Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 6/2018

05-09-2017 | Original Article

GHG emission pathways until 2300 for the 1.5 °C temperature rise target and the mitigation costs achieving the pathways

Authors: Keigo Akimoto, Fuminori Sano, Toshimasa Tomoda

Published in: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The Paris Agreement of the 21st Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change refers to the 1.5 °C target as well as the 2 °C target, and it is important to estimate the emission pathways and mitigation measures for the 1.5 °C target for the discussions on the target. The possible emission pathways vary widely because of the uncertainties involved. We assumed three kinds of temperature trajectories for meeting below 1.5 °C compared with the pre-industrial level, and three numbers for the climate sensitivity. The first trajectory remains below 1.5 °C all the time until 2300, the second overshoots but returns to below 1.5 °C by 2100, and the third overshoots but returns to below 1.5 °C by 2300. There are large differences in terms of 2030 emissions between the estimate from the submitted Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and any of assessed emission pathways involving climate sensitivity of 3.0 °C or higher, and high emission reduction costs were estimated, even for 2030. With climate sensitivity of 2.5 °C, only the third trajectory exhibits consistent emissions in 2030 with the NDCs. However, this case also appears very difficult to achieve, requiring enormous amounts of negative emissions after the middle of this century toward 2300. A climate mitigation strategy aiming for the 1.5 °C target will be debatable, because we face serious difficulties in near- or/and long-term for all the possible emission pathways, and therefore, we should rather focus on actual emission reduction activities than on the 1.5 °C target with poor feasibility.
Literature
go back to reference Akimoto K, Sano F, Homma T, Oda J, Nagashima M, Kii M (2010) Estimates of GHG emission reduction potential by country, sector, and cost. Energy Policy 38(7):3384–3393CrossRef Akimoto K, Sano F, Homma T, Oda J, Nagashima M, Kii M (2010) Estimates of GHG emission reduction potential by country, sector, and cost. Energy Policy 38(7):3384–3393CrossRef
go back to reference Akimoto K, Homma T, Sano F, Nagashima M, Tokushige K, Tomoda T (2014) Assessment of the emission reduction target of halving CO2 emissions by 2050: macro-factors analysis and model analysis under newly developed socio-economic scenarios. Energy Strategy Reviews 2(3–4):246–256CrossRef Akimoto K, Homma T, Sano F, Nagashima M, Tokushige K, Tomoda T (2014) Assessment of the emission reduction target of halving CO2 emissions by 2050: macro-factors analysis and model analysis under newly developed socio-economic scenarios. Energy Strategy Reviews 2(3–4):246–256CrossRef
go back to reference Hayashi A, Akimoto K, Sano F, Tomoda T (2015) Evaluation of global energy crop production potential up to 2100 under socioeconomic development and climate change scenarios. J Jpn Inst Energy 94(6):548–554CrossRef Hayashi A, Akimoto K, Sano F, Tomoda T (2015) Evaluation of global energy crop production potential up to 2100 under socioeconomic development and climate change scenarios. J Jpn Inst Energy 94(6):548–554CrossRef
go back to reference Hellegatte S et al (2016) Mapping the climate change challenge. Nat Clim Chang 6:663–668CrossRef Hellegatte S et al (2016) Mapping the climate change challenge. Nat Clim Chang 6:663–668CrossRef
go back to reference Houghton RA, Byers B, Nassikas AA (2015) A role for tropical forests in stabilizing atmospheric CO2. Nat Clim Chang 5:1022–1023CrossRef Houghton RA, Byers B, Nassikas AA (2015) A role for tropical forests in stabilizing atmospheric CO2. Nat Clim Chang 5:1022–1023CrossRef
go back to reference IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press
go back to reference IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press
go back to reference IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press
go back to reference IPCC (2014a) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press IPCC (2014a) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press
go back to reference IPCC (2014b) Climate change 2014: synthesis report IPCC (2014b) Climate change 2014: synthesis report
go back to reference Kaya Y, Yamaguchi M, Akimoto K (2015) The uncertainty of climate sensitivity and its implication for the. Paris Negot Sustain Sci 11(3):515–518CrossRef Kaya Y, Yamaguchi M, Akimoto K (2015) The uncertainty of climate sensitivity and its implication for the. Paris Negot Sustain Sci 11(3):515–518CrossRef
go back to reference Knutti R, Rogelji J, Sedláček J, Fischer EM (2016) A scientific critique of the two-degree climate change target. Nat Geosci 9:13–18CrossRef Knutti R, Rogelji J, Sedláček J, Fischer EM (2016) A scientific critique of the two-degree climate change target. Nat Geosci 9:13–18CrossRef
go back to reference Luderer G, Pietzcker RC, Bertram C, Kriegler E, Meinshausen M, Edenhofer O (2013) Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets. Environ Res Lett 8(3):034033 Luderer G, Pietzcker RC, Bertram C, Kriegler E, Meinshausen M, Edenhofer O (2013) Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets. Environ Res Lett 8(3):034033
go back to reference Meinshausen M, Raper SCB, Wigley TML (2011a) Emulating coupled atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6–part 1: model description and calibration. Atmos Chem Phys 11:1417–1456CrossRef Meinshausen M, Raper SCB, Wigley TML (2011a) Emulating coupled atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6–part 1: model description and calibration. Atmos Chem Phys 11:1417–1456CrossRef
go back to reference Meinshausen M et al (2011b) The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Clim Chang 109:213–241CrossRef Meinshausen M et al (2011b) The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Clim Chang 109:213–241CrossRef
go back to reference Ranger N, Gohar LK, Lowe JA, Raper SCB, Bowen A, Ward RE (2012) Is it possible to limit global warming to no more than 1.5 C? Clim Chang 111:973–981CrossRef Ranger N, Gohar LK, Lowe JA, Raper SCB, Bowen A, Ward RE (2012) Is it possible to limit global warming to no more than 1.5 C? Clim Chang 111:973–981CrossRef
go back to reference Rogelj J, Meinshausen M, Knutti R (2012) Global warming under old and new scenarios using IPCC climate sensitivity range estimates. Nat Clim Chang 2:248–253CrossRef Rogelj J, Meinshausen M, Knutti R (2012) Global warming under old and new scenarios using IPCC climate sensitivity range estimates. Nat Clim Chang 2:248–253CrossRef
go back to reference Rogelj J, Luderer G, Pietzcker RC, Kriegler E, Schaeffer M, Krey V, Riahi K (2015a) Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C. Nat Clim Chang 5:519–527CrossRef Rogelj J, Luderer G, Pietzcker RC, Kriegler E, Schaeffer M, Krey V, Riahi K (2015a) Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C. Nat Clim Chang 5:519–527CrossRef
go back to reference Rogelj J, Schaeffer M, Meinshausen M, Knutti R, Alcamo J, Riahi K, Hare W (2015b) Zero emission targets as long-term global goals for climate protection. Environ Res Lett 10(10):105007 Rogelj J, Schaeffer M, Meinshausen M, Knutti R, Alcamo J, Riahi K, Hare W (2015b) Zero emission targets as long-term global goals for climate protection. Environ Res Lett 10(10):105007
go back to reference Sanderson BM, O’Neill BC, Tebaldi C (2016) What would it take to achieve the Paris temperature targets? Geophys Res Lett 43(13):7133–7142CrossRef Sanderson BM, O’Neill BC, Tebaldi C (2016) What would it take to achieve the Paris temperature targets? Geophys Res Lett 43(13):7133–7142CrossRef
go back to reference Schaeffer M, Gohar L, Kriegler L, Lowe J, Riahi K, van Vuuren D (2015) Mid- and long-term climate projections for fragmented and delayed-action scenarios. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 90:257–268CrossRef Schaeffer M, Gohar L, Kriegler L, Lowe J, Riahi K, van Vuuren D (2015) Mid- and long-term climate projections for fragmented and delayed-action scenarios. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 90:257–268CrossRef
go back to reference Schleussner C-F, Rogelj J, Schaeffer M, Lissner T, Licker R, Fischer EM, Knutti R, Levermann A, Frieler K, Hare W (2016) Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal. Nat Clim Chang 6:827–835CrossRef Schleussner C-F, Rogelj J, Schaeffer M, Lissner T, Licker R, Fischer EM, Knutti R, Levermann A, Frieler K, Hare W (2016) Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal. Nat Clim Chang 6:827–835CrossRef
go back to reference Tol R, Yohe GW (2006) Of dangerous climate change and dangerous emission reduction. In: Schellnhuber HJ et al. (eds) Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 291–298 Tol R, Yohe GW (2006) Of dangerous climate change and dangerous emission reduction. In: Schellnhuber HJ et al. (eds) Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 291–298
Metadata
Title
GHG emission pathways until 2300 for the 1.5 °C temperature rise target and the mitigation costs achieving the pathways
Authors
Keigo Akimoto
Fuminori Sano
Toshimasa Tomoda
Publication date
05-09-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 1381-2386
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1596
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-017-9762-z

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 6/2018 Go to the issue