Skip to main content
Top
Published in:
Cover of the book

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

1. Fine–Kinney Occupational Risk Assessment Method and Its Extensions by Fuzzy Sets: A State-of-the-Art Review

Authors : Assoc. Prof. Muhammet Gul, Assoc. Prof. Suleyman Mete, Assist. Prof. Faruk Serin, Assoc. Prof. Erkan Celik

Published in: Fine–Kinney-Based Fuzzy Multi-criteria Occupational Risk Assessment

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The Fine–Kinney method (Fine in J Saf Res 3:157–166, 1971; Kinney and Wiruth in Practical risk analysis for safety management. Naval Weapons Center, pp 1–20, 1976), which was first introduced as an occupational health and safety risk analysis tool in the 1970s, is a systematic methodology that provides a mathematical formula for calculating the risk that arises due to a specified hazard. In the traditional version of Fine–Kinney as suggested in its original version, a risk score (RS) is calculated as a result of mathematical multiplication of probability (P), exposure (E), and consequence (C) parameters. These calculated risk scores are used to establish priorities for the corrective efforts in order to eliminate risks or reduce their effects to a reasonable level. This simple and useful method is preferred and implemented by small and medium-sized enterprises. In the academic literature, it has been applied for many risk analysis problems, although it includes several drawbacks recently revealed. In this method, no weight assignment is made for each risk parameter. Also, it is hard to assess consequence, exposure, and probability, precisely. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) is a pool of methods used in occupational health and safety risk analysis both by international standard-setting organizations and scholars from the literature. In classical MCDM methods, performance values and weights of decision criteria are known precisely and are specified with crisp numbers. However, many real-world problems contain uncertainties, and the knowledge and judgment of experts cannot be expressed precisely. Fuzzy-based MCDM methods, which are developed to reflect types and degrees of uncertainties better, produce more accurate results compared to classical methods. In this chapter, we first present the basics of Fine–Kinney method, including its implementing procedure, basic terminology, and drawbacks. Then, we provide a state-of-the-art review of Fine–Kinney occupational risk assessment method and its extensions by fuzzy sets. Graphical results obtained from the review are demonstrated to show the current state. Future work suggestions are also included to the chapter to show the possible gaps and possible opportunities.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Fine, W. T. (1971). Mathematical evaluations for controlling hazards. Journal of Safety Research, 3(4), 157–166. Fine, W. T. (1971). Mathematical evaluations for controlling hazards. Journal of Safety Research, 3(4), 157–166.
2.
go back to reference Kinney, G. F., & Wiruth, A. D. (1976). Practical risk analysis for safety management (pp. 1–20). Naval Weapons Center. Kinney, G. F., & Wiruth, A. D. (1976). Practical risk analysis for safety management (pp. 1–20). Naval Weapons Center.
3.
go back to reference Dickson, T. J. (2002). Calculating risks: Fine’s mathematical formula 30 years later. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 6(1), 31–39.CrossRef Dickson, T. J. (2002). Calculating risks: Fine’s mathematical formula 30 years later. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 6(1), 31–39.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Birgören, B. (2017). Calculation challenges and solution suggestions for risk factors in the risk analysis method in the Fine Kinney risk analysis method. Uluslararası Mühendislik Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dergisi, 9(1), 19–25.CrossRef Birgören, B. (2017). Calculation challenges and solution suggestions for risk factors in the risk analysis method in the Fine Kinney risk analysis method. Uluslararası Mühendislik Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dergisi, 9(1), 19–25.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gul, M. (2018). A review of occupational health and safety risk assessment approaches based on multi-criteria decision-making methods and their fuzzy versions. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 24(7), 1723–1760.CrossRef Gul, M. (2018). A review of occupational health and safety risk assessment approaches based on multi-criteria decision-making methods and their fuzzy versions. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 24(7), 1723–1760.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kokangül, A., Polat, U., & Dağsuyu, C. (2017). A new approximation for risk assessment using the AHP and Fine Kinney methodologies. Safety Science, 91, 24–32.CrossRef Kokangül, A., Polat, U., & Dağsuyu, C. (2017). A new approximation for risk assessment using the AHP and Fine Kinney methodologies. Safety Science, 91, 24–32.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Karasan, A., Ilbahar, E., Cebi, S., & Kahraman, C. (2018). A new risk assessment approach: Safety and Critical Effect Analysis (SCEA) and its extension with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Safety Science, 108, 173–187.CrossRef Karasan, A., Ilbahar, E., Cebi, S., & Kahraman, C. (2018). A new risk assessment approach: Safety and Critical Effect Analysis (SCEA) and its extension with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Safety Science, 108, 173–187.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ilbahar, E., Karaşan, A., Cebi, S., & Kahraman, C. (2018). A novel approach to risk assessment for occupational health and safety using Pythagorean fuzzy AHP & fuzzy inference system. Safety Science, 103, 124–136.CrossRef Ilbahar, E., Karaşan, A., Cebi, S., & Kahraman, C. (2018). A novel approach to risk assessment for occupational health and safety using Pythagorean fuzzy AHP & fuzzy inference system. Safety Science, 103, 124–136.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gul, M., Celik, E., & Akyuz, E. (2017). A hybrid risk-based approach for maritime applications: The case of ballast tank maintenance. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 23(6), 1389–1403.CrossRef Gul, M., Celik, E., & Akyuz, E. (2017). A hybrid risk-based approach for maritime applications: The case of ballast tank maintenance. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 23(6), 1389–1403.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gul, M., Guven, B., & Guneri, A. F. (2018). A new Fine–Kinney-based risk assessment framework using FAHP-FVIKOR incorporation. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 53, 3–16.CrossRef Gul, M., Guven, B., & Guneri, A. F. (2018). A new Fine–Kinney-based risk assessment framework using FAHP-FVIKOR incorporation. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 53, 3–16.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gul, M., Guneri, A. F., & Baskan, M. (2018). An occupational risk assessment approach for construction and operation period of wind turbines. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 4(3), 281–298. Gul, M., Guneri, A. F., & Baskan, M. (2018). An occupational risk assessment approach for construction and operation period of wind turbines. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 4(3), 281–298.
12.
go back to reference Wang, W., Liu, X., & Qin, Y. (2018). A fuzzy Fine–Kinney-based risk evaluation approach with extended MULTIMOORA method based on Choquet integral. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 125, 111–123.CrossRef Wang, W., Liu, X., & Qin, Y. (2018). A fuzzy Fine–Kinney-based risk evaluation approach with extended MULTIMOORA method based on Choquet integral. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 125, 111–123.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Oturakçı, M., Dağsuyu, C., & Kokangül, A. (2015). A new approach to Fine Kinney method and an implementation study. Alphanumeric Journal, 3(2), 83–92.CrossRef Oturakçı, M., Dağsuyu, C., & Kokangül, A. (2015). A new approach to Fine Kinney method and an implementation study. Alphanumeric Journal, 3(2), 83–92.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Marhavilas, P. K., & Koulouriotis, D. E. (2008). A risk-estimation methodological framework using quantitative assessment techniques and real accidents’ data: Application in an aluminum extrusion industry. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 21(6), 596–603.CrossRef Marhavilas, P. K., & Koulouriotis, D. E. (2008). A risk-estimation methodological framework using quantitative assessment techniques and real accidents’ data: Application in an aluminum extrusion industry. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 21(6), 596–603.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gurcanli, G. E., Bilir, S., & Sevim, M. (2015). Activity based risk assessment and safety cost estimation for residential building construction projects. Safety Science, 80, 1–12.CrossRef Gurcanli, G. E., Bilir, S., & Sevim, M. (2015). Activity based risk assessment and safety cost estimation for residential building construction projects. Safety Science, 80, 1–12.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Netro, Z. G. C., Romero, E. D. L. T., & Flores, J. L. M. (2018). Adaptation of the Fine–Kinney method in supply chain risk assessment. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 174, 43–55. Netro, Z. G. C., Romero, E. D. L. T., & Flores, J. L. M. (2018). Adaptation of the Fine–Kinney method in supply chain risk assessment. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 174, 43–55.
17.
go back to reference Korkmaz, E., Iskender, G., & Babuna, F. G. (2016, October). Assessment of occupational health and safety for a gas meter manufacturing plant. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 44, No. 3, p. 032015). IOP Publishing. Korkmaz, E., Iskender, G., & Babuna, F. G. (2016, October). Assessment of occupational health and safety for a gas meter manufacturing plant. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 44, No. 3, p. 032015). IOP Publishing.
18.
go back to reference Makajić-Nikolić, D., Kuzmanović, M., & Panić, B. (2018). Terrorism risks assessment of tourism destinations. In XIII Balkan Conference on Operational Research (BALCOR) (pp. 341–348). The Mathematical Institute of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts. Makajić-Nikolić, D., Kuzmanović, M., & Panić, B. (2018). Terrorism risks assessment of tourism destinations. In XIII Balkan Conference on Operational Research (BALCOR) (pp. 341–348). The Mathematical Institute of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts.
19.
go back to reference Birgören, B. (2017). Calculation challenges and solution suggestions for risk factors in the risk analysis method in the Fine Kinney risk analysis method. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 9(1), 19–25. Birgören, B. (2017). Calculation challenges and solution suggestions for risk factors in the risk analysis method in the Fine Kinney risk analysis method. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 9(1), 19–25.
20.
go back to reference Gul, M., & Celik, E. (2018). Fuzzy rule-based Fine–Kinney risk assessment approach for rail transportation systems. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 24(7), 1786–1812.CrossRef Gul, M., & Celik, E. (2018). Fuzzy rule-based Fine–Kinney risk assessment approach for rail transportation systems. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 24(7), 1786–1812.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Supciller, A. A., & Abali, N. (2015). Occupational health and safety within the scope of risk analysis with fuzzy proportional risk assessment technique (fuzzy PRAT). Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 31(7), 1137–1150.CrossRef Supciller, A. A., & Abali, N. (2015). Occupational health and safety within the scope of risk analysis with fuzzy proportional risk assessment technique (fuzzy PRAT). Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 31(7), 1137–1150.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Oturakçı, M., & Dağsuyu, C. (2017). Fuzzy Fine–Kinney approach in risk assessment and an application. Karaelmas Journal of Occupational Health and Safety, 1(1), 17–25. Oturakçı, M., & Dağsuyu, C. (2017). Fuzzy Fine–Kinney approach in risk assessment and an application. Karaelmas Journal of Occupational Health and Safety, 1(1), 17–25.
23.
go back to reference Yilmaz, F., & Ozcan, M. S. (2019). A risk analysis and ranking application for lifting vehicles used in construction sites with integrated AHP and Fine–Kinney approach. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 13(3), 152–161.CrossRef Yilmaz, F., & Ozcan, M. S. (2019). A risk analysis and ranking application for lifting vehicles used in construction sites with integrated AHP and Fine–Kinney approach. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 13(3), 152–161.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Zhang, X., Xing, X., Xie, Y., Zhang, Y., Xing, Z., & Luo, X. (2019). Airport operation situation risk assessment: Combination method based on FAHP and Fine Kinney. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. Zhang, X., Xing, X., Xie, Y., Zhang, Y., Xing, Z., & Luo, X. (2019). Airport operation situation risk assessment: Combination method based on FAHP and Fine Kinney. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management.
Metadata
Title
Fine–Kinney Occupational Risk Assessment Method and Its Extensions by Fuzzy Sets: A State-of-the-Art Review
Authors
Assoc. Prof. Muhammet Gul
Assoc. Prof. Suleyman Mete
Assist. Prof. Faruk Serin
Assoc. Prof. Erkan Celik
Copyright Year
2021
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52148-6_1