Top

Published in:

2023 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

5. Generative Adversarial Networks for Labelled Vibration Data Generation

Authors : Furkan Luleci, F. Necati Catbas, Onur Avci

Published in: Special Topics in Structural Dynamics & Experimental Techniques, Volume 5

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

As Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) being implemented more over the years, the use of operational modal analysis of civil structures has become more significant for the assessment and evaluation of engineering structures. Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) algorithms have been in use for structural damage diagnostics of civil structures in the last couple of decades. While collecting vibration data from civil structures is a challenging and expensive task for both undamaged and damaged cases, in this paper, the authors are introducing Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) that is built on the Deep Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN) and using Wasserstein Distance for generating artificial labelled data to be used for structural damage diagnostic purposes. The authors named the developed model “1D W-DCGAN” and successfully generated vibration data which is very similar to the input. The methodology presented in this paper will pave the way for vibration data generation for numerous future applications in the SHM domain.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Modal Testing with Piezoelectric Stack Actuators

next chapter Validation of an Impulse Response Filter for Impact Force Reconstruction on a Hammer Drill

Catbas, F.N., Gokce, H.B., Gul, M.: Nonparametric analysis of structural health monitoring data for identification and localization of changes: concept, lab, and real-life studies. Struct. Heal. Monit. 11, 613–626 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921712451955 CrossRef

Yao, R., Pakzad, S.N.: Autoregressive statistical pattern recognition algorithms for damage detection in civil structures. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 31, 355–368 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.02.014 CrossRef

Abdeljaber, O., Avci, O., Do, N.T., Gul, M., Celik, O., Catbas, F.N.: Quantification of structural damage with self-organizing maps. In: Structural Health Monitoring, Damage Detection & Mechatronics, vol. 7, pp. 47–57. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29956-3_5 CrossRef

Gul, M., Catbas, F.N.: Ambient vibration data analysis for structural identification and global condition assessment. J. Eng. Mech. 134(8), 650–662 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2008)134:8(650) CrossRef

Gul, M., Necati Catbas, F.: Statistical pattern recognition for Structural Health Monitoring using time series modeling: theory and experimental verifications. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 23, 2192–2204 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.02.013 CrossRef

Gul, M., Catbas, F.N.: Damage assessment with ambient vibration data using a novel time series analysis methodology. J. Struct. Eng. 137(12), 1518–1526 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000366 CrossRef

Chaabane, M., Ben Hamida, A., Mansouri, M., Nounou, H.N., Avci, O.: Damage detection using enhanced multivariate statistical process control technique. In: 2016 17th Int. Conf. Sci. Tech. Autom. Control Comput. Eng. STA 2016 – Proc. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/STA.2016.7952052 CrossRef

Avci, O., Abdeljaber, O.: Self-organizing maps for structural damage detection: a novel unsupervised vibration-based algorithm. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30(3), 04015043 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000801 CrossRef

Abdeljaber, O., Avci, O., Kiranyaz, S., Gabbouj, M., Inman, D.J.: Real-time vibration-based structural damage detection using one-dimensional convolutional neural networks. J. Sound Vib. 388, 154–170 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2016.10.043 CrossRef

10.

Farrar, C.R., Lieven, N.A.J.: Damage prognosis: the future of structural health monitoring. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A. 365(1851), 623–632 (2007). http://www.jstor.org/stable/25190456

11.

Zonzini, F., et al.: Structural health monitoring and prognostic of industrial plants and civil structures: a sensor to cloud architecture. IEEE Instrum. Meas. Mag. 23(9), 21–27 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/MIM.2020.9289069 CrossRef

12.

Farrar Charles, R., Lieven Nick, A.J.: Damage prognosis: the future of structural health monitoring. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 365, 623–632 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2006.1927 CrossRef

13.

Cot, L.D., Gómez, C., Gamboa, F., Kopsaftopoulos, F., Chang, F.K.: SHM-based fatigue damage prognostics in composite structures. In: Proceedings of the Eighth European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring (EWSHM), pp. 800–809. Bilbao, Spain (2016)

14.

Pawar, P.M., Venkatesulu Reddy, K., Ganguli, R.: Damage detection in beams using spatial fourier analysis and neural networks. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 18, 347–359 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X06066292 CrossRef

15.

Cury, A., Crémona, C.: Pattern recognition of structural behaviors based on learning algorithms and symbolic data concepts. Struct. Control Heal. Monit. 19, 161–186 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.412 CrossRef

16.

Hakim, S.J.S., Abdul Razak, H., Ravanfar, S.A.: Fault diagnosis on beam-like structures from modal parameters using artificial neural networks. Measurement. 76, 45–61 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.08.021 CrossRef

17.

Lee, J.J., Lee, J.W., Yi, J.H., Yun, C.B., Jung, H.Y.: Neural networks-based damage detection for bridges considering errors in baseline finite element models. J. Sound Vib. 280, 555–578 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.01.003 CrossRef

18.

Gui, H., Pan, Z., Lin, Y., Li, Z., Yuan, Z.: Data-driven support vector machine with optimization techniques for structural health monitoring and damage detection. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 21, 523–534 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1518-5 CrossRef

19.

de Lautour, O.R., Omenzetter, P.: Damage classification and estimation in experimental structures using time series analysis and pattern recognition. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 24, 1556–1569 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.12.008 CrossRef

20.

Zhu, F., Wu, Y.: A rapid structural damage detection method using integrated ANFIS and interval modeling technique. Appl. Soft Comput. J. 25, 473–484 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.08.043 CrossRef

21.

Pathirage, C.S.N., Li, J., Li, L., Hao, H., Liu, W., Ni, P.: Structural damage identification based on autoencoder neural networks and deep learning. Eng. Struct. 172, 13–28 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.109 CrossRef

22.

Khodabandehlou, H., Pekcan, G., Fadali, M.S.: Vibration-based structural condition assessment using convolution neural networks. Struct. Control Heal. Monit. 26(2), e2308 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2308 CrossRef

23.

Cofre-Martel, S., Kobrich, P., Lopez Droguett, E., Meruane, V.: Deep convolutional neural network-based structural damage localization and quantification using transmissibility data. Shock Vib. 2019, 9859281 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9859281 CrossRef

24.

Goodfellow, I.J., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., Bengio, Y.: Generative adversarial networks. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 27 (2014). Retrieved October 8, 2021, from https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2661v1

25.

Radford, A., Metz, L., Chintala, S.: Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06434 (2015)

26.

Arjovsky, M., Chintala, S., Bottou, L.: Wasserstein generative adversarial networks. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, in Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 70, pp. 214–223. PMLR (2017). Available from https://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/arjovsky17a.html

27.

Truong, T., Yanushkevich, S.: Generative adversarial network for radar signal synthesis. In: 2019 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pp. 1–7. IEEE (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ijcnn.2019.8851887 CrossRef

28.

Hazra, D., Byun, Y.-C.: SynSigGAN: generative adversarial networks for synthetic biomedical signal generation. Biology. 9(12), 441 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9120441 CrossRef

29.

Kuo, P.-H., Lin, S.-T., Hu, J.: DNAE-GAN: Noise-free acoustic signal generator by integrating autoencoder and generative adversarial network. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 16(5), 155014772092352 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147720923529 CrossRef

30.

Luo, T., Fan, Y., Chen, L., Guo, G., Zhou, C.: EEG Signal Reconstruction Using a Generative Adversarial Network with Wasserstein Distance and Temporal-Spatial-Frequency Loss. Front. Neuroinform. 14, 15 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2020.00015 CrossRef

31.

Wulan, N., Wang, W., Sun, P., Wang, K., Xia, Y., Zhang, H.: Generating electrocardiogram signals by deep learning. Neurocomputing. 404, 122–136 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.04.076 CrossRef

32.

Shao, S., Wang, P., Yan, R.: Generative adversarial networks for data augmentation in machine fault diagnosis. Comput. Ind. 106, 85–93 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.01.001 CrossRef

33.

Wang, T., Trugman, D., Lin, Y.: SeismoGen: seismic waveform synthesis using GAN with application to seismic data augmentation. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth. 126(4), e20077 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020jb020077 CrossRef

34.

Palazzo, S., Spampinato, C., Kavasidis, I., Giordano, D., Shah, M.: Generative adversarial networks conditioned by brain signals (n.d.). Retrieved October 8, 2021, from https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content_ICCV_2017/papers/Palazzo_Generative_Adversarial_Networks_ICCV_2017_paper.pdf

35.

Jin, L., Tan, F., Jiang, S.: Generative adversarial network technologies and applications in computer vision. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2020, 1–17 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1459107 CrossRef

36.

Golany, T., Radinsky, K.: PGANs: personalized generative adversarial networks for ECG synthesis to improve patient-specific deep ECG classification. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 33, pp. 557–564 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.3301557 CrossRef

37.

Sabir, R., Rosato, D., Hartmann, S., Gühmann, C.: Signal generation using 1D deep convolutional generative adversarial networks for fault diagnosis of electrical machines. In: 2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), pp. 3907–3914. IEEE (2021, January 1). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR48806.2021.9413119 CrossRef

38.

Guo, Q., Li, Y., Song, Y., Wang, D., Chen, W.: Intelligent fault diagnosis method based on full 1-D convolutional generative adversarial network. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 16(3), 2044–2053 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2019.2934901 CrossRef

39.

Gao, S., Wang, X., Miao, X., Su, C., Li, Y.: ASM1D-GAN: an intelligent fault diagnosis method based on assembled 1D convolutional neural network and generative adversarial networks. J. Signal Process. Syst. 91(10), 1237–1247 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-019-01463-8 CrossRef

40.

Luo, Y., Cai, X., Zhang, Y., Xu, J., Yuan, X.: Multivariate time series imputation with generative adversarial networks (n.d.). Retrieved October 8, 2021, from https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2018/file/96b9bff013acedfb1d140579e2fbeb63-Paper.pdf

41.

Zhang, X., Qin, Y., Yuen, C., Jayasinghe, L., Liu, X.: Time-series regeneration with convolutional recurrent generative adversarial network for remaining useful life estimation. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 17(10), 6820–6831 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2020.3046036 CrossRef

42.

Lei, X., Sun, L., Xia, Y.: Lost data reconstruction for structural health monitoring using deep convolutional generative adversarial networks. Struct. Health Monit. 20(4), 2069–2087 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921720959226 CrossRef

43.

Fan, G., Li, J., Hao, H., Xin, Y.: Data driven structural dynamic response reconstruction using segment based generative adversarial networks. Eng. Struct. 234, 111970 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.111970 CrossRef

44.

Jiang, H., Wan, C., Yang, K., Ding, Y., Xue, S.: Continuous missing data imputation with incomplete dataset by generative adversarial networks–based unsupervised learning for long-term bridge health monitoring. Struct. Health Monit. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217211021942

45.

Zhang, C., Kuppannagari, S., Kannan, R., Prasanna, V. K.: Generative adversarial network for synthetic time series data generation in smart grids (2019). Www.osti.gov. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1607585

46.

Avci, O., Abdeljaber, O., Kiranyaz. S., and Inman, D.J. (2017). Structural Damage Detection in Real-Time: Implementation of 1D Convolutional Neural Networks for SHM Applications, IMAC XXXV, Conference and Exposition on Structural Dynamics, January 30-February 2, 2017, Garden Grove, CA, USA

47.

Borji, A.: Pros and cons of GAN evaluation measures (2018). ArXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03446

48.

Heusel, M., Ramsauer, H., Unterthiner, T., Nessler, B., Hochreiter, S.: GANs trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium (n.d.). https://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.08500.pdf

49.

Costa, V., Lourenço, N., Correia, J., Machado, P.: COEGAN: evaluating the coevolution effect in generative adversarial networks. In: Proceedings of the genetic and evolutionary computation conference, pp. 374–382 (2019)CrossRef

Title: Generative Adversarial Networks for Labelled Vibration Data Generation
Authors: Furkan Luleci
F. Necati Catbas
Onur Avci
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Book: Special Topics in Structural Dynamics & Experimental Techniques, Volume 5
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05404-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-05405-1

Copyright Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05405-1_5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"