Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Business Ethics 3/2018

26-11-2015

Gender Biases in Bank Lending: Lessons from Microcredit in France

Authors: Anastasia Cozarenco, Ariane Szafarz

Published in: Journal of Business Ethics | Issue 3/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The evidence on gender discrimination in lending remains controversial. To capture gender biases in banks’ loan allocations, we observe the impact on the applicants of a microfinance institution (MFI) and exploit the natural experiment of a regulatory change imposing a strict EUR 10,000 loan ceiling on microcredit. Descriptive statistics indicate that the presence of the ceiling is associated both with bank-MFI co-financing and with harsher treatment of female borrowers. To investigate causal links, we develop an econometric approach that addresses the concerns of selection biases, multicollinearity, and endogeneity. Our empirical findings suggest that the change in the MFI’s gender-related attitude was triggered by banks through co-financing. Hence, we speculate that co-financing pushes ceiling-constrained MFIs to import whatever biases in loan granting that the banks are prone to. Overall, this paper stresses that apparently benign regulations such as loan ceilings can significantly harm the women’s empowerment efforts made by MFIs.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Riding and Swift (1990), Coleman (2000) and Bellucci et al. (2010) find that collateral requirements are gender-related in Canada, the UK, and Italy, respectively. Alesina et al. (2013) and Agier and Szafarz (2013a) show that female micro-entrepreneurs receive smaller loans than male ones in Italy and Brazil, respectively. More generally, Bagus et al. (2015) discuss the ethicality of banks’ actions.
 
2
According to Field et al. (2014, p. 10) “much of today’s microcredit arrangements bear little resemblance to loans offered by organizations such as the United States Small Business Administration (SBA), which are also designed, ostensibly, to support the kind of entrepreneurial risk-taking necessary for success.”
 
3
This ceiling is significantly lower than the EUR 25,000 threshold recommended by the European Commission.
 
4
Most of them are unemployed people aiming at self-employment.
 
5
MFIs and banks have different statuses. MFIs are subsidized institutions maximizing social performance within a budget constraint, while banks are driven by profit maximization (Aubert et al. 2009). However, Armendariz and Szafarz (2011) provide evidence that the social mission varies across MFIs.
 
6
In the United States, the loan ceiling for microcredit is USD 50,000. The European Union (EU) recommends the use of a EUR 25,000 ceiling, but member states remain free to set their own rules. Some countries (Romania, Italy) have adopted the EU recommendation, while others, like Hungary, Portugal, Slovakia, and the UK, allow MFIs to grant loans exceeding EUR 25,000. France is the only EU member to impose a ceiling below the EU recommendation.
 
7
In our dataset, 71 % of the applicants with a secured bank loan ended up with a co-financing arrangement. Moreover, in 3 years out of four (2009, 2010, and 2011, but not 2012) the interest rates charged by the banks are significantly higher than the rate charged by the MFI.
 
8
As pointed out by Vanroose and D’Espallier (2013), microfinance reaches more clients in countries with low financial inclusion, which is not the case of developed countries in general, and France in particular.
 
10
In 2010, the MFI opened two new branches and its staff passed from six to ten employees.
 
11
The granted loan size was smaller than the requested one in just 7.6 % of our sample. In contrast, most MFIs determine loan sizes in house (Agier and Szafarz, 2013b).
 
12
This threshold was hardly binding.
 
13
The sample size is smaller for the first period, which may result in larger standard deviations and less rejections of H0.
 
14
However, as pointed out by Johnson (2014), characteristics that are highly correlated with gender can hide an underlying reality involving gender discrimination.
 
15
Due to the specific nature of our sample, introducing the interaction term in Eq. (4) would make little sense. During the ceiling-free period, only six applicants came to the MFI with a bank loan and none of them ended up with a loan from the institution.
 
16
This argument involving credit risk is speculative since we do not observe the outcomes of the loans. This being said, the literature amply documents that women are more creditworthy than men, all else equal (D’Espallier et al. 2011).
 
17
This approach is consistent with the 2PLS estimation sequence that starts with project size. Another option would be to select only the applications involving no bank loan. In addition to making a break with our estimation strategy, this option would likely introduce a massive selection bias.
 
18
However, the authors detect a gender gap for loans exceeding EUR 25,000.
 
19
Conversely, reforms aiming at gender equality can also backfire (Bøhren and Staubo 2014).
 
20
In contrast, experimental data addresses the problem of unobservable characteristics (Beaman et al. 2009).
 
21
This approach is used by Bertrand and Mullainathan (2004) on the labor market.
 
Literature
go back to reference Agier, I., & Szafarz, A. (2013a). Microfinance and gender: Is there a glass ceiling on loan size? World Development, 42, 165–181.CrossRef Agier, I., & Szafarz, A. (2013a). Microfinance and gender: Is there a glass ceiling on loan size? World Development, 42, 165–181.CrossRef
go back to reference Agier, I., & Szafarz, A. (2013b). Subjectivity in credit allocation to micro-entrepreneurs: Evidence from Brazil. Small Business Economics, 41, 263–275.CrossRef Agier, I., & Szafarz, A. (2013b). Subjectivity in credit allocation to micro-entrepreneurs: Evidence from Brazil. Small Business Economics, 41, 263–275.CrossRef
go back to reference Alesina, A. F., Lotti, F., & Mistrulli, P. E. (2013). Do women pay more for credit? Evidence from Italy. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11, 45–66.CrossRef Alesina, A. F., Lotti, F., & Mistrulli, P. E. (2013). Do women pay more for credit? Evidence from Italy. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11, 45–66.CrossRef
go back to reference Ananth, B. (2005). Financing microfinance: The ICICI bank partnership model. Small Enterprise Development, 16, 57–65.CrossRef Ananth, B. (2005). Financing microfinance: The ICICI bank partnership model. Small Enterprise Development, 16, 57–65.CrossRef
go back to reference Andersen, T. B., & Malchow-Møller, N. (2006). Strategic interaction in undeveloped credit markets. Journal of Development Economics, 80, 275–298.CrossRef Andersen, T. B., & Malchow-Møller, N. (2006). Strategic interaction in undeveloped credit markets. Journal of Development Economics, 80, 275–298.CrossRef
go back to reference Armendariz, B., & Morduch, J. (2010). The economics of microfinance (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Armendariz, B., & Morduch, J. (2010). The economics of microfinance (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
go back to reference Armendariz, B., & Szafarz, A. (2011). On mission drift in microfinance institutions. In B. Armendariz & M. Labie (Eds.), The handbook of microfinance (pp. 341–366). London-Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.CrossRef Armendariz, B., & Szafarz, A. (2011). On mission drift in microfinance institutions. In B. Armendariz & M. Labie (Eds.), The handbook of microfinance (pp. 341–366). London-Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.CrossRef
go back to reference Aubert, C., de Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (2009). Designing credit agent incentives to prevent mission drift in pro-poor microfinance institutions. Journal of Development Economics, 90, 153–162.CrossRef Aubert, C., de Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (2009). Designing credit agent incentives to prevent mission drift in pro-poor microfinance institutions. Journal of Development Economics, 90, 153–162.CrossRef
go back to reference Bagus, P., Gabriel, A., & Howden, D. (2015). Reassessing the ethicality of some common financial practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 1–10. Bagus, P., Gabriel, A., & Howden, D. (2015). Reassessing the ethicality of some common financial practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 1–10.
go back to reference Beaman, L., Chattopadhyay, R., Duflo, E., Pande, R., & Topalova, P. (2009). Powerful women: Does exposure reduce bias? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124, 1497–1540.CrossRef Beaman, L., Chattopadhyay, R., Duflo, E., Pande, R., & Topalova, P. (2009). Powerful women: Does exposure reduce bias? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124, 1497–1540.CrossRef
go back to reference Bellucci, A., Borisov, A., & Zazzaro, A. (2010). Does gender matter in bank-firm relationships? Evidence from small business lending. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34, 2968–2984.CrossRef Bellucci, A., Borisov, A., & Zazzaro, A. (2010). Does gender matter in bank-firm relationships? Evidence from small business lending. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34, 2968–2984.CrossRef
go back to reference Bennardo, A., Pagano, M., & Piccolo, S. (2015). Multiple bank lending, creditor rights and information sharing. Review of Finance, 19, 519–570.CrossRef Bennardo, A., Pagano, M., & Piccolo, S. (2015). Multiple bank lending, creditor rights and information sharing. Review of Finance, 19, 519–570.CrossRef
go back to reference Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (2002). The economics of small business finance: The roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22, 613–673.CrossRef Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (2002). The economics of small business finance: The roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22, 613–673.CrossRef
go back to reference Bernard, C., Le Moign, C. and Nicolaï, J.-P. (2013). L’Entrepreneuriat Féminin. Centre d’Analyse Stratégique, Working Paper 2013-06. Bernard, C., Le Moign, C. and Nicolaï, J.-P. (2013). L’Entrepreneuriat Féminin. Centre d’Analyse Stratégique, Working Paper 2013-06.
go back to reference Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are emily and greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94, 991–1013.CrossRef Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are emily and greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94, 991–1013.CrossRef
go back to reference Blanchard, L., Zhao, B., & Yinger, J. (2008). Do lenders discriminate against minority and woman entrepreneurs? Journal of Urban Economics, 63, 467–497.CrossRef Blanchard, L., Zhao, B., & Yinger, J. (2008). Do lenders discriminate against minority and woman entrepreneurs? Journal of Urban Economics, 63, 467–497.CrossRef
go back to reference Blanchflower, D. G., Levine, P. B., & Zimmerman, D. J. (2003). Discrimination in the small-business credit market. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 930–943.CrossRef Blanchflower, D. G., Levine, P. B., & Zimmerman, D. J. (2003). Discrimination in the small-business credit market. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 930–943.CrossRef
go back to reference Bøhren, Ø., & Staubo, S. (2014). Does mandatory gender balance work? Changing organizational form to avoid board upheaval. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 152–168.CrossRef Bøhren, Ø., & Staubo, S. (2014). Does mandatory gender balance work? Changing organizational form to avoid board upheaval. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 152–168.CrossRef
go back to reference Brabant, M., Dugos, P., & Massou, F. (2009). Rapport sur le Microcrédit. Inspection Générale des Finances. Brabant, M., Dugos, P., & Massou, F. (2009). Rapport sur le Microcrédit. Inspection Générale des Finances.
go back to reference Brana, S. (2013). Microcredit: An answer to the gender problem in funding? Small Business Economics, 40, 87–100.CrossRef Brana, S. (2013). Microcredit: An answer to the gender problem in funding? Small Business Economics, 40, 87–100.CrossRef
go back to reference Carter, S., Shaw, E., Lam, W., & Wilson, F. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurship, and bank lending: The criteria and processes used by bank loan officers in assessing applications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 427–444.CrossRef Carter, S., Shaw, E., Lam, W., & Wilson, F. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurship, and bank lending: The criteria and processes used by bank loan officers in assessing applications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 427–444.CrossRef
go back to reference Cavalluzzo, K. S., Cavalluzzo, L. C., & Wolken, J. D. (2002). Competition, small business financing, and discrimination: Evidence from a new survey. Journal of Business, 75, 641–679.CrossRef Cavalluzzo, K. S., Cavalluzzo, L. C., & Wolken, J. D. (2002). Competition, small business financing, and discrimination: Evidence from a new survey. Journal of Business, 75, 641–679.CrossRef
go back to reference Cavalluzzo, K. S., & Wolken, J. D. (2005). Small business loan turndowns, and discrimination. Journal of Business, 78, 2153–2177.CrossRef Cavalluzzo, K. S., & Wolken, J. D. (2005). Small business loan turndowns, and discrimination. Journal of Business, 78, 2153–2177.CrossRef
go back to reference Coleman, S. (2000). Access to capital and terms of credit: A comparison of men- and women-owned small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 38, 37–52. Coleman, S. (2000). Access to capital and terms of credit: A comparison of men- and women-owned small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 38, 37–52.
go back to reference Cornée, S., & Szafarz, A. (2014). Vive la Différence: Social banks and reciprocity in the credit market. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 361–380.CrossRef Cornée, S., & Szafarz, A. (2014). Vive la Différence: Social banks and reciprocity in the credit market. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 361–380.CrossRef
go back to reference Cull, R., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Morduch, J. (2011). Does regulatory supervision curtail microfinance profitability and outreach? World Development, 39, 949–965.CrossRef Cull, R., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Morduch, J. (2011). Does regulatory supervision curtail microfinance profitability and outreach? World Development, 39, 949–965.CrossRef
go back to reference D’Espallier, B., Guérin, I., & Mersland, R. (2011). Women and repayment in microfinance: A global analysis. World Development, 39, 758–772.CrossRef D’Espallier, B., Guérin, I., & Mersland, R. (2011). Women and repayment in microfinance: A global analysis. World Development, 39, 758–772.CrossRef
go back to reference Fay, M., & Williams, L. (1993). Gender bias and the availability of business loans. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 363–376.CrossRef Fay, M., & Williams, L. (1993). Gender bias and the availability of business loans. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 363–376.CrossRef
go back to reference Field, E., Holland, A., & Pande, R. (2014). Microfinance: Points of Promise. In J. Kimmel (Ed.), Contemporary and Emerging Issues. W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, forthcoming. Field, E., Holland, A., & Pande, R. (2014). Microfinance: Points of Promise. In J. Kimmel (Ed.), Contemporary and Emerging Issues. W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, forthcoming.
go back to reference Garikipati, S. (2008). The impact of lending to women on household vulnerability and women’s empowerment: Evidence from India. World Development, 36, 2620–2642.CrossRef Garikipati, S. (2008). The impact of lending to women on household vulnerability and women’s empowerment: Evidence from India. World Development, 36, 2620–2642.CrossRef
go back to reference Guérin, I. (2011). The gender of finance and lessons for microfinance. In B. Armendariz & M. Labie (Eds.), The handbook of microfinance (pp. 589–612). London-Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.CrossRef Guérin, I. (2011). The gender of finance and lessons for microfinance. In B. Armendariz & M. Labie (Eds.), The handbook of microfinance (pp. 589–612). London-Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.CrossRef
go back to reference Guérin, I., Roesch, M., Venkatasubramanian, G., & Kumar, S. (2013). The Social meaning of over-indebtedness and creditworthiness in the context of poor rural South Indian households (Tamil Nadu). In Guérin, I., S. Morvant-Roux & M. Villarreal (Eds.), Microfinance, debt and over-indebtedness. Juggling with money (pp. 125–150). London: Routledge. Guérin, I., Roesch, M., Venkatasubramanian, G., & Kumar, S. (2013). The Social meaning of over-indebtedness and creditworthiness in the context of poor rural South Indian households (Tamil Nadu). In Guérin, I., S. Morvant-Roux & M. Villarreal (Eds.), Microfinance, debt and over-indebtedness. Juggling with money (pp. 125–150). London: Routledge.
go back to reference Gutiérrez-Nieto, B., Serrano-Cinca, C., & Camón-Cala, J. (2014). A credit score system for socially responsible lending. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 1–11. Gutiérrez-Nieto, B., Serrano-Cinca, C., & Camón-Cala, J. (2014). A credit score system for socially responsible lending. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 1–11.
go back to reference Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161.CrossRef Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161.CrossRef
go back to reference Hudon, M., & Traça, D. (2011). On the efficiency effects of subsidies in microfinance: An empirical inquiry. World Development, 39, 966–973.CrossRef Hudon, M., & Traça, D. (2011). On the efficiency effects of subsidies in microfinance: An empirical inquiry. World Development, 39, 966–973.CrossRef
go back to reference Jain, S. (1999). Symbiosis versus crowding-out: The interaction of formal and informal credit markets in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 59, 419–444.CrossRef Jain, S. (1999). Symbiosis versus crowding-out: The interaction of formal and informal credit markets in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 59, 419–444.CrossRef
go back to reference Johnson, S., & Nino-Zarazua, M. (2011). Financial access and exclusion in Kenya and Uganda. Journal of Development Studies, 47, 475–496.CrossRef Johnson, S., & Nino-Zarazua, M. (2011). Financial access and exclusion in Kenya and Uganda. Journal of Development Studies, 47, 475–496.CrossRef
go back to reference Ladd, H. F. (1998). Evidence on discrimination in mortgage lending. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 41–62.CrossRef Ladd, H. F. (1998). Evidence on discrimination in mortgage lending. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 41–62.CrossRef
go back to reference Orser, B., Hogarth-Scott, S., & Riding, A. (2000). Performance, firm size, and management problem solving. Journal of Small Business Management, 38, 42–58. Orser, B., Hogarth-Scott, S., & Riding, A. (2000). Performance, firm size, and management problem solving. Journal of Small Business Management, 38, 42–58.
go back to reference Riding, A., & Swift, C. (1990). Women business owners and terms of credit: Some empirical findings of the Canadian experience. Journal of Business Venturing, 5, 327–340.CrossRef Riding, A., & Swift, C. (1990). Women business owners and terms of credit: Some empirical findings of the Canadian experience. Journal of Business Venturing, 5, 327–340.CrossRef
go back to reference Storey, D. J. (2004). Racial and gender discrimination in the micro firms credit market? Evidence from Trinidad and Tobago. Small Business Economics, 23, 401–422.CrossRef Storey, D. J. (2004). Racial and gender discrimination in the micro firms credit market? Evidence from Trinidad and Tobago. Small Business Economics, 23, 401–422.CrossRef
go back to reference Vanroose, A., & D’Espallier, B. (2013). Do microfinance institutions accomplish their mission? Evidence from the relationship between traditional financial sector development and microfinance institutions’ outreach and performance. Applied Economics, 45, 1965–1982.CrossRef Vanroose, A., & D’Espallier, B. (2013). Do microfinance institutions accomplish their mission? Evidence from the relationship between traditional financial sector development and microfinance institutions’ outreach and performance. Applied Economics, 45, 1965–1982.CrossRef
go back to reference Wilson, F. (2015). Making loan decisions in banks: Straight from the gut? Journal of Business Ethics, 24, 1–11.CrossRef Wilson, F. (2015). Making loan decisions in banks: Straight from the gut? Journal of Business Ethics, 24, 1–11.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Gender Biases in Bank Lending: Lessons from Microcredit in France
Authors
Anastasia Cozarenco
Ariane Szafarz
Publication date
26-11-2015
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2948-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Journal of Business Ethics 3/2018 Go to the issue