Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management 1/2023

Open Access 04-11-2022 | Review Papers

Flexible Green Supply Chain Management in Emerging Economies: A Systematic Literature Review

Authors: M. K. Dhillon, P. M. Rafi-Ul-Shan, H. Amar, F. Sher, S. Ahmed

Published in: Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management | Issue 1/2023

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to synthesize the fragmented extant knowledge on flexible and green supply chain management (FGSCM) in the context of emerging economies and to unearth research gaps to motivate future research. We adopted a novel structured systematic literature review by triangulating a systematic literature review, text mining, and network analysis. Institutional theory and contingency theory were employed to analyze the results of the review. The results show that, firstly, research on FGSCM in emerging economies, despite its importance, is immature compared to general FGSCM literature. Second, the specificities of strategies and practices that distinguish this topic in emerging economies are discussed and the drivers and barriers are identified with respect to sources of institutional pressure. Third, a research framework for FGSCM in emerging economies is developed and 12 gaps for future research are identified. This study has exclusively developed a research framework for FGSCM in an emerging economy which has received the least consideration in the literature and practice. The framework was developed to synthesize the existing literature and to identify the research gaps to inspire future research.
Notes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Economic growth and consumerism have placed greater demands for energy and material consumption, resulting in increased concerns for environmental and natural resource preservation (Jia et al., 2018). Environmental issues are prime concerns for global economies due to global warming, increased pollution and depleting non-renewable resources (Malviya & Kant, 2015). Supply chain advancements since the 1990s introduced a new perspective that integrates environmental management within business operations to achieve a competitive advantage (Srivastava, 2007). Moreover, dissemination of flexibility from the manufacturing sector to the interorganizational and supply chain level created exciting, yet under-researched, opportunities for supply chain flexibility (Singh et al., 2020a, 2020b; Stevenson & Spring, 2007; Wadhwa & Rao, 2004).
Globalization resulted in increased demand for various products in the mid-twentieth century forcing global organizations to enter into new contexts of production where they had never operated before (Rajeev et al., 2017). The geographic extension of the supply chain resulted in more than 20% of the greenhouse gas to be emitted by organizations venturing on global platforms, due to the increased complexity of the sourcing and distribution channels as well as the socio-economic conditions of different countries (Dubey et al., 2017). Globalization not only created concerns vis-à-vis the ecological impact of supply chains, but also affected recent supply chain disruptions due to the Covid-19 pandemic. From this, it was established that the supply chain must be built flexibly to survive in volatile environments (Butt, 2021; Stevenson & Spring, 2007).
Growing environmental concerns and stringent environmental laws in developed countries have driven global companies to outsource the most polluting segments of their businesses to developing nations (Dwivedi et al., 2021; Garcia-Saravia Ortiz-de-Montellano & van der Meer, 2022; Geng et al., 2017a, 2017b). Among developing countries, emerging economies (e.g., Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, known as BRICS) are prime targets of multinational corporations due to a large consumer base, relatively disposable income, rapid industrialization, diversity of supply base, availability of skilled workforce, and lower operating costs (Tumpa et al., 2019). Emerging economies welcome foreign direct investment and benefit directly from globalization. This shift of location, however, has increased environmental concerns in emerging nations as well as the need for stricter environmental and social standards (Geng et al., 2017a, 2017b). On the other side, focal supply chain firms understood that the shift to emerging economies, despite the lower operating costs and new markets, involves unforeseen risks, which are specific to these countries. These risks can be mitigated only if the supply chain is proactive and if flexibility is built in supply chains in advance (Settembre-Blundo et al., 2021; Tukamuhabwa et al., 2017).
Recently, supply chain flexibility is becoming an attractive area of research for researchers and academicians (Singh et al., 2020a, 2020b). There is some research in this area, such as by Singh et al., (2020a, 2020b), who focus on measuring the performance of supply chain flexibility of an Indian soap manufacturing firm. Another research by Singh et al., (2020a, 2020b) focuses on mapping the causal relations among various supply chain flexibility dimensions and their impact on the Indian hygiene industry. However, there is limited research in the context of flexible green supply chain management (FGSCM). Research on FGSCM in emerging economies has been limited due to the contextual specificities of these countries such as the uncertainty inherent in their business environment and poor infrastructure to deal with sustainability issues (Silvestre, 2015; Singh et al., 2020a, 2020b). For example, 90% waste in India is dumped in the environment due to the lack of waste treatment and disposal facilities (Soda et al., 2015). Western corporates widely source from these manufacturers and service providers due to the availability of cheap labor and material. However, they have limited understanding of the context and poor visibility over the operational practices of their supply chains in such emerging economies (Rosin et al., 2020; Singh et al., 2019, 2020a, 2020b). Consequently, they are subject to scandals such as the Rana Plaza disaster in Bangladesh and enduring criticisms of overlooking environmental issues in their supply chain operations carried out in emerging economies (Bin Makhashen et al., 2020). Moreover, supply chain environmental issues exacerbated by disruptions in the recent pandemic have shown that sustainability and flexibility should be considered jointly in supply chain management, a need that has not been addressed in the literature hitherto (Paul & Chowdhury, 2020; Sassanelli & Terzi, 2022; Shibin et al., 2016).
Our initial review of the literature on FGSCM identifies the following gaps:
(a)
Limited research has been conducted on FGSCM in the context of emerging economies, despite the increasing trend of operations and procurement from these countries (Singh et al., 2019, 2020a, 2020b)
 
(b)
Despite the interconnectedness of flexibility and environmental sustainability in the supply chain management context, the literature has investigated these topics separately.
 
(c)
Existing frameworks for flexible or green supply chain management fall short of utility for emerging economies due to inherently different characteristics of the business environment in these countries.
 
(d)
While some systematic literature reviews in emerging economies have been conducted on flexible or green supply chain management barriers (Rahman et al., 2019; Shibin et al., 2016; Tumpa et al., 2019) and organizational performance (Geng et al., 2017a, 2017b), the literature scants systematic reviews that unearth the specificities and the sources of institutional pressures in emerging economies.
 
This review seeks to bridge these gaps by conducting a systematic literature review on FGSCM in emerging economies and addressing the following interrelated research questions -
i.
What is the status quo of FGSCM research in emerging economies?
 
ii.
What are the specificities of FGSCM strategies and practices in emerging economies?
 
iii.
What are the sources of institutional pressure, i.e., drivers and barriers, to adopt FGSCM strategies and practices in emerging economies?
 
iv.
How can the extant body of knowledge inform future research on FGSCM in emerging economies?
 
This article responds to the calls for further work on the FGSCM in emerging economies by proposing an innovative methodology that triangulates data from eclectic methods through a systematic literature review, text mining, and network analysis supported by two organizational theories for the cross-validation of findings and to eliminate subjectivity from the selection and review process. Three contributions to the literature of supply chain management are made. First, this article brings together the interrelated, yet separate, research developments in flexibility and environmental sustainability in supply chain management in emerging economies within the past 20 years. Second, it juxtaposes the FGSCM strategies and practices in emerging economies with the ones from the general literature, and thus unearths the contextual specificities of emerging economies using a contingency theory lens. Third, it identifies the sources of pressures that motivate or hinder FGSCM in emerging economies using institution theory to help policy makers advocate for FGSCM drivers and tackle the barriers.
The rest of this article is organized as follows. Section 2 presents the research design, theoretical perspectives, and the methodology used for the systematic literature review. Section 3 presents the results of a systematic literature review and provides infographics of the important trends found in the literature. Section 4 provides a thematic analysis of the results by identifying the strategies, practices, barriers, and enablers of FGSCM in emerging economies and comparing them against general FGSCM literature using the theoretical perspectives. Section 5 unearths the research gaps for future research and develops a research framework for FGSCM in emerging economies. Finally, Sect. 6 concludes the paper and provides the limitations.

Research Design and Methodology

This section describes the research design, including the methodology, theoretical underpinning, and analysis approaches. The research gap, as discussed in Sect. 1, is where flexible SCM, green SCM, and SCM in emerging economies overlap. Motivated by this research gap, our proposed methodology triangulates different approaches to extract, analyze, and synthesize extant literature on FGSCM in emerging economies. It combines a systematic literature review, text mining, and network analysis to identify, evaluate, and synthesize the existing research (Denyer & Tranfield, 2009). An eclectic theoretical underpinning of contingency theory and institutional theory is adopted throughout the review. The methodology integrates the findings to build a theoretical framework for FGSCM in emerging economies. Figure 1 shows the research gap, theoretical lens, and the steps of the proposed methodology.

Theoretical Perspective

A combined contingency theory and institutional theory lens was used to interpret the selected articles and develop a research framework. Contingency theory (Lawrence & Lorsch, 1967) is a major theoretical lens that expresses different organizational systems are the results of differences in their operating context. Since one of the objectives of this research is to understand the specificities of FGSCM in emerging economies, it can serve as an appropriate theoretical lens to scrutinize the differences between FGSCM strategies and practices in developed and emerging economies. Furthermore, we considered drivers and barriers as sources of positive and negative pressures, respectively, on the firms to adopt FGSCM strategies and practices. We take an institutional theory perspective (DiMaggio & Powell, 1983) to identify the source of drivers and barriers in emerging economies and discern whether they emerged to comply with regulations (coercive), to copy competitors or cope with cultural cognitive pressures (mimetic), or if they are in response to customer pressure (normative).

Stages of the Methodology

The methodology started with a search in electronic databases to locate, select, and evaluate extant studies. First, relevant keywords were identified based on the internal discussion of authors, all of whom are academics with a background in supply chain and operations management. A corporate practitioner from India, experienced in FGSCM, was involved in the discussions at a later stage to ensure the viability of the keywords. The initial keywords were refined into series of search strings using Boolean logic, for example, "Green AND/OR Supply Chain," and "Emerging AND/OR Economy AND/OR Flexible AND/OR Supply Chain." Nearly synonymous keywords such as "Developing Country" or "Sustainable/Ethical Supply Chain" were also used. The search strings were continuously refined, resulting in 26 of the most relevant strings that were used to search data on Web of Science, Science Direct, ABI/INFORM and Emerald Insight. The following exclusion criteria, as proposed by Newbert (2007), were used to narrow the results down to those which were more relevant.
  • Articles should be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals in English.
  • Only journals in the area of logistics, operations management, and supply chain management are included.
  • Articles should be published in the last 20 years.
  • Articles must contain at least one of the keywords in their title or abstract.
After reviewing the title, keywords, and abstract of the returned results, irrelevant articles were excluded and the rest of the articles were reviewed in their entirety, resulting in 108 articles shortlisted for the review. Table 1 shows the process of applying inclusion and exclusion criteria in detail and Fig. 2 summarizes Table 1. Figure 2 summarizes the total exclusion and remaining articles in each stage.
Table 1
Application of inclusion and exclusion criteria
Stages
Exclusion criteria
Number of articles excluded
Total exclusion
Remaining articles
Initial screening
Exclusion of duplicates
253
253
644
Title review stage
Non peer-reviewed articles
92
142
502
Conference proceedings
37
Non-English
13
Keywords and abstract screening
Articles focusing on technical engineering issues
43
265
237
Articles on sustainable consumption and consumer behavior
64
Articles on sustainability in education and teaching and pure social sustainability
17
Articles on developed countries and economies
31
Articles focused on modular design and production
59
Articles on supply chain partners and alliances
31
Articles on flexible manufacturing optimization
20
Full text review stage
Technical articles on life cycle assessment
28
122
115
Articles on technology development for remanufacturing and recycling
43
Articles on city and urban transport
21
Articles on clean and renewable energies in supply chains
19
Articles on the development analytical tools for flexible supply chains
11
Crosschecks
Articles lacking any implications for FGSCM strategies, practices, drivers, and barriers in emerging economy
07
07
108
Next, to extract the key themes covered in the shortlisted articles, the text-mining technique was employed. The finalized articles from the previous stage were imported into NVivo12 for cross-validation. The articles were coded and categorized in terms of FGSCM conceptualization, operational impacts, strategies and practices, and drivers and barriers. All the authors were involved in coding and compiling the articles, which was later validated by an external researcher to ensure reproducibility of results and eliminating subjectivity. Text mining strengthened the validity and reliability of the selection process, including the finalized articles and the main themes. It also highlighted low values of relative frequencies as potential themes for future research.
Finally, to unearth the interconnection among the identified results, a network analysis was used. All major and minor categories and frequencies resulting from the previous stage were coded in a separate dataset and stored in NVivo12 for network analysis. Conducting a network analysis on this dataset identified the knowledge gaps of FGSCM in emerging economies and revealed the studies with higher interconnection. A combined contingency and institutional theory lens were used to synthesize the findings and develop a research framework.

Results of Systematic Literature Review

This section explains the stages of implementing the proposed research methodology and addressing the first research question on the status quo of FGSCM literature in emerging economies.

Phase I: Initial Search in Academic Databases

The concept of FGSCM gained its academic coverage in the 1990s (Fahimnia et al., 2015). However, most of the articles on FGSCM-related wider issues emerged after 2000 (Quarshie et al., 2016) followed by a sharp growth in academic publications afterward (Rafi-ul-Shan et al., 2018). Thus, the period used to conduct this review was determined to be from January 2000 to December 2021. Figures 3 compares the annual frequency of publications on general FGSCM and FGSCM in emerging economies indicating that, firstly, noticeably less research has been conducted on FGSCM in emerging economies and, secondly, the slope of increase is significantly lower for the latter.

Phase II: Text Mining

Conducting text mining using NVivo12 on the articles resulting from phase 1 facilitated visualization of the focus using word clouds as well as further analysis based on the industry sector, research methodology, and data analytics tools of the reviewed articles (Bin Makhashen et al., 2020). Figure 4 depicts the word cloud, highlighting the most frequently used words in the selected articles in bigger fonts, while other less frequent words appear in smaller fonts. A word cloud is a powerful visualization tool to identify common words in complex environments and facilitates unearthing dominant themes and keywords in a given context (Birko et al., 2015). The most frequently used words were “green” (word count: 5652), “supply chain” (4361), “sustainable” (4002), “environmental” (3794), “flexible” (3220), “management” (2431), and “emerging” (2187), followed by other keywords.
The analysis of articles by industry sector suggests that the extant empirical research on FGSCM used various industrial sectors, as shown in Fig. 5. The top three industries were the manufacturing industry 11.2% (29 articles), electronics and electrical industries 10.42% (27 articles), and textile and apparel industry 8.88% (23 articles). A figure of 12% of reviewed articles (31 articles) did not disclose the industry. The reviewed articles were sorted based on the country on which the study focused. The results, shown in Table 2, reveal that India (43 articles) and China (38 articles) were by far the two highest-researched emerging economies.
Table 2
The frequency of emerging economies in the reviewed articles
No
Countries
Total number of publications
Percentage
1
India
43
18.00
2
China
38
15.90
3
Taiwan
27
11.30
4
Brazil
18
7.53
5
Bangladesh
17
7.11
6
Malaysia
15
6.27
7
South Africa
13
5.44
8
Mexico
09
3.76
9
Indonesia
07
2.93
10
Pakistan
05
2.10
11
Other countries
47
19.66
The articles were also analyzed based on research methodologies. As shown in Fig. 6, quantitative and mathematical modeling prevailed, which is at odds with the general trend of FGSCM literature. Our findings are at odds with Ansari and Kant (2017) who found more case studies and empirical qualitative studies, but are supported by Rajeev et al. (2017) who found that GSCM lacks qualitative research in the context of emerging economies when compared to the developed economies. It implies the maturity of literature on FGSCM as compared to FGSCM in emerging economies. Since quantitative methods were prevailing, the articles were further analyzed based on the applied data analytical tools, as shown in Fig. 7. Among various analytical tools applied, interpretive structural modeling (ISM) with 13 articles was the most popular data analysis technique, followed by Fuzzy TOPSIS (12 articles) and sensitivity analysis with 11 articles.

Phase III: Network Analysis

The articles with at least one citation were selected from the final list of articles, and their objectives and key findings were scrutinized to conduct network analysis. A network analysis was conducted on these articles. The results are depicted in Fig. 8.
It was found that FGSCM-related research is on the rise when compared to the FGSCM-related research in the context of emerging economies. Our network analysis demonstrated undirected empirical research on FGSCM in emerging economies, on the far edges of the network and distanced from the most cited FGSCM-related articles, enabling us to identify the most important contributions in the research domain. Based on the network analysis, key articles on FGSCM in emerging economies are highlighted. A summary of key contributions in the research domain is provided in the appendix.

Thematic Analysis of the Literature

This section provides an in-depth analysis of the selected articles from the systematic literature review. Firstly, FGSCM strategies and practices were extracted. Building upon the contingency theory, they were juxtaposed with the general literature of FGSCM to identify the contextual specificities of emerging economies (second research question). Secondly, the drivers and barriers of FGSCM in emerging economies were identified and categorized based on the source of institutional pressure using the institutional theory (third research question).

FGSCM Strategies and Practices

Many researchers attempted to identify and categorize FGSCM strategies and practices (e.g., Fang & Zhang, 2018; Nema et al., 2013; Srivastava, 2007; Zhu et al., 2007), but little research has been done on FGSCM strategies and practices in emerging economies and their specificities. Most of the terminologies, classifications, and categories of FGSCM strategies and practices were developed from the developed economies or network perspective. There are few studies that have researched the emerging economic context, such as those by Singh et al., (2020a, 2020b), Singh et al. (2019), and Singh and Acharya (2013) that extensively focused on developing a framework for supply chain flexibility. However, it was noticed that FGSCM strategies and practices received the least consideration in literature and practice. Thus, we identified FGSCM strategies and practices from the selected articles and juxtaposed them with the ones from the general FGSCM literature using the contingency theory lens. The results, summarized in Table 3, reveal that there are significant disparities between FGSCM strategies and practices in emerging economies and developed countries. These specificities should be considered when devising a FGSCM strategy or implementing practice in an emerging economy.
Table 3
FGSCM strategies and practices in emerging economies
FGSCM strategies
Related practices
Selected sources from emerging economies literature
Selected sources from general FGSCM literature
Specificities of emerging economies based on the contrasting selected sources
Green purchasing and supply management
Environmental audit for the internal management of suppliers
Asking suppliers to acquire ISO 14001 certification
Green supplier development programs
Vijayvargy et al. (2017)
Diab et al. (2015)
Liu et al. (2017)
Luthra et al. (2016)
Jabbour et al. (2020)
Silvestre (2015)
Adhikari and Bisi (2020)
Green et al. (2012)
Touzi et al. (2015)
Rao and Holt (2005)
Zhu et al. (2008)
Corruption and distrust increase procurement costs and hinder green procurement in emerging economies
Supplier–buyer relation is unregulated and involves higher informality in emerging economies
Buying organizations from developed countries have higher bargaining power over the suppliers in emerging economies. Accordingly, they share less revenue with suppliers leading to lower greening quality
Green/flexible manufacturing and operations
Reusing, recycling and remanufacturing
Environmental compliances, auditing programs, and total quality environmental management programs
Flexible manufacturing and process development with environmental considerations
Govindan et al. (2015)
Liu et al. (2017)
Luthra et al. (2016)
Jabbour et al. (2020)
Adhikari and Bisi (2020)
Raj et al. (2008)
Dubey et al. (2015)
Srivastava (2007)
Kleindorfer et al. (2005)
Rafi-Ul-Shan et al. (2018)
In light of weaker regulations, internal stakeholders in emerging economies such as firm owners play a greater role in green / flexible manufacturing and operations than external stakeholders such as governments
In emerging economies, the production is more labor-oriented rather than technology-oriented which leads to higher sustainability risks
In emerging economies, green/flexible production is determined mostly when the cost–benefit analysis indicates profitability
Green logistic
Corporate environmental strategies toward logistics, reduction of carbon emissions and the use of a greener fleet
Using greener modes of transport
Using fuel with less carbon intensity
Reduction of exhaust emission
Luthra et al. (2016)
Lai and Wong (2012)
Zhu and Sarkis (2016)
Esfahbodi et al. (2016)
Jakhar et al. (2018)
Jawaad and Zafar (2019)
Cosimato and Troisi (2015)
Kumar et al. (2015)
Ali et al. (2016)
In emerging economies, sustainability terms are barely included in the contracts of third-party logistics providers
Due to unaligned objectives of different organizational functions, green logistics would not necessarily lead to improved cost performance in emerging economies
SMEs in emerging economies have just recently started considering green logistics initiatives such as minimizing empty miles and better space utilizations
Flexible reverse logistic and material recovery
Recovery of excess inventories and materials
Sale of scrap, used materials and excess capital equipment
Concurrent design of forward and reverse logistics
Using the empty capacity of backhaul trucks for reverse logistics
Vijayvargy et al. (2017)
Epoh and Mafini (2018)
Fang and Zhang (2018)
Jayaram and Avittathur (2015)
Scavarda et al. (2019)
Maric and Opazo-basaez (2019)
Thun and Müller (2010)
Chiou et al. (2011)
Gavronski et al. (2011)
Gunasekaran and Spalanzani (2012)
Zhu et al. (2013)
Laosirihongthong et al. (2013)
Poor waste separation at the point of waste generation in emerging economies makes recovery and reverse logistics complicated
Reverse logistics in emerging economies, especially in countries other than China, is still immature both from research and practice perspectives
Green / flexible product design and packaging
Selection of recyclable and biodegradable packaging materials
Green product development by considering reuse, recycle, and recovery of materials, and the component parts at design stage
Liu et al. (2017)
Luthra et al. (2016)
Vijayvargy et al. (2017)
Epoh and Mafini (2018)
Zhu et al. (2008)
Diab et al. (2015)
Esfahbodi et al. (2016)
Jayaram and Avittathur (2015)
Geng et al., (2017a, 2017b)
Zhang and Zhao (2012)
Chiou et al. (2011)
Gavronski et al. (2011)
Gunasekaran and Spalanzani (2012)
Zhu et al. (2013)
Gan et al. (2021)
In emerging economies, organizations adopt reactive strategies in acquiring green design standards such as ISO/TR 14,062 (e.g., when obliged by government or buyer), whereas in developed countries proactive strategies are prevalent
In emerging economies, eco-design is justified mostly when it leads to profitability
In emerging economies, governments’ investment is lower in waste management infrastructure and open-air landfilling is by far the most widespread method
Green marketing and customer relationship management
Use of environmentally friendly labeling of the products
Encouraging customers to buy greener products
Cooperation with customers for eco-design and greener packaging
Vijayvargy et al. (2017)
Fang and Zhang (2018)
Zhu and Sarkis (2016)
Luthra et al. (2016)
Geng et al., (2017a, 2017b)
Jayaram and
Scavarda et al. (2019)
Jayaram and Avittathur (2015)
Jawaad and Zafar (2019)
Pakdeechoho and Sukhotu (2018)
Chan et al. (2012)
Mobley et al. (1995)
Essousi and Linton (2010)
Wang et al. (2013)
Scarpa and Willis (2010)
Herring (2006)
Young et al. (2010)
Bai and Sarkis (2010)
Nishitani (2010)
Due to lower awareness of customers in emerging economies about environmental issues, more information should be provided in product marketing as well as through product labels and leaflets
In emerging economies, customer collaboration has a stronger impact on environmental performance, as compared to supplier collaboration
In emerging economies, firms compete based on minimum environmental quality standards and low prices, rather than focusing on high environmental performance
Internal environmental management
Commitment of senior manager to FGSCM strategies
Inter-departmental cooperation for environmental improvements
Environment documentations and auditing
Zhu et al. (2008)
Epoh and Mafini (2018)
Vijayvargy et al. (2017)
Luthra et al. (2016)
Silvestre (2015)
Fang and Zhang (2018)
Nema et al. (2013)
Çankaya and Sezen (2019)
Yu and Ramanathan (2015)
The firms in emerging economies poorly promote and implement employees’ environmental training and incentives. Environmental certifications such as ISO 14000 series are inadequate
Green/flexible innovation
Technologies for energy savings (Saunila et al., 2018)
Using non-toxic raw materials
Research and development orientation to green products
Zhang et al. (2019)
Silvestre (2015)
Pakdeechoho and Sukhotu (2018)
Abraham and Dao (2019) Saunila et al. (2018)
Huang and Li (2017)
Albort-Morant et al. (2016)
Kumar et al. (2020)
Focal firms in emerging economies are the main determinants of green/flexible innovation. It is less likely that other supply chain members take initiatives
Governments of emerging economies offer less sustainability incentives to motivate firms for innovation
In emerging economies, green / flexible innovations are mostly concentrated at the end of product life, e.g., to repurpose the used product or its components, while in developed countries green/flexible innovation is placed throughout the supply chain including at the product design level
Green/flexible information system
Designing energy efficient IT equipment
Reducing data centers energy consumption
Green et al. (2012)
Abraham and Dao (2019)
Silvestre (2015)
Martín-Góme et al. (2019)
Gholami et al. (2013)
Basaglia et al. (2009)
Butler (2011)
Elliot (2011)
Gupta et al. (2019)
Inadequate infrastructures in emerging economies such as internet access, fiber optic, and information technology knowledge limit the implementation and efficiency of green information systems and negatively impact supply chain flexibility

FGSCM Drivers and Barriers

Organizations in emerging economies face various drivers and barriers to adopt FGSCM strategies and practices. These pressures originate from different internal (from within the organization) and external (from outside the organization) stakeholders. This review unearthed major drivers and barriers and analyzed the sources from which they originated. Drivers related to government and regulations were categorized as coercive pressure. Drivers motivated by competitors or the cultural environment were considered as mimetic pressures. When a driver pertained to customer or market, it was perceived as normative pressure. Similarly, where a barrier was related to lack of government regulations or support, it was categorized as coercive pressure, indicating that governments should increase their support or exert further pressure to address the barrier. The same holds for barriers assigned to mimetic and normative pressures. When a driver or barrier originated from the internal environment of a firm, e.g., management commitment to environmental training, it is considered as an internal driver or barrier. For the sake of simplicity, when the analysis found management support as a driver and lack of management support as a barrier, for instance, it was only mentioned once in the list of drivers. Tables 4 and 5 provide a summary of identified drivers and barriers, respectively. These tables spotlight the two major key drivers/barriers (internal and external) of FGSCM in emerging economies.
Table 4
Key drivers of FGSCM in emerging economies
Key drivers
Source of institutional pressure
Description
Selected sources
External
Coercive
Government rules and regulations obliging firms to adopt FGSCM practices
Govindan et al. (2016)
Mathiyazhagan et al.(2018)
Mhelembe and Mafini (2019)
Government incentives for funding, training and development of FGSCM initiatives
Pakdeechoho and Sukhotu (2018)
Mangla et al. (2016)
Govindan et al. (2016)
Mimetic
Increased competition among organizations for green / flexible initiatives
Luthra et al., (2015a, 2015b)
Mathiyazhagan and Haq (2013)
Gaining competitive advantage over competitors by differentiation of products and services
Dhull and Narwal (2018)
Gandhi et al. (2015)
Competitors designing products with reusability, recyclability, or flexibility
Mathiyazhagan and Haq (2013) Mathiyazhagan et al. (2014)
Competitors using cleaner technologies and renewable energies
Dhull and Narwal (2018)
Dhull and Narwal (2016)
Luthra et al., (2015a, 2015b)
Adoption of FGSCM practices by suppliers and other supply chain partners
Gandhi et al. (2015)
Bhool and Narwal (2013)
Dhull and Narwal (2018)
Gosling et al. (2010)
Normative
Growing awareness among the customers for eco-friendly products
Bhool and Narwal (2013)
Luthra et al., (2015a, 2015b)
Improving organizational image in the eyes of customers
Bhool and Narwal (2013)
Luthra et al., (2015a, 2015b)
Better market for green products
Dhull and Narwal (2016)
Gandhi et al. (2015)
Internal
Top management and employees’ willingness and commitment
Gandhi et al. (2015)
Shibin et al. (2016)
Organizational culture and policies
Mathiyazhagan and Haq (2013)
Luthra et al., (2015a, 2015b)
Shibin et al. (2016)
Environmental training and development
Raut et al. (2017)
Dhull and Narwal (2016)
Organizations understanding the cost benefits of adopting FGSCM practices
Raut et al. (2017)
Kumar et al. (2016)
Shibin et al. (2016)
Table 5
Key barriers of FGSCM in emerging economies
Key drivers
Source of institutional pressure
Description
Selected sources
External
Coercive
Weak government regulations regarding FGSCM
Delmonico et al. (2018)
Govindan et al. (2014)
Sarker et al. (2021)
Corruption and bribery
Silvestre (2015)
Muduli et al. (2013)
Intricate tax systems and overly bureaucratic government systems
Silvestre (2015)
Muduli et al. (2013)
Import–export regulations and transnational trade laws
Yadav et al. (2020)
Govindan et al. (2014)
Mimetic
Poor collaboration among supply chain partners to provoke FGSCM initiatives
Tumpa et al. (2019)
Govindan et al. (2014)
Shibin et al. (2016)
Lack of suppliers’ and supply chain partners’ interest to implement FGSCM initiatives
Majumdar and Sinha (2019)
Balaji et al. (2014)
Shibin et al. (2016)
Unavailability of third parties to collect used products
Balon et al. (2016)
Govindan et al. (2014)
Wang et al. (2015)
Normative
Lack of customer interest or preference for FGSCM-related practices
Shohan et al. (2020)
Govindan et al. (2014)
Mangla et al. (2014)
Lower customer demand for green/flexible products
Wang et al. (2015)
Yadav et al. (2020)
Weak promotion of green products
Tumpa et al. (2019)
Lorek and Spangenberg, (2014)
Khan and Qianli (2017)
Internal
FGSCM initiatives not included in organizational strategies and planning
Majumdar and Sinha (2019)
Balon et al. (2016)
Mangla et al. (2014)
Unfit business models to support FGSCM
Govindan et al. (2014)
Muduli et al. (2013)
Resistance to change and unwillingness to adopt FGSCM practices
Delmonico et al. (2018)
Dube and Gawande (2016)
High costs of environment friendly products and/or green initiatives
Govindan et al. (2014)
Balaji et al. (2014)
Performance appraisal systems designed solely based on financial measures
Yadav et al. (2020)
Govindan et al. (2014)
Lack of appropriate technologies for green and flexible design, manufacturing, or recycling
Rahman et al. (2019)
Mathiyazhagan et al. (2016)
Mangla et al. (2014)
Lack of information technologies systems for coordination and communication for FGSCM
Rahman et al. (2019)
Majumdar and Sinha (2019)
Lack of skilled workforce for FGSCM
Geng et al., (2017a, 2017b)
Muduli et al. (2013)

Toward a Research Framework for FGSCM in Emerging Economies

This section addresses the fourth research question about synthesizing the extant body of knowledge to inform future research on FGSCM in emerging economies. Firstly, it puts forward research gaps based on the findings of the systematic literature review. Next, it integrates the findings of the study and the research gaps to develop a research framework for FGSCM in emerging economies.

Research Gaps to Inspire Future Research

Overall, the results confirm the findings of previous research (Geng et al., 2017a, 2017b; Silvestre, 2015) about the dearth of research on FGSCM in emerging economies. Despite the calls and dire need from a practice perspective, the research shows only a modest increase in this area. This section identifies the research gaps to develop a research framework and motivate future research.

Purchasing and Supply Management

The analysis of the word cloud reveals that some important themes in FGSCM such as purchasing and supply management are overlooked in emerging economies. Further analysis of institutional pressures shows that these areas are particularly important because larger multinational organizations often exert their purchasing power to increase their profit share, rather than to drive suppliers in emerging economies toward sustainability and flexibility. Moreover, no studies, apart from Adhikari and Bisi (2020), were found to investigate the effect of different types of contracts on sustainability.
Gap 1: To further investigate green/flexible purchasing and supply management in emerging economies and particularly how supplier–buyer power imbalance influences mainstreaming sustainability and flexibility in supply chains.
Gap 2: To study the impact of contract terms and contract types, e.g., profit-sharing contracts or performance-based contracts on the sustainability and flexibility of firms in emerging economies.

Industry and Country Analysis

The analysis of industries and countries show while some industries such as manufacturing, electronics, and the apparel industry received the most attention, other industries such as the service sector, SMEs, nonprofits, and development organizations are overlooked. This is an important observation as smaller firms in emerging economies are less equipped to develop FGSCM capabilities. Moreover, nonprofit and development organizations do not often account for sustainability in their strategy and operations (Zarei et al., 2019).
In terms of flexibility, our analysis of the literature shows that while the research has transcended beyond manufacturing flexibility in developed economies, as highlighted by Stevenson and Spring, (2007) and Yu et al. (2015), the interorganizational components of supply chain flexibility are still absent in emerging economies. In terms of countries, China and India received the greatest research attention while other emerging economies have been investigated less.
Gap 3: To investigate FGSCM in the service sector, SMEs, nonprofit and development supply chains in emerging economies
Gap 4: To transcend research beyond firm level flexibility and account for interorganizational and supply chain flexibility in emerging economies
Gap 5: To study FGSCM in less explored emerging economies such as Mexico, Russia, South Africa, and Turkey and to conduct comparative cross-country analysis with the extant studies in China and India.

Methodology and Theory

In terms of methodology, unlike the trend in general FGSCM literature where qualitative studies prevail (Ansari & Kant, 2017), the reviewed articles heavily used quantitative methods such as mathematical modeling (31%) and surveys (20%). Moreover, collaboration and action research aims at generating contextual knowledge (Coughlan & Coghlan, 2002), making it a perfect methodology to elaborate on the context of emerging economies. However, no participatory or action research methodologies were found during the review. In turn, the dearth of qualitative methods led to poor theory application and development. The review of Geng et al., (2017a, 2017b) identified that the majority of articles in emerging economies had not specified any theory in the period 1996–2015. Our review supports their findings and postulates that in the period 2000–2020, insufficient theory development, testing, and elaboration still prevails.
Gap 6: To conduct case studies and participatory/action research and further theory application and development on FGSCM in emerging economies

Context Specificity

Using the contingency theory lens helped to juxtapose the studies in general FGSCM with the ones in emerging economies (Table 3) and revealed that the contextual specificities in emerging economies reduce the slope of FGSCM evolution trajectory (supported by Silvestre, 2015). From the theoretical perspective, such specificities are the contingency factors in the context of an emerging economy that drive organizations to adopt different decisions vis-a-vis their operating context. Therefore, an interesting avenue for future research is studying how organizations, especially focal business firms, operating in emerging economies align their strategies and practices (response variables) to achieve a fit with these contingency factors (as context variables) to achieve more sustainable and flexible supply chains (as performance) (see: Sousa & Voss, 2008).
Gap 7: To identify the specificities of emerging economies context, to explore how firms adjust their strategies and practices to cope with such specificities, and to assess the resulting flexibility and sustainability performance.
Further comparison of the two contexts shows that in emerging economies, FGSCM strategies are often adopted only when they promise financial returns and are more likely to be abandoned if they fail in doing so (Esfahbodi et al., 2016), making proactive green strategy adoption less prevalent in emerging economies. Moreover, flexible reverse logistics, waste management, and green/flexible design were found to be the least developed strategies in emerging economies. The literature of FGSCM in developed countries can provide valuable insights for these areas.
As for other strategies, while present in both contexts, the implementation shows disparities. Customer collaboration in emerging economies leads to a stronger impact on environmental performance, as compared to supplier collaboration. Yet, studies on customer sustainability awareness in emerging economies are scarce. This motivates future research to explore strategies that improve customer collaboration and awareness in emerging economies. Furthermore, while research in developed countries indicates the positive impact of emerging technologies such as blockchain or industry 4.0 on FGSCM (Saberi et al., 2019), our review found no studies on the adoption of these technologies in emerging economies.
Gap 8: To study how to customize or transfer benchmark strategies and practices of flexible reverse logistics, waste management, and green/flexible design from developed countries to emerging economies.
Gap 9: To identify the strategies that improve customer collaboration and awareness in emerging economies and evaluate their impact on the flexibility and sustainability performance of firms.
Gap 10: To investigate the impact of emerging technologies and concepts such as blockchain, industry 4.0, 3D printing, and big data on FGSCM in emerging economies

Institutional Pressures

Identifying the sources of pressures on organizations that cause drivers or barriers on the path of FGSCM help managers to harness these pressures for mainstreaming FGSCM in emerging economies. The analysis presented in Tables 4 and 5 reveals more drivers and barriers related to the internal environment of firms, indicating that the (lack of) internal organizational support is an overriding (barrier) driver. This is in accordance with the findings of Jabbour et al. (2020) who expressed that company owners and shareholders are the most salient stakeholders to drive FGSCM in emerging economies. Little research, however, exists on the organizational functions and their impact on FGSCM in emerging economies.
Gap 11: To investigate the internal organizational factors, from a functional perspective, that impact the adoption of FGSCM strategies and practices in emerging economies
By taking an institutional theory lens, this review identified coercive pressures from government and regulations as powerful sources of compliance. However, fewer drivers and barriers related to coercive pressures were found, compared to the ones related to mimetic and normative pressures. This is notwithstanding the findings of Jayaram and Avittathur (2015) but is in line with Jabbour et al. (2020) about FGSCM-related coercive pressures in emerging economies.
Our findings suggests that business firms in emerging economies increasingly earn legitimacy by copying successful FGSCM strategies and practices of other firms (mimetic isomorphism) or due to customer and market pressures (normative isomorphism). It can imply that FGSCM in emerging economies is moving from mere compliance with regulations (coercive isomorphism) as firms are under increasing pressures by competitors and customers to gain legitimacy and market sustainability through FGSCM strategies and practices.
Gap 12: To study the institutional pressures emanating from customers and competitors driving/impeding FGSCM strategies and practices in emerging economies

Developing a Research Framework of FGSCM in Emerging Economies

Developing research frameworks for flexible or sustainable SCM has been at the center of scholars’ attention as these frameworks synthesize and illustrate the status quo and future directions in a concise and visualized, yet inclusive, manner. Some examples of such research frameworks are, inter alia, Seuring and Müller (2008), Sarkis et al. (2011), Dubey et al. (2015), Rajeev et al. (2017), Liao (2020), and Carter et al. (2021). However, our survey of the literature shows the paucity of combined flexible and sustainable SCM frameworks in the context of emerging economies. Hitherto, extant research frameworks focused merely on one aspect of FGSCM in emerging economies such as barriers and enablers (see Delmonico et al., 2018; Rahman et al., 2019; Tumpa et al., 2019), or investigated the impact of FGSCM strategies and practices on environmental performance (e.g., Esfahbodi et al., 2016; Geng et al., 2017a, 2017b; Luthra & Mangla, 2018). The literature scants research frameworks that firstly delve into the specificities of emerging economies vis-à-vis combined flexible and sustainable SCM, and secondly inclusively synthesize strategies and practices, as well as drivers and barriers.
Our proposed research framework addresses these shortcomings. Firstly, it not only synthesizes FGSCM strategies and practices in emerging economies, but also it discerns the specificities of emerging economies using the contingency theory lens (Table 3). This helps managers and decision-makers to account for the contextual differences in emerging economies when devising their organizational strategies and practices. Secondly, the literature advocates that institutional pressures in emerging economies to adopt FGSCM strategies and practices are significantly different in emerging economies from developed countries (Raj et al., 2022). We have classified the identified drivers and barriers found from our systematic review, based on the source of pressure they originate using the institutional theory perspective (Tables 4 and 5). This classification deepens the understanding of policymakers about the institutional pressures in emerging economies and allows them to harness these pressures appropriately to promote FGSCM. Resulting from these observations, the research framework directs scholars to future research by identifying the main research gaps in the literature. The research framework is presented in Fig. 9.

Conclusion

Emerging economies are prime targets of global businesses and multinational corporations for the outsourcing of manufacturing while the in-house operations that satisfy domestic demand in these countries are also seeing sharp growth (Jayaram & Avittathur, 2015). This paper reviewed the literature within the past 20 years and proposed a strategic research framework of FGSCM in emerging economies to address the increasing pressures from different stakeholders and calls from scholars to study FGSCM in emerging economies.
The study set out a systematic literature review to identify the status quo of research on the topic. The methodology is novel in that it combines a systematic literature review, text mining, and network analysis to explore, analyze, and synthesize knowledge gaps in the research domain. The applied inclusion and exclusion criteria, brainstorming sessions and crosschecks applied in consecutive steps contributed toward the selection quality of shortlisted articles and their subsequent analysis by limiting subjective biasness (Denyer & Tranfield, 2009). Text mining and network analysis of selected articles facilitated identifying networks of research articles dealing with particular aspects of FGSCM strategies and practices and showed that the extant empirical research articles in the research domain are fragmented.
Two grand organizational theories were employed: contingency theory to distinguish the specificities of emerging economies context, and institutional theory to discern the sources of pressures on institutions that facilitate or hinder FGSCM in emerging economies. Using contingency theory revealed that contextual specificities reduce the slope of FGSCM in emerging economies and using institutional theory revealed that coercive pressures from governments and regulations are powerful sources of compliances.
Finally, a research framework was developed to synthesize the extant literature and to identify the research gaps to inspire future research. This framework will help managers and decision-makers to understand the contextual differences in emerging economies while planning their organizational strategies and practices. Furthermore, the classification of drivers and barriers deepens the understanding of policy makers about the institutional pressures in the emerging economies allowing them to promote FGSCM.
This study is not devoid of limitations; firstly, the systematic literature review did not include studies with a mere focus on social sustainability. Higher prevalence of issues such as worker exploitation, unfair wages, substandard working environment, gender discrimination, and child labor in emerging economies are imperative avenues for future research. Secondly, the systematic literature review was restricted to the period of 2000–2020, to four academic databases, and to the research published in English. Some more important articles might exist outside our search boundaries.

Key Questions

(1)
What is the status quo of FGSCM research in emerging economies?
 
(2)
What are the specificities of FGSCM strategies and practices in emerging economies?
 
(3)
What are the sources of institutional pressure, i.e., drivers and barriers, to adopt FGSCM strategies and practices in emerging economies?
 
(4)
How can the extant body of knowledge inform future research on FGSCM in emerging economies?
 

Acknowledgements

The authors are very thankful to all the associated personnel in any reference that contributed in/for the purpose of this research.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interest.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix

Appendix

See Table
Table 6
Analysis of key articles on FGSCM in emerging economies
Author(s)
Country
Objective of the research
Key Findings
Adhikari and Bisi (2020)
India
To explore collaboration mechanism using greening cost-sharing and profit-sharing contracts for FGSCM in apparel industry
It analyzes the bargaining process between the supply chain members for cost-sharing and profit-sharing contracts and investigates the impact of the fairness concern of the supply chain members on the greening and pricing decisions
Jawaad and Zafar (2020)
Pakistan
To study the impact of FGSCM on firm performance with a mediating role of investment recovery and competitiveness
FGSCM practices positive influence firm performance while investment recovery is a strong mediator between intra-organizational green activities and firm performance
Rahman et al. (2019)
Bangladesh
To identify and evaluate barriers of implementing FGSCM
Using a Fuzzy-VIKOR approach the following barriers were identified in the plastic industry of Bangladesh: inadequate knowledge and support, insufficient technology and infrastructure, financial constraints and unsupportive organizational and operational policies
Pinto et al. (2018)
BRICS
To explore and analyze the environmental management practices adopted by industries in BRICS countries in the period from 2011 to 2015
China, India and Brazil show a greater interest in disseminating research on environmental management issues whereas Russia and South Africa did not follow the same trend due to weaker environmental engagement
Delmonico et al. (2018)
Brazil
Identifying the barriers to sustainable procurement in Brazil
Five categories of barriers – organizational culture, motivation, economic uncertainty, market, and operations – were identified, out of which organizational culture is the most prominent one
Geng et al., (2017a, 2017b)
Asian emerging economies
To understand the relationship between FGSCM practices and firm performance in the manufacturing sector through a systematic literature review
According to the results of meta-analysis, FGSCM practices lead to better performance in economic, environmental, operational, and social performance. Other factors such as industry type, firm size, ISO certification, and export orientation are influential on the firm performance
Gopal and Thakkar (2016)
India
To analyze and identify critical success factors of sustainable supply management practices for Indian automobile industries
Sustainable supply chain performance (SSCP) was investigated in the Indian automobile industry. The result shows SSCP is correlated and helps in improving the supply chain performance among the industries surveyed. Moreover, environmental and social performance have a positive relationship with economic performance
Younis et al. (2016)
United Arab Emirates
To investigate the relationship between the implementation of FGSCM practices and their impact on corporate performance
It identified that FGSCM practices impacted the corporate performance differently and provided guidelines on what practice an organization should adopt considering the desired outcome
Chan et al. (2016)
China
To examine the mediating effect of green product innovation between the regulatory pressures and firm performance including the moderating effect of environmental dynamism on the relationship between green production innovation and firm performance
Environmental regulations have a positive impact on green product innovation whereas environmental dynamism has a relatively strong moderation effect on the relationship among green product innovation and cost efficiency
Jabbour and Jabbour (2016)
Brazil
To propose a synergistic and integrative framework for the green human resources management (GHRM) and FGSCM relationship and to propose a research agenda for this integration
It advocated GHRM-FGSCM integration from academic, managerial, and practical perspectives in the areas of organizational sustainability
Prasad et al. (2016)
India
To investigate the applicability of lean and green practices to foundry industries in India
It found that lean and green practices should be linked to enhance operational and environmental performance
Feng et al. (2016a, 2016b)
China
To examine how the relationship between environmental management systems and financial performance is moderated by switching cost, competitive intensity and their interaction
The results show a positive relationship between environmental management systems and financial performance. This relationship effects negatively by switching cost and effects positively by competitive intensity
Soundararajan and Brown (2016)
India
To examine the problems related to supplier facilities from a developing country supplier perspective
Due to suppliers' traditions, beliefs, local demands and resource dependency, codes of conducts fail in practice in emerging economies. In order to improve practices, buyer–supplier collaboration and trust is required
Chen et al. (2015)
China and India, and Sweden
To investigate the environmental management practices (EMPs) and firm performance in manufacturing companies of Sweden, China, and India
The results indicate that most EMPs do not have a positive correlation with financial performance, whereas a number of EMPs were found to have a strong correlation with improving innovation performance in various companies. Similarly, a negative correlation was found between the environmental standard for suppliers and sales growth
Jayaram and Avittathur (2015)
India
To analyze the expected changes to supply chain management by deploying FGSCM strategies
The article developed a conceptual grounded theory framework that linked environmental government policies to customer actions and firm sustainability strategies. It identified that green design, product recovery and reverse logistics are the key to FGSCM strategies
Park et al. (2015)
Indonesia
To analyze sustainability practices adopted by multinational companies in developing countries
This study found a critical need for a balance between centralized and decentralized governance for a successful sustainability strategy
Jia et al. (2015)
India
To analyze and identify the dominant SSCM practices in Indian mining and mineral industry
The article concluded that suppliers’ ISO14000 certification plays the most influential role over the recommended 25 SSCM practices. This certification is considered essential to increase sustainability performances in Indian mining and mineral industries
Lee (2015)
South Korea
To investigate the effects of FGSCM on environmental and operational performances considering social capital accumulation in the supply chain
The study found that FGSCM contributes to the environmental and operational performance improvements of the supply chain through social capital accumulation. Relational capital particularly plays a vital role in the relationships between FGSCM and environmental and operational performances
Luthra et al., (2015a, 2015b)
India
To identify, analyze and model the critical success factor to implement FGSCM toward sustainability in Indian mining industries
The article identified scarcity of natural resources as the most important critical success factor for FGSCM implementation and further developed a model to test its applicability in the Indian mining industry
Silvestre (2015)
Brazil
To study how supply chain sustainability can be implemented and managed in emerging economies through an evolutionary approach
This study found that the way a buyer company manager is influenced by its established network of relationships contributes to shaping the evolution of SSCM
Mansi (2015)
India
To explore the sustainable procurement practices across the Central Public Sector Enterprise in India
The study proposes a sustainable procurement index by analyzing the sustainability reports of 50 government owned companies in India. The study findings suggest a low adoption of green initiatives
Mathiyazhagan et al. (2015)
India
To investigate the pressures of FGSCM adoption and prioritize them
It identified pressures from non-governmental organizations for environmentally friendly products to motivate adoption of FGSCM in the Indian mining and mineral industry. Pressures from NGOs were ranked first, and financial factors were ranked last
Sen et al. (2015)
India and UK
To explore the role of environmental proactivity in financial performance in the context of manufacturing enterprises in India and the UK
The findings indicated positive correlation of environmental proactivity with financial performance and manufacturing and non-manufacturing based operational performance
Li et al. (2015)
Taiwan
To explore factors that impede implementation of environmental practices in eco-industrial parks
This study found that intellectual property rights restrict access to information and new technologies
Soda et al. (2015)
India
To investigate the level of adoption and implementation of FGSCM practices in an Indian context
The article focused on describing the adoption of FGSCM practices in India and identified operational efficiency as a primary driver. It further highlights the lack of literature on FGSCM in emerging economies
Ferreira et al. (2017)
Brazil
To examine the relationship between the maturity of environmental management and the adoption of FGSCM practices utilizing an integrative framework
Adherence to the integrative framework was verified, and sensitivity to changes in maturity of environmental management and the adoption of FGSCM practices were observed
Diabat et al. (2014)
India
To analyze the enablers for implementing FGSCM in Indian textile industries
This article identified five enablers for the implementation of FGSCM and reported that all the identified drivers were related to employee engagement
Ganapathy et al. (2014)
India
To identify the suitable combination of management and innovation practices that enables firms to eco-innovate and achieve sustainable performance
The role of management practice is more significant toward eco-innovation than innovative practices. Training on environmental related practices could tackle innovation and social factors in the Indian manufacturing sector context
Mitra and Datta (2014)
India
To explore the FGSCM practices and their impact on the performance in Indian manufacturing industries
This research identified green design, investment recovery and green purchasing practices that have a significant impact on the environmental performance of the firms
Mohanty and Prakash (2014)
India
To study whether the green score measures a common construct called FGSCM and whether internal and external pressures have any influence on FGSCM practices
The study investigated external factors such as suppliers, market pressure, competitors, and internal drivers such as on-the-job training and commitment of management, crucial for the implementation of FGSCM among the SMEs
Stiller and Gold (2014)
India
To explore the social SSCM practices in the Indian seed sector
It explored socially SSCM practices in the Indian seed sector. The research explored six types of practices, namely, reconceptualizing supply chain design, supply base continuity, decommunization, traditional supplier development, novel supplier development, transparency and traceability, and reward and incentive system
Zhu et al. (2013)
China
To investigate different types of institutional pressures motivating manufacturing enterprises to pursue FGSCM practices and commensurate performance outcomes
This study shows that institutional pressures have driven the manufacturer adoption of internal FGSCM practices which in turn relates to their external FGSCM practices adoption. The results from the statistical analysis also suggest that FGSCM practices indirectly improves economic performance
Jaikumar et al. (2013)
India
To identify the organizational factors that influence the environmental performance of companies
It identified factors such as pollution intensity, company size, collaboration with a foreign company and ISO 14000 certification to have a positive impact on the environmental performance of a company
Hsu et al. (2013)
Malaysia
To investigate the supply chain drivers that influence FGSCM initiatives in an emerging economy
The study found four important drivers of green supply chain adoption that collectively affect a firm’s green purchasing, design-for-environment and reverse logistics initiatives
Hultman et al. (2012)
Brazil and India
To investigate the firms’ responses to carbon markets in Brazil and India
There is no standard practice to account for financial benefits of clean development mechanisms investments. The non-financial reputational factors were the primary motivation for managers that are pursuing clean development mechanisms projects
Jayaraman et al. (2012)
India
To investigate the relationship between the consumer’s attitude toward the environment and the perceived image of a company that was environmentally conscious
Investigate relationship between the consumer’s attitude toward the environment and the perceived image of a company that was environmentally conscious. It found a strong correlation between the decision to buy a green product and the respondent’s concern for the environment as well as the perception formed of the firm
Koh et al. (2012)
India
To assess the adoption of low carbon and FGSCM practices by Indian service and manufacturing sectors
The research found that low carbon and FGSCM practice is a quality management initiative that requires bilateral efforts for the integration of the whole supply chain along with setting-up of supplier evaluation methods that ensures sustainable environmental operations
Zailani et al. (2012)
Malaysia
To investigate the extent of implementation of FGSCM practices and the outcomes of these practices on supply chain performance in Malaysia
The study found that FGSCM practices have a positive effect on sustainable supply chain performance and suggested that firms need to collaborate in advocating FGSCM practices as a route for firm’s commercial success rather than as a moral obligation
Rao et al. (2012)
India
To investigate if the environmental audit practices help the industries to increase productivity and maintain the environment at the same time
Identified various waste streams, waste minimization and treatment options in the distillery industry through environmental audit practice
Bhateja et al. (2011)
India
To identify the various FGSCM practices adopted both among SMEs and large-scale industries
Investigated factors that impact FGSCM integration and performance in the Indian manufacturing sector. Cost and lack of awareness about environmental issues were the main barriers but communication and collaboration for the integration of green initiatives was observed
Diabat and Govindan (2011)
India
To analyze different drivers affecting implementation of FGSCM using interpretive structural modeling
Analyzed drivers that affect implementation of FGSCM. It highlighted eleven drivers and an ISM model was developed and the interaction between the drivers were analyzed for the case study of the article
Munguia et al. (2010)
Mexico
To explore the pollution prevention practices performed by workers in the Mexican auto refinishing industry as well as their implications on the occupational, safety and environmental health of the workers and community
The findings indicate that the Mexican auto body shop industry is not consistent with the accepted precepts of sustainability. Mexican workers oftentimes perform their tasks under critical conditions which involves high level of pollution as well as considerable occupational and environmental risks
Zhu et al. (2010)
China
To examine whether different types of manufacturing enterprises on environmental-oriented supply chain cooperation exist and whether such cooperation impacts circular economy practices and economic and environmental performance outcomes in China
Findings suggest a need and importance to further strengthen the cooperation with upstream and downstream supply chain partners for a circular economy initiative to succeed
Rathore et al. (2011)
India
To understand the scenarios of remanufacturing and its implementation in the current socio-economic context
Investigated opportunities for establishing remanufacturing as a formal activity from the user perspective. A prescriptive model was proposed which utilizes the usage patterns of different consumer groups to create a self-sustainable demand–supply system
Park et al. (2010)
China
To analyze the integration of business values and environmental returns in the Chinese circular economy policy
Findings suggest that value creation within a supply chain can provide the impetus for organizations to adopt a circular economy and sustainable supply chain practices for competitive reasons. The four major business value dimensions include cost reduction, revenue generation, resiliency, and legitimacy and image
Sen (2009)
India
To investigate the relationship between the adoption of FGSCM practices and shareholder value creation
Investigated relationship between the adoption of FGSCM practices and shareholder value creation and found a positive correlation
Shukla et al. (2009)
India
To identify implementation level, major drivers, various practices and performance of environmentally and socially conscious SCM
Environmentally and socially responsive supply chains are in the early adoption stages in India. Research companies were aware of environmental and social issues, but actual implementation lacks a holistic approach
Zhu and Sarkis (2006)
China
To investigate the drivers and practices of FGSCM in Chinese manufacturing sector
The results suggest that FGSCM drivers are similar in the manufacturing sector, but FGSCM practices are industry specific
Luken and Stares (2005)
India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Thailand
To describe the findings of a project carried out in developing countries to help small and medium enterprises developing sustainable initiatives without compromising competitiveness
The results suggest that well targeted, enterprise-specific efforts to meet corporate social responsibility requirements can make a positive contribution to both short-term profitability and longer-term competitiveness
Zhu and Sarkis (2004)
China
To analyze the role of quality management and just-in-time practices as moderators in the adoption of FGSCM
Findings suggest that FGSCM practices tended to have win–win relationships in terms of environmental and economic performance. Quality management was found to be a positive moderator while JIT programs with internal environmental management practices may cause further degradation of environmental performance
6
Literature
go back to reference Abraham, T., & Dao, V. T. (2019). A longitudinal exploratory investigation of innovation systems and sustainability maturity using case studies in three industries. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 32(4), 668–687.CrossRef Abraham, T., & Dao, V. T. (2019). A longitudinal exploratory investigation of innovation systems and sustainability maturity using case studies in three industries. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 32(4), 668–687.CrossRef
go back to reference Adhikari, A., & Bisi, A. (2020). Collaboration, bargaining, and fairness concern for a green apparel supply chain: An emerging economy perspective. Transportation Research Part E, 135, 1–23.CrossRef Adhikari, A., & Bisi, A. (2020). Collaboration, bargaining, and fairness concern for a green apparel supply chain: An emerging economy perspective. Transportation Research Part E, 135, 1–23.CrossRef
go back to reference Albort-Morant, G., Leal-Millán, A., & Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2016). The antecedents of green innovation performance: A model of learning and capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4912–4917.CrossRef Albort-Morant, G., Leal-Millán, A., & Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2016). The antecedents of green innovation performance: A model of learning and capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4912–4917.CrossRef
go back to reference Ansari, Z. N., & Kant, R. (2017). Exploring the framework development for sustainability in Supply chain management: A systematic literature synthesis and future research directions: Sustainable supply chain management framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(7), 873–892.CrossRef Ansari, Z. N., & Kant, R. (2017). Exploring the framework development for sustainability in Supply chain management: A systematic literature synthesis and future research directions: Sustainable supply chain management framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(7), 873–892.CrossRef
go back to reference Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2010). Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), 252–264.CrossRef Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2010). Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), 252–264.CrossRef
go back to reference Balaji, M., Velmurugan, V., & Manikanda, P. K. (2014). Barriers in green supply chain management: An Indian foundry perspective. International Journal of Research Engineering and Technology, 03, 423–429.CrossRef Balaji, M., Velmurugan, V., & Manikanda, P. K. (2014). Barriers in green supply chain management: An Indian foundry perspective. International Journal of Research Engineering and Technology, 03, 423–429.CrossRef
go back to reference Balon, V., Sharma, A. K., & Barua, M. K. (2016). Assessment of barriers in green supply chain management using ISM: A case study of the automobile industry in India. Global Business Review, 17, 116–135.CrossRef Balon, V., Sharma, A. K., & Barua, M. K. (2016). Assessment of barriers in green supply chain management using ISM: A case study of the automobile industry in India. Global Business Review, 17, 116–135.CrossRef
go back to reference Basaglia, S., Caporarello, L., Magni, M., & Pennarola, F. (2009). Environmental and organizational drivers influencing the adoption of VoIP. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 7(1), 103–118.CrossRef Basaglia, S., Caporarello, L., Magni, M., & Pennarola, F. (2009). Environmental and organizational drivers influencing the adoption of VoIP. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 7(1), 103–118.CrossRef
go back to reference Bhateja, A. K., Babbar, R., Singh, S., & Sachdeva, A. (2011). Study of green supply chain management in the Indian manufacturing industries: A literature review cum an analytical approach for the measurement of performance. International Journal of Computational Engineering and Management, 13, 84–99. Bhateja, A. K., Babbar, R., Singh, S., & Sachdeva, A. (2011). Study of green supply chain management in the Indian manufacturing industries: A literature review cum an analytical approach for the measurement of performance. International Journal of Computational Engineering and Management, 13, 84–99.
go back to reference Bhool, R., & Narwal, M. S. (2013). An analysis of drivers affecting the implementation of green supply chain management for the Indian manufacturing industries. International Journal of Reserch in Engineering and Technology, 2, 242–254.CrossRef Bhool, R., & Narwal, M. S. (2013). An analysis of drivers affecting the implementation of green supply chain management for the Indian manufacturing industries. International Journal of Reserch in Engineering and Technology, 2, 242–254.CrossRef
go back to reference Bin Makhashen, Y., Rafi-ul-Shan, P. M., Bashiri, M., Hasan, R., Amar, H., & Khan, M. N. (2020). Exploring the role of ambidexterity and coopetition in designing resilient fashion supply chains: A multi-evidence-based approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(6), 1599–1625.CrossRef Bin Makhashen, Y., Rafi-ul-Shan, P. M., Bashiri, M., Hasan, R., Amar, H., & Khan, M. N. (2020). Exploring the role of ambidexterity and coopetition in designing resilient fashion supply chains: A multi-evidence-based approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(6), 1599–1625.CrossRef
go back to reference Birko, S., Dove, E. S., & Özdemir, V. (2015). Evaluation of nine consensus indices in Delphi foresight research and their dependency on Delphi survey characteristics: A simulation study and debate on Delphi design and interpretation. PLoS ONE, 10(8), 0135162.CrossRef Birko, S., Dove, E. S., & Özdemir, V. (2015). Evaluation of nine consensus indices in Delphi foresight research and their dependency on Delphi survey characteristics: A simulation study and debate on Delphi design and interpretation. PLoS ONE, 10(8), 0135162.CrossRef
go back to reference Butt, A. S. (2021). Understanding the implications of pandemic outbreaks on supply chains: An exploratory study of the effects caused by the COVID-19 across four South Asian Countries and steps taken by firms to address the disruptions. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistic Management, 52(4), 370–392.CrossRef Butt, A. S. (2021). Understanding the implications of pandemic outbreaks on supply chains: An exploratory study of the effects caused by the COVID-19 across four South Asian Countries and steps taken by firms to address the disruptions. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistic Management, 52(4), 370–392.CrossRef
go back to reference Cankaya, S., and Sezen, B. (2019). Effects of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance. Journal Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(1), 98–121CrossRef Cankaya, S., and Sezen, B. (2019). Effects of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance. Journal Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(1), 98–121CrossRef
go back to reference Carter, T. R., Benzie, M., Campiglio, E., Carlsen, H., Fronzek, S., Hild´en, M., Reyer, C.P.O. and West, C. (2021). A conceptual framework for cross-border impacts of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 69. Carter, T. R., Benzie, M., Campiglio, E., Carlsen, H., Fronzek, S., Hild´en, M., Reyer, C.P.O. and West, C. (2021). A conceptual framework for cross-border impacts of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 69.
go back to reference Chan, H. K., He, H., & Wang, W. Y. C. (2012). Green marketing and its impact on supply chain management in industrial markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 41, 557–562.CrossRef Chan, H. K., He, H., & Wang, W. Y. C. (2012). Green marketing and its impact on supply chain management in industrial markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 41, 557–562.CrossRef
go back to reference Chan, H. K., Yee, R. W. Y., Dai, J., & Lim, M. K. (2016). The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on green product innovation and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 181(22), 383–391. Chan, H. K., Yee, R. W. Y., Dai, J., & Lim, M. K. (2016). The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on green product innovation and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 181(22), 383–391.
go back to reference Chen, L., Tang, O., & Feldmann, A. (2015). Applying GRI reports for the investigation of environmental management practices and company performance in Sweden, China And India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 36–46.CrossRef Chen, L., Tang, O., & Feldmann, A. (2015). Applying GRI reports for the investigation of environmental management practices and company performance in Sweden, China And India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 36–46.CrossRef
go back to reference Chiou, T., Chan, H. K., Lettice, F., & Chung, S. H. (2011). The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part e: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 822–883.CrossRef Chiou, T., Chan, H. K., Lettice, F., & Chung, S. H. (2011). The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part e: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 822–883.CrossRef
go back to reference Cosimato, S., & Troisi, O. (2015). Green supply chain management. TQM Journal, 27, 256–276.CrossRef Cosimato, S., & Troisi, O. (2015). Green supply chain management. TQM Journal, 27, 256–276.CrossRef
go back to reference Coughlan, P., & Coghlan, D. (2002). Action research for operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management., 22, 220–240.CrossRef Coughlan, P., & Coghlan, D. (2002). Action research for operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management., 22, 220–240.CrossRef
go back to reference Delmonico, D., Jabbourb, C. J. C., Pereirac, S. C. F., Jabbourb, A. B. L. D. S., Renwickd, D. W. S., & Thomée, A. M. T. (2018). Unveiling barriers to sustainable public procurement in emerging economies: Evidence from a leading sustainable supply chain initiative in Latin America. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 134, 70–79.CrossRef Delmonico, D., Jabbourb, C. J. C., Pereirac, S. C. F., Jabbourb, A. B. L. D. S., Renwickd, D. W. S., & Thomée, A. M. T. (2018). Unveiling barriers to sustainable public procurement in emerging economies: Evidence from a leading sustainable supply chain initiative in Latin America. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 134, 70–79.CrossRef
go back to reference Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., (2009). Producing a systematic review. In The Sage Handbook of Organisational Reserch Methods, (pp. 671- 689). Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., (2009). Producing a systematic review. In The Sage Handbook of Organisational Reserch Methods, (pp. 671- 689).
go back to reference Dhull, S., & Narwal, M. S. (2016). Drivers and barriers in green supply chain management adaptation: A state-of-art review. Uncertain Supply Chain ManagEment, 4, 61–76.CrossRef Dhull, S., & Narwal, M. S. (2016). Drivers and barriers in green supply chain management adaptation: A state-of-art review. Uncertain Supply Chain ManagEment, 4, 61–76.CrossRef
go back to reference Dhull, S., & Narwal, M. S. (2018). Prioritizing the drivers of green supply chain management in Indian manufacturing industries using fuzzy TOPSIS method: Government, industry, environment, and public perspectives. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 2, 47–60.CrossRef Dhull, S., & Narwal, M. S. (2018). Prioritizing the drivers of green supply chain management in Indian manufacturing industries using fuzzy TOPSIS method: Government, industry, environment, and public perspectives. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 2, 47–60.CrossRef
go back to reference Diab, S. M., Al-bourini, F. A., & Abu-rumman, A. H. (2015). The impact of green supply chain management practices on organizational performance: A study of Jordanian food industries. Journal of Management and Sustanablity, 5, 149–157. Diab, S. M., Al-bourini, F. A., & Abu-rumman, A. H. (2015). The impact of green supply chain management practices on organizational performance: A study of Jordanian food industries. Journal of Management and Sustanablity, 5, 149–157.
go back to reference Diabat, A., & Govindan, K. (2011). An analysis of the drivers affecting the implementation of green supply chain management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(6), 659–667.CrossRef Diabat, A., & Govindan, K. (2011). An analysis of the drivers affecting the implementation of green supply chain management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(6), 659–667.CrossRef
go back to reference Diabat, A., Kannan, D., & Mathiyazhagan, K. (2014). Analysis of enablers for implementation of sustainable supply chain management - a textile case. Journal of Cleaner Production, 83, 391–403.CrossRef Diabat, A., Kannan, D., & Mathiyazhagan, K. (2014). Analysis of enablers for implementation of sustainable supply chain management - a textile case. Journal of Cleaner Production, 83, 391–403.CrossRef
go back to reference DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.CrossRef DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.CrossRef
go back to reference Dube, A. S., & Gawande, R. S. (2016). Analysis Of green supply chain barriers using integrated ISM-Fuzzy MICMAC approach. Benchmarking an International Journal, 23, 1558–1578.CrossRef Dube, A. S., & Gawande, R. S. (2016). Analysis Of green supply chain barriers using integrated ISM-Fuzzy MICMAC approach. Benchmarking an International Journal, 23, 1558–1578.CrossRef
go back to reference Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Ali, S. S. (2015a). Exploring the relationship between leadership, operational practices, institutional pressures and environmental performance: A framework for green supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics., 160, 120–132.CrossRef Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Ali, S. S. (2015a). Exploring the relationship between leadership, operational practices, institutional pressures and environmental performance: A framework for green supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics., 160, 120–132.CrossRef
go back to reference Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Childe, S. J., Shibin, K. T., & Wamba, S. F. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management: Framework and further research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 1119–1130.CrossRef Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Childe, S. J., Shibin, K. T., & Wamba, S. F. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management: Framework and further research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 1119–1130.CrossRef
go back to reference Dwivedi, A., Agrawal, D., Jha, A., Gastaldi, M., Paul, S. K., & D’Adamo, I. (2021). Addressing the challenges to sustainable initiatives in value chain flexibility: Implications for Sustainable Development Goals. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 22(Suppl. 2), S179–S197.CrossRef Dwivedi, A., Agrawal, D., Jha, A., Gastaldi, M., Paul, S. K., & D’Adamo, I. (2021). Addressing the challenges to sustainable initiatives in value chain flexibility: Implications for Sustainable Development Goals. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 22(Suppl. 2), S179–S197.CrossRef
go back to reference Elliott, R. (2013). The taste for green: The possibilities and dynamics of status differentiation through “green” consumption. Poetics, 41(3), 294–322.CrossRef Elliott, R. (2013). The taste for green: The possibilities and dynamics of status differentiation through “green” consumption. Poetics, 41(3), 294–322.CrossRef
go back to reference Epoh, L. R., & Mafini, C. (2018). Green supply chain management in small and medium enterprises: Further empirical thoughts from South Africa. Journal of Transportation and Supply Chain Managment, 12, 1–12. Epoh, L. R., & Mafini, C. (2018). Green supply chain management in small and medium enterprises: Further empirical thoughts from South Africa. Journal of Transportation and Supply Chain Managment, 12, 1–12.
go back to reference Esfahbodi, A., Zhang, Y., & Watson, G. (2016). Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Trade-offs between environmental and cost performance. International Journal of Production Economics., 181, 350–366.CrossRef Esfahbodi, A., Zhang, Y., & Watson, G. (2016). Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Trade-offs between environmental and cost performance. International Journal of Production Economics., 181, 350–366.CrossRef
go back to reference Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Davarzani, H. (2015b). Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 162, 101–114.CrossRef Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Davarzani, H. (2015b). Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 162, 101–114.CrossRef
go back to reference Fang, C., & Zhang, J. (2018). Performance of green supply chain management: A systematic review and meta analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 1064–1081.CrossRef Fang, C., & Zhang, J. (2018). Performance of green supply chain management: A systematic review and meta analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 1064–1081.CrossRef
go back to reference Feng, T., Cai, D., Wang, D., & Zhang, X. (2016a). Environmental management systems and financial performance: The joint effect of switching cost and competitive intensity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113(2), 781–791.CrossRef Feng, T., Cai, D., Wang, D., & Zhang, X. (2016a). Environmental management systems and financial performance: The joint effect of switching cost and competitive intensity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113(2), 781–791.CrossRef
go back to reference Feng, X., Fu, B., Piao, S., Wang, S., Ciais, P., Zeng, Z., Lu, Y., Zeng, Y., Li, Y., Jiang, X., & Wu, B. (2016b). Revegetation in China’s Loess Plateau is approaching sustainable water resource limits. Nature Climate Change, 6(11), 1019–1022.CrossRef Feng, X., Fu, B., Piao, S., Wang, S., Ciais, P., Zeng, Z., Lu, Y., Zeng, Y., Li, Y., Jiang, X., & Wu, B. (2016b). Revegetation in China’s Loess Plateau is approaching sustainable water resource limits. Nature Climate Change, 6(11), 1019–1022.CrossRef
go back to reference Ferreira, M. A., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Jabbour, D. S. B. L. (2017). Maturity levels of material cycles and waste management in a context of green supply chain management: An innovative framework and its application to Brazilian Cases. The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 19(1), 516–525.CrossRef Ferreira, M. A., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Jabbour, D. S. B. L. (2017). Maturity levels of material cycles and waste management in a context of green supply chain management: An innovative framework and its application to Brazilian Cases. The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 19(1), 516–525.CrossRef
go back to reference Gan, T.-S., Steffan, M., Grunow, M., & Akkerman, R. (2021). Concurrent design of product and supply chain architectures for modularity and flexibility: Process, methods, and application. International Journal of Production Research, 60, 2292–2311.CrossRef Gan, T.-S., Steffan, M., Grunow, M., & Akkerman, R. (2021). Concurrent design of product and supply chain architectures for modularity and flexibility: Process, methods, and application. International Journal of Production Research, 60, 2292–2311.CrossRef
go back to reference Ganapathy, S. P., Natarajan, J., Gunasekaran, A., & Subramanian, N. (2014). Influence of eco-innovation on Indian manufacturing sector sustainable performance. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 21(3), 198–209.CrossRef Ganapathy, S. P., Natarajan, J., Gunasekaran, A., & Subramanian, N. (2014). Influence of eco-innovation on Indian manufacturing sector sustainable performance. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 21(3), 198–209.CrossRef
go back to reference Gandhi, S., Kumar, S., Kumar, P., & Kumar, D. (2015). Evaluating factors in implementation of successful green supply chain management using DEMATEL: A case study. International Strategic Management Review, 3, 96–109.CrossRef Gandhi, S., Kumar, S., Kumar, P., & Kumar, D. (2015). Evaluating factors in implementation of successful green supply chain management using DEMATEL: A case study. International Strategic Management Review, 3, 96–109.CrossRef
go back to reference Garcia-Saravia Ortiz-de-Montellano, C., & van der Meer, Y. (2022). A theoretical framework for circular processes and circular impacts through a comprehensive review of indicators. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 23(2), 291–314.CrossRef Garcia-Saravia Ortiz-de-Montellano, C., & van der Meer, Y. (2022). A theoretical framework for circular processes and circular impacts through a comprehensive review of indicators. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 23(2), 291–314.CrossRef
go back to reference Gavronski, I., Klassen, R. D., Vachon, S., & Nascimento, L. (2011). A resource-based view of green supply management. Transportation Research Part e: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 872–885.CrossRef Gavronski, I., Klassen, R. D., Vachon, S., & Nascimento, L. (2011). A resource-based view of green supply management. Transportation Research Part e: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 872–885.CrossRef
go back to reference Geng, R., Mansouri, A., & Aktas, E. (2017b). The relationship between green supply chain management and performance: A meta-analysis of empirical evidences in Asian emerging economies. International Journal of Production Economics., 183, 245–258.CrossRef Geng, R., Mansouri, A., & Aktas, E. (2017b). The relationship between green supply chain management and performance: A meta-analysis of empirical evidences in Asian emerging economies. International Journal of Production Economics., 183, 245–258.CrossRef
go back to reference Geng, R., Mansouri, S. A., Aktas, E., & Yen, D. A. (2017a). The role of Guanxi in green supply chain management in Asia’s emerging economies: A conceptual framework. Industrial Marketing Management, 63, 1–17.CrossRef Geng, R., Mansouri, S. A., Aktas, E., & Yen, D. A. (2017a). The role of Guanxi in green supply chain management in Asia’s emerging economies: A conceptual framework. Industrial Marketing Management, 63, 1–17.CrossRef
go back to reference Gholami, R., Binti, A., Ramayah, T., & Molla, A. (2013). Senior managers’ perception on green information systems (IS) adoption and environmental performance: Results from a field survey. Information and Management, 50(7), 431–438.CrossRef Gholami, R., Binti, A., Ramayah, T., & Molla, A. (2013). Senior managers’ perception on green information systems (IS) adoption and environmental performance: Results from a field survey. Information and Management, 50(7), 431–438.CrossRef
go back to reference Gopal, P. R. C., & Thakkar, J. (2016). Sustainable supply chain practices: An empirical investigation on Indian automobile industry. Production Planning & Control, 27(1), 49–64.CrossRef Gopal, P. R. C., & Thakkar, J. (2016). Sustainable supply chain practices: An empirical investigation on Indian automobile industry. Production Planning & Control, 27(1), 49–64.CrossRef
go back to reference Gosling, J., et al. (2016). The role of supply chain leadership in the learning of sustainable practice: Toward an integrated framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 1458–1469.CrossRef Gosling, J., et al. (2016). The role of supply chain leadership in the learning of sustainable practice: Toward an integrated framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 1458–1469.CrossRef
go back to reference Govindan, K., Kaliyan, M., Kannan, D., & Haq, A. N. (2014). Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Production Economics., 147, 555–568.CrossRef Govindan, K., Kaliyan, M., Kannan, D., & Haq, A. N. (2014). Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Production Economics., 147, 555–568.CrossRef
go back to reference Govindan, K., Kannan, D., & Shankar, M. (2015). Evaluation of green manufacturing practices using a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with PROMETHEE. International Journal of Production Research, 53, 6344–6371.CrossRef Govindan, K., Kannan, D., & Shankar, M. (2015). Evaluation of green manufacturing practices using a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with PROMETHEE. International Journal of Production Research, 53, 6344–6371.CrossRef
go back to reference Govindan, K., Muduli, K., Devika, K., & Barve, A. (2016). Resources, conservation and recycling investigation of the influential strength of factors on adoption of green supply chain management practices: An Indian mining scenario. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 107, 185–194.CrossRef Govindan, K., Muduli, K., Devika, K., & Barve, A. (2016). Resources, conservation and recycling investigation of the influential strength of factors on adoption of green supply chain management practices: An Indian mining scenario. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 107, 185–194.CrossRef
go back to reference Green, K. W., Pamela, J., Jeramy, J. Z., & Vikram, M. (2012). Green supply chain management practices: Impact on performance. Supply Chain Mangement: an International Journal, 17, 290–305.CrossRef Green, K. W., Pamela, J., Jeramy, J. Z., & Vikram, M. (2012). Green supply chain management practices: Impact on performance. Supply Chain Mangement: an International Journal, 17, 290–305.CrossRef
go back to reference Gunasekaran, A., & Spalanzani, A. (2012). Sustainability of manufacturing and services: Investigations for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 35–47.CrossRef Gunasekaran, A., & Spalanzani, A. (2012). Sustainability of manufacturing and services: Investigations for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 35–47.CrossRef
go back to reference Gupta, S., Drave, V. A., Bag, S., & Luo, Z. (2019). Leveraging smart supply chain and information system agility for supply chain flexibility. Information Systems Frontiers, 21, 547–564.CrossRef Gupta, S., Drave, V. A., Bag, S., & Luo, Z. (2019). Leveraging smart supply chain and information system agility for supply chain flexibility. Information Systems Frontiers, 21, 547–564.CrossRef
go back to reference Hamzaoui Essoussi, L., & Linton, J. D. (2010). New or recycled products: How much are consumers willing to pay? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(5), 458–468.CrossRef Hamzaoui Essoussi, L., & Linton, J. D. (2010). New or recycled products: How much are consumers willing to pay? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(5), 458–468.CrossRef
go back to reference Herring, H. (2006). Energy efficiency—a critical view. Energy, 31(1), 10–20.CrossRef Herring, H. (2006). Energy efficiency—a critical view. Energy, 31(1), 10–20.CrossRef
go back to reference Hsu, C. W., Kuo, T. C., Chen, S. H., & Hu, A. H. (2013). Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 164–172.CrossRef Hsu, C. W., Kuo, T. C., Chen, S. H., & Hu, A. H. (2013). Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 164–172.CrossRef
go back to reference Huang, J.-W., & Li, Y.-H. (2017). Green innovation and performance: The view of organizational capability and social reciprocity. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 309–324.CrossRef Huang, J.-W., & Li, Y.-H. (2017). Green innovation and performance: The view of organizational capability and social reciprocity. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 309–324.CrossRef
go back to reference Hultman, N. E., Pulver, S., Guimaraes, L., Deshmukh, R., & Kane, J. (2012). carbon market risks and rewards: Firm perception of CDM investment decisions in Brazil and India. Energy Policy, 40, 90–102. Hultman, N. E., Pulver, S., Guimaraes, L., Deshmukh, R., & Kane, J. (2012). carbon market risks and rewards: Firm perception of CDM investment decisions in Brazil and India. Energy Policy, 40, 90–102.
go back to reference Jabbour, A., Jabbour, C., Hingley, M., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Ramsden, G., & Twigg, D. (2020). sustainability of supply chains in the Wake of the coronavirus (COVID-19/SARS-Cov-2) pandemic: Lessons and trends. Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications., 2(3), 2631–3871. Jabbour, A., Jabbour, C., Hingley, M., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Ramsden, G., & Twigg, D. (2020). sustainability of supply chains in the Wake of the coronavirus (COVID-19/SARS-Cov-2) pandemic: Lessons and trends. Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications., 2(3), 2631–3871.
go back to reference Jabbour, C. J. C., & Jabbour, A. B. L. (2016). Green human resource management and green supply chain management: Linking two emerging agendas. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1824–1833.CrossRef Jabbour, C. J. C., & Jabbour, A. B. L. (2016). Green human resource management and green supply chain management: Linking two emerging agendas. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1824–1833.CrossRef
go back to reference Jaikumar, G., Karpagam, M., & Thiyagarajan, S. (2013). Factors influencing corporate environmental performance in India. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 6(1), 2–17.CrossRef Jaikumar, G., Karpagam, M., & Thiyagarajan, S. (2013). Factors influencing corporate environmental performance in India. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 6(1), 2–17.CrossRef
go back to reference Jakhar, S. K., Rathore, H., & Mangla, S. K. (2018). ‘Is lean synergistic with sustainable supply chain? An empirical investigation from emerging economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 139, 262–269.CrossRef Jakhar, S. K., Rathore, H., & Mangla, S. K. (2018). ‘Is lean synergistic with sustainable supply chain? An empirical investigation from emerging economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 139, 262–269.CrossRef
go back to reference Jawaad, M., & Zafar, S. (2019). Improving sustainable development and firm performance in emerging economies by implementing green supply chain activities. Sustainable Development, 28, 25–38.CrossRef Jawaad, M., & Zafar, S. (2019). Improving sustainable development and firm performance in emerging economies by implementing green supply chain activities. Sustainable Development, 28, 25–38.CrossRef
go back to reference Jawaad, M., & Zafar, S. (2020). Improving sustainable development and firm performance in emerging economies by implementing green supply chain activities. Sustainable Development, 28, 25–38.CrossRef Jawaad, M., & Zafar, S. (2020). Improving sustainable development and firm performance in emerging economies by implementing green supply chain activities. Sustainable Development, 28, 25–38.CrossRef
go back to reference Jayaram, J., & Avittathur, B. (2015). Green supply chains: A perspective from an emerging economy. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 234–244.CrossRef Jayaram, J., & Avittathur, B. (2015). Green supply chains: A perspective from an emerging economy. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 234–244.CrossRef
go back to reference Jayaraman, V., Singh, R., & Anandnarayan, A. (2012). impact of sustainable manufacturing practices on consumer perception and revenue growth: An emerging economy perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 50(1), 1395–1410.CrossRef Jayaraman, V., Singh, R., & Anandnarayan, A. (2012). impact of sustainable manufacturing practices on consumer perception and revenue growth: An emerging economy perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 50(1), 1395–1410.CrossRef
go back to reference Jia, F., Zuluaga-cardona, L., Bailey, A., & Rueda, X. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management in developing countries: An analysis of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, 263–278.CrossRef Jia, F., Zuluaga-cardona, L., Bailey, A., & Rueda, X. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management in developing countries: An analysis of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, 263–278.CrossRef
go back to reference Jia, P., Diabat, A., & Mathiyazhagan, K. (2015). Analyzing the SSCM practices in the mining and mineral industry by ISM approach. Resources Policy, 46, 76–85.CrossRef Jia, P., Diabat, A., & Mathiyazhagan, K. (2015). Analyzing the SSCM practices in the mining and mineral industry by ISM approach. Resources Policy, 46, 76–85.CrossRef
go back to reference Khan, S.A.R. and Dong, Q. (2017) ‘The Environmental Supply Chain Management and the Companies’ Sustainable Development. In Proceedings of the 2017 3rd International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education. Atlantis Press, pp. 125–129. Khan, S.A.R. and Dong, Q. (2017) ‘The Environmental Supply Chain Management and the Companies’ Sustainable Development. In Proceedings of the 2017 3rd International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education. Atlantis Press, pp. 125–129.
go back to reference Kleindorfer, P. R., Singhal, K., & Wassenhove, L. N. V. (2005). Sustainable operations management. Production and Operation Management, 14, 482–492.CrossRef Kleindorfer, P. R., Singhal, K., & Wassenhove, L. N. V. (2005). Sustainable operations management. Production and Operation Management, 14, 482–492.CrossRef
go back to reference Koh, S. C. L., Ganesh, K., Chidambaram, N., & Anbuudayasankar, S. P. (2012). Assessment on the adoption of low carbon and green supply chain management practices in Indian supply chain sectors – manufacturing and service industries. International Journal of Business and Globalization, 9(3), 311–345.CrossRef Koh, S. C. L., Ganesh, K., Chidambaram, N., & Anbuudayasankar, S. P. (2012). Assessment on the adoption of low carbon and green supply chain management practices in Indian supply chain sectors – manufacturing and service industries. International Journal of Business and Globalization, 9(3), 311–345.CrossRef
go back to reference Kumar, N., Agrahari, R. P., & Roy, D. (2015). Review of green supply chain processes. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(3), 374–381.CrossRef Kumar, N., Agrahari, R. P., & Roy, D. (2015). Review of green supply chain processes. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(3), 374–381.CrossRef
go back to reference Kumar, S., Govindan, K., & Luthra, S. (2016). Critical success factors for reverse logistics in Indian industries: A structural model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 129, 608–621.CrossRef Kumar, S., Govindan, K., & Luthra, S. (2016). Critical success factors for reverse logistics in Indian industries: A structural model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 129, 608–621.CrossRef
go back to reference Kumar, V., Jabarzadeh, Y., Jeihouni, P., & Garza-reyes, J. A. (2020). Learning orientation and innovation performance: The mediating role of operations strategy and supply chain integration. Supply Chain Management- an International Journal, 4, 457–474.CrossRef Kumar, V., Jabarzadeh, Y., Jeihouni, P., & Garza-reyes, J. A. (2020). Learning orientation and innovation performance: The mediating role of operations strategy and supply chain integration. Supply Chain Management- an International Journal, 4, 457–474.CrossRef
go back to reference Lai, K., & Wong, C. W. Y. (2012). Green logistics management and performance: Some empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing exporters. Omega, 40, 267–282.CrossRef Lai, K., & Wong, C. W. Y. (2012). Green logistics management and performance: Some empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing exporters. Omega, 40, 267–282.CrossRef
go back to reference Laosirihongthong, T., Adebanjo, D., & Tan, K. (2013). Green supply chain management practices and performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 113(8), 1088–1109.CrossRef Laosirihongthong, T., Adebanjo, D., & Tan, K. (2013). Green supply chain management practices and performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 113(8), 1088–1109.CrossRef
go back to reference Lawrence, P., & Lorsch, J. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 1–47.CrossRef Lawrence, P., & Lorsch, J. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 1–47.CrossRef
go back to reference Lee, S. Y. (2015). The effects of green supply chain management on the supplier’s performance through social capital accumulation. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(1), 42–55.CrossRef Lee, S. Y. (2015). The effects of green supply chain management on the supplier’s performance through social capital accumulation. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(1), 42–55.CrossRef
go back to reference Li, S., Jayaraman, V., Paulraj, A., & Shang, K. C. (2015). Proactive environmental strategies and performance: role of green supply chain processes and product design in the Chinese high-tech industry. International Journal of Production Research, 54, 2136–2151.CrossRef Li, S., Jayaraman, V., Paulraj, A., & Shang, K. C. (2015). Proactive environmental strategies and performance: role of green supply chain processes and product design in the Chinese high-tech industry. International Journal of Production Research, 54, 2136–2151.CrossRef
go back to reference Liao, Y. (2020). An integrative framework of supply chain flexibility. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(6), 1321–1342.CrossRef Liao, Y. (2020). An integrative framework of supply chain flexibility. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(6), 1321–1342.CrossRef
go back to reference Liu, Y., Zhu, Q., & Seuring, S. (2017). Linking capabilities to green operations strategies: The moderating role of corporate environmental proactivity. International Journal of Production Economics, 187, 182–195.CrossRef Liu, Y., Zhu, Q., & Seuring, S. (2017). Linking capabilities to green operations strategies: The moderating role of corporate environmental proactivity. International Journal of Production Economics, 187, 182–195.CrossRef
go back to reference Lorek, S., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2014). Sustainable consumption within a sustainable economy – beyond green growth and green economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 33–44.CrossRef Lorek, S., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2014). Sustainable consumption within a sustainable economy – beyond green growth and green economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 33–44.CrossRef
go back to reference Luken, R., & Stares, R. (2005). Small business responsibility in developing countries: A threat or an opportunity? Business Strategy and the Environment, 14, 38–53.CrossRef Luken, R., & Stares, R. (2005). Small business responsibility in developing countries: A threat or an opportunity? Business Strategy and the Environment, 14, 38–53.CrossRef
go back to reference Luthra, S., Garg, D., & Haleem, A. (2015a). An analysis of interactions among critical success factors to implement green supply chain management towards sustainability: An Indian perspective. Resources Policy, 46, 37–50.CrossRef Luthra, S., Garg, D., & Haleem, A. (2015a). An analysis of interactions among critical success factors to implement green supply chain management towards sustainability: An Indian perspective. Resources Policy, 46, 37–50.CrossRef
go back to reference Luthra, S., Garg, D., & Haleem, A. (2015b). An analysis of interactions among critical success factors to implement green supply chain management towards sustainability: An Indian perspective. Resource Policy, 46, 37–50.CrossRef Luthra, S., Garg, D., & Haleem, A. (2015b). An analysis of interactions among critical success factors to implement green supply chain management towards sustainability: An Indian perspective. Resource Policy, 46, 37–50.CrossRef
go back to reference Luthra, S., Garg, D., & Haleem, A. (2016). the impacts of critical success factors for implementing green supply chain management towards sustainability: An empirical investigation of Indian automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 121, 142–158.CrossRef Luthra, S., Garg, D., & Haleem, A. (2016). the impacts of critical success factors for implementing green supply chain management towards sustainability: An empirical investigation of Indian automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 121, 142–158.CrossRef
go back to reference Luthra, S., Garg, D., & HaleemA,. (2015c). Critical success factors of green supply chain management for achieving sustainability in Indian automobile industry. Production Planning and Control, 26, 339–362. Luthra, S., Garg, D., & HaleemA,. (2015c). Critical success factors of green supply chain management for achieving sustainability in Indian automobile industry. Production Planning and Control, 26, 339–362.
go back to reference Luthra, S., & Mangla, S. (2018). Evaluating challenges to Industry 4.0 initiatives for supply chain sustainability in emerging economies. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117, 168–179.CrossRef Luthra, S., & Mangla, S. (2018). Evaluating challenges to Industry 4.0 initiatives for supply chain sustainability in emerging economies. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117, 168–179.CrossRef
go back to reference Majumdar, A., & Sinha, S. K. (2019). Analyzing the barriers of green textile supply chain management in Southeast Asia using interpretive structural modeling. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 17, 176–187.CrossRef Majumdar, A., & Sinha, S. K. (2019). Analyzing the barriers of green textile supply chain management in Southeast Asia using interpretive structural modeling. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 17, 176–187.CrossRef
go back to reference Malviya, R. K., & Kant, R. (2015). Green supply chain management (GSCM): A structured literature review and research implications. Benchmarking-an International Journal, 22, 1360–1394.CrossRef Malviya, R. K., & Kant, R. (2015). Green supply chain management (GSCM): A structured literature review and research implications. Benchmarking-an International Journal, 22, 1360–1394.CrossRef
go back to reference Mangla, S. K., Govindan, K., & Luthra, S. (2016). Critical success factors for reverse logistics in Indian industries: A structural model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 129, 608–621.CrossRef Mangla, S. K., Govindan, K., & Luthra, S. (2016). Critical success factors for reverse logistics in Indian industries: A structural model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 129, 608–621.CrossRef
go back to reference Mangla, S. K., Kumar, P., & Barua, M. K. (2015). Risk analysis in green supply chain using fuzzy AHP approach: A case study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 104, 375–390.CrossRef Mangla, S. K., Kumar, P., & Barua, M. K. (2015). Risk analysis in green supply chain using fuzzy AHP approach: A case study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 104, 375–390.CrossRef
go back to reference Mansi, M. (2015). Sustainable procurement disclosure practices in central public sector enterprises: Evidence from India. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Elsevier, 21(2), 125–137.CrossRef Mansi, M. (2015). Sustainable procurement disclosure practices in central public sector enterprises: Evidence from India. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Elsevier, 21(2), 125–137.CrossRef
go back to reference Maric, J., & Opazo-basaez, M. (2019). Green servitization for flexible and sustainable supply chain operations: A review of reverse logistics services in manufacturing. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 20, S65–S80.CrossRef Maric, J., & Opazo-basaez, M. (2019). Green servitization for flexible and sustainable supply chain operations: A review of reverse logistics services in manufacturing. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 20, S65–S80.CrossRef
go back to reference Martín-Gómez, A., Aguayo-González, F., & Luque, A. (2019). A holonic framework for managing the sustainable supply chain in emerging economies with smart connected metabolism. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 219–232.CrossRef Martín-Gómez, A., Aguayo-González, F., & Luque, A. (2019). A holonic framework for managing the sustainable supply chain in emerging economies with smart connected metabolism. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 219–232.CrossRef
go back to reference Mathiyazhagan, K., Datta, U., Bhadauria, R., Singla, A., & Krishnamoorthi, S. (2018). Identification and prioritization of motivational factors for the green supply chain management adoption: Case from Indian construction industries. Opsearch, 55, 202–219.CrossRef Mathiyazhagan, K., Datta, U., Bhadauria, R., Singla, A., & Krishnamoorthi, S. (2018). Identification and prioritization of motivational factors for the green supply chain management adoption: Case from Indian construction industries. Opsearch, 55, 202–219.CrossRef
go back to reference Mathiyazhagan, K., Diabat, A., Al-Refaie, A., & Xu, L. (2015). Application of analytical hierarchy process to evaluate pressures to implement green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 229–236.CrossRef Mathiyazhagan, K., Diabat, A., Al-Refaie, A., & Xu, L. (2015). Application of analytical hierarchy process to evaluate pressures to implement green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 229–236.CrossRef
go back to reference Mathiyazhagan, K., Govidan, K., & Haq, A. N. (2014). Pressure analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Production Research, 52, 188–202.CrossRef Mathiyazhagan, K., Govidan, K., & Haq, A. N. (2014). Pressure analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Production Research, 52, 188–202.CrossRef
go back to reference Mathiyazhagan, K., & Haq, A. N. (2013). Analysis of the influential pressures for green supply chain management adoption—an Indian perspective using interpretive structural modeling. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 68, 817–833.CrossRef Mathiyazhagan, K., & Haq, A. N. (2013). Analysis of the influential pressures for green supply chain management adoption—an Indian perspective using interpretive structural modeling. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 68, 817–833.CrossRef
go back to reference Mathiyazhagan, K., Haq, A. N., & Baxi, V. (2016). Analysing the barriers for the adoption of green supply chain management – the Indian plastic industry perspective. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, 8, 46–65.CrossRef Mathiyazhagan, K., Haq, A. N., & Baxi, V. (2016). Analysing the barriers for the adoption of green supply chain management – the Indian plastic industry perspective. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, 8, 46–65.CrossRef
go back to reference Mhelembe, K., & Mafini, C. (2019). Modelling the link between supply chain risk, flexibility and performance in the public sector. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 22(1), 1–12.CrossRef Mhelembe, K., & Mafini, C. (2019). Modelling the link between supply chain risk, flexibility and performance in the public sector. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 22(1), 1–12.CrossRef
go back to reference Mitra, S., & Datta, P. P. (2014). Adoption of green supply chain management practices and their impact on performance: An exploratory study of Indian manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Research, 52(7), 2085–2107.CrossRef Mitra, S., & Datta, P. P. (2014). Adoption of green supply chain management practices and their impact on performance: An exploratory study of Indian manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Research, 52(7), 2085–2107.CrossRef
go back to reference Mobley, A. S., Painter, T. S., Untch, E. M., & Unnavav, R. H. (1995). Consumer evaluation of recycled products. Psychology and Marketing, 12(3), 165–176.CrossRef Mobley, A. S., Painter, T. S., Untch, E. M., & Unnavav, R. H. (1995). Consumer evaluation of recycled products. Psychology and Marketing, 12(3), 165–176.CrossRef
go back to reference Mohanty, R. P., & Prakash, A. (2014). Green supply chain management practices in India: A confirmatory empirical study. Production & Manufacturing Research, 2(1), 438–456.CrossRef Mohanty, R. P., & Prakash, A. (2014). Green supply chain management practices in India: A confirmatory empirical study. Production & Manufacturing Research, 2(1), 438–456.CrossRef
go back to reference Muduli, K., Govindan, K., Barve, A., & Geng, Y. (2013). Barriers to green supply chain management in Indian mining industries: A graph theoretic approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 335–344.CrossRef Muduli, K., Govindan, K., Barve, A., & Geng, Y. (2013). Barriers to green supply chain management in Indian mining industries: A graph theoretic approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 335–344.CrossRef
go back to reference Mumtaz, U., et al. (2018). Identifying the critical factors of green supply chain management: Environmental benefits in Pakistan. Science of the Total Environment, 640–641, 144–152.CrossRef Mumtaz, U., et al. (2018). Identifying the critical factors of green supply chain management: Environmental benefits in Pakistan. Science of the Total Environment, 640–641, 144–152.CrossRef
go back to reference Munguia, N., Zavala, A., & Marin, A. (2010). Identifying pollution prevention opportunities in the Mexican auto refining industry. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 21(3), 324–335.CrossRef Munguia, N., Zavala, A., & Marin, A. (2010). Identifying pollution prevention opportunities in the Mexican auto refining industry. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 21(3), 324–335.CrossRef
go back to reference Nema, N., Nougriaya, M., Soni, M., & Talankar, M. (2013). Green supply chain management practices in textile and apparel industries: Literature review. International Journal Commerce and Business Management, 1, 330–336. Nema, N., Nougriaya, M., Soni, M., & Talankar, M. (2013). Green supply chain management practices in textile and apparel industries: Literature review. International Journal Commerce and Business Management, 1, 330–336.
go back to reference Newbert, S. (2007). Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 121–146.CrossRef Newbert, S. (2007). Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 121–146.CrossRef
go back to reference Nishitani, K. (2010). Demand for ISO 14001 adoption in the global supply chain: An empirical analysis focusing on environmentally conscious markets. Resource and Energy Economics, 32(3), 395–407.CrossRef Nishitani, K. (2010). Demand for ISO 14001 adoption in the global supply chain: An empirical analysis focusing on environmentally conscious markets. Resource and Energy Economics, 32(3), 395–407.CrossRef
go back to reference Pakdeechoho, N., & Sukhotu, V. (2018). Sustainable supply chain collaboration: Incentives in emerging economies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(2), 273–294.CrossRef Pakdeechoho, N., & Sukhotu, V. (2018). Sustainable supply chain collaboration: Incentives in emerging economies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(2), 273–294.CrossRef
go back to reference Park, J., Sarkis, J., & Wu, Z. (2010). Creating integrated business and environmental value within the context of China’s circular economy and ecological modernization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(15), 1494–1501.CrossRef Park, J., Sarkis, J., & Wu, Z. (2010). Creating integrated business and environmental value within the context of China’s circular economy and ecological modernization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(15), 1494–1501.CrossRef
go back to reference Park, Y. R., Song, S., Choe, S., & Baik, Y. (2015). Corporate social responsibility in international business: Illustrations from Korean and Japanese electronics MNEs in Indonesia. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(3), 747–761.CrossRef Park, Y. R., Song, S., Choe, S., & Baik, Y. (2015). Corporate social responsibility in international business: Illustrations from Korean and Japanese electronics MNEs in Indonesia. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(3), 747–761.CrossRef
go back to reference Paul, S. K., & Chowdhury, P. (2020). Strategies for managing the impacts of disruptions during COVID-19: an example of toilet paper. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 21(3), 283–293.CrossRef Paul, S. K., & Chowdhury, P. (2020). Strategies for managing the impacts of disruptions during COVID-19: an example of toilet paper. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 21(3), 283–293.CrossRef
go back to reference Pinto, G. M. C., Pedroso, B., Moraes, J., Pilatti, L. A., & Picinin, C. T. (2018). Environmental management practices in industries of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS) from 2011 to 2015. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 1251–1261.CrossRef Pinto, G. M. C., Pedroso, B., Moraes, J., Pilatti, L. A., & Picinin, C. T. (2018). Environmental management practices in industries of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS) from 2011 to 2015. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 1251–1261.CrossRef
go back to reference Prasad, S., Khanduja, D., & Sharma, S. K. (2016). An empirical study on applicability of lean and green practices in the foundry industry. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 27(3), 408–426.CrossRef Prasad, S., Khanduja, D., & Sharma, S. K. (2016). An empirical study on applicability of lean and green practices in the foundry industry. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 27(3), 408–426.CrossRef
go back to reference Quarshie, A. M., Salmi, A., & Leuschner, R. (2016). Sustainability and corporate social responsibility in supply chains: The state of research in supply chain management and business ethics. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22, 82–97.CrossRef Quarshie, A. M., Salmi, A., & Leuschner, R. (2016). Sustainability and corporate social responsibility in supply chains: The state of research in supply chain management and business ethics. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22, 82–97.CrossRef
go back to reference Rafi-Ul-Shan, P. M., Grant, D. B., Perry, P., & Ahmed, S. (2018). Relationship between sustainability and risk management in fashion supply chains: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 46, 466–486.CrossRef Rafi-Ul-Shan, P. M., Grant, D. B., Perry, P., & Ahmed, S. (2018). Relationship between sustainability and risk management in fashion supply chains: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 46, 466–486.CrossRef
go back to reference Rahman, T., Ali, S. M., Moktadir, M. A., & Kusi-Sarpong, S. (2019). Evaluating barriers to implementing green supply chain management: An example from an emerging economy. Production Planning and Control, 3(8), 673–698.CrossRef Rahman, T., Ali, S. M., Moktadir, M. A., & Kusi-Sarpong, S. (2019). Evaluating barriers to implementing green supply chain management: An example from an emerging economy. Production Planning and Control, 3(8), 673–698.CrossRef
go back to reference Raj, A., Mukherjee, A. A., de Sousa Jabbour, A., & Srivastava, S. K. (2022). Supply chain management during and post-COVID-19 pandemic: Mitigation strategies and practical lessons learned. Journal of Business Research, 142, 1125–1139.CrossRef Raj, A., Mukherjee, A. A., de Sousa Jabbour, A., & Srivastava, S. K. (2022). Supply chain management during and post-COVID-19 pandemic: Mitigation strategies and practical lessons learned. Journal of Business Research, 142, 1125–1139.CrossRef
go back to reference Raj, T., Shankar, R., & Suhaib, M. (2008). An ISM approach for modelling the enablers of flexible manufacturing system: The case for India. International Journal of Production Economics, 46, 6883–6912.CrossRef Raj, T., Shankar, R., & Suhaib, M. (2008). An ISM approach for modelling the enablers of flexible manufacturing system: The case for India. International Journal of Production Economics, 46, 6883–6912.CrossRef
go back to reference Rajeev, A., Pati, R. K., Padhi, S. S., & Govindan, K. (2017). Evolution of sustainability in supply chain management: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 299–314.CrossRef Rajeev, A., Pati, R. K., Padhi, S. S., & Govindan, K. (2017). Evolution of sustainability in supply chain management: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 299–314.CrossRef
go back to reference Rao, P., & Holt, D. (2005). Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? International Journal of Operationa and Production Management, 25, 898–916.CrossRef Rao, P., & Holt, D. (2005). Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? International Journal of Operationa and Production Management, 25, 898–916.CrossRef
go back to reference Rao, T. B., Chonde, S. G., Bhosale, P. R., Jadhav, A. S., & Raut, P. D. (2012). Environmental audit of distillery industry: A case study of Kumbhi Kasari Distillery Factory, Kuditre, Kolhapur. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology: An International Quarterly Scientific Journal, 11(1), 141–145. Rao, T. B., Chonde, S. G., Bhosale, P. R., Jadhav, A. S., & Raut, P. D. (2012). Environmental audit of distillery industry: A case study of Kumbhi Kasari Distillery Factory, Kuditre, Kolhapur. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology: An International Quarterly Scientific Journal, 11(1), 141–145.
go back to reference Rathore, P., Kota, S., & Chakrabarti, A. (2011). Sustainability through remanufacturing in India: A case study on mobile handsets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(15), 1709–1722.CrossRef Rathore, P., Kota, S., & Chakrabarti, A. (2011). Sustainability through remanufacturing in India: A case study on mobile handsets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(15), 1709–1722.CrossRef
go back to reference Raut, R. D., Narkhede, B., & Gardas, B. B. (2017). To identify the critical success factors of sustainable supply chain management practices in the context of oil and gas industries: ISM approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 68, 33–47.CrossRef Raut, R. D., Narkhede, B., & Gardas, B. B. (2017). To identify the critical success factors of sustainable supply chain management practices in the context of oil and gas industries: ISM approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 68, 33–47.CrossRef
go back to reference Rosin, F., et al. (2020). Impacts of industry 4.0 technologies on Lean principles. International Journal of Production Research, 58(6), 1644–1661.CrossRef Rosin, F., et al. (2020). Impacts of industry 4.0 technologies on Lean principles. International Journal of Production Research, 58(6), 1644–1661.CrossRef
go back to reference Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., & Sarkis, J. (2019). Blockchains and the supply chain: Findings from a broad study of practitioners. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 47, 95–103.CrossRef Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., & Sarkis, J. (2019). Blockchains and the supply chain: Findings from a broad study of practitioners. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 47, 95–103.CrossRef
go back to reference Sarker, S. K., Reeve, R., & Matthiopoulos, J. (2021). Solving the fourth-corner problem: Forecasting ecosystem primary production from spatial multispecies trait-based models. Ecological Monographs, 91(3), e01454.CrossRef Sarker, S. K., Reeve, R., & Matthiopoulos, J. (2021). Solving the fourth-corner problem: Forecasting ecosystem primary production from spatial multispecies trait-based models. Ecological Monographs, 91(3), e01454.CrossRef
go back to reference Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., & Lai, K. H. (2011). An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 130, 1–15.CrossRef Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., & Lai, K. H. (2011). An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 130, 1–15.CrossRef
go back to reference Sassanelli, C., & Terzi, S. (2022). The D-BEST reference model: a flexible and sustainable support for the digital transformation of small and medium enterprises. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 23(3), 345–370.CrossRef Sassanelli, C., & Terzi, S. (2022). The D-BEST reference model: a flexible and sustainable support for the digital transformation of small and medium enterprises. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 23(3), 345–370.CrossRef
go back to reference Saunila, M., Ukko, J., & Rantala, T. (2018). Sustainability as a driver of green innovation investment and exploitation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 631–641.CrossRef Saunila, M., Ukko, J., & Rantala, T. (2018). Sustainability as a driver of green innovation investment and exploitation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 631–641.CrossRef
go back to reference Scarpa, R., & Willis, K. (2010). Willingness-to-pay for renewable energy: Primary and discretionary choice of British households’ for micro-generation technologies. Energy Economics, 32(1), 129–136.CrossRef Scarpa, R., & Willis, K. (2010). Willingness-to-pay for renewable energy: Primary and discretionary choice of British households’ for micro-generation technologies. Energy Economics, 32(1), 129–136.CrossRef
go back to reference Scavarda, A., et al. (2019). A proposed healthcare supply chain management framework in the emerging economies with the sustainable lenses: The theory, the practice, and the policy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 418–430.CrossRef Scavarda, A., et al. (2019). A proposed healthcare supply chain management framework in the emerging economies with the sustainable lenses: The theory, the practice, and the policy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 418–430.CrossRef
go back to reference Sen, P., Roy, M., & Pal, P. (2015). Exploring role of environmental proactivity in financial performance of manufacturing enterprises: A structural modelling approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 583–594.CrossRef Sen, P., Roy, M., & Pal, P. (2015). Exploring role of environmental proactivity in financial performance of manufacturing enterprises: A structural modelling approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 583–594.CrossRef
go back to reference Sen, S. (2009). Linking green supply chain management and shareholder value creation. The IUP Journal of Supply Chain Management, 7(3), 95–109. Sen, S. (2009). Linking green supply chain management and shareholder value creation. The IUP Journal of Supply Chain Management, 7(3), 95–109.
go back to reference Settembre-Blundo, D., González-Sánchez, R., Medina-Salgado, S., & García-Muiña, F. E. (2021). Flexibility and resilience in corporate decision making: a new sustainability-based risk management system in uncertain times. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 22(Suppl. 2), S107–S132.CrossRef Settembre-Blundo, D., González-Sánchez, R., Medina-Salgado, S., & García-Muiña, F. E. (2021). Flexibility and resilience in corporate decision making: a new sustainability-based risk management system in uncertain times. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 22(Suppl. 2), S107–S132.CrossRef
go back to reference Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1699–1710.CrossRef Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1699–1710.CrossRef
go back to reference Shibin, K. T., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Dubey, R., Singh, M., & Wamba, S. F. (2016). Enablers and barriers of flexible green supply chain management: A total interpretive structural modeling approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 17, 171–188.CrossRef Shibin, K. T., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Dubey, R., Singh, M., & Wamba, S. F. (2016). Enablers and barriers of flexible green supply chain management: A total interpretive structural modeling approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 17, 171–188.CrossRef
go back to reference Shohan, S., et al. (2019). Green supply chain management in the chemical industry: Structural framework of drivers. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 26(8), 752–768.CrossRef Shohan, S., et al. (2019). Green supply chain management in the chemical industry: Structural framework of drivers. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 26(8), 752–768.CrossRef
go back to reference Shukla, A. C., Deshmukh, S. G., & Kanda, A. (2009). Environmentally responsive supply chains: Learnings from the Indian auto sector. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 6(2), 154–171.CrossRef Shukla, A. C., Deshmukh, S. G., & Kanda, A. (2009). Environmentally responsive supply chains: Learnings from the Indian auto sector. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 6(2), 154–171.CrossRef
go back to reference Silvestre, B. S. (2015). Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Environmental turbulence, institutional voids and sustainability trajectories. International Journal of Production Economics, 167, 156–169.CrossRef Silvestre, B. S. (2015). Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Environmental turbulence, institutional voids and sustainability trajectories. International Journal of Production Economics, 167, 156–169.CrossRef
go back to reference Singh, R. K., & Acharya, P. (2013). Supply chain flexibility: A frame work of research dimensions. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 14(3), 157–166.CrossRef Singh, R. K., & Acharya, P. (2013). Supply chain flexibility: A frame work of research dimensions. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 14(3), 157–166.CrossRef
go back to reference Singh, R. K., Acharya, P., & Modgil, S. (2020a). A template based approach to measure supply chain flexibility: A case study of Indian soap manufacturing firm- supply chain flexibility: A framework of research dimensions. Global Journal of Flexible System Management, 14(3), 157–166.CrossRef Singh, R. K., Acharya, P., & Modgil, S. (2020a). A template based approach to measure supply chain flexibility: A case study of Indian soap manufacturing firm- supply chain flexibility: A framework of research dimensions. Global Journal of Flexible System Management, 14(3), 157–166.CrossRef
go back to reference Singh, R. K., Modgil, S., & Acharya, P. (2019). Assessment of flexible supply chain using system dynamics modelling: A case of Indian soap manufacturing firm. Global Journal of Flexible System Management, 20(1), 39–63.CrossRef Singh, R. K., Modgil, S., & Acharya, P. (2019). Assessment of flexible supply chain using system dynamics modelling: A case of Indian soap manufacturing firm. Global Journal of Flexible System Management, 20(1), 39–63.CrossRef
go back to reference Singh, R. K., Modgil, S., & Acharya, P. (2020b). Identification and causal assessment of supply chain flexibility. Benchmarking: an International Journal, 27(2), 517–549.CrossRef Singh, R. K., Modgil, S., & Acharya, P. (2020b). Identification and causal assessment of supply chain flexibility. Benchmarking: an International Journal, 27(2), 517–549.CrossRef
go back to reference Soda, S., Sachdeva, A., & Garg, R. K. (2015). GSCM: Practices, trends and prospects in Indian context. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 26(6), 889–910.CrossRef Soda, S., Sachdeva, A., & Garg, R. K. (2015). GSCM: Practices, trends and prospects in Indian context. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 26(6), 889–910.CrossRef
go back to reference Soundararajan, V., & Brown, J. A. (2016). Voluntary governance mechanisms in global supply chains: Beyond CSR to a stakeholder utility perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(1), 83–102.CrossRef Soundararajan, V., & Brown, J. A. (2016). Voluntary governance mechanisms in global supply chains: Beyond CSR to a stakeholder utility perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(1), 83–102.CrossRef
go back to reference Sousa, R., & Voss, C. A. (2008). Contingency research in operations management practices. Journal of Operations Management, 26(6), 697–713.CrossRef Sousa, R., & Voss, C. A. (2008). Contingency research in operations management practices. Journal of Operations Management, 26(6), 697–713.CrossRef
go back to reference Srivastava, S. K. (2007). Green supply-chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 53–80.CrossRef Srivastava, S. K. (2007). Green supply-chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 53–80.CrossRef
go back to reference Stevenson, M., & Spring, M. (2007). Flexibility from a supply chain perspective: Definition and review. International Journal of Operation and Production Management, 27, 685–713.CrossRef Stevenson, M., & Spring, M. (2007). Flexibility from a supply chain perspective: Definition and review. International Journal of Operation and Production Management, 27, 685–713.CrossRef
go back to reference Stiller, S., & Gold, S. (2014). Socially sustainable supply chain management practices in the Indian seed sector – a case study. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 5(1), 52–67.CrossRef Stiller, S., & Gold, S. (2014). Socially sustainable supply chain management practices in the Indian seed sector – a case study. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 5(1), 52–67.CrossRef
go back to reference Thun, J.-H., & Müller, A. (2010). An empirical analysis of green supply chain management in the German automotive industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(2), 119–132. Thun, J.-H., & Müller, A. (2010). An empirical analysis of green supply chain management in the German automotive industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(2), 119–132.
go back to reference Touzi, B., Mabrouki, C., & Farchi, A. (2015). Green supply chain management practices in textile and clothing sector: Literature review. International Journal of Commerce, Business and Management (IJCBM), 4(4), 1229–1238. Touzi, B., Mabrouki, C., & Farchi, A. (2015). Green supply chain management practices in textile and clothing sector: Literature review. International Journal of Commerce, Business and Management (IJCBM), 4(4), 1229–1238.
go back to reference Tukamuhabwa, B., Stevenson, M., & Busby, J. (2017). "Supply chain resilience in a developing country context: A case study on the interconnectedness of threats, strategies and outcomes. Supply Chain Managment, 22, 486–505.CrossRef Tukamuhabwa, B., Stevenson, M., & Busby, J. (2017). "Supply chain resilience in a developing country context: A case study on the interconnectedness of threats, strategies and outcomes. Supply Chain Managment, 22, 486–505.CrossRef
go back to reference Tumpa, T. J., Ali, S. M., Rahman, M. H., Paul, S. K., Chowdhury, P., & Rehman Khan, S. A. (2019). Barriers to green supply chain management: An emerging economy context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, 117617.CrossRef Tumpa, T. J., Ali, S. M., Rahman, M. H., Paul, S. K., Chowdhury, P., & Rehman Khan, S. A. (2019). Barriers to green supply chain management: An emerging economy context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, 117617.CrossRef
go back to reference Vijayvargy, L., Thakkar, J., & Agarwal, G. (2017). Green supply chain management practices and performance: The role of firm-size for emerging economies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28, 299–323.CrossRef Vijayvargy, L., Thakkar, J., & Agarwal, G. (2017). Green supply chain management practices and performance: The role of firm-size for emerging economies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28, 299–323.CrossRef
go back to reference Wang, P., Liu, Q., & Qi, Y. (2014). Factors influencing sustainable consumption behaviors: A survey of the rural residents in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 152–165.CrossRef Wang, P., Liu, Q., & Qi, Y. (2014). Factors influencing sustainable consumption behaviors: A survey of the rural residents in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 152–165.CrossRef
go back to reference Wang, Z., Mathiyazhagan, K., Xu, L., & Diabat, A. (2015). A decision making trial and evaluation laboratory approach to analyze the barriers to Green Supply Chain Management adoption in a food packaging company. Journal of Cleaner Production, 117, 19–28.CrossRef Wang, Z., Mathiyazhagan, K., Xu, L., & Diabat, A. (2015). A decision making trial and evaluation laboratory approach to analyze the barriers to Green Supply Chain Management adoption in a food packaging company. Journal of Cleaner Production, 117, 19–28.CrossRef
go back to reference Wadhwa, S., & Rao, K. S. (2004). A unified framework for manufacturing and supply chain flexibility. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 5(1), 29–36. Wadhwa, S., & Rao, K. S. (2004). A unified framework for manufacturing and supply chain flexibility. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 5(1), 29–36.
go back to reference Yadav, G., Luthra, S., Jakhar, S.K., Mangla, S.K., Rai, D.P., (2020) A framework to overcome sustainable supply chain challenges through solution measures of industry 4.0 and circular economy: An automotive case. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 254. Yadav, G., Luthra, S., Jakhar, S.K., Mangla, S.K., Rai, D.P., (2020) A framework to overcome sustainable supply chain challenges through solution measures of industry 4.0 and circular economy: An automotive case. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 254.
go back to reference Yildiz Çankaya, S., & Sezen, B. (2019). Effects of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(1), 98–121.CrossRef Yildiz Çankaya, S., & Sezen, B. (2019). Effects of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(1), 98–121.CrossRef
go back to reference Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S., & Oates, C. J. (2010). Sustainable consumption: Green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustainable Development, 18(1), 20–31. Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S., & Oates, C. J. (2010). Sustainable consumption: Green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustainable Development, 18(1), 20–31.
go back to reference Younis, H., Sundarakani, B., & Vel, P. (2016). The impact of implementing green supply chain management practices on corporate performance. Competitiveness Review, 26(3), 216–245.CrossRef Younis, H., Sundarakani, B., & Vel, P. (2016). The impact of implementing green supply chain management practices on corporate performance. Competitiveness Review, 26(3), 216–245.CrossRef
go back to reference Yu, K., Cadeaux, J., & Luo, B. (2015). Operational flexibility: review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 169, 190–202.CrossRef Yu, K., Cadeaux, J., & Luo, B. (2015). Operational flexibility: review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 169, 190–202.CrossRef
go back to reference Yu, W., & Ramanathan, R. (2015). An empirical examination of stakeholder pressures, green operations practices and environmental performance. International Journal of Production Research, 53(21), 6390–6407.CrossRef Yu, W., & Ramanathan, R. (2015). An empirical examination of stakeholder pressures, green operations practices and environmental performance. International Journal of Production Research, 53(21), 6390–6407.CrossRef
go back to reference Zailani, S., Jeyaraman, K., Vengadasan, G., & Premkumar, R. (2012). Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) in Malaysia: A survey. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 330–340.CrossRef Zailani, S., Jeyaraman, K., Vengadasan, G., & Premkumar, R. (2012). Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) in Malaysia: A survey. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 330–340.CrossRef
go back to reference Zarei, M. H., Carrasco-Gallego, R., & Ronchi, S. (2019). To greener pastures: An action research study on the environmental sustainability of humanitarian supply chains. International Journal of Operations & Production Management., 39, 1193–1225.CrossRef Zarei, M. H., Carrasco-Gallego, R., & Ronchi, S. (2019). To greener pastures: An action research study on the environmental sustainability of humanitarian supply chains. International Journal of Operations & Production Management., 39, 1193–1225.CrossRef
go back to reference Zhang, D., Rong, Z., & Ji, Q. (2019). Green innovation and firm performance: Evidence from listed companies in China. Resource, Conservation and Recycling, 144, 48–55.CrossRef Zhang, D., Rong, Z., & Ji, Q. (2019). Green innovation and firm performance: Evidence from listed companies in China. Resource, Conservation and Recycling, 144, 48–55.CrossRef
go back to reference Zhang, G., & Zhao, Z. (2012). Green packaging management of logistics enterprises. Physics Procedia, 24, 900–905.CrossRef Zhang, G., & Zhao, Z. (2012). Green packaging management of logistics enterprises. Physics Procedia, 24, 900–905.CrossRef
go back to reference Zhu, G., Geng, Y., & Lai, K. (2010). Circular economy practices among Chinese manufacturers varying in environmental-oriented supply chain cooperation and the performance implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(6), 1324–1331.CrossRef Zhu, G., Geng, Y., & Lai, K. (2010). Circular economy practices among Chinese manufacturers varying in environmental-oriented supply chain cooperation and the performance implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(6), 1324–1331.CrossRef
go back to reference Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22(3), 265–289.CrossRef Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22(3), 265–289.CrossRef
go back to reference Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2006). An inter-sectoral comparison of green supply chain management in China: Drivers and practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(5), 472–486.CrossRef Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2006). An inter-sectoral comparison of green supply chain management in China: Drivers and practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(5), 472–486.CrossRef
go back to reference Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2016). Green marketing and consumerism as social change in China: Analyzing the literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 289–302.CrossRef Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2016). Green marketing and consumerism as social change in China: Analyzing the literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 289–302.CrossRef
go back to reference Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. (2007). Green supply chain management: Pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(11–12), 1041–1052.CrossRef Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. (2007). Green supply chain management: Pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(11–12), 1041–1052.CrossRef
go back to reference Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. (2008). Green supply chain management implications for closing the loop. Transportation Research Part E, 44, 1–18.CrossRef Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. (2008). Green supply chain management implications for closing the loop. Transportation Research Part E, 44, 1–18.CrossRef
go back to reference Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2013). Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(2), 106–117.CrossRef Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2013). Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(2), 106–117.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Flexible Green Supply Chain Management in Emerging Economies: A Systematic Literature Review
Authors
M. K. Dhillon
P. M. Rafi-Ul-Shan
H. Amar
F. Sher
S. Ahmed
Publication date
04-11-2022
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0972-2696
Electronic ISSN: 0974-0198
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-022-00321-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management 1/2023 Go to the issue

Premium Partner