Top

Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications

Published in:

27-06-2022

Energy efficient clustering with compressive sensing for underwater wireless sensor networks

Authors: Roshani V. Bhaskarwar, Dnyandeo J. Pete

Published in: Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications | Issue 5/2022

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Due to the challenges of the Internet of Things (IoT) enabled underwater communications, Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks (UWSNs) have been graced as a hot research topic. The energy efficiency, void communications, and packet collisions are vital challenges in using IoT-enabled UWSNs. To this end, we propose a novel cluster-based routing protocol called Energy Efficient UWSNs Clustering Protocol (EEUCP). The EEUCP is an integrated clustering with routing technique that aids in energy conservation for network lifetime enhancement in UWSNs. Initially, the underwater sensor nodes deployed in different layers of the ocean column are divided into clusters by a simple K means algorithm. The Fuzzy Logic (FL) approach is then implemented to select an optimal Cluster Head (CH) for each cluster in the network. The FL rules are designed using three input variables Residual Energy (RE), Distance to the Surface Sink (DSS), and Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR) of every sensor in the cluster. To address the problem of void communication, the reliable forwarding relay selection problem is formulated and has been solved by directly utilizing the periodic fuzzy trust values of the sensor nodes obtained during the CH selection phase. To further reduce the energy consumption and number of transmissions from the CH to the sink node, a hybrid data reduction, and Compressive sensing (CS) mechanism has been adopted. For data reduction, the lightweight high similarity data analysis mechanism is utilized. The hybrid CS method is implemented where the random CS metrics are applied to the periodically aggregated CH data before transmitting it to the surface sink node. The simulation results demonstrate that the EEUCP protocol significantly minimizes the energy consumption and improves the network Quality of Service (QoS) performances compared to the existing algorithms.

previous article Blockchain-based multi-user certificateless encryption with keyword search for electronic health record sharing

next article Fog-assisted hierarchical data routing strategy for IoT-enabled WSN: Forest fire detection

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Mahajan HB, Badarla A (2018) Application of Internet of Things for Smart Precision Farming: Solutions and Challenges. Int J Adv Sci Technol 37–45

Mahajan HB, Badarla A (2019) Experimental Analysis of Recent Clustering Algorithms for Wireless Sensor Network: Application of IoT based Smart Precision Farming. J Adv Res Dynam Control Syst 11(9). https://doi.org/10.5373/JARDCS/V11I9/20193162

Ali T, Irfan M, Shaf A, Saeed Alwadie A, Sajid A, Awais M, Aamir M (2020) A secure communication in IoT enabled underwater and wireless sensor network for smart cities. Sensors 20(15):4309. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20154309CrossRef

Nayyar A, Ba CH, Cong Duc NP, Binh HD (2018) Smart-IoUT 1.0: A smart aquatic monitoring network based on Internet of underwater things (IoUT). Int Conf Ind Netw Intell Syst 191–207. Springer, Cham

Morais R, Mendes J, Silva R, Silva N, Sousa JJ, Peres E (2021) A versatile, low-power and low-cost IoT device for field data gathering in precision agriculture practices. Agriculture 11(7):619CrossRef

Mahalle PN, Shelar PA, Shinde GR, Dey N (2021) Applications of UWSN. In: The Underwater World for Digital Data Transmission. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1307-4_5

Frampton KD (2006) Acoustic self-localization in a distributed sensor network. IEEE Sens J 6(1):166–172. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2005.860361CrossRef

Wei X, Guo H, Wang X, Wang X, Qiu M (2021) Reliable Data Collection Techniques in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials

Awan KM, Shah PA, Iqbal K, Gillani S, Ahmad W, Nam Y (2019) Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks: A Review of Recent Issues and Challenges. Wirel Commun Mob Comput 2019:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6470359CrossRef

10.

Khan I, Ahmad S, Azim N, Shah SB (2017) Issues & Challenges In Underwater Sensor Networks. Int J Adv Comput Technique Appl (IJACTA) 5:61–66

11.

Nayyar A, Puri V, Le DN (2019) Comprehensive analysis of routing protocols surrounding underwater sensor networks (UWSNs). Data Manage Analytics Innov 435–450. Springer, Singapore

12.

Bhaskarwar RV, Pete DJ (2021) Cross-Layer Design Approaches in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey. SN Comput Sci 2(5):1–26CrossRef

13.

Fattah S, Gani A, Ahmedy I, Idris MYI, Targio Hashem IA (2020) A Survey on Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks: Requirements, Taxonomy, Recent Advances, and Open Research Challenges. Sensors 20(18):5393. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20185393CrossRef

14.

Sandeep DN, Kumar V (2017) Review on Clustering, Coverage and Connectivity in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks: A Communication Techniques Perspective. IEEE Access 5:11176–11199. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2713640CrossRef

15.

Sreedharan PS, Pete DJ (2020) A fuzzy multicriteria decision-making-based CH selection and hybrid routing protocol for WSN. Int J Commun Syst 33(15):e4536CrossRef

16.

Mahajan HB, Badarla A, Junnarkar AA (2021) CL-IoT: cross-layer Internet of Things protocol for intelligent manufacturing of smart farming. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 12:7777–7791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02502-0CrossRef

17.

Mahajan HB, Badarla A (2021) Cross-Layer Protocol for WSN-Assisted IoT Smart Farming Applications Using Nature Inspired Algorithm. Wireless Pers Commun. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08866-6CrossRef

18.

Sarangi K, Bhattacharya I (2019) A study on data aggregation techniques in wireless sensor network in static and dynamic scenarios. Innovations Syst Softw Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-019-00326-6CrossRef

19.

Vinodha D, Mary Anita EA (2018) Secure Data Aggregation Techniques for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Review. Arch Comput Methods Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-018-9267-2CrossRef

20.

Singh VK, Singh VK, Kumar M (2017) In-Network Data Processing Based on Compressed Sensing in WSN: A Survey. Wireless Pers Commun 96(2):2087–2124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4288-yCrossRef

21.

Amutha J, Sharma S, Nagar J (2019) WSN Strategies Based on Sensors, Deployment, Sensing Models, Coverage and Energy Efficiency: Review, Approaches and Open Issues. Wireless Personal Commun. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06903-z

22.

Wu F-Y, Yang K, Duan R, Tian T (2018) Compressive Sampling and Reconstruction of Acoustic Signal in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Sens J 18(14):5876–5884. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2018.2839772CrossRef

23.

Sun P, Wu L, Wang Z, Xiao M, Wang Z (2018) Sparsest Random Sampling for Cluster-Based Compressive Data Gathering in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Access 6:36383–36394. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2846815CrossRef

24.

Yan H, Shi ZJ, Cui J (2008) DBR: depth-based routing for underwater sensor networks. In: Networking 2008 Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks, Wireless Networks, Next Generation Internet 72–86

25.

Lee U, Wang P, Noh Y, Vieira LF, Gerla M, Cui, JH (2010) Pressure routing for underwater sensor networks. 2010 Proc IEEE INFOCOM 1–9. IEEE

26.

Noh Y, Lee U, Wang P, Choi BSC, Gerla M (2012) VAPR: Void-aware pressure routing for underwater sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 12(5):895–908CrossRef

27.

John S, Menon VG, Nayyar A (2020) Simulation-based performance analysis of location-based opportunistic routing protocols in underwater sensor networks having communication voids. In Data Management, Analytics and Innovation (pp. 697–711). Springer, Singapore

28.

Krishnaswamy V, Manvi SS (2019) Fuzzy and PSO Based Clustering Scheme in Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks Using Energy and Distance Parameters. Wireless Pers Commun. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06483-yCrossRef

29.

Goyal N, Dave M, Verma AK (2016) Energy Efficient Architecture for Intra and Inter Cluster Communication for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 89(2):687–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3302-0CrossRef

30.

Hou R, He L, Hu S, Luo J (2018) Energy-Balanced Unequal Layering Clustering in Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks. IEEE Access 6:39685–39691. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2854276CrossRef

31.

Sahana S, Singh K (2019) Fuzzy based energy efficient underwater routing protocol. J Discrete Math Sci Cryptography 22(8):1501–1515. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720529.2019.1695901CrossRefMATH

32.

Tavakoli J, Moghim N, Leila A, Pasandideh F (2020) A Fuzzy Based Energy Efficient Clustering Routing Protocol in Underwater Sensor Networks

33.

Natesan S, Krishnan R (2020) FLCEER. Int J Inf Technol Web Eng 15(3):76–101. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijitwe.2020070105CrossRef

34.

Khan W, Wang H, Anwar MS, Ayaz M, Ahmad S, Ullah I (2019) A Multi-Layer Cluster Based Energy Efficient Routing Scheme for UWSNs. IEEE Access 7:77398–77410. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2922060CrossRef

35.

Gomathi RM, Manickam JM, Sivasangari A, Ajitha P (2020) Energy efficient dynamic clustering routing protocol in underwater wireless sensor networks. Int J Networking Virtual Organ 22:415. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNVO.2020.107576CrossRef

36.

Khan MF, Bibi M, Aadil F, Lee J-W (2021) Adaptive Node Clustering for Underwater Sensor Networks. Sensors 21(13):4514. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21134514CrossRef

37.

Nguyen N-T, Le TTT, Nguyen H-H, Voznak M (2021) Energy-Efficient Clustering Multi-Hop Routing Protocol in a UWSN. Sensors 21(2):627. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020627CrossRef

38.

Wang Q, Lin D, Yang P, Zhang Z (2019) An Energy-Efficient Compressive Sensing-Based Clustering Routing Protocol for WSNs. IEEE Sens J 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2019.2893912

39.

Pacharaney US, Gupta RK (2019) Clustering and compressive data gathering in wireless sensor network. Wireless Pers Commun 109(2):1311–1331CrossRef

40.

Huang S, Yang. (2019) Data Uploading Strategy for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. Sensors 19(23):5265. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19235265CrossRef

41.

Wang S, Lin Y, Tao H, Sharma PK, Wang J (2019) Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks Node Localization Based on Compressive Sensing in Water Hydrology. Sensors 19(20):4552. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19204552CrossRef

42.

Wang R, Liu G, Kang W, Li B, Ma R, Zhu C (2018) Bayesian Compressive Sensing Based Optimized Node Selection Scheme in Underwater Sensor Networks. Sensors 18(8):2568. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082568CrossRef

43.

Liang Q, Liu X, Na Z, Wang W, Mu J, Zhang B (Eds.) (2020) Communications, Signal Processing, and Systems. Lecture Notes Electr Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6504-1

44.

Arunkumar JR, Anusuya R, Sundar Rajan M et al (2020) Underwater Wireless Information Transfer with Compressive Sensing for Energy Efficiency. Wireless Pers Commun 113:715–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07249-7.

45.

Chen X, Xiong W, Chu S (2020) Two-Tier PSO Based Data Routing Employing Bayesian Compressive Sensing in Underwater Sensor Networks. Sensors 20(20):5961. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20205961CrossRef

46.

Li X, Wang C, Yang Z, Yan L, Han S (2018) Energy-efficient and secure transmission scheme based on chaotic compressive sensing in underwater wireless sensor networks. Digital Signal Process 81:129–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsp.2018.07.006CrossRef

47.

Yadav S, Kumar V (2019) Hybrid compressive sensing enabled energy efficient transmission of multi-hop clustered UWSNs. AEU-Int J Electron Commun 152836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2019.152836

48.

Goyal N, Dave M, Verma AK (2017) Data aggregation in underwater wireless sensor network: Recent approaches and issues. J King Saud Univ - Comput Inf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2017.04.007CrossRef

49.

Goyal N, Dave M, Verma AK (2017) Improved Data Aggregation for Cluster Based Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci, India, Sect A 87(2):235–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-017-0344-yCrossRef

50.

Ruby D, Jeyachidra J (2019) Semaphore Based Data Aggregation and Similarity Findings for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. Int J Grid High-Perform Comput 11(3):59–76. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijghpc.2019070104CrossRef

51.

Zhang Z, Li J, Yang X (2020) Data Aggregation in Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks by Using Local Tree Reconstruction Algorithm. Complexity 2020:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3594263CrossRef

52.

Jan SRU, Khan R, Jan MA (2020) An energy-efficient data aggregation approach for cluster-based wireless sensor networks. Ann Telecommun. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-020-00823-xCrossRef

53.

Ruby D, Jeyachidra J (2020) Hierarchical classification of time series data aggregation in underwater wireless sensor networks. Underw Technol 37(2):53–64. https://doi.org/10.3723/ut.37.053underwaterCrossRef

54.

Qaisar S, Bilal RM, Iqbal W, Naureen M, Lee S (2013) Compressive sensing: From theory to applications, a survey. J Commun Netw 15(5):443–456CrossRef

55.

Nayyar A, Balas VE (2019) Analysis of simulation tools for underwater sensor networks (UWSNs). In International conference on innovative computing and communications (pp. 165–180). Springer, Singapore

Title: Energy efficient clustering with compressive sensing for underwater wireless sensor networks
Authors: Roshani V. Bhaskarwar
Dnyandeo J. Pete
Publication date: 27-06-2022
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications / Issue 5/2022
Print ISSN: 1936-6442
Electronic ISSN: 1936-6450
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-022-01346-z

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 5/2022

A high performance two-layer consensus architecture for blockchain-based IoT systems

A new design of intrusion detection in IoT sector using optimal feature selection and high ranking-based ensemble learning model

Revisiting FAW attack in an imperfect PoW blockchain system

A Mixed-integer programming model using particle swarm optimization algorithm for resource discovery in the cloudiot

EPSAPI: An efficient and provably secure authentication protocol for an IoT application environment

An enhanced mutually authenticated security protocol with key establishment for cloud enabled smart vehicle to grid network

Premium Partner