Comparison of current practice between European countries and the united states of America. New York State Department of Transportation. New York, NY, USA.
Metadata
Title
Effect of Strut Stiffness on Seismic Performance of Fully Integral Steel Bridge with a Strut-Braced Pier
Authors
Byung H. Choi
Jaeyoung Kwak
Hung Thanh Diep
Publication date
23-03-2024
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Journal of Steel Structures / Issue 2/2024
Print ISSN: 1598-2351
Electronic ISSN: 2093-6311
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-024-00821-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2024

International Journal of Steel Structures 2/2024 Go to the issue

Premium Partners