Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention 1/2016

01-02-2016 | Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed

Failure Analysis and Anisotropy Evaluation of 3D-Printed Tensile Test Specimens of Different Geometries and Print Raster Patterns

Authors: Angel R. Torrado, David A. Roberson

Published in: Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention | Issue 1/2016

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Anisotropic mechanical properties related to build orientation is a characteristic of parts fabricated with 3D printing technologies. In the development of new materials for 3D printing processes, understanding the effects of 3D printer build orientation and raster pattern on physical property and failure mode differences is extremely important. While there is currently no standard for the evaluation of build orientation-based mechanical performance, such analysis has typically been achieved through the fabrication and scrutiny of tensile and other test coupons which were printed in different build orientations. In some cases, printing specimens in the ZXY (or vertical) build orientation can be difficult due to the capability of a given 3D printer platform. There are also multiple tensile test specimen geometries specified in the ASTM D638 standard for the tensile testing of polymer materials and understanding which specimen geometry works best for 3D printing is not currently well understood. The work presented here explores the effect of tensile test specimen geometry on the anisotropy of mechanical properties related to the build orientation of tensile test specimens. The test coupons were fabricated using a material extrusion 3D printing platform based on fused deposition modeling technology using a grade of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene not typically used in 3D printing in order to simulate the testing of a new material. The effects of raster pattern and the geometric dependence of mechanical property anisotropy were explored, and validation of the use of “faux vertical” specimens in lieu of ZXY-printed specimens was demonstrated. Finally, scanning electron microscopy was used to perform fractography on the various versions of the printed tensile test specimens in order to determine the effect of raster pattern on failure mode.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference C.W. Hull, Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. U.S. Patent No. 4,575,330. 11 March 1986 C.W. Hull, Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. U.S. Patent No. 4,575,330. 11 March 1986
2.
go back to reference ASTM F2924-14, Standard specification for additive manufacturing titanium-6 aluminum-4 vanadium with powder bed fusion (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2014) ASTM F2924-14, Standard specification for additive manufacturing titanium-6 aluminum-4 vanadium with powder bed fusion (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2014)
3.
go back to reference ASTM F3001-14, Standard Specification for Additive Manufacturing Titanium-6 Aluminum-4 Vanadium ELI (Extra Low Interstitial) with Powder Bed Fusion (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2014) ASTM F3001-14, Standard Specification for Additive Manufacturing Titanium-6 Aluminum-4 Vanadium ELI (Extra Low Interstitial) with Powder Bed Fusion (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2014)
4.
go back to reference ASTM F3049-14, Standard Guide for Characterizing Properties of Metal Powders Used for Additive Manufacturing Processes (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2014) ASTM F3049-14, Standard Guide for Characterizing Properties of Metal Powders Used for Additive Manufacturing Processes (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2014)
5.
go back to reference ASTM F3055-14a, Standard Specification for Additive Manufacturing Nickel Alloy (UNS N07718) with Powder Bed Fusion (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2014) ASTM F3055-14a, Standard Specification for Additive Manufacturing Nickel Alloy (UNS N07718) with Powder Bed Fusion (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2014)
6.
go back to reference ASTM F3056-14e1, Standard Specification for Additive Manufacturing Nickel Alloy (UNS N06625) with Powder Bed Fusion (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2014) ASTM F3056-14e1, Standard Specification for Additive Manufacturing Nickel Alloy (UNS N06625) with Powder Bed Fusion (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2014)
7.
go back to reference ASTM F3122-14, Standard Guide for Evaluating Mechanical Properties of Metal Materials Made via Additive Manufacturing Processes (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2014) ASTM F3122-14, Standard Guide for Evaluating Mechanical Properties of Metal Materials Made via Additive Manufacturing Processes (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2014)
8.
go back to reference ASTM F2792-12a, Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2013) ASTM F2792-12a, Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2013)
9.
go back to reference ASTM 52921:13, Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing—Coordinate Systems and Test Methodologies (ISO/ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2013) ASTM 52921:13, Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing—Coordinate Systems and Test Methodologies (ISO/ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2013)
10.
go back to reference ASTM F3091M-14, Standard Specification for Powder Bed Fusion of Plastic Materials (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2014) ASTM F3091M-14, Standard Specification for Powder Bed Fusion of Plastic Materials (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2014)
11.
go back to reference A.R. Torrado, C.M. Shemelya, J.D. English, Y. Lin, R.B. Wicker, D.A. Roberson, Characterizing the effect of additives to ABS on the mechanical property anisotropy of specimens fabricated by material extrusion 3D printing. Addit. Manuf. 6, 16–29 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.addma.2015.02.001 CrossRef A.R. Torrado, C.M. Shemelya, J.D. English, Y. Lin, R.B. Wicker, D.A. Roberson, Characterizing the effect of additives to ABS on the mechanical property anisotropy of specimens fabricated by material extrusion 3D printing. Addit. Manuf. 6, 16–29 (2015). doi:10.​1016/​j.​addma.​2015.​02.​001 CrossRef
12.
go back to reference A.R. Torrado Perez, D.A. Roberson, R.B. Wicker, Fracture surface analysis of 3D-printed tensile specimens of novel ABS-based materials. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 14(3), 343–353 (2014)CrossRef A.R. Torrado Perez, D.A. Roberson, R.B. Wicker, Fracture surface analysis of 3D-printed tensile specimens of novel ABS-based materials. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 14(3), 343–353 (2014)CrossRef
15.
go back to reference O.S. Es-Said, J. Foyos, R. Noorani, M. Mendelson, R. Marloth, B.A. Pregger, Effect of layer orientation on mechanical properties of rapid prototyped samples. Mater. Manuf. Process. 15, 107–122 (2000). doi:10.1080/10426910008912976 CrossRef O.S. Es-Said, J. Foyos, R. Noorani, M. Mendelson, R. Marloth, B.A. Pregger, Effect of layer orientation on mechanical properties of rapid prototyped samples. Mater. Manuf. Process. 15, 107–122 (2000). doi:10.​1080/​1042691000891297​6 CrossRef
17.
go back to reference V. Vega, J. Clements, T. Lam, A. Abad, B. Fritz, N. Ula et al., The effect of layer orientation on the mechanical properties and microstructure of a polymer. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 20, 978–988 (2011). doi:10.1007/s11665-010-9740-z CrossRef V. Vega, J. Clements, T. Lam, A. Abad, B. Fritz, N. Ula et al., The effect of layer orientation on the mechanical properties and microstructure of a polymer. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 20, 978–988 (2011). doi:10.​1007/​s11665-010-9740-z CrossRef
18.
go back to reference A. Bagsik, V. Schoeppner, E. Klemp, in 4th International Scientific Conference on Polymeric Materials (2010) A. Bagsik, V. Schoeppner, E. Klemp, in 4th International Scientific Conference on Polymeric Materials (2010)
20.
go back to reference B. Caulfield, P.E. McHugh, S. Lohfeld, Dependence of mechanical properties of polyamide components on build parameters in the SLS process. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 182(1), 477–488 (2007)CrossRef B. Caulfield, P.E. McHugh, S. Lohfeld, Dependence of mechanical properties of polyamide components on build parameters in the SLS process. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 182(1), 477–488 (2007)CrossRef
21.
go back to reference ASTM D638, Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2010) ASTM D638, Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2010)
23.
go back to reference A.R. Torrado Perez, Defeating Anisotropy in Material Extrusion 3D Printing via Materials Development, Ph.D. Dissertation, Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, 2015 A.R. Torrado Perez, Defeating Anisotropy in Material Extrusion 3D Printing via Materials Development, Ph.D. Dissertation, Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, 2015
24.
go back to reference D.A. Roberson, A.R. TorradoPerez, C.M. Shemelya, A. Rivera, E. MacDonald, R.B. Wicker, Comparison of stress concentrator fabrication for 3D printed polymeric izod impact test specimens. Addit. Manuf. 7, 1–11 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.addma.2015.05.002 CrossRef D.A. Roberson, A.R. TorradoPerez, C.M. Shemelya, A. Rivera, E. MacDonald, R.B. Wicker, Comparison of stress concentrator fabrication for 3D printed polymeric izod impact test specimens. Addit. Manuf. 7, 1–11 (2015). doi:10.​1016/​j.​addma.​2015.​05.​002 CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Failure Analysis and Anisotropy Evaluation of 3D-Printed Tensile Test Specimens of Different Geometries and Print Raster Patterns
Authors
Angel R. Torrado
David A. Roberson
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1547-7029
Electronic ISSN: 1864-1245
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-016-0067-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention 1/2016 Go to the issue

Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed

Porcelain Faucet Handle Failure Analysis

Premium Partners