Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare 3/2017

31-01-2017 | Original Paper

First-mover advantage in round-robin tournaments

Authors: Alex Krumer, Reut Megidish, Aner Sela

Published in: Social Choice and Welfare | Issue 3/2017

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We study round-robin tournaments with either three or four symmetric players whose values of winning are common knowledge. With three players there are three rounds, each of which includes one pair-wise game such that each player competes in two rounds only. The player who wins two games wins the tournament. We characterize the subgame perfect equilibrium and show that each player’s expected payoff and probability of winning is maximized when he competes in the first and the last rounds. With four players there are three rounds, each of which includes two sequential pair-wise games where each player plays against a different opponent in every round. We again characterize the subgame perfect equilibrium and show that a player who plays in the first game of each of the first two rounds has a first-mover advantage as reflected by a significantly higher winning probability as well as by a significantly higher expected payoff than his opponents.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
The case when each player plays against all the other players twice is known as a double round-robin tournament.
 
2
The main reason that the games are played sequentially is that the profit of the organizers from broadcasting the games will be much higher than when the games are played simultaneously.
 
3
See also Glenn (1960) and Searles (1963) for early contributions.
 
4
The uniqueness of the equilibrium in our model is derived from the uniqueness of the equilibrium in a two-player one-stage all-pay auction (Baye et al. 1996).
 
5
The probability of winning of each of the players who plays in the first round is equal to 0.35 while the probability of the player who start playing in the second round is 0.3. The mathematical analysis is available upon request.
 
Literature
go back to reference Baye M, Kovenock D, de Vries C (1996) The all-pay auction with complete information. Econ Theory 8:291–305CrossRef Baye M, Kovenock D, de Vries C (1996) The all-pay auction with complete information. Econ Theory 8:291–305CrossRef
go back to reference Becker G (1983) A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Q J Econ 98(3):371–400CrossRef Becker G (1983) A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Q J Econ 98(3):371–400CrossRef
go back to reference Dasgupta P (1986) The theory of technological competition. In: Stiglitz JE, Mathewson GF (eds) New developments in the analysis of market structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 519–547CrossRef Dasgupta P (1986) The theory of technological competition. In: Stiglitz JE, Mathewson GF (eds) New developments in the analysis of market structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 519–547CrossRef
go back to reference Glenn W (1960) A comparison of the effectiveness of tournaments. Biometrika 47:253–262CrossRef Glenn W (1960) A comparison of the effectiveness of tournaments. Biometrika 47:253–262CrossRef
go back to reference Gradstein M, Konrad K (1999) Orchestrating rent seeking contests. Econ J 109:536–545CrossRef Gradstein M, Konrad K (1999) Orchestrating rent seeking contests. Econ J 109:536–545CrossRef
go back to reference Groh C, Moldovanu B, Sela A, Sunde U (2012) Optimal seedings in elimination tournaments. Econ Theory 49:59–80CrossRef Groh C, Moldovanu B, Sela A, Sunde U (2012) Optimal seedings in elimination tournaments. Econ Theory 49:59–80CrossRef
go back to reference Hillman A, Riley J (1989) Politically contestable rents and transfers. Econ Polit 1:17–39CrossRef Hillman A, Riley J (1989) Politically contestable rents and transfers. Econ Polit 1:17–39CrossRef
go back to reference Konrad K, Leininger W (2007) The generalized Stackelberg equilibrium of the all-pay auction with complete information. Rev Econ Design 11(2):165–174CrossRef Konrad K, Leininger W (2007) The generalized Stackelberg equilibrium of the all-pay auction with complete information. Rev Econ Design 11(2):165–174CrossRef
go back to reference Kovenock D, Roberson B (2009) Is the 50-state strategy optimal? J Theor Polit 21(2):213–236CrossRef Kovenock D, Roberson B (2009) Is the 50-state strategy optimal? J Theor Polit 21(2):213–236CrossRef
go back to reference Rosen S (1986) Prizes and incentives in elimination tournaments. Am Econ Rev 74:701–715 Rosen S (1986) Prizes and incentives in elimination tournaments. Am Econ Rev 74:701–715
go back to reference Searles D (1963) On the probability of winning with different tournament procedures. J Am Stat Assoc 58:1064–1081CrossRef Searles D (1963) On the probability of winning with different tournament procedures. J Am Stat Assoc 58:1064–1081CrossRef
go back to reference Wright B (1983) The economics of invention incentives: patents, prizes, and research contracts. Am Econ Rev 73(4):691–707 Wright B (1983) The economics of invention incentives: patents, prizes, and research contracts. Am Econ Rev 73(4):691–707
Metadata
Title
First-mover advantage in round-robin tournaments
Authors
Alex Krumer
Reut Megidish
Aner Sela
Publication date
31-01-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Social Choice and Welfare / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0176-1714
Electronic ISSN: 1432-217X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-017-1027-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Social Choice and Welfare 3/2017 Go to the issue