Top

Society

Published in:

31-07-2023 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Fragmented Discourses: The Indian Digital Public Sphere in a Post-truth Era

Authors: Shabin Basheer, Chitra Karunakaran Prasanna, Fathimath Mahitha. K.

Published in: Society | Issue 6/2023

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The paper explores the fragmented discourses in the Indian digital public sphere in a post-truth world. The normative concept of the public sphere by Jürgen Habermas has been brought under critical scrutiny in the era of emotional communication online. The digital world opened democratic and inclusive spaces that are desirable for a picture-perfect public sphere as imagined by Habermas. The low entry barriers and inclusivity of the digital public sphere changed the patterns of political communication worldwide. However, such a change is not an isolated event and must be located within the historical context of a changing political environment. Contemporary society has entered the post-truth era where opinionated, emotional outbursts downplay objective reality. The paper explores explicitly the public comments recorded under an infotainment video on the YouTube platform of a private channel in Kerala, the southernmost state of India. A case study method was adopted to analyze the theme, subtext, and visible structure of the discourse in the digital public sphere, which is a subset of the larger public sphere. Disconcertingly, the findings revealed fragmented discourses in a public sphere, characterized by unidimensional historical narratives, fallacious arguments, political apathy, and emotional or romanticized appeals, all of which are classic symptoms of a post-truth era.

previous article Geographies of Public Deliberation: A Closer Look at the Ingredient of Space

next article Minority Language Public Sphere: The Irish Language in the Media and Beyond

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Adorno, T. W., & Frenkel-Brunswik, E. (1969). The Authoritarian Personality. Norton. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=HYq2wwEACAAJ

Ali, A. (2001). Evolution of the public sphere in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 2419–2425.

Anderson, P. (2013). The Indian Ideology. Verso Books. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=OD9gDwAAQBAJ

Arendt, H. (1967). Truth and politics. Truth: Engagements across Philosophical Traditions, 295.

BBC. (2022, October 13). Kerala’s TJ Joseph: The Indian teacher whose hand was cut off for an exam paper.

Bernholz, L., Cordelli, C., & Reich, R. (2013). The Emergence of Digital Civil Society. In Stanford Center on Philanthropy and Civil Society (Issue September).

Bilgin, P. (2017). Resisting post‐truth politics, a primer: Or, how not to think about human mobility and the global environment. Global Policy, 8, 55–59.CrossRef

Bohman, J. (2008). The transformation of the public sphere: Political authority, communicative freedom, and internet publics. In Information Technology and Moral Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498725.005CrossRef

Bruns, A., & Highfield, T. (2015). Is Habermas on twitter? Social media and the public sphere. In The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716299CrossRef

Butter, M., & Knight, P. (2020). Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=8DjSDwAAQBAJ

Calhoun, C., Gerteis, J., Moody, J., Pfaff, S., & Virk, I. (2022). Contemporary Sociological Theory. Wiley. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=A8Z6EAAAQBAJ

Castells, M. (2009). The Rise of the Network Society, with a New Preface: The Information Age - Economy, Society and Culture. In Information Age Ser.CrossRef

Couldry, N. (2008). Mediatization or mediation? Alternative understandings of the emergent space of digital storytelling. New Media and Society, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808089414

D’Ancona, M. (2017). Post Truth: The New War on Truth and how to Fight Back. Ebury Press. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=Z7ZWMQAACAAJ

Dahlberg, L. (2007). Rethinking the fragmentation of the cyberpublic: from consensus to contestation. New Media & Society, 9(5), 827–847.CrossRef

Dean, J. (2002). Publicity’s Secret: How Technoculture Capitalizes on Democracy. Cornell University Press. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=vPPAAYt4xlgC

Dey, S. (2020). Let There Be Clamor: Exploring the Emergence of a New Public Sphere in India and Use of Social Media as an Instrument of Activism. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 44(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859919827319

Diamond, J. M. (1998). Guns, Germs and Steel: A Short History of Everybody for the Last 13,000 Years. Vintage. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=OwVrSMQPPowC

Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261

Downey, J., & Fenton, N. (2003). New media, counter publicity and the public sphere. New Media and Society, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444803005002003

Guha, R. (2017). India After Gandhi: The History of the World’s Largest Democracy. Pan Macmillan. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=AW4sDwAAQBAJ

Habermas, J. (1991). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (First). MIT Press.

Habermas, J. (2022). Reflections and Hypotheses on a Further Structural Transformation of the Political Public Sphere. Theory, Culture and Society, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221112341

Habermas, J., Lennox, S., & Lennox, F. (1974). The public sphere: An encyclopedia article (1964). New German Critique, 3, 49–55.CrossRef

Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. Penguin Books Limited. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=y9-GG5gPzgwC

Haksar, N., & Vaishnav, K. (2022). The BJP’s use of online Authoritarian populism to advance an Ethnoreligious Nationalist agenda in the 2019 General Election poses a threat to Indian Democracy. Al-Qantara, 8(3).

Harambam, J., Grusauskaite, K., & de Wildt, L. (2022). Poly-truth, or the limits of pluralism: Popular debates on conspiracy theories in a post-truth era. Public Understanding of Science, 31(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221092145

Harsin, J. (2017). Trump l’Œil: Is Trump’s Post-Truth Communication Translatable? Contemporary French and Francophone Studies, 21(5), 512–522.CrossRef

Heble, A. (2002). Re-ethicizing the classroom: Pedagogy, the public sphere, and the postcolonial condition. College Literature, 29(1).

Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (2011). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=18IWX4hxHNUC

Lawless, B., & Chen, Y.-W. (2019). Developing a method of critical thematic analysis for qualitative communication inquiry. Howard Journal of Communications, 30(1), 92–106.CrossRef

Lockie, S. (2017). Post-truth politics and the social sciences. Environmental Sociology, 3(1), 1–5.CrossRef

Malcolm, D. (2021). Post-Truth Society? An Eliasian Sociological Analysis of Knowledge in the 21st Century. Sociology, 55(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038521994039

Mills, C. W. (1959). The Sociological Imagination. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=sdbtAAAAMAAJ

Negt, O., Kluge, A., & Labanyi, P. (1988). “ The Public Sphere and Experience”: Selections. October, 46, 60–82.

Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=mX_woAEACAAJ

Rajagopal, A. (2001). Politics After Television: Hindu Nationalism and the Reshaping of the Public in India. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=PbgW2jTESKEC

Rao, M. (2011). Love Jihad and demographic fears. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 18(3), 425–430.CrossRef

Ringel, S., & Davidson, R. (2022). Proactive ephemerality: How journalists use automated and manual tweet deletion to minimize risk and its consequences for social media as a public archive. New Media and Society, 24(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820972389

Schudson, M. (1999). The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. Harvard University Press. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=aawMAQAAMAAJ

Seeliger, M., & Villa Braslavsky, P. I. (2022). Reflections on the Contemporary Public Sphere: An Interview with Judith Butler. Theory, Culture and Society, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764211066260

Sircar, N. (2020). The politics of vishwas: Political mobilization in the 2019 national election. Contemporary South Asia, 28(2), 178–194.CrossRef

Stake, R. E. (1978). The case study method in social inquiry. Educational Researcher, 7(2), 5–8.CrossRef

Sudarmanto, B., & Meliala, A. (2020). Harmful Discourse on Social Media: The Triggering Factors of Persecution Acts in Post-Truth Era. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 14(1).

Tandoc Jr, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “fake news” A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153.CrossRef

Thakur, A. K. (2020). New media and the Dalit counter-public sphere. Television & New Media, 21(4), 360–375.CrossRef

Turner, J. (2013). Contemporary Sociological Theory. Sage.

Vaidhyanathan, S. (2018). Antisocial Media: How Facebook Disconnects Us and Undermines Democracy. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=GGZaDwAAQBAJ

Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405.CrossRef

Warner, M. (2014). Public/Private. In Critical Terms for the Study of the gender (358–392). University of Chicago Press

Zimmer, M. (2010). “But the data is already public”: on the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 12, 313–325.CrossRef

Title: Fragmented Discourses: The Indian Digital Public Sphere in a Post-truth Era
Authors: Shabin Basheer
Chitra Karunakaran Prasanna
Fathimath Mahitha. K.
Publication date: 31-07-2023
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Society / Issue 6/2023
Print ISSN: 0147-2011
Electronic ISSN: 1936-4725
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-023-00877-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 6/2023

Du Bois Watches Standup: Double Consciousness Revisited

Luke Russell, Evil: A Very Short Introduction

Serhii Plokhy, The Russo-Ukrainian War: The Return of History

“This Is Not a Riot”: Activists’ Responses to Accusations of Violence in the Ferguson Unrest

Minority Language Public Sphere: The Irish Language in the Media and Beyond

Geographies of Public Deliberation: A Closer Look at the Ingredient of Space