Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Science Teacher Education 7/2012

01-11-2012

Examining Teachers’ Instructional Moves Aimed at Developing Students’ Ideas and Questions in Learner-Centered Science Classrooms

Authors: Christopher J. Harris, Rachel S. Phillips, William R. Penuel

Published in: Journal of Science Teacher Education | Issue 7/2012

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Prior research has shown that orchestrating scientific discourse in classrooms is difficult and takes a great deal of effort on the part of teachers. In this study, we examined teachers’ instructional moves to elicit and develop students’ ideas and questions as they orchestrated discourse with their fifth grade students during a learner-centered environmental biology unit. The unit materials included features meant to support teachers in eliciting and working with students’ ideas and questions as a source for student-led investigations. We present three contrasting cases of teachers to highlight evidence that shows teachers’ differing strategies for eliciting students’ ideas and questions, and for developing their ideas, questions and questioning skills. Results from our cross case analysis provide insight into the ways in which teachers’ enactments enabled them to work with students’ ideas and questions to help advance learning. Consistent with other studies, we found that teachers could readily elicit ideas and questions but experienced challenges in helping students develop them. Findings suggest a need for more specified supports, such as specific discourse strategies, to help teachers attend to student thinking. We explore implications for curricular tools and discuss a need for more examples of effective discourse moves for use by teachers in orchestrating scientific discourse.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Alozie, N. M., Moje, E. B., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). An analysis of the supports and constraints for scientific discussion in high school project-based science. Science Education, 94(3), 395–427. Alozie, N. M., Moje, E. B., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). An analysis of the supports and constraints for scientific discussion in high school project-based science. Science Education, 94(3), 395–427.
go back to reference Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
go back to reference Baranes, R., Perry, M., & Stigler, J. W. (1989). Activation of real-world knowledge in the solution of word problems. Cognition and Instruction, 6(4), 287–318.CrossRef Baranes, R., Perry, M., & Stigler, J. W. (1989). Activation of real-world knowledge in the solution of word problems. Cognition and Instruction, 6(4), 287–318.CrossRef
go back to reference Beatty, I. D., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., & Dufresne, R. J. (2006). Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching. American Journal of Physics, 74(1), 31–39.CrossRef Beatty, I. D., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., & Dufresne, R. J. (2006). Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching. American Journal of Physics, 74(1), 31–39.CrossRef
go back to reference Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Patrick, H., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1997). Teaching for understanding. In B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (Vol. II, pp. 819–878). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Patrick, H., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1997). Teaching for understanding. In B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (Vol. II, pp. 819–878). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
go back to reference Carlsen, W. S. (1988). The effects of science teacher subject-matter knowledge on teacher questioning and classroom discourse. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Carlsen, W. S. (1988). The effects of science teacher subject-matter knowledge on teacher questioning and classroom discourse. Unpublished doctoral thesis.
go back to reference Carlsen, W. S. (1993). The effects of science teacher subject-matter knowledge on teacher questioning and classroom discourse. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Stanford University, Palo Alto. Carlsen, W. S. (1993). The effects of science teacher subject-matter knowledge on teacher questioning and classroom discourse. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Stanford University, Palo Alto.
go back to reference Cazden, C. (1988). Classroom discourse. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Cazden, C. (1988). Classroom discourse. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
go back to reference Chin, C., Brown, D. E., & Bruce, B. C. (2002). Student-generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 521–549.CrossRef Chin, C., Brown, D. E., & Bruce, B. C. (2002). Student-generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 521–549.CrossRef
go back to reference Chin, C., & Chia, L.-G. (2006). Problem-based learning: Using ill-structured problems in biology project work. Science Education, 90(1), 44–67.CrossRef Chin, C., & Chia, L.-G. (2006). Problem-based learning: Using ill-structured problems in biology project work. Science Education, 90(1), 44–67.CrossRef
go back to reference Crawford, T., Kelly, G. J., & Brown, C. (2000). Ways of knowing beyond facts and laws of science: An ethnographic investigation of student engagement in scientific practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(3), 237–258.CrossRef Crawford, T., Kelly, G. J., & Brown, C. (2000). Ways of knowing beyond facts and laws of science: An ethnographic investigation of student engagement in scientific practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(3), 237–258.CrossRef
go back to reference Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.CrossRef Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.CrossRef
go back to reference Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.CrossRef Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.CrossRef
go back to reference Dillon, J. T. (1988). The remedial status of student questioning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20, 197–210.CrossRef Dillon, J. T. (1988). The remedial status of student questioning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20, 197–210.CrossRef
go back to reference Dufresne, R. J., & Gerace, W. J. (2004). Assessing-To-Learn: Formative assessment in physics instruction. The Physics Teacher, 42(7), 428–433.CrossRef Dufresne, R. J., & Gerace, W. J. (2004). Assessing-To-Learn: Formative assessment in physics instruction. The Physics Teacher, 42(7), 428–433.CrossRef
go back to reference Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science: Hearing children’s questions and theories, responding with curricula. New York: Teachers College Press. Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science: Hearing children’s questions and theories, responding with curricula. New York: Teachers College Press.
go back to reference Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 431–473.CrossRef Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 431–473.CrossRef
go back to reference Herrenkohl, L. R., Palincsar, A. S., DeWater, L. S., & Kawasaki, K. (1999). Developing scientific communities in classrooms: A sociocognitive approach. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3–4), 451–493. Herrenkohl, L. R., Palincsar, A. S., DeWater, L. S., & Kawasaki, K. (1999). Developing scientific communities in classrooms: A sociocognitive approach. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3–4), 451–493.
go back to reference Hofstein, A., Navon, O., Kipnis, M., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Developing students’ ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 791–806.CrossRef Hofstein, A., Navon, O., Kipnis, M., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Developing students’ ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 791–806.CrossRef
go back to reference Jacobs, V., & Ambrose, R. (2008). Making the most of story problems in teaching. Teaching Children Mathematics, 15, 260–266. Jacobs, V., & Ambrose, R. (2008). Making the most of story problems in teaching. Teaching Children Mathematics, 15, 260–266.
go back to reference King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 338–368. King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 338–368.
go back to reference Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77(3), 319–337.CrossRef Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77(3), 319–337.CrossRef
go back to reference Lee, O., & Buxton, C. A. (2001). Diversity and equity in science education: Research, policy, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press. Lee, O., & Buxton, C. A. (2001). Diversity and equity in science education: Research, policy, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
go back to reference Lehrer, R., Giles, N. D., & Schauble, L. (2002). Children’s work with data. In R. Lehrer & L. Schauble (Eds.), Investigating real data in the classroom: Expanding children’s understanding of math and science (pp. 1–26). New York: Teachers College Press. Lehrer, R., Giles, N. D., & Schauble, L. (2002). Children’s work with data. In R. Lehrer & L. Schauble (Eds.), Investigating real data in the classroom: Expanding children’s understanding of math and science (pp. 1–26). New York: Teachers College Press.
go back to reference Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 371–388). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 371–388). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
go back to reference Magnusson, S. J., Palincsar, A. S., & Templin, M. (2004). Community, culture, and conversation in inquiry-based science instruction. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 131–155). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRef Magnusson, S. J., Palincsar, A. S., & Templin, M. (2004). Community, culture, and conversation in inquiry-based science instruction. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 131–155). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRef
go back to reference Marbach-Ad, G., & Sokolove, P. G. (2000). Can undergraduate biology students learn to ask higher level questions? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 854–870.CrossRef Marbach-Ad, G., & Sokolove, P. G. (2000). Can undergraduate biology students learn to ask higher level questions? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 854–870.CrossRef
go back to reference Martin, J. R. (1989). Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. London: Oxford University Press. Martin, J. R. (1989). Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. London: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Marx, R. W., & Harris, C. J. (2006). No child left behind and science education: Opportunities, challenges, and risks. Elementary School Journal, 106(5), 467–477. Marx, R. W., & Harris, C. J. (2006). No child left behind and science education: Opportunities, challenges, and risks. Elementary School Journal, 106(5), 467–477.
go back to reference McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation. Science Education, 94(2), 203–229. McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation. Science Education, 94(2), 203–229.
go back to reference Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (2002). Accountable talk: Classroom conversation that works (CD-ROM set). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh. Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (2002). Accountable talk: Classroom conversation that works (CD-ROM set). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.
go back to reference Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Moje, E. B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. W. (2001). “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?”: Language, iteracy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 469–498.CrossRef Moje, E. B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. W. (2001). “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?”: Language, iteracy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 469–498.CrossRef
go back to reference Mumme, J., & Caroll, C. E. (2007). Learning to lead mathematics professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Mumme, J., & Caroll, C. E. (2007). Learning to lead mathematics professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
go back to reference National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
go back to reference National Research Council. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
go back to reference National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
go back to reference National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
go back to reference National Research Council. (2010). A framework for science education: Preliminary public draft. Washington, DC: Committee on Conceptual Framework for New Science Education Standards, Board on Science Education, National Research Council. National Research Council. (2010). A framework for science education: Preliminary public draft. Washington, DC: Committee on Conceptual Framework for New Science Education Standards, Board on Science Education, National Research Council.
go back to reference Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 261–290. Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 261–290.
go back to reference O’Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic talk and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24(4), 318–355.CrossRef O’Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic talk and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24(4), 318–355.CrossRef
go back to reference O’Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1996). Shifting participant frameworks: Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussions. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 63–103). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef O’Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1996). Shifting participant frameworks: Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussions. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 63–103). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020.CrossRef Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020.CrossRef
go back to reference Penuel, W. R., Yarnall, L., Koch, M., & Roschelle, J. (2004). Meeting teachers in the middle: Designing handheld computer-supported activities to improve student questioning. In Y. B. Kafai, W. A. Sandoval, N. Enyedy, A. S. Nixon & F. Herrera (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 404–411). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Penuel, W. R., Yarnall, L., Koch, M., & Roschelle, J. (2004). Meeting teachers in the middle: Designing handheld computer-supported activities to improve student questioning. In Y. B. Kafai, W. A. Sandoval, N. Enyedy, A. S. Nixon & F. Herrera (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 404–411). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
go back to reference Phillips, R. S., Harris, C. J., Penuel, W. R., & Cheng, B. (2010, March). Teachers managing students’ ideas, questions, and contributions in the context of an innovative inquirybased elementary science unit. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA. Phillips, R. S., Harris, C. J., Penuel, W. R., & Cheng, B. (2010, March). Teachers managing students’ ideas, questions, and contributions in the context of an innovative inquirybased elementary science unit. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA.
go back to reference Reeve, S., & Bell, P. (2009). Children’s self-documentation and understanding of the concepts ‘healthy’ and ‘unhealthy’. International Journal of Science Education, 31(14), 1953–1974.CrossRef Reeve, S., & Bell, P. (2009). Children’s self-documentation and understanding of the concepts ‘healthy’ and ‘unhealthy’. International Journal of Science Education, 31(14), 1953–1974.CrossRef
go back to reference Rowe, M. B. (1986). Wait time: Slowing down may be a way of speeding up!. Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 43–50.CrossRef Rowe, M. B. (1986). Wait time: Slowing down may be a way of speeding up!. Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 43–50.CrossRef
go back to reference Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). Text-based and knowledge-based questioning by children. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 177–199.CrossRef Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). Text-based and knowledge-based questioning by children. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 177–199.CrossRef
go back to reference Schoenfeld, A. H. (2002). A highly interactive discourse structure. Social Constructivist Teaching, 9, 131–169.CrossRef Schoenfeld, A. H. (2002). A highly interactive discourse structure. Social Constructivist Teaching, 9, 131–169.CrossRef
go back to reference Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 475–522.CrossRef Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 475–522.CrossRef
go back to reference Schwartz, D. L., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. D. (1999). Toward the development of flexibily adaptive instructional designs. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 183–214). Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum. Schwartz, D. L., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. D. (1999). Toward the development of flexibily adaptive instructional designs. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 183–214). Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.
go back to reference Shechtman, N., Knudsen, J., & Stevens, H. (2010, May). The Bridging Teacher Professional Development project: Supporting mathematical argumentation in distressed urban middle school contexts. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO. Shechtman, N., Knudsen, J., & Stevens, H. (2010, May). The Bridging Teacher Professional Development project: Supporting mathematical argumentation in distressed urban middle school contexts. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
go back to reference Shodell, M. (1995). The question-driven classroom: Student questions as course curriculum on biology. The American Biology Teacher, 57, 278–281.CrossRef Shodell, M. (1995). The question-driven classroom: Student questions as course curriculum on biology. The American Biology Teacher, 57, 278–281.CrossRef
go back to reference Shutt, K., Phillips, R. S., Vye, N., Van Horne, K., & Bransford, J. D. (2010, April). Developing science inquiry skills with challenge-based, student-directed learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO. Shutt, K., Phillips, R. S., Vye, N., Van Horne, K., & Bransford, J. D. (2010, April). Developing science inquiry skills with challenge-based, student-directed learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
go back to reference Tabak, I., & Baumgartner, E. (2004). The teacher as partner: Exploring participant structures, symmetry, and identity work in scaffolding. Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), 393–429.CrossRef Tabak, I., & Baumgartner, E. (2004). The teacher as partner: Exploring participant structures, symmetry, and identity work in scaffolding. Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), 393–429.CrossRef
go back to reference Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2009, June). Learning progressions as vision tools for advancing teachers’ pedagogical performance. Paper presented at the Learning Progressions in Science Conference, Iowa City, IA. Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2009, June). Learning progressions as vision tools for advancing teachers’ pedagogical performance. Paper presented at the Learning Progressions in Science Conference, Iowa City, IA.
go back to reference Thompson, J., Windschitl, M., & Braaten, M. (2009, March). Toward a theory of developing pedagogical expertise: A 3-year study of individuals becoming teachers. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference, Anaheim, CA. Thompson, J., Windschitl, M., & Braaten, M. (2009, March). Toward a theory of developing pedagogical expertise: A 3-year study of individuals becoming teachers. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference, Anaheim, CA.
go back to reference Thompson, J., Windschitl, M., & Braaten, M. (2010, March). Developing a theory of teacher practice. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference, Philadelphia, PA. Thompson, J., Windschitl, M., & Braaten, M. (2010, March). Developing a theory of teacher practice. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
go back to reference van Zee, E. H., Iwasyk, M., Kurose, A., Simpson, D., & Wild, J. (2001). Student and teacher questioning during conversations about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 159–190.CrossRef van Zee, E. H., Iwasyk, M., Kurose, A., Simpson, D., & Wild, J. (2001). Student and teacher questioning during conversations about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 159–190.CrossRef
go back to reference van Zee, E. H., & Minstrell, J. (1997). Using questioning to guide student thinking. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(2), 227–269.CrossRef van Zee, E. H., & Minstrell, J. (1997). Using questioning to guide student thinking. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(2), 227–269.CrossRef
go back to reference Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529–552.CrossRef Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529–552.CrossRef
go back to reference Wells, G., & Mejia-Arauz, R. (2006). Dialogue in the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 379–428.CrossRef Wells, G., & Mejia-Arauz, R. (2006). Dialogue in the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 379–428.CrossRef
go back to reference Yarnall, L., Shechtman, N., & Penuel, W. R. (2006). Using handheld computers to support improved classroom assessment in science: Results from a field trial. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(2), 142–158. Yarnall, L., Shechtman, N., & Penuel, W. R. (2006). Using handheld computers to support improved classroom assessment in science: Results from a field trial. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(2), 142–158.
go back to reference Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Metadata
Title
Examining Teachers’ Instructional Moves Aimed at Developing Students’ Ideas and Questions in Learner-Centered Science Classrooms
Authors
Christopher J. Harris
Rachel S. Phillips
William R. Penuel
Publication date
01-11-2012
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Science Teacher Education / Issue 7/2012
Print ISSN: 1046-560X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1847
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9237-0

Other articles of this Issue 7/2012

Journal of Science Teacher Education 7/2012 Go to the issue

Premium Partner