Skip to main content
Top

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

6. Funktionen und Positionen in Familienunternehmen

Authors : Birgit Felden, Andreas Hack, Christina Hoon

Published in: Management von Familienunternehmen

Publisher: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Kapitel werden Sie zunächst erfahren, wie Entscheidungsprozesse in Familienunternehmen vollzogen werden. Die Möglichkeiten, in Unternehmen zu entscheiden, werden juristisch über die Inhaberschaft konstituiert. Anders formuliert: Nur derjenige, dem Anteile des Unternehmens gehören, kann die damit verbundenen Rechte wahrnehmen; er oder sie hat jedoch auch die damit einhergehenden Verpflichtungen zu erfüllen.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Vgl. nachfolgend Habig und Bernighaus (2004).
 
2
Mitglieder mit Sitz in Deutschland sind beispielsweise die Friedrich Schwarze GmbH & Co. KG (gegr. 1664) oder die Möllergroup GmbH & Co.KG (gegr. 1730).
 
3
Neben dem Liquiditätsabfluss ist die Bewertung des Unternehmens in Scheidungsfällen vielfach der größte Zankapfel, denn es gibt keine gesetzlich vorgeschriebene Bewertungsmethodik für solche Fälle. Vgl. hierzu Felden (1996).
 
4
Wobei es die Wahrscheinlichkeit einer familieninternen Nachfolge im Management erhöht, wenn das erstgeborene Kind männlich ist (vgl. Bennedson et al. 2007).
 
5
In einem Drittel aller Familienunternehmen arbeiten beide Ehepartner gemeinsam mit (Fitzgerald und Muske 2002).
 
Literature
go back to reference Acker, L., & Athnassakos, A. (2003). A simultaneous equation analysis of analyst’ forecast bias and institutional ownership. Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 30(7–8), 1017–1041.CrossRef Acker, L., & Athnassakos, A. (2003). A simultaneous equation analysis of analyst’ forecast bias and institutional ownership. Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 30(7–8), 1017–1041.CrossRef
go back to reference Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1327.CrossRef Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1327.CrossRef
go back to reference Barnett, F., & Barnett, S. (1988). Working together: Entrepreneurial couples. Berkeley: Ten Speed Press. Barnett, F., & Barnett, S. (1988). Working together: Entrepreneurial couples. Berkeley: Ten Speed Press.
go back to reference Belenzon, S., & Zarutskie, R. (2011). Family ownership and performance in new firms. Working Paper: Fuga School of Business, Duke University. Belenzon, S., & Zarutskie, R. (2011). Family ownership and performance in new firms. Working Paper: Fuga School of Business, Duke University.
go back to reference Bennedsen, M., Meisner Nielsen, K., Pérez-González, F., & Wolfenzon, D. (2007). Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2), 647–691.CrossRef Bennedsen, M., Meisner Nielsen, K., Pérez-González, F., & Wolfenzon, D. (2007). Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2), 647–691.CrossRef
go back to reference Bird, M., & Zellweger, T. (2018). Relational embeddedness and firm growth: Comparing spousal and sibling entrepreneurs. Organization Science, 29(2), 264–283.CrossRef Bird, M., & Zellweger, T. (2018). Relational embeddedness and firm growth: Comparing spousal and sibling entrepreneurs. Organization Science, 29(2), 264–283.CrossRef
go back to reference Böllhoff, C. (Hrsg.). (2006). Spitzenleistungen in Familienunternehmen: Ein Managementhandbuch. Stuttgart: Schäffer- Poeschel. Böllhoff, C. (Hrsg.). (2006). Spitzenleistungen in Familienunternehmen: Ein Managementhandbuch. Stuttgart: Schäffer- Poeschel.
go back to reference Bövers, J., & Hoon, C. (2018). Having Two at the Corporate Apex: Sharing Leadership at the Top of Family Firms. Working Paper. Universität Bielefeld. Bövers, J., & Hoon, C. (2018). Having Two at the Corporate Apex: Sharing Leadership at the Top of Family Firms. Working Paper. Universität Bielefeld.
go back to reference Brenes, E. R., Madrigal, K., & Requenta, B. (2011). Corporate governance and family business performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(3), 280–285.CrossRef Brenes, E. R., Madrigal, K., & Requenta, B. (2011). Corporate governance and family business performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(3), 280–285.CrossRef
go back to reference Bundesverband Deutscher Stiftungen. (2018). Faktenblatt zu Stiftungen in Deutschland. Bundesverband Deutscher Stiftungen. (2018). Faktenblatt zu Stiftungen in Deutschland.
go back to reference Casasola, M. J, & Tribó, J. A. (2004). Banks as blockholders. Working Paper 04–01 (01): Universidad Carlos III. Casasola, M. J, & Tribó, J. A. (2004). Banks as blockholders. Working Paper 04–01 (01): Universidad Carlos III.
go back to reference Chaganti, R., & Damanpour, F. (1991). Institutional ownership, capital structure and firm performance. Strategic Management Review, 12(7), 479–492.CrossRef Chaganti, R., & Damanpour, F. (1991). Institutional ownership, capital structure and firm performance. Strategic Management Review, 12(7), 479–492.CrossRef
go back to reference Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Litz, R. A. (2004). Comparing the agency cost of family and non-family firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 28(4):335–354.CrossRef Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Litz, R. A. (2004). Comparing the agency cost of family and non-family firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 28(4):335–354.CrossRef
go back to reference Cruz, C. C., Gómez-Mejia, L. R., & Becerra, M. (2010). Perceptions of benevolence and the design of agency contracts: CEO-TMT relationships in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 69–89.CrossRef Cruz, C. C., Gómez-Mejia, L. R., & Becerra, M. (2010). Perceptions of benevolence and the design of agency contracts: CEO-TMT relationships in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 69–89.CrossRef
go back to reference Davis, J. H., Allen, M. R., & Hayes, H. D. (2010). Is blood thicker than water? A study of stewardship perceptions in family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(6), 1093–1116.CrossRef Davis, J. H., Allen, M. R., & Hayes, H. D. (2010). Is blood thicker than water? A study of stewardship perceptions in family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(6), 1093–1116.CrossRef
go back to reference Dyer, W. G., Dyer, W. J., & Gardner, R. G. (2013). Should my spouse be my partner? Preliminary evidence from the panel study of income dynamics. Family Business Review, 26(1), 68–80.CrossRef Dyer, W. G., Dyer, W. J., & Gardner, R. G. (2013). Should my spouse be my partner? Preliminary evidence from the panel study of income dynamics. Family Business Review, 26(1), 68–80.CrossRef
go back to reference Eddleston, K., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 545–565.CrossRef Eddleston, K., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 545–565.CrossRef
go back to reference Eddleston, K., Kellermanns, F. W., & Sarathy, R. (2008). Resource configuration in family firms: Linking resources, strategic planning and technological opportunities to performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 26–50. Eddleston, K., Kellermanns, F. W., & Sarathy, R. (2008). Resource configuration in family firms: Linking resources, strategic planning and technological opportunities to performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 26–50.
go back to reference Faghfouri, P., Kraiczy, N. D., Hack, A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2015). Ready for a crisis? How supervisory boards affect crisis readiness of German small and medium-sized family firms. Review of Managerial Science, 9, 317–338.CrossRef Faghfouri, P., Kraiczy, N. D., Hack, A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2015). Ready for a crisis? How supervisory boards affect crisis readiness of German small and medium-sized family firms. Review of Managerial Science, 9, 317–338.CrossRef
go back to reference Felden, B., & Adams, P. (2006). Geregelte Nachfolge im Ratingprozess. In A.-K. Achleitner, O. Everling, & S. Klemm (Hrsg.), Nachfolgerating (S. 247–264). Wiesbaden: Gabler.CrossRef Felden, B., & Adams, P. (2006). Geregelte Nachfolge im Ratingprozess. In A.-K. Achleitner, O. Everling, & S. Klemm (Hrsg.), Nachfolgerating (S. 247–264). Wiesbaden: Gabler.CrossRef
go back to reference Felden, B., & Klaus, A. (2007). Nachfolgeregelung. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel. Felden, B., & Klaus, A. (2007). Nachfolgeregelung. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.
go back to reference Fitzgerald, M. A., & Muske, G. (2002). Copreneurs: An exploration and comparison to other family businesses. Family Business Review, 15(1), 1–16.CrossRef Fitzgerald, M. A., & Muske, G. (2002). Copreneurs: An exploration and comparison to other family businesses. Family Business Review, 15(1), 1–16.CrossRef
go back to reference Fleschutz, K. (2009). Die Stiftung als Nachfolgeinstrument für Familienunternehmen. Wiesbaden: Gabler. Fleschutz, K. (2009). Die Stiftung als Nachfolgeinstrument für Familienunternehmen. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
go back to reference Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4,409–421.CrossRef Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4,409–421.CrossRef
go back to reference Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 32–33,122–124. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 32–33,122–124.
go back to reference Gersick, K., Davis, J., McCollom Hampton, M., & Lansberg, I. (1997). Generation to generation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Gersick, K., Davis, J., McCollom Hampton, M., & Lansberg, I. (1997). Generation to generation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
go back to reference Gimeno, A., Baulenas, G., & Coma-Cros, J. (2010). Familienunternehmen führen- Komplexität managen. Göttingen: Vanderhoeck & Ruprecht. Gimeno, A., Baulenas, G., & Coma-Cros, J. (2010). Familienunternehmen führen- Komplexität managen. Göttingen: Vanderhoeck & Ruprecht.
go back to reference Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & Castro, J. de. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1):653–707.CrossRef Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & Castro, J. de. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1):653–707.CrossRef
go back to reference Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Nuñez-Nickel, M., & Gutierrez, I. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44,81–95. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Nuñez-Nickel, M., & Gutierrez, I. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44,81–95.
go back to reference Habig, H. (2004). Die Auswahl der optimalen Gesellschaftsform. In C. G. Böllhoff, M. W. Böllhoff, W. A. Böllhoff, & M. Ebert (Hrsg.), Management von industriellen Familienunternehmen. Von der Gründung bis zum Generationsübergang (S. 21–30), Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel. Habig, H. (2004). Die Auswahl der optimalen Gesellschaftsform. In C. G. Böllhoff, M. W. Böllhoff, W. A. Böllhoff, & M. Ebert (Hrsg.), Management von industriellen Familienunternehmen. Von der Gründung bis zum Generationsübergang (S. 21–30), Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.
go back to reference Hambrick, D., & Mason, P. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top management. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.CrossRef Hambrick, D., & Mason, P. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top management. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.CrossRef
go back to reference Hauswald, H., Hack, A., Kellermanns, F.W., & Patzelt, H. (2016). Attracting new talent to family firms. Who is attracted and under what conditions? Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 40, 963–989.CrossRef Hauswald, H., Hack, A., Kellermanns, F.W., & Patzelt, H. (2016). Attracting new talent to family firms. Who is attracted and under what conditions? Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 40, 963–989.CrossRef
go back to reference Haynes, G. W., Walker, R., Rowe, B. R., & Hong, G. (1999). The intermingling of business and family finances in family owned businesses. Family Business Review, 12(3), 225–239.CrossRef Haynes, G. W., Walker, R., Rowe, B. R., & Hong, G. (1999). The intermingling of business and family finances in family owned businesses. Family Business Review, 12(3), 225–239.CrossRef
go back to reference Heuvel, J. van den, Gils, A. van, & Voordechers, W. (2006). Board roles in small and medium-sized family businesses: Performance and importance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(5):467–485.CrossRef Heuvel, J. van den, Gils, A. van, & Voordechers, W. (2006). Board roles in small and medium-sized family businesses: Performance and importance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(5):467–485.CrossRef
go back to reference Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A., & Sharfstein, D. (1990). The role of banks in reducing the costs of financial distress in Japan. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(1), 67–88.CrossRef Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A., & Sharfstein, D. (1990). The role of banks in reducing the costs of financial distress in Japan. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(1), 67–88.CrossRef
go back to reference Jara-Bertín, M., López-Iturriaga, F., & López de Foronda, O. (2008). The contest to the control in European family firms: How other shareholders affect firm value. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(3), 146–159.CrossRef Jara-Bertín, M., López-Iturriaga, F., & López de Foronda, O. (2008). The contest to the control in European family firms: How other shareholders affect firm value. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(3), 146–159.CrossRef
go back to reference Kirchdörfer, R. (2012). Rechtliche Grundlagen und Einsatzmöglichkeiten von Stiftungen. Familienunternehmen und Stiftungen, 2, 62–73. Kirchdörfer, R. (2012). Rechtliche Grundlagen und Einsatzmöglichkeiten von Stiftungen. Familienunternehmen und Stiftungen, 2, 62–73.
go back to reference Klein, S. (2010). Familienunternehmen: Theoretische und empirische Grundlagen. Lohmar: Josef Eul. Klein, S. (2010). Familienunternehmen: Theoretische und empirische Grundlagen. Lohmar: Josef Eul.
go back to reference Koch, B. (1995). Mitglieder der Familie Haniel dürfen bei Haniel nicht arbeiten, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 2.3.1995, 26. Koch, B. (1995). Mitglieder der Familie Haniel dürfen bei Haniel nicht arbeiten, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 2.3.1995, 26.
go back to reference Marshack, K. J. (1998). Entrepreneurial couples: Making it work at work and at home. Paolo Alto: Davies-Black. Marshack, K. J. (1998). Entrepreneurial couples: Making it work at work and at home. Paolo Alto: Davies-Black.
go back to reference Maury, B., & Pajuste, A. (2005). Multiple large shareholders and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1813–1834.CrossRef Maury, B., & Pajuste, A. (2005). Multiple large shareholders and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1813–1834.CrossRef
go back to reference Miller, D., & Breton-Miller, I. Le. (2005). Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Miller, D., & Breton-Miller, I. Le. (2005). Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
go back to reference Morck, R., Strangeland, D., & Yeung, B. (2000). Inherited wealth, corporate control, and economic growth: The Canadian disease? In: R. Morck (Hrsg.), Concentrated corporate ownership (NBER conference volume, 319–372). Chicago: University of Chicago press. Morck, R., Strangeland, D., & Yeung, B. (2000). Inherited wealth, corporate control, and economic growth: The Canadian disease? In: R. Morck (Hrsg.), Concentrated corporate ownership (NBER conference volume, 319–372). Chicago: University of Chicago press.
go back to reference Muske, G., & Fitzgerald, M. A. (2006). A panel study of copreneurs in business: Who enters, continues, and exits? Family Business Review, 19(3):193–205.CrossRef Muske, G., & Fitzgerald, M. A. (2006). A panel study of copreneurs in business: Who enters, continues, and exits? Family Business Review, 19(3):193–205.CrossRef
go back to reference Nickel, S., Nicolistsas, D., & Dryden, N. (1997). What makes firms perform well? European Economic Review, 41(3):783–796.CrossRef Nickel, S., Nicolistsas, D., & Dryden, N. (1997). What makes firms perform well? European Economic Review, 41(3):783–796.CrossRef
go back to reference Nordstrom, O., & Jennings, J. E. (2018). Looking in the other direction: An ethonograhic analysis of how family businesses can be operated to enhance familial well-being. Enterpreneurship Theory & Practice, 42(2), 317–339.CrossRef Nordstrom, O., & Jennings, J. E. (2018). Looking in the other direction: An ethonograhic analysis of how family businesses can be operated to enhance familial well-being. Enterpreneurship Theory & Practice, 42(2), 317–339.CrossRef
go back to reference Pijanowski, T., Hack, A., Kraiczy, N. D., & Schlippe, A. von. (2014). Bank loan officers’ perceptions of family firms. How similarity attraction influences loan availability decisions. Working Paper, Universität Bern. Pijanowski, T., Hack, A., Kraiczy, N. D., & Schlippe, A. von. (2014). Bank loan officers’ perceptions of family firms. How similarity attraction influences loan availability decisions. Working Paper, Universität Bern.
go back to reference Randoy, T., & Goel, S. (2003). Ownership structure, founder leadership and performance in Norwegian SMEs: Implications for financing entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 619–637.CrossRef Randoy, T., & Goel, S. (2003). Ownership structure, founder leadership and performance in Norwegian SMEs: Implications for financing entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 619–637.CrossRef
go back to reference Salvato, C., Minichilli, A., & Raffaella P. (2012). Faster route to the CEO suite nepotism or managerial proficiency? Family Business Review, 25(2), 206–224.CrossRef Salvato, C., Minichilli, A., & Raffaella P. (2012). Faster route to the CEO suite nepotism or managerial proficiency? Family Business Review, 25(2), 206–224.CrossRef
go back to reference Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 473–490.CrossRef Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 473–490.CrossRef
go back to reference Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholz, A. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99–116.CrossRef Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholz, A. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99–116.CrossRef
go back to reference Stewart, A., & Hitt, M. A. (2012). Why can’t a family business be more like a nonfamily business? Modes of professionalization in family firms. Family Business Review, 25(1), 58–86.CrossRef Stewart, A., & Hitt, M. A. (2012). Why can’t a family business be more like a nonfamily business? Modes of professionalization in family firms. Family Business Review, 25(1), 58–86.CrossRef
go back to reference Stiftung Familienunternehmen (2017). Die volkswirtschaftliche Bedeutung der Familienunternehmen. München: Stiftung Familienunternehmen. Stiftung Familienunternehmen (2017). Die volkswirtschaftliche Bedeutung der Familienunternehmen. München: Stiftung Familienunternehmen.
go back to reference Thomsen, S., & Pedersen, T. (2000). Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European countries. Strategic Management Journal, 21(6), 689–705.CrossRef Thomsen, S., & Pedersen, T. (2000). Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European countries. Strategic Management Journal, 21(6), 689–705.CrossRef
go back to reference Tribó, J. A., & Casasola, M. J. (2010). Banks as firm’s blockholders: A study in Spain. Applied Financial Economics, 20(5), 425–438.CrossRef Tribó, J. A., & Casasola, M. J. (2010). Banks as firm’s blockholders: A study in Spain. Applied Financial Economics, 20(5), 425–438.CrossRef
go back to reference Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics 80(2):385–417.CrossRef Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics 80(2):385–417.CrossRef
go back to reference Woods, J. A., Dalziel, T., & Barton, S. L. (2012). Escalation of commitment in private family businesses: The influence of outside board members. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3(1), 18–27.CrossRef Woods, J. A., Dalziel, T., & Barton, S. L. (2012). Escalation of commitment in private family businesses: The influence of outside board members. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3(1), 18–27.CrossRef
go back to reference Zellweger, T., Richards, M., Sieger, P., & Patel, P. C. (2016). How much am I expected to pay for my parents’ firm? An institutional logics perspective on family discounts. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 40(5), 1041–1069.CrossRef Zellweger, T., Richards, M., Sieger, P., & Patel, P. C. (2016). How much am I expected to pay for my parents’ firm? An institutional logics perspective on family discounts. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 40(5), 1041–1069.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Funktionen und Positionen in Familienunternehmen
Authors
Birgit Felden
Andreas Hack
Christina Hoon
Copyright Year
2019
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24058-5_6