Skip to main content
Top

2016 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

8. Factor Endowments and the Pattern of Commodity and Factor Trade

Author : Michihiro Ohyama

Published in: Macroeconomics, Trade, and Social Welfare

Publisher: Springer Japan

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In the traditional theory of international trade, it is customary to assume that the factors of production are prohibited from moving from country to country for some reason or another. This assumption of factor immobility has an important function, especially in the theory of comparative advantage. The standard Heckscher–Ohlin theory explains the pattern of commodity trade in terms of factor endowment proportions of different countries on the assumption that no factors of production are internationally mobile (for an excellent recapitulation and generalization of the doctrine, see Dixit and Woodland 1982). In reality, however, some factors are known to move across national borders, as exemplified by the international transfer of entrepreneurial resources and labor services (often through direct investment), as well as by international capital movements.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Hence, it is technological differences between countries that give rise to comparative advantage positions in their model.
 
2
We assume throughout the chapter that excess supply functions are differentiable with respect to all their arguments. If the number of commodities is greater than the number of internationally immobile factors (i.e., n > m ), the supplies of commodities may not be uniquely determined for given prices. We exclude this “singular” case from our analysis arbitrarily. Jones and Ruffin (1975) and Ferguson (1978) discuss the “Ricardian” case in which n = 2 and m = 1 .
 
3
They extend the result of Dixit and Woodland (1982, p. 208) to the present context.
 
4
As noted before, the effects of endowment changes on the pattern of trade may become indeterminate if the number of commodities exceeds that of immobile factors. But we have the same problem in the standard model of international trade where no factors are internationally mobile.
 
5
It should be noted that the prices of immobile factors are generally dependent on their endowments, as shown in Eqs. (8.1) and (8.2). This dependence disappears in the present setup only because we have constant returns to scale in production and the numbers of commodities and immobile factors are equal.
 
Literature
go back to reference Batra, R. N., & Casas, F. R. (1976). A synthesis of the Heckscher–Ohlin and the neoclassical models of international trade. Journal of International Economics, 6, 21–38.CrossRef Batra, R. N., & Casas, F. R. (1976). A synthesis of the Heckscher–Ohlin and the neoclassical models of international trade. Journal of International Economics, 6, 21–38.CrossRef
go back to reference Dixit, A. K., & Norman, V. (1980). Theory of international trade, a dual general equilibrium approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Dixit, A. K., & Norman, V. (1980). Theory of international trade, a dual general equilibrium approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Dixit, A., & Woodland, A. (1982). The relationship between factor endowments and commodity trade. Journal of International Economics, 13, 201–214.CrossRef Dixit, A., & Woodland, A. (1982). The relationship between factor endowments and commodity trade. Journal of International Economics, 13, 201–214.CrossRef
go back to reference Ethier, W. J., & Svensson, L. E. O. (1986). The theorems of international trade with factor mobility. Journal of International Economics, 20, 21–42.CrossRef Ethier, W. J., & Svensson, L. E. O. (1986). The theorems of international trade with factor mobility. Journal of International Economics, 20, 21–42.CrossRef
go back to reference Ferguson, D. G. (1978). International capital mobility and comparative advantage—The two-country, two-factor case. Journal of International Economics, 8, 373–396.CrossRef Ferguson, D. G. (1978). International capital mobility and comparative advantage—The two-country, two-factor case. Journal of International Economics, 8, 373–396.CrossRef
go back to reference Hill, J. K., & Méndez, J. (1983). Factor mobility and the general equilibrium model of productions. Journal of International Economics, 19, 18–26. Hill, J. K., & Méndez, J. (1983). Factor mobility and the general equilibrium model of productions. Journal of International Economics, 19, 18–26.
go back to reference Jones, R. W., & Easton, S. T. (1983). Factor intensities and factor substitution in general equilibrium. Journal of International Economics, 19, 65–99.CrossRef Jones, R. W., & Easton, S. T. (1983). Factor intensities and factor substitution in general equilibrium. Journal of International Economics, 19, 65–99.CrossRef
go back to reference Jones, R. W., & Ruffin, R. (1975). Trade patterns with capital mobility. In M. Parkin & A. R. Nobay (Eds.), Current economic problems: The proceedings of the Association of University Teachers of Economics (pp. 307–332). Manchester: Cambridge University Press. Jones, R. W., & Ruffin, R. (1975). Trade patterns with capital mobility. In M. Parkin & A. R. Nobay (Eds.), Current economic problems: The proceedings of the Association of University Teachers of Economics (pp. 307–332). Manchester: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Leontief, W. W. (1954). Domestic production and foreign trade: The American capital position reexamined. Economia Internazionale, 7, 9–45. Leontief, W. W. (1954). Domestic production and foreign trade: The American capital position reexamined. Economia Internazionale, 7, 9–45.
go back to reference Ruffin, R. (1981). Trade and factor movements with three factors and two goods. Economics Letters, 7, 177–182.CrossRef Ruffin, R. (1981). Trade and factor movements with three factors and two goods. Economics Letters, 7, 177–182.CrossRef
go back to reference Suzuki, K. (1983). A synthesis of the Heckscher–Ohlin and the neoclassical models of international trade: A comment. Journal of International Economics, 14, 141–144.CrossRef Suzuki, K. (1983). A synthesis of the Heckscher–Ohlin and the neoclassical models of international trade: A comment. Journal of International Economics, 14, 141–144.CrossRef
go back to reference Svensson, L. E. O. (1984). Factor trade and goods trade. Journal of International Economics, 16, 365–378.CrossRef Svensson, L. E. O. (1984). Factor trade and goods trade. Journal of International Economics, 16, 365–378.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Factor Endowments and the Pattern of Commodity and Factor Trade
Author
Michihiro Ohyama
Copyright Year
2016
Publisher
Springer Japan
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55807-1_8