Skip to main content
Top

2022 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

9. Every Woman Is a Vessel: An Exploratory Study on Gender and Academic Entrepreneurship in a Nascent Technology Transfer System

Authors : Dolores Modic, Ana Hafner, Tamara Valič-Besednjak

Published in: University-Industry Knowledge Interactions

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Previous research shows that women are under-represented among academic entrepreneurs, indicating a gender gap in this field. Using a case-oriented approach combining interview analysis and fuzzy-set analysis, we explore potential barriers to women’s engagement in academic entrepreneurship as perceived by both the researchers and the heads of technology transfer offices (TTOs). The inclusion of the latter group foreshadows the relevance of different actors who can influence the gender gap in academic entrepreneurship settings. We thus contribute to the body of knowledge about female academic entrepreneurship. The potential barriers are modelled as internal and external. We reveal that internal barriers (e.g., work-family balance and ambition) are perceived as more crucial than external barriers by both groups of respondents. However, TTOs and researchers seem to partially disagree about those barriers, which may impact the effectiveness of mechanisms implemented to mitigate the gender gap in academic entrepreneurship. Moreover, although both TTOs and researchers recognise the gender gap, neither party identified TTOs as responsible for reducing the associated disparities. Our fuzzy-set analysis, performed to explore the causal relationships between different gender gap conditions and female academic entrepreneurial activity, reveals two combinations of barriers underlying women’s low engagement in academic entrepreneurship.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
In this approach, anchor values are determined by joint discussion and agreement among all authors to ensure the values correspond with theory and data and to avoid individual bias. Similar approaches have proven successful in prior research (e.g., Modic & Rončević, 2018).
 
2
The INT4 barrier was operationalised as the researcher’s age and the TTO’s age (years of existence). The barrier, in this case, is a lack of experience resulting from the younger age; therefore, we re-calculated the barrier and included it in the analysis as ‘absence of experience’. We used ~INT4 = fuzzyneg(INT4).
 
3
Consistency measures the degree to which the term and the term solution are subsets of the outcome (Ragin, 2008). We followed the idea of reporting positive experience the cut-off is set at 0.70 (Schneider & Wageman, 2007). We set the cut-off even more strictly, at 0.8, to ensure higher levels of degree to which cases in the dataset are members of the proposed solution. Similarly, the coverage threshold, representing the degree of the outcome being explained by the proposed solution, is also set to 0.8.
 
4
A sufficient presence of a condition (or combination of conditions) is enough for the output to occur. Since the inclusion interpretation is sometimes more theoretically relevant than the correlation interpretation, the sufficiency check is part of standard fuzzy-set analysis. The calculation method is parallel to the Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test (Smithson, 2005).
 
5
The test of necessity gives information about conditions that need to be present for the output to occur. Analysis of necessity is an analysis of correlation. The calculation method is parallel to Chi square tests in discrete membership of sets (Smithson, 2005).
 
Literature
go back to reference Abreu, M., & Grinevich, V. (2017). Gender patterns in academic entrepreneurship. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4), 763–794.CrossRef Abreu, M., & Grinevich, V. (2017). Gender patterns in academic entrepreneurship. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4), 763–794.CrossRef
go back to reference Adam, F., Gojkovič, U., Hafner, A., et al. (2014). High-technology enterprises – influence of organisational culture and social networks on knowledge transfer (in Slovenian). IRSA. Adam, F., Gojkovič, U., Hafner, A., et al. (2014). High-technology enterprises – influence of organisational culture and social networks on knowledge transfer (in Slovenian). IRSA.
go back to reference Alsos, G. A., Hytti, U., & Ljunggren, E. (2016). Gender and innovation – an introduction. In Research handbook on gender and innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRef Alsos, G. A., Hytti, U., & Ljunggren, E. (2016). Gender and innovation – an introduction. In Research handbook on gender and innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRef
go back to reference Arenius, P., & Minniti, M. (2005). Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 24, 233–247.CrossRef Arenius, P., & Minniti, M. (2005). Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 24, 233–247.CrossRef
go back to reference Azagra-Caro, J. M., & Llopis, O. (2018). Who do you care about? Scientists’ personality traits and perceived impact on beneficiaries. R&D Management, 48(5), 566–579.CrossRef Azagra-Caro, J. M., & Llopis, O. (2018). Who do you care about? Scientists’ personality traits and perceived impact on beneficiaries. R&D Management, 48(5), 566–579.CrossRef
go back to reference Bird, S. R. (2011). Unsettling universities’ incongruous, gendered bureaucratic structures: A case-study approach. Gender, Work and Organization, 18(2), 202–239.CrossRef Bird, S. R. (2011). Unsettling universities’ incongruous, gendered bureaucratic structures: A case-study approach. Gender, Work and Organization, 18(2), 202–239.CrossRef
go back to reference Brooks, A. W., Huang, L., Kearney, S. W., & Murray, F. E. (2014). Investors prefer entrepreneurial ventures pitched by attractive men. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(12), 4427–4431.CrossRef Brooks, A. W., Huang, L., Kearney, S. W., & Murray, F. E. (2014). Investors prefer entrepreneurial ventures pitched by attractive men. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(12), 4427–4431.CrossRef
go back to reference Brush, C., Green, P., Balachandra, L., & Davis, A. E. (2014). Diana report women entrepreneurs 2014: Bridging the gender gap in venture capital. Babson College. Brush, C., Green, P., Balachandra, L., & Davis, A. E. (2014). Diana report women entrepreneurs 2014: Bridging the gender gap in venture capital. Babson College.
go back to reference Brush, C., Edelman, L. F., Manolova, T., & Welter, F. (2019). A gendered look at entrepreneurship ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 53(2), 393–408.CrossRef Brush, C., Edelman, L. F., Manolova, T., & Welter, F. (2019). A gendered look at entrepreneurship ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 53(2), 393–408.CrossRef
go back to reference Colyvas, J. A., Snellman, K., Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. P. (2012). Disentangling effort and performance: A renewed look at gender differences in commercializing medical school research. Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–12. Colyvas, J. A., Snellman, K., Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. P. (2012). Disentangling effort and performance: A renewed look at gender differences in commercializing medical school research. Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–12.
go back to reference Corley, E. A. (2005). How do career strategies, gender, and work environment affect faculty productivity levels in university-based science centers? Review of Policy Research, 22(5), 637–655.CrossRef Corley, E. A. (2005). How do career strategies, gender, and work environment affect faculty productivity levels in university-based science centers? Review of Policy Research, 22(5), 637–655.CrossRef
go back to reference Ebersberger, B., & Pirhofer, C. (2011). Gender, management education and the willingness for academic entrepreneurship. Applied Economics Letters, 18(9), 841–844.CrossRef Ebersberger, B., & Pirhofer, C. (2011). Gender, management education and the willingness for academic entrepreneurship. Applied Economics Letters, 18(9), 841–844.CrossRef
go back to reference Fini, R., Lacetera, N., & Shane, S. (2010). Inside or outside the IP system? Business creation in academia. Research Policy, 39(8), 1060–1069.CrossRef Fini, R., Lacetera, N., & Shane, S. (2010). Inside or outside the IP system? Business creation in academia. Research Policy, 39(8), 1060–1069.CrossRef
go back to reference Foss, L., & Gibson, D. V. (2015). The entrepreneurial university: Context and institutional change. The Entrepreneurial University.CrossRef Foss, L., & Gibson, D. V. (2015). The entrepreneurial university: Context and institutional change. The Entrepreneurial University.CrossRef
go back to reference Foss, L., Henry, C., Ahl, H., & Mikalsen, G. H. (2019). Women’s entrepreneurship policy research: A 30-year review of the evidence. Small Business Economics, 53(2), 409–429.CrossRef Foss, L., Henry, C., Ahl, H., & Mikalsen, G. H. (2019). Women’s entrepreneurship policy research: A 30-year review of the evidence. Small Business Economics, 53(2), 409–429.CrossRef
go back to reference Friedman, J., & Silberman, J. (2003). University technology transfer: Do incentives, management, and location matter? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 17–30.CrossRef Friedman, J., & Silberman, J. (2003). University technology transfer: Do incentives, management, and location matter? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 17–30.CrossRef
go back to reference Frietsch, R., Haller, I., Funken-Vrohlings, M., & Grupp, H. (2009). Gender-specific patterns in patenting and publishing. Research Policy, 38, 590–599.CrossRef Frietsch, R., Haller, I., Funken-Vrohlings, M., & Grupp, H. (2009). Gender-specific patterns in patenting and publishing. Research Policy, 38, 590–599.CrossRef
go back to reference Gauthier, L. R. (2000). The role of questioning: Beyond comprehension’s front door. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 40, 239–252. Gauthier, L. R. (2000). The role of questioning: Beyond comprehension’s front door. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 40, 239–252.
go back to reference Goedegebuure, L., & van Vught, F. (1996). Comparative higher education studies: The perspective from the policy sciences. Higher Education, 32, 371–394.CrossRef Goedegebuure, L., & van Vught, F. (1996). Comparative higher education studies: The perspective from the policy sciences. Higher Education, 32, 371–394.CrossRef
go back to reference Goel, R. K., Göktepe-Hultén, D., & Ram, R. (2015). Academics’ entrepreneurship propensities and gender differences. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(1), 161–177.CrossRef Goel, R. K., Göktepe-Hultén, D., & Ram, R. (2015). Academics’ entrepreneurship propensities and gender differences. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(1), 161–177.CrossRef
go back to reference Grimpe, C., & Fier, H. (2010). Informal university technology transfer: A comparison between the United States and Germany. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(6), 637–650.CrossRef Grimpe, C., & Fier, H. (2010). Informal university technology transfer: A comparison between the United States and Germany. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(6), 637–650.CrossRef
go back to reference Henry, C., Foss, L., & Ahl, H. (2016). Gender and entrepreneurship research: A review of methodological approaches. International Small Business Journal, 34(3), 217–241.CrossRef Henry, C., Foss, L., & Ahl, H. (2016). Gender and entrepreneurship research: A review of methodological approaches. International Small Business Journal, 34(3), 217–241.CrossRef
go back to reference Loscocco, K., & Bird, S. R. (2012). Gendered paths: Why women lag behind men in small business success. Work and Occupations, 39(2), 183–219.CrossRef Loscocco, K., & Bird, S. R. (2012). Gendered paths: Why women lag behind men in small business success. Work and Occupations, 39(2), 183–219.CrossRef
go back to reference Martínez, G. L., Raffo, J., & Saito, K. (2016). Identifying the gender of PCT inventors. Economic Research Working Paper No. 33. WIPO. Martínez, G. L., Raffo, J., & Saito, K. (2016). Identifying the gender of PCT inventors. Economic Research Working Paper No. 33. WIPO.
go back to reference Milli, J., Gault, B., Williams-Baron, E. X., & Berlan, B. (2016). The gender patenting gap. Institute for Women’s Policy Research. Milli, J., Gault, B., Williams-Baron, E. X., & Berlan, B. (2016). The gender patenting gap. Institute for Women’s Policy Research.
go back to reference Minniti, M. (2009). Gender Issues in Entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 5(7-8), 497–621.CrossRef Minniti, M. (2009). Gender Issues in Entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 5(7-8), 497–621.CrossRef
go back to reference Modic, D., & Rončević, B. (2018). Social topography for sustainable innovation policy: Putting institutions, social networks and cognitive frames in their place. Comparative Sociology, 17(2018), 100–127.CrossRef Modic, D., & Rončević, B. (2018). Social topography for sustainable innovation policy: Putting institutions, social networks and cognitive frames in their place. Comparative Sociology, 17(2018), 100–127.CrossRef
go back to reference Modic, D., & Yoshioka-Kobayashi, T. (2020). Individual-level determinants of academic patent licensing to start-ups: Impacts of principal investigators’ embeddedness in the industry. In A. Novotny, T. Clausen, E. Rasmussen, & J. Wiklund (Eds.), Research handbook on start-up incubation ecosystems. Edward Elgar Publishing. Modic, D., & Yoshioka-Kobayashi, T. (2020). Individual-level determinants of academic patent licensing to start-ups: Impacts of principal investigators’ embeddedness in the industry. In A. Novotny, T. Clausen, E. Rasmussen, & J. Wiklund (Eds.), Research handbook on start-up incubation ecosystems. Edward Elgar Publishing.
go back to reference Modic, D., Novak, M., Prijon, L., & Miller, J. L. (2015). Let the best (wo)man decide: Gender equality in economic decision making in SME’s. Report on a US Embassy NGO small grant sponsored initiative. Ljubljana: Prudentia Institute. Modic, D., Novak, M., Prijon, L., & Miller, J. L. (2015). Let the best (wo)man decide: Gender equality in economic decision making in SME’s. Report on a US Embassy NGO small grant sponsored initiative. Ljubljana: Prudentia Institute.
go back to reference Novotny, A. (2017). The heterogeneity of the academic profession: The effect of occupational variables on university scientists’ participation in research commercialization. Minerva, 55(4), 485–508.CrossRef Novotny, A. (2017). The heterogeneity of the academic profession: The effect of occupational variables on university scientists’ participation in research commercialization. Minerva, 55(4), 485–508.CrossRef
go back to reference Paisey, C., & Paisey, N. J. (2010). Comparative research: An opportunity for accounting researchers to learn from other professions. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 6, 180–199.CrossRef Paisey, C., & Paisey, N. J. (2010). Comparative research: An opportunity for accounting researchers to learn from other professions. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 6, 180–199.CrossRef
go back to reference Ragin, C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Ragin, C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2010). Athena in the world of techne: The gender dimension of technology, innovation and entrepreneurship. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 5(1), 1–12.CrossRef Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2010). Athena in the world of techne: The gender dimension of technology, innovation and entrepreneurship. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 5(1), 1–12.CrossRef
go back to reference Robb, A. M., & Coleman, S. (2009). Characteristics of new firms: A comparison by gender. Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. Robb, A. M., & Coleman, S. (2009). Characteristics of new firms: A comparison by gender. Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.
go back to reference Rosa, P., & Dawson, A. (2006). Gender and the commercialization of university science: Academic founders of spinout companies. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 18(4), 341–366.CrossRef Rosa, P., & Dawson, A. (2006). Gender and the commercialization of university science: Academic founders of spinout companies. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 18(4), 341–366.CrossRef
go back to reference Ruzzier, M., Antončič, B., Zirnstein, E., et al. (2011). Slovenian researchers at the cross-roads (in Slovenian). Univerza na Primorskem. Ruzzier, M., Antončič, B., Zirnstein, E., et al. (2011). Slovenian researchers at the cross-roads (in Slovenian). Univerza na Primorskem.
go back to reference Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2007). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) und fuzzy sets: Ein lehrbuch für anwender und jene, die es werden wollen. Barbara Budrich. Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2007). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) und fuzzy sets: Ein lehrbuch für anwender und jene, die es werden wollen. Barbara Budrich.
go back to reference Shane, S., Dolmans, S. A. M., Jankowski, J., et al. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: Which inventors do technology licensing officers prefer for spinoffs? Journal of Technology Transfer, 40, 273–292.CrossRef Shane, S., Dolmans, S. A. M., Jankowski, J., et al. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: Which inventors do technology licensing officers prefer for spinoffs? Journal of Technology Transfer, 40, 273–292.CrossRef
go back to reference Shauman, K. A., & Xie, Y. (1996). Geographic mobility of scientists: Sex differences and family constraints. Demography, 33(4), 445–468.CrossRef Shauman, K. A., & Xie, Y. (1996). Geographic mobility of scientists: Sex differences and family constraints. Demography, 33(4), 445–468.CrossRef
go back to reference Smithson, M. (2005). Fuzzy set inclusion: Linking fuzzy set methods with mainstream techniques. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(4), 431–461.CrossRef Smithson, M. (2005). Fuzzy set inclusion: Linking fuzzy set methods with mainstream techniques. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(4), 431–461.CrossRef
go back to reference Stephan, P. E., & El-Ganainy, A. (2007). The entrepreneurial puzzle: Explaining the gender gap. Journal of Technology Transfer, 32, 475–487.CrossRef Stephan, P. E., & El-Ganainy, A. (2007). The entrepreneurial puzzle: Explaining the gender gap. Journal of Technology Transfer, 32, 475–487.CrossRef
go back to reference Suhadolnik, G. (2018). Do our universities and institutes give birth to start-ups and why not? (English title). Manager, 1(6), 2018. Suhadolnik, G. (2018). Do our universities and institutes give birth to start-ups and why not? (English title). Manager, 1(6), 2018.
go back to reference Sullivan, D. M., & Meek, W. R. (2012). Gender and entrepreneurship: A review and process model. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(5), 428–458.CrossRef Sullivan, D. M., & Meek, W. R. (2012). Gender and entrepreneurship: A review and process model. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(5), 428–458.CrossRef
go back to reference Wajcman, J. (2010). Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 143–152.CrossRef Wajcman, J. (2010). Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 143–152.CrossRef
go back to reference Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
Metadata
Title
Every Woman Is a Vessel: An Exploratory Study on Gender and Academic Entrepreneurship in a Nascent Technology Transfer System
Authors
Dolores Modic
Ana Hafner
Tamara Valič-Besednjak
Copyright Year
2022
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84669-5_9

Premium Partner