Skip to main content
Top

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Embedding Accountability Throughout the Innovation Process in the Green Economy: The Need for an Innovative Approach

Authors : Andri D. Setiawan, Rajbeer Singh, Henny Romijn

Published in: ICoSI 2014

Publisher: Springer Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Innovation in the green economy entails transformative change in society. Vital infrastructure technologies in the fields of energy, water, communication, waste handling, and so on have many interdependencies with other economic sectors. Hence, introducing green innovation in such sectors has complex repercussions and requires many complementary changes to be made elsewhere in the economy as well. Therefore, such innovations come with large uncertainties and risks. They need a long time to be fully developed and assimilated into society, and this is never a smooth journey because many effects were not foreseen at the start. Undesirable social, economic and environmental consequences can easily occur along the way. Therefore, innovation in the green economy introduces the need to foreground issues of accountability more prominently and explicitly throughout the innovation process. This implies that it is necessary to start defining accountability from the beginning of the innovation process—not only toward the end. This can help us to figure out beforehand about what (negative) impacts could possibly emerge and how they can be prevented, in order to lead to satisfactory outcomes for all stakeholders. Therefore, this paper attempts to create an understanding of the importance of embedding accountability throughout innovation process in the green economy by addressing the following questions: How do we define accountability for innovation in the green economy? What kind of approach may help us in embedding accountability throughout the innovation process in the green economy? To answer these questions, the concept of responsible innovation is introduced and the application of the approach is illustrated through a case study. The paper concludes that responsible innovation approach allows the careful scrutinizing of the (emerging) impacts of innovation and provides a clear map of the roles, tasks, and liabilities of innovation actors as the basis for embedding accountability throughout the innovation process.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
There are also recent approaches that are very closely related to the RI approach, for example the term “responsive research” used by researchers in the UK and “reflexive modernization” used by René Kemp and Jan Peter Voss. (See e.g., https://​blogs.​nottingham.​ac.​uk/​makingsciencepub​lic/​2014/​03/​31/​responsive-research-which-research-whose-responsibility/​.).
 
Literature
3.
go back to reference Chapple, K., et al., Innovation in the Green Economy: An Extension of the Regional Innovation System Model? Economic Development Quarterly, 2011. 25(1): p. 5–25. Chapple, K., et al., Innovation in the Green Economy: An Extension of the Regional Innovation System Model? Economic Development Quarterly, 2011. 25(1): p. 5–25.
4.
go back to reference Peng, L. and G.-S. Yan, Clean Energy Grid-Connected Technology Based on Smart Grid. Energy Procedia, 2011. 12(0): p. 213–218. Peng, L. and G.-S. Yan, Clean Energy Grid-Connected Technology Based on Smart Grid. Energy Procedia, 2011. 12(0): p. 213–218.
5.
go back to reference Verbong, G.P.J., S. Beemsterboer, and F. Sengers, Smart grids or smart users? Involving users in developing a low carbon electricity economy. Energy Policy, 2013. 52(0): p. 117–125. Verbong, G.P.J., S. Beemsterboer, and F. Sengers, Smart grids or smart users? Involving users in developing a low carbon electricity economy. Energy Policy, 2013. 52(0): p. 117–125.
6.
go back to reference Phuangpornpitak, N. and S. Tia, Opportunities and Challenges of Integrating Renewable Energy in Smart Grid System. Energy Procedia, 2013. 34(0): p. 282–290. Phuangpornpitak, N. and S. Tia, Opportunities and Challenges of Integrating Renewable Energy in Smart Grid System. Energy Procedia, 2013. 34(0): p. 282–290.
7.
go back to reference van de Poel, I., et al., The Problem of Many Hands: Climate Change as an Example. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2012. 18(1): p. 49–67. van de Poel, I., et al., The Problem of Many Hands: Climate Change as an Example. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2012. 18(1): p. 49–67.
8.
go back to reference Owen, R. and N. Goldberg, Responsible Innovation: A Pilot Study with the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. Risk Analysis, 2010. 30(11): p. 1699–1707. Owen, R. and N. Goldberg, Responsible Innovation: A Pilot Study with the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. Risk Analysis, 2010. 30(11): p. 1699–1707.
9.
go back to reference Singh, R. and O. Kroesen, Understanding responsible innovation from developing countries perspectives, in The 2nd Conference on Responsible Innovation 2012. 2012: The Hague, The Netherlands. Singh, R. and O. Kroesen, Understanding responsible innovation from developing countries perspectives, in The 2nd Conference on Responsible Innovation 2012. 2012: The Hague, The Netherlands.
10.
go back to reference Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten, Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 2013. 42(9): p. 1568–1580. Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten, Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 2013. 42(9): p. 1568–1580.
11.
go back to reference Setiawan, A.D. and R. Singh, Responsible Innovation in Practice: The Adoption of Solar PV in Telecom Towers in Indonesia, in Responsible Innovation Volume II, J. Van den Hoven, E. J. Koops, H. A. Romijn, T. E. Swierstra and I. Oosterlaken, Editor. Forthcoming, Springer. Setiawan, A.D. and R. Singh, Responsible Innovation in Practice: The Adoption of Solar PV in Telecom Towers in Indonesia, in Responsible Innovation Volume II, J. Van den Hoven, E. J. Koops, H. A. Romijn, T. E. Swierstra and I. Oosterlaken, Editor. Forthcoming, Springer.
12.
go back to reference Ubois, J., Responsible Innovation/Sustainable Innovation, in Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, November 2010. 2010. Ubois, J., Responsible Innovation/Sustainable Innovation, in Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, November 2010. 2010.
13.
go back to reference Halle, M., Accountability in the Green Economy. Review of Policy Research, 2011. 28(5): p. 473–477. Halle, M., Accountability in the Green Economy. Review of Policy Research, 2011. 28(5): p. 473–477.
14.
go back to reference Leat, D., Are voluntary organizations accountable?, in Voluntary Agencies: Challenges of Organization and Management, D. Billis, and Harris, M., Editor. 1996: Basingstoke: Macmillan. Leat, D., Are voluntary organizations accountable?, in Voluntary Agencies: Challenges of Organization and Management, D. Billis, and Harris, M., Editor. 1996: Basingstoke: Macmillan.
15.
go back to reference Taylor, M., Democracy and Accountability, in International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home, S.J. Smith, Editor. 2012, Elsevier: San Diego. p. 314–318. Taylor, M., Democracy and Accountability, in International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home, S.J. Smith, Editor. 2012, Elsevier: San Diego. p. 314–318.
16.
go back to reference Hellström, T., Systemic innovation and risk: technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation. Technology in Society, 2003. 25(3): p. 369–384. Hellström, T., Systemic innovation and risk: technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation. Technology in Society, 2003. 25(3): p. 369–384.
17.
go back to reference Kemp, R., J. Schot, and R. Hoogma, Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 1998. 10(2): p. 175–195. Kemp, R., J. Schot, and R. Hoogma, Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 1998. 10(2): p. 175–195.
18.
go back to reference Lee, R.G., Look at Mother Nature on the Run in the 21st Century: Responsibility, Research and Innovation. Transnational Environmental Law, 2012. 1(01): p. 105–117. Lee, R.G., Look at Mother Nature on the Run in the 21st Century: Responsibility, Research and Innovation. Transnational Environmental Law, 2012. 1(01): p. 105–117.
19.
go back to reference Sutcliffe, H., A Report on Responsible Research and Innovation for the European Commission. 2011: MATTER, London. Sutcliffe, H., A Report on Responsible Research and Innovation for the European Commission. 2011: MATTER, London.
20.
go back to reference von Schomberg, R., Prospects for technology assessment in a framework ofresponsible research and innovation. In: Dusseldorp, M., Beecroft, R. (Eds.), Tech-nikfolgen Abschätzen Lehren: Bildungspotenziale Transdisziplinärer. Vs Verlag,Methoden, Wiesbaden. 2011. von Schomberg, R., Prospects for technology assessment in a framework ofresponsible research and innovation. In: Dusseldorp, M., Beecroft, R. (Eds.), Tech-nikfolgen Abschätzen Lehren: Bildungspotenziale Transdisziplinärer. Vs Verlag,Methoden, Wiesbaden. 2011.
21.
go back to reference De Moor, K., et al., Towards Innovation Foresight: Two empirical case studies on future TV experiences for/by users. Futures, (0). De Moor, K., et al., Towards Innovation Foresight: Two empirical case studies on future TV experiences for/by users. Futures, (0).
22.
go back to reference Peter, M.K. and D.G. Jarratt, The practice of foresight in long-term planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (0). Peter, M.K. and D.G. Jarratt, The practice of foresight in long-term planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (0).
23.
go back to reference Sarpong, D., M. Maclean, and C. Davies, A matter of foresight: How practices enable (or impede) organizational foresightfulness. European Management Journal, 2013. 31(6): p. 613–625. Sarpong, D., M. Maclean, and C. Davies, A matter of foresight: How practices enable (or impede) organizational foresightfulness. European Management Journal, 2013. 31(6): p. 613–625.
24.
go back to reference Muniesa, F. and M. Lenglet, Responsible Innovation in Finance: Directions and Implications, in Responsible Innovation. 2013, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p. 185–198. Muniesa, F. and M. Lenglet, Responsible Innovation in Finance: Directions and Implications, in Responsible Innovation. 2013, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p. 185–198.
25.
go back to reference Parkhill, K., et al., Deliberation and Responsible Innovation: A Geoengineering Case Study, in Responsible Innovation. 2013, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p. 219–239. Parkhill, K., et al., Deliberation and Responsible Innovation: A Geoengineering Case Study, in Responsible Innovation. 2013, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p. 219–239.
26.
go back to reference Stahl, B.C., G. Eden, and M. Jirotka, Responsible Research and Innovation in Information and Communication Technology: Identifying and Engaging with the Ethical Implications of ICTs, in Responsible Innovation. 2013, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p. 199–218. Stahl, B.C., G. Eden, and M. Jirotka, Responsible Research and Innovation in Information and Communication Technology: Identifying and Engaging with the Ethical Implications of ICTs, in Responsible Innovation. 2013, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p. 199–218.
Metadata
Title
Embedding Accountability Throughout the Innovation Process in the Green Economy: The Need for an Innovative Approach
Authors
Andri D. Setiawan
Rajbeer Singh
Henny Romijn
Copyright Year
2017
Publisher
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-661-4_17