Skip to main content
Top

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

“Führer befiehl, wir folgen dir!” Charismatic Leaders in Extremist Groups

Authors : Michael Baurmann, Gregor Betz, Rainer Cramm

Published in: Morality, Governance, and Social Institutions

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

If we want to understand how extremist group ideologies are established, we have to comprehend the social processes which form the basis of the emergence and distribution of such beliefs. In our chapter, we present an innovative approach to examining these processes and explaining how they function: with the method of computer-based simulation of opinion formation, we develop heuristic explanatory models which help to generate new and interesting hypotheses. The focus is thereby not on individuals and their idiosyncrasies but on the dynamic mutual adaptation of beliefs in a group. These dynamics can produce an incremental establishment of “charismatic” opinion leaders and an increasing radicalization and alienation. A prototype of such a simulation model has produced promising first results which are presented and discussed.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Russell Hardin does not like the term “trust” in this context because he wants to reserve the use of this term for relations with “strong” ties (Hardin 2009, 26). Insofar we use a thin concept of trust which also includes relations which are impersonal but share important aspects with personal trust relations such as dependence or risk-taking. However, this is a terminological, not a substantial point of departure (cf. Baurmann 2010b).
 
2
The explanatory significance of such modeling is discussed in a special issue of Erkenntnis (vol. 70, no. 1, January 2009) “Economic Models as Credible Worlds or as Isolating Tools?” with contributions among others by Nancy Cartwright, Till Grüne-Yanoff, Tarja Knuuttila and Robert Sugden.
 
3
For an application of this model to a “veritistic” issue cf. Betz et al. (2013).
 
4
In this prototype, we do not differentiate between the attribution of competence and veracity but subsume both under “competence”.
 
5
But in contrast to the Lehrer-Wagner model, the competence degrees are not used in our model as weights for averaging but only to select trustworthy persons.
 
6
Deffuant et al. (2002) and Deffuant (2006) refine the bounded-confidence model to study the dynamics of polarization and radicalization processes but they do not consider second-order opinions. The same applies to a recent publication by Hegselmann and Krause (2015) in which they explicitly deal with the dissemination of extremist beliefs but without including the formation of epistemic trust relations.
 
7
Technically the charismatic leader P5 is not removed from the simulation but becomes part of the mainstream.
 
Literature
go back to reference Baurmann, M. 2007. Rational Fundamentalism? An Explanatory Model of Fundamentalist Beliefs. Episteme: Journal of Social Epistemology 4: 150–166.CrossRef Baurmann, M. 2007. Rational Fundamentalism? An Explanatory Model of Fundamentalist Beliefs. Episteme: Journal of Social Epistemology 4: 150–166.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2010a. Fundamentalism and Epistemic Authority. In Democracy and Fundamentalism, The Tampere Club Series, ed. A. Aarnio, vol. 3, 71–86. Tampere: Tampere University Press. ———. 2010a. Fundamentalism and Epistemic Authority. In Democracy and Fundamentalism, The Tampere Club Series, ed. A. Aarnio, vol. 3, 71–86. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
go back to reference ———. 2010b. Kollektives Wissen und epistemisches Vertrauen. Der Ansatz der Sozialen Erkenntnistheorie. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. 50 (Sonderheft): 185–201. ———. 2010b. Kollektives Wissen und epistemisches Vertrauen. Der Ansatz der Sozialen Erkenntnistheorie. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. 50 (Sonderheft): 185–201.
go back to reference Baurmann, M., G. Betz, and R. Cramm. 2014. Meinungsdynamiken in fundamentalistischen Gruppen. Erklärungshypothesen auf der Basis von Simulationsmodellen. Analyse & Kritik 36: 61–102. Baurmann, M., G. Betz, and R. Cramm. 2014. Meinungsdynamiken in fundamentalistischen Gruppen. Erklärungshypothesen auf der Basis von Simulationsmodellen. Analyse & Kritik 36: 61–102.
go back to reference Betz, G. 2006. Prediction or Prophecy? The Boundaries of Economic Foreknowledge and Their Socio-Political Consequences. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitats-Verlag. Betz, G. 2006. Prediction or Prophecy? The Boundaries of Economic Foreknowledge and Their Socio-Political Consequences. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitats-Verlag.
go back to reference ———. 2010. Theorie dialektischer Strukturen. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann Verlag. ———. 2010. Theorie dialektischer Strukturen. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann Verlag.
go back to reference Betz, G., M. Baurmann, and R. Cramm. 2013. Is Epistemic Trust of Veritistic Value? Etica & Politica – Ethics & Politics XV: 25–41. Betz, G., M. Baurmann, and R. Cramm. 2013. Is Epistemic Trust of Veritistic Value? Etica & Politica – Ethics & Politics XV: 25–41.
go back to reference Deffuant, G. 2006. Comparing Extremism Propagation Patterns in Continuous Opinion Models. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 9 (3). Deffuant, G. 2006. Comparing Extremism Propagation Patterns in Continuous Opinion Models. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 9 (3).
go back to reference Deffuant G., F. Amblard, G. Weisbuch, and T. Faure. 2002. How Can Extremism Prevail? A Study Based on the Relative Agreement Interaction Model. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5 (4). Deffuant G., F. Amblard, G. Weisbuch, and T. Faure. 2002. How Can Extremism Prevail? A Study Based on the Relative Agreement Interaction Model. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5 (4).
go back to reference Hardin, R. 1992. The Street-Level Epistemology of Trust. Analyse & Kritik 14: 152–176.CrossRef Hardin, R. 1992. The Street-Level Epistemology of Trust. Analyse & Kritik 14: 152–176.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2002. The Crippled Epistemology of Extremism. In Political Extremism and Rationality, ed. A. Breton et al., 3–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef ———. 2002. The Crippled Epistemology of Extremism. In Political Extremism and Rationality, ed. A. Breton et al., 3–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2009. How Do You Know?: The Economics of Ordinary Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef ———. 2009. How Do You Know?: The Economics of Ordinary Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Hedström, P., and R. Swedberg, eds. 1998. Social Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hedström, P., and R. Swedberg, eds. 1998. Social Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Hedström, P., and P. Ylikoski. 2010. Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences. The Annual Review of Sociology 36: 49–67.CrossRef Hedström, P., and P. Ylikoski. 2010. Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences. The Annual Review of Sociology 36: 49–67.CrossRef
go back to reference Hegselmann, R. 2004. Opinion Dynamics – Insights by Radically Simplifying Models. In Laws and Models in Science, ed. D. Gillies, 19–46. London: King’s College Publications. Hegselmann, R. 2004. Opinion Dynamics – Insights by Radically Simplifying Models. In Laws and Models in Science, ed. D. Gillies, 19–46. London: King’s College Publications.
go back to reference Hegselmann, R., and A. Flache. 1998. Understanding Complex Social Dynamics: A Plea for Cellular Automata Based Modelling. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 1 (3). Hegselmann, R., and A. Flache. 1998. Understanding Complex Social Dynamics: A Plea for Cellular Automata Based Modelling. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 1 (3).
go back to reference Hegselmann, R., and U. Krause. 2002. Opinion Dynamics and Bounded Confidence: Models, Analysis and Simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5(3). Hegselmann, R., and U. Krause. 2002. Opinion Dynamics and Bounded Confidence: Models, Analysis and Simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5(3).
go back to reference ———. 2006. Truth and Cognitive Division of Labour First Steps Towards a Computer Aided Social Epistemology. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 3 (9). ———. 2006. Truth and Cognitive Division of Labour First Steps Towards a Computer Aided Social Epistemology. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 3 (9).
go back to reference ———. 2015. Opinion Dynamics Under the Influence of Radical Groups, Charismatic Leaders, and Other Constant Signals: A Simple Unifying Model. Networks and Heterogenous Media 10: 477–509.CrossRef ———. 2015. Opinion Dynamics Under the Influence of Radical Groups, Charismatic Leaders, and Other Constant Signals: A Simple Unifying Model. Networks and Heterogenous Media 10: 477–509.CrossRef
go back to reference Lehrer, K., and C. Wagner. 1981. Rational Consensus in Science and Society: A Philosophical and Mathematical Study. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRef Lehrer, K., and C. Wagner. 1981. Rational Consensus in Science and Society: A Philosophical and Mathematical Study. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
“Führer befiehl, wir folgen dir!” Charismatic Leaders in Extremist Groups
Authors
Michael Baurmann
Gregor Betz
Rainer Cramm
Copyright Year
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61070-2_10