Top

Environmental Management

Published in:

01-04-2008

Evaluation of Dairy Effluent Management Options Using Multiple Criteria Analysis

Authors: Stefan A. Hajkowicz, Sarah A. Wheeler

Published in: Environmental Management | Issue 4/2008

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

This article describes how options for managing dairy effluent on the Lower Murray River in South Australia were evaluated using multiple criteria analysis (MCA). Multiple criteria analysis is a framework for combining multiple environmental, social, and economic objectives in policy decisions. At the time of the study, dairy irrigation in the region was based on flood irrigation which involved returning effluent to the river. The returned water contained nutrients, salts, and microbial contaminants leading to environmental, human health, and tourism impacts. In this study MCA was used to evaluate 11 options against 6 criteria for managing dairy effluent problems. Of the 11 options, the MCA model selected partial rehabilitation of dairy paddocks with the conversion of remaining land to other agriculture. Soon after, the South Australian Government adopted this course of action and is now providing incentives for dairy farmers in the region to upgrade irrigation infrastructure and/or enter alternative industries.

previous article The Impacts of Human Visitation on Mussel Bed Communities Along the California Coast: Are Regulatory Marine Reserves Effective in Protecting These Communities?

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Adhikari M, Paudel KP, Martin NR Jr, Gauthier WM (2005) Economics of dairy waste use as fertilizer in central Texas. Waste Management 25:1067–1074CrossRef

ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) (2001) Water Account Australia. ABS Catalogue No. 4610.0, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, 137 pp

ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics). (2004). Year Book Australia. N umber 86. ABS Catalogue No. 1301.0, Australian Bureau of Statistics. Canberra, 872 pp

Beck MP, Lin BW (1983) Some heuristics for the consensus ranking problem. Computers and Operations Research 10: 1–7CrossRef

Bennet J (2005) Australasian environmental economics: contributions, conflicts and cop-outs. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 49: 243–261CrossRef

Bodini A, Ricci A Viaroli P (2000) A multimethodological approach for the sustainable management of perifluvial wetlands of the Po River (Italy). Environmental Management 26: 59–72CrossRef

Bojórquez-Tapia LA, Sánchez-Colon S, Martinez AF. (2005). Building Consensus in Environmental Impact Assessment Through Multicriteria Modeling and Sensitivity Analysis. Environmental Management 36(3): 469–481CrossRef

Brans JP, Mareschal B (2005) Pages 163–195 in Figueira J., G. Salvatore, M. Ehrgott (Eds), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the art surveys, Springer, New York

Brans JP, Vincke P, Mareschal B (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research 24: 228–238CrossRef

Brouwer R, van Ek R (2004) Integrated ecological, economic and social impact assessment of alternative flood control policies in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics 50:1–21CrossRef

Cassells SM, Meister AD (2001) Cost and trade impacts of environmental regulations: effluent control and the New Zealand dairy sector. Australian Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics 45(2): 257–274CrossRef

Cook WD, Kress M (1990) A data envelopment model for aggregating preference rankings. Management Science 36: 1302–1310

d’Angelo A, Eskandari A, Szidarovszky F (1998) Social choice procedures in water resource management. Journal of Environmental Management 52: 203–210CrossRef

Demirel B, Yenigun O, Onay TT. (2005) Anaerobic treatment of dairy wastewaters: a review. Process Biochemistry 40: 2583–2595CrossRef

DWLBC (Department of Water, Land, Biodiversity Conservation) (2003) Guidelines: New requirements and public financial assistance for irrigated agriculture in the Lower Murray Reclaimed Irrigation Areas. Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation, Government of South Australia, Adelaide, 3pp

Eder G, Duckstein L, Nachtnebel HP (1997) Ranking water resource projects and evaluating criteria by multicriterion Q-analysis: an Austrian case study. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 6: 259–271CrossRef

Emond EJ, Mason DW (2002) A new rank correlation coefficient with application to the consensus ranking problem. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. 11: 17–28CrossRef

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2003) EPA Guidelines for Lower Murray Reclaimed Irrigation Areas. Environmental Protection Agency, Adelaide, South Australia, 5pp

Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (Eds) (2005) Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. Springer: New York; 1045 pp

Gershon M, Duckstein L (1983) Multiobjective approaches to river basin planning. Journal of the Water Resources Planning and Management Division 109: 13–28CrossRef

Hajkowicz SA, McDonald GT, Smith PN (2000) An evaluation of multiple objective decision support weighting techniques in natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 43: 505–518CrossRef

Hubble I, Phillips R (1999) Tasmanian dairy farm effluent management program. Journal of Cleaner Production 7: 167–168CrossRef

Janssen R. (2001) On the use of multi-criteria analysis in environmental impact assessment in the Netherlands. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 10: 101–109CrossRef

Joubert AR, Leiman A, de Klerk HM, Katau S, Aggenbach JC (1997) Fynbos vegetation and the supply of water: a comparison of multi-criteria decision analysis and cost benefit analysis. Ecological Economics 22: 123–140CrossRef

Kasanen E, Wallenius H, Wallenius J, Zionts S (2000) A study of high-level managerial decision processes, with implications for MCDM research. European Journal of Operational Research 120: 496–510CrossRef

Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1993) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs, Second edition. Cambridge University Press, London, 569pp

Lahdelma R, Salminen R, Hokkanen J (2000) Using multiple criteria methods in environmental planning and management. Environmental Management 26: 595–605CrossRef

LMIAG (Lower Murray Irrigation Action Group) (1999) Draft Land and Water Management Plan for the Lower Murray Reclaimed Swamp Irrigation Areas. LMIAG, Murray Bridge, South Australia, pp 53

Mardle S, Pascoe S, Herrero I (2004) Management Objective Importance in Fisheries: An Evaluation Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Environmental Management 33:1–11CrossRef

Mendoza G, Prabhu R (2000) Development of a Methodology for Selecting Criteria and Indicators of Sustainable Forest Management: A Case Study on Participatory Assessment. Environmental Management 26: 659–673CrossRef

Mingers J, Rosenhead J (2004) Problem structuring methods in action. European Journal of Operational Research 152: 530–554CrossRef

Munda G (2005) In: Figueira J, Salvatore G, Ehrgott M, (eds), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the art surveys, Springer, New York pp. 953–987

Ozelkan EC, Duckstein L (1996) Analysing water resource alternatives and handling criteria by multi criterion decision techniques. Journal of Environmental Management 48: 69–96CrossRef

Prato T. (1999) Multiple attribute decision analysis for ecosystem management. Ecological Economics 30: 207–222CrossRef

Raju KS, Duckstein L, Arondel C (2000) Multicriterion Analysis for Sustainable Water Resources Planning: A Case Study in Spain. Water Resources Management 14: 435–456CrossRef

RMWRC (River Murray Water Resources Committee) (1995) River Murray Regional Water Resource Management Plan - Border to the Barrages and Beyond. River Murray Water Resources Committee, Berri, South Australia

Roy B. (1968) Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (la méthode ELECTRE). la Revue d’Informatique et de Recherche Opérationnelle (RIRO) 8: 57–75

Saaty TL (2005) In: Figueira J, Salvatore G, Ehrgott M (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the art surveys, Springer, New York pp. 345–408

Scheubrein R, Zionts SA (2006) A problem structuring front end for a multiple criteria decision support system. Computers & Operations Research 33: 18–31CrossRef

Seo F, Sakawa M (1988) Multiple criteria decision analysis in regional planning: concepts, methods and applications. Kluwer Academic, Boston, 535pp

Strijker D, Sijtsma FJ, Wiersma D (2000) Evaluation of Nature Conservation: An Application to the Dutch Ecological Network. Environmental and Resource Economics 16: 363–378CrossRef

Vellidis G, Smith MC, Leibowitz SG, Ainslie WB, Pruitt BA (2003) Prioritizing wetland restoration for sediment yield reduction: a conceptual model. Environmental Management 31: 301–312CrossRef

Weber M, Borcherding K (1993) Behavioural influences on weight judgements in multiattribute decision making. European Journal of Operational Research 67: 1–12CrossRef

Weistroffer HR, Smith CH, Narula SC (2005) In: Figueira J, Salvatore G, Ehrgott M (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the art surveys, Springer, New York pp. 989–1018

Wheeler S, Young D, Bright M (2001) Consultancy for Lower Murray Reclaimed Irrigation Areas: Options study stage two. Volume 1. PIRSA Rural Solutions, Adelaide, 111 pp

Whittle J, Philcox M (1996) Drainage Management Options for the Lower Murray Reclaimed Swamps. Primary Industries South Australia, Adelaide

Willers HC, Karamanlis XN, Schulte DD (1999) Potential of closed water systems on dairy farms. Water Science Technology 39: 113–119CrossRef

Zanakis SH, Solomon A, Wishart N, Dublish S (1998) Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of selected methods. European Journal of Operational Research 107: 507–529CrossRef

Zeleny M (1973) In: Cocharane JL, Zeleny M (eds) Multiple criteria decision making, University of Southern Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C pp. 262–301

Title: Evaluation of Dairy Effluent Management Options Using Multiple Criteria Analysis
Authors: Stefan A. Hajkowicz
Sarah A. Wheeler
Publication date: 01-04-2008
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Environmental Management / Issue 4/2008
Print ISSN: 0364-152X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-007-9060-8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 4/2008

The Impacts of Human Visitation on Mussel Bed Communities Along the California Coast: Are Regulatory Marine Reserves Effective in Protecting These Communities?

Field Validation of a Conservation Network on the Eastern Shore of Maryland, USA, Using Breeding Birds as Bio-Indicators

Crowding and Experience-Use History: A Study of the Moderating Effect of Place Attachment Among Water-Based Recreationists

Transaction Costs Economics of Irreplaceability: ex ante and ex post Evaluation of Conservation Networks’ Vulnerability to Environmental Shocks

A Site-Related Suitability Analysis for the Production of Biomass as a Contribution to Sustainable Regional Land-Use

Against Oversimplifying the Issues on Relocating Turtle Eggs