Top

Published in:

2024 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

4. Generative AI and the Technological Imaginary of Game Design

Author : Stefan Werning

Published in: Creative Tools and the Softwarization of Cultural Production

Publisher: Springer Nature Switzerland

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The chapter explores the emergence of AI-driven tools within the digital game industry, investigating the shift from experimental applications like NVIDIA’s GameGAN to production-ready tools like Ludo AI and its impact on the contemporary ‘technological imaginary’ of digital gaming. Game-making, particularly the creation of procedural complexity from a few, simple rules, has repeatedly been characterized as a magic trick, which is not fully rationalizable; the work of Jennifer Whitson shows how even game designers often view their software tools as ‘agential,’ ‘so complex as to be fully unknowable,’ and thus, ‘magical.’ The infusion of machine learning into these tools, from pre-production over asset creation to playtesting, is transforming both practitioners’ and players’ assumptions regarding game design, raising questions of authorship and neoliberally informed conceptions of creativity, changing workflows, and equitable working conditions that can be inferred from the already-observable cultural and aesthetic implications of AI in visual design work. The chapter analyzes these hopes, fears, and expectations as part of a broader ‘technological imaginary’ of game-making through a diachronic framing analysis incorporating academic and industry publications as well as ‘software affordances’ of available tools. The material corpus comprises early academic visions of AI in game design and first attempts at standardization but also grassroots experiments using general-purpose tools like GitHub Copilot or ChatGPT to create games and develop game development literacy. The analysis investigates the framing of AI-based tools in game design as a socio-technical process, foregrounding the interplay between human and non-human agents/actants and the potential risk, which only few industry practitioners currently caution against, that AI-driven tools might make game design too ‘frictionless’ and might require more playful ‘tinkering’ with or repurposing of the rapidly evolving AI tools to see beyond their ‘readiness-to-hand’ moving forward.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter The Spatial Languages of Virtual Production: Critiquing Softwarization with Aesthetic Analysis

next chapter Autoharps, Chord Organs, and MIDI Packs: Easy-Playing Instruments, Gender, and Classes of Musical Participation

For a concise overview see, e.g., https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/12/how-neural-networks-work-and-why-theyve-become-a-big-business/

See http://www.gamesbyangelina.org/2011/03/hello-world/

The findings below both refer to changes in game design, with a focus on inventing games, and ‘game development,’ with a focus on the technical implementation of both digital and analogue games; both terms will be used depending on the context, but, to combine both, I suggest referring to the technological imaginary of ‘game-making’ as the goal of this chapter.

For a general purpose example see, e.g., https://assetstore.unity.com/packages/tools/ai/easy-neural-network-195215

See https://www.dicebreaker.com/topics/wolfgang-kramer/interview/wolfgang-kramer-interview-board-games-society-designers

See https://github.com/UnityTechnologies/AngryBots2

See https://ludo.ai/ideation

For an early application of the diagram to general-purpose AI from 2020 see https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/2-megatrends-dominate-the-gartner-hype-cycle-for-artificial-intelligence-2020

See, e.g., https://assetstore.unity.com/?category=templates&q=idle%20games

See https://www.futuretools.io/?tags-n5zn=gaming (as of 19 February 2023).

See https://www.scenario.gg/ and https://masterpiecestudio.com/blog/3d-generative-ai respectively.

See, e.g., https://queerqueenlywriting.wordpress.com/2018/09/03/lifestyle-games/

See, e.g., https://towardsdatascience.com/angelina-6d4a6a311a4?gi=d8cfa96cbb93

See, e.g., https://www.runn.io/blog/crunch-time-in-game-development

In the first half of 2022, more than 6000 titles were published on Steam alone, amounting to “over 34 games a day”; see https://www.gamedeveloper.com/blogs/video-game-insights-report-first-half-of-2022-on-steam

See https://www.gamedeveloper.com/business/what-is-the-game-development-life-cycle-

See https://app.ludo.ai/game-ideator

See https://voyageplay.ai/

See https://actornetwork.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/obligatory-passage-points-and-delegates/

See, e.g., https://web.media.mit.edu/~mres/papers/edutainment.pdf

See https://www.gamedeveloper.com/design/game-design%2D%2D-theory-and-practice-the-elements-of-gameplay

See, e.g., the still operational https://machinations.io/

See, e.g., https://promptbattle.com/

For an interview with a PromptBase artist see, e.g., https://www.theverge.com/2022/9/2/23326868/dalle-midjourney-ai-promptbase-prompt-market-sales-artist-interview

For an overview of the eponymous workshop organized by the European Video Games Society in September 2022, see https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/greening-video-games-industry-winning-solutions-environment

See https://gtg.benabraham.net/gtg-link-no/

For an overview of the ecological impact of ML and potential solutions see, e.g., https://www.numenta.com/blog/2022/05/24/ai-is-harming-our-planet/ and https://spectrum.ieee.org/deep-learning-sustainability

Aragon, C. R., & Williams, A. (2011). Collaborative creativity. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1875–1884. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979214

Bjork, S., & Holopainen, J. (2005). Patterns in game design. Charles River Media.

Burton, C. H. (2008). Superhero as metaphor: Using creative pedagogies to engage. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2008.020207

Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953CrossRef

Clark, N. (2007). Thing theory. Human Studies, 30, 471–477.CrossRef

Cook, D. (2007, July 19). The chemistry of game design. https://www.gamedeveloper.com/design/the-chemistry-of-game-design

Cukier, K., & Mayer-Schoenberger, V. (2013). The rise of Big Data: How it’s changing the way we think about the world. Foreign Affairs, 92(3), 28–40.

Diaz, C. G., Perry, P., & Fiebrink, R. (2019). Interactive machine learning for more expressive game interactions. IEEE Conference on Games (CoG), 2019, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIG.2019.8848007CrossRef

Edwards, G., Subianto, N., Englund, D., Goh, J. W., Coughran, N., Milton, Z., Mirnateghi, N., & Ali Shah, S. A. (2021). The role of machine learning in game development domain: A review of current trends and future directions. DICTA 2021, 2021 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1109/DICTA52665.2021.9647261

Gellel, A., & Sweetser, P. (2020). A hybrid approach to procedural generation of roguelike video game levels. International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3402942.3402945

Hagener, M. (2020). Thinking Inside and Outside of the (Black) Box. In D. Chateau & J. Moure (Eds.), Post-Cinema (pp. 175–192). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463727235_ch10CrossRef

Jónasdóttir, H., & Müller, S. (2020). Theorizing affordance actualization in digital innovation from a socio-technical perspective: The case of the video game industry. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 32(1), 147–180.

Jones, I. B. (2016). Do the locomotion: Obstinate avatars, dehiscent performances, and the rise of the comedic video game. The Velvet Light Trap, 77, 86–99. https://doi.org/10.7560/vlt7706CrossRef

Kangas, M. (2010). Creative and playful learning: Learning through game co-creation and games in a playful learning environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2009.11.001CrossRef

Kluitenberg, E. (2019). On the archaeology of imaginary media. In E. Huhtamo & J. Parikka (Eds.), Media archaeology (pp. 48–69). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520948518-005CrossRef

Kühme, D. (1997). Bürger und Spiel—Gesellschaftsspiele im deutschen Bürgertum zwischen 1750 und 1850. Campus.

Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 70–81.CrossRef

Lee, J. (2009). Battlin’ on the corner: Techniques for sustaining play. Social Problems, 56(3), 578–598. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2009.56.3.578CrossRef

Lee, V. (2006). Virtual bodies, flying objects: The digital imaginary in contemporary martial arts films. Journal of Chinese Cinemas, 1(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1386/jcc.1.1.9_1CrossRef

Lister, M., Dovey, J., Giddings, S., Grant, I., & Kelly, K. (Eds.). (2009). New media: A critical introduction. Routledge.

Liu, V., Vermeulen, J., Fitzmaurice, G., & Matejka, J. (2022). 3DALL-E: Integrating text-to-image AI in 3D design workflows. Preprint retrieved from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.11603

Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. MIT Press.

Murray, J. (1997). Hamlet on the Holodeck: The future of narrative in cyberspace. The Free Press.

Natkin, S., & Vega, L. (2004). A petri net model for computer games analysis. International Journal of Intelligent Games & Simulation, 3(1), 37–44.

Nelson, M. J., & Mateas, M. (2007). Towards automated game design. In AI*IA 2007: Artificial intelligence and human-oriented computing (pp. 626–637). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74782-6_54CrossRef

Paltieli, G. (2021). The political imaginary of national AI strategies. AI and Society, 1, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01258-1CrossRef

Pan, Y., Opgenhaffen, M., & van Gorp, B. (2021). China’s pathway to climate sustainability: A diachronic framing analysis of People’s Daily’s coverage of climate change (1995–2018). Environmental Communication, 15(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1817766CrossRef

Riedl, M. O., & Zook, A. (2013). AI for game production. IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Games (CIG), 2013, 1–8. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6633663/

Sarkar, A., & Cooper, S. (2020). Towards game design via creative machine learning (GDCML). 2020 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG), 744–751.

Shouse, E. (2005). Feeling, emotion, affect. M/C A Journal of Media and Culture, 8(6) http://www.journal.media-culture.org.au/0512/03-shouse.php

Sicart, M. (2011). Against procedurality. The International Journal of Computer Game Research, 11(3), 209.

Sykes, J. (2006). A player-centred approach to digital game design. In J. Rutter & J. Bryce (Eds.), Understanding Digital Games (pp. 75–92). SAGE Publications.CrossRef

Togelius, J., & Schmidhuber, J. (2008). An experiment in automatic game design. IEEE Symposium On Computational Intelligence and Games, 2008, 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIG.2008.5035629CrossRef

van Ittersum, D. (2009). Distributing memory: Rhetorical work in digital environments. Technical Communication Quarterly, 18(3), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572250902942026CrossRef

Werning, S. (2021). Making games: The poetics and politics of game creation tools. MIT Press.CrossRef

Whitson, J. R. (2018). Voodoo software and boundary objects in game development: How developers collaborate and conflict with game engines and art tools. New Media and Society, 20(7), 2315–2332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817715020CrossRef

Yaneva, A. (2009). Making the social hold: Towards an actor-network theory of design. Design and Culture, 1(3), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2009.11643291CrossRef

Title: Generative AI and the Technological Imaginary of Game Design
Author: Stefan Werning
Publisher: Springer Nature Switzerland
Book: Creative Tools and the Softwarization of Cultural Production
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-45692-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-45693-0

Copyright Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45693-0_4