Introduction
Research Design and Methodology
Theoretical Perspective
Stages of the Methodology
-
Articles should be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals in English.
-
Only journals in the area of logistics, operations management, and supply chain management are included.
-
Articles should be published in the last 20 years.
-
Articles must contain at least one of the keywords in their title or abstract.
Stages | Exclusion criteria | Number of articles excluded | Total exclusion | Remaining articles |
---|---|---|---|---|
Initial screening | Exclusion of duplicates | 253 | 253 | 644 |
Title review stage | Non peer-reviewed articles | 92 | 142 | 502 |
Conference proceedings | 37 | |||
Non-English | 13 | |||
Keywords and abstract screening | Articles focusing on technical engineering issues | 43 | 265 | 237 |
Articles on sustainable consumption and consumer behavior | 64 | |||
Articles on sustainability in education and teaching and pure social sustainability | 17 | |||
Articles on developed countries and economies | 31 | |||
Articles focused on modular design and production | 59 | |||
Articles on supply chain partners and alliances | 31 | |||
Articles on flexible manufacturing optimization | 20 | |||
Full text review stage | Technical articles on life cycle assessment | 28 | 122 | 115 |
Articles on technology development for remanufacturing and recycling | 43 | |||
Articles on city and urban transport | 21 | |||
Articles on clean and renewable energies in supply chains | 19 | |||
Articles on the development analytical tools for flexible supply chains | 11 | |||
Crosschecks | Articles lacking any implications for FGSCM strategies, practices, drivers, and barriers in emerging economy | 07 | 07 | 108 |
Results of Systematic Literature Review
Phase I: Initial Search in Academic Databases
Phase II: Text Mining
No | Countries | Total number of publications | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
1 | India | 43 | 18.00 |
2 | China | 38 | 15.90 |
3 | Taiwan | 27 | 11.30 |
4 | Brazil | 18 | 7.53 |
5 | Bangladesh | 17 | 7.11 |
6 | Malaysia | 15 | 6.27 |
7 | South Africa | 13 | 5.44 |
8 | Mexico | 09 | 3.76 |
9 | Indonesia | 07 | 2.93 |
10 | Pakistan | 05 | 2.10 |
11 | Other countries | 47 | 19.66 |
Phase III: Network Analysis
Thematic Analysis of the Literature
FGSCM Strategies and Practices
FGSCM strategies | Related practices | Selected sources from emerging economies literature | Selected sources from general FGSCM literature | Specificities of emerging economies based on the contrasting selected sources |
---|---|---|---|---|
Green purchasing and supply management | Environmental audit for the internal management of suppliers Asking suppliers to acquire ISO 14001 certification Green supplier development programs | Vijayvargy et al. (2017) Diab et al. (2015) Liu et al. (2017) Luthra et al. (2016) Jabbour et al. (2020) Silvestre (2015) Adhikari and Bisi (2020) | Green et al. (2012) Touzi et al. (2015) Rao and Holt (2005) Zhu et al. (2008) | Corruption and distrust increase procurement costs and hinder green procurement in emerging economies Supplier–buyer relation is unregulated and involves higher informality in emerging economies Buying organizations from developed countries have higher bargaining power over the suppliers in emerging economies. Accordingly, they share less revenue with suppliers leading to lower greening quality |
Green/flexible manufacturing and operations | Reusing, recycling and remanufacturing Environmental compliances, auditing programs, and total quality environmental management programs Flexible manufacturing and process development with environmental considerations | Govindan et al. (2015) Liu et al. (2017) Luthra et al. (2016) Jabbour et al. (2020) Adhikari and Bisi (2020) Raj et al. (2008) | Dubey et al. (2015) Srivastava (2007) Kleindorfer et al. (2005) Rafi-Ul-Shan et al. (2018) | In light of weaker regulations, internal stakeholders in emerging economies such as firm owners play a greater role in green / flexible manufacturing and operations than external stakeholders such as governments In emerging economies, the production is more labor-oriented rather than technology-oriented which leads to higher sustainability risks In emerging economies, green/flexible production is determined mostly when the cost–benefit analysis indicates profitability |
Green logistic | Corporate environmental strategies toward logistics, reduction of carbon emissions and the use of a greener fleet Using greener modes of transport Using fuel with less carbon intensity Reduction of exhaust emission | Luthra et al. (2016) Lai and Wong (2012) Zhu and Sarkis (2016) Esfahbodi et al. (2016) Jakhar et al. (2018) Jawaad and Zafar (2019) | Cosimato and Troisi (2015) Kumar et al. (2015) Ali et al. (2016) | In emerging economies, sustainability terms are barely included in the contracts of third-party logistics providers Due to unaligned objectives of different organizational functions, green logistics would not necessarily lead to improved cost performance in emerging economies SMEs in emerging economies have just recently started considering green logistics initiatives such as minimizing empty miles and better space utilizations |
Flexible reverse logistic and material recovery | Recovery of excess inventories and materials Sale of scrap, used materials and excess capital equipment Concurrent design of forward and reverse logistics Using the empty capacity of backhaul trucks for reverse logistics | Vijayvargy et al. (2017) Epoh and Mafini (2018) Fang and Zhang (2018) Jayaram and Avittathur (2015) Scavarda et al. (2019) Maric and Opazo-basaez (2019) | Thun and Müller (2010) Chiou et al. (2011) Gavronski et al. (2011) Gunasekaran and Spalanzani (2012) Zhu et al. (2013) Laosirihongthong et al. (2013) | Poor waste separation at the point of waste generation in emerging economies makes recovery and reverse logistics complicated Reverse logistics in emerging economies, especially in countries other than China, is still immature both from research and practice perspectives |
Green / flexible product design and packaging | Selection of recyclable and biodegradable packaging materials Green product development by considering reuse, recycle, and recovery of materials, and the component parts at design stage | Liu et al. (2017) Luthra et al. (2016) Vijayvargy et al. (2017) Epoh and Mafini (2018) Zhu et al. (2008) Diab et al. (2015) Esfahbodi et al. (2016) Jayaram and Avittathur (2015) | Zhang and Zhao (2012) Chiou et al. (2011) Gavronski et al. (2011) Gunasekaran and Spalanzani (2012) Zhu et al. (2013) Gan et al. (2021) | In emerging economies, organizations adopt reactive strategies in acquiring green design standards such as ISO/TR 14,062 (e.g., when obliged by government or buyer), whereas in developed countries proactive strategies are prevalent In emerging economies, eco-design is justified mostly when it leads to profitability In emerging economies, governments’ investment is lower in waste management infrastructure and open-air landfilling is by far the most widespread method |
Green marketing and customer relationship management | Use of environmentally friendly labeling of the products Encouraging customers to buy greener products Cooperation with customers for eco-design and greener packaging | Vijayvargy et al. (2017) Fang and Zhang (2018) Zhu and Sarkis (2016) Luthra et al. (2016) Jayaram and Scavarda et al. (2019) Jayaram and Avittathur (2015) Jawaad and Zafar (2019) Pakdeechoho and Sukhotu (2018) | Chan et al. (2012) Mobley et al. (1995) Essousi and Linton (2010) Wang et al. (2013) Scarpa and Willis (2010) Herring (2006) Young et al. (2010) Bai and Sarkis (2010) Nishitani (2010) | Due to lower awareness of customers in emerging economies about environmental issues, more information should be provided in product marketing as well as through product labels and leaflets In emerging economies, customer collaboration has a stronger impact on environmental performance, as compared to supplier collaboration In emerging economies, firms compete based on minimum environmental quality standards and low prices, rather than focusing on high environmental performance |
Internal environmental management | Commitment of senior manager to FGSCM strategies Inter-departmental cooperation for environmental improvements Environment documentations and auditing | Zhu et al. (2008) Epoh and Mafini (2018) Vijayvargy et al. (2017) Luthra et al. (2016) Silvestre (2015) | Fang and Zhang (2018) Nema et al. (2013) Çankaya and Sezen (2019) Yu and Ramanathan (2015) | The firms in emerging economies poorly promote and implement employees’ environmental training and incentives. Environmental certifications such as ISO 14000 series are inadequate |
Green/flexible innovation | Technologies for energy savings (Saunila et al., 2018) Using non-toxic raw materials Research and development orientation to green products | Zhang et al. (2019) Silvestre (2015) Pakdeechoho and Sukhotu (2018) | Huang and Li (2017) Albort-Morant et al. (2016) Kumar et al. (2020) | Focal firms in emerging economies are the main determinants of green/flexible innovation. It is less likely that other supply chain members take initiatives Governments of emerging economies offer less sustainability incentives to motivate firms for innovation In emerging economies, green / flexible innovations are mostly concentrated at the end of product life, e.g., to repurpose the used product or its components, while in developed countries green/flexible innovation is placed throughout the supply chain including at the product design level |
Green/flexible information system | Designing energy efficient IT equipment Reducing data centers energy consumption | Green et al. (2012) Abraham and Dao (2019) Silvestre (2015) Martín-Góme et al. (2019) | Gholami et al. (2013) Basaglia et al. (2009) Butler (2011) Elliot (2011) Gupta et al. (2019) | Inadequate infrastructures in emerging economies such as internet access, fiber optic, and information technology knowledge limit the implementation and efficiency of green information systems and negatively impact supply chain flexibility |
FGSCM Drivers and Barriers
Key drivers | Source of institutional pressure | Description | Selected sources |
---|---|---|---|
External | Coercive | Government rules and regulations obliging firms to adopt FGSCM practices | Govindan et al. (2016) |
Mathiyazhagan et al.(2018) | |||
Mhelembe and Mafini (2019) | |||
Government incentives for funding, training and development of FGSCM initiatives | Pakdeechoho and Sukhotu (2018) | ||
Mangla et al. (2016) | |||
Govindan et al. (2016) | |||
Mimetic | Increased competition among organizations for green / flexible initiatives | ||
Mathiyazhagan and Haq (2013) | |||
Gaining competitive advantage over competitors by differentiation of products and services | Dhull and Narwal (2018) | ||
Gandhi et al. (2015) | |||
Competitors designing products with reusability, recyclability, or flexibility | |||
Competitors using cleaner technologies and renewable energies | Dhull and Narwal (2018) | ||
Dhull and Narwal (2016) | |||
Adoption of FGSCM practices by suppliers and other supply chain partners | Gandhi et al. (2015) | ||
Bhool and Narwal (2013) | |||
Dhull and Narwal (2018) | |||
Gosling et al. (2010) | |||
Normative | Growing awareness among the customers for eco-friendly products | Bhool and Narwal (2013) | |
Improving organizational image in the eyes of customers | Bhool and Narwal (2013) | ||
Better market for green products | Dhull and Narwal (2016) | ||
Gandhi et al. (2015) | |||
Internal | Top management and employees’ willingness and commitment | Gandhi et al. (2015) | |
Shibin et al. (2016) | |||
Organizational culture and policies | Mathiyazhagan and Haq (2013) | ||
Shibin et al. (2016) | |||
Environmental training and development | Raut et al. (2017) | ||
Dhull and Narwal (2016) | |||
Organizations understanding the cost benefits of adopting FGSCM practices | Raut et al. (2017) | ||
Kumar et al. (2016) | |||
Shibin et al. (2016) |
Key drivers | Source of institutional pressure | Description | Selected sources |
---|---|---|---|
External | Coercive | Weak government regulations regarding FGSCM | Delmonico et al. (2018) |
Govindan et al. (2014) | |||
Sarker et al. (2021) | |||
Corruption and bribery | Silvestre (2015) | ||
Muduli et al. (2013) | |||
Intricate tax systems and overly bureaucratic government systems | Silvestre (2015) | ||
Muduli et al. (2013) | |||
Import–export regulations and transnational trade laws | Yadav et al. (2020) | ||
Govindan et al. (2014) | |||
Mimetic | Poor collaboration among supply chain partners to provoke FGSCM initiatives | Tumpa et al. (2019) | |
Govindan et al. (2014) | |||
Shibin et al. (2016) | |||
Lack of suppliers’ and supply chain partners’ interest to implement FGSCM initiatives | Majumdar and Sinha (2019) | ||
Balaji et al. (2014) | |||
Shibin et al. (2016) | |||
Unavailability of third parties to collect used products | Balon et al. (2016) | ||
Govindan et al. (2014) | |||
Wang et al. (2015) | |||
Normative | Lack of customer interest or preference for FGSCM-related practices | Shohan et al. (2020) | |
Govindan et al. (2014) | |||
Mangla et al. (2014) | |||
Lower customer demand for green/flexible products | Wang et al. (2015) | ||
Yadav et al. (2020) | |||
Weak promotion of green products | Tumpa et al. (2019) | ||
Lorek and Spangenberg, (2014) | |||
Khan and Qianli (2017) | |||
Internal | FGSCM initiatives not included in organizational strategies and planning | Majumdar and Sinha (2019) | |
Balon et al. (2016) | |||
Mangla et al. (2014) | |||
Unfit business models to support FGSCM | Govindan et al. (2014) | ||
Muduli et al. (2013) | |||
Resistance to change and unwillingness to adopt FGSCM practices | Delmonico et al. (2018) | ||
Dube and Gawande (2016) | |||
High costs of environment friendly products and/or green initiatives | Govindan et al. (2014) | ||
Balaji et al. (2014) | |||
Performance appraisal systems designed solely based on financial measures | Yadav et al. (2020) | ||
Govindan et al. (2014) | |||
Lack of appropriate technologies for green and flexible design, manufacturing, or recycling | Rahman et al. (2019) | ||
Mathiyazhagan et al. (2016) | |||
Mangla et al. (2014) | |||
Lack of information technologies systems for coordination and communication for FGSCM | Rahman et al. (2019) | ||
Majumdar and Sinha (2019) | |||
Lack of skilled workforce for FGSCM | |||
Muduli et al. (2013) |