Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Environmental Management 6/2010

01-12-2010

Harnessing Ecosystem Models and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Support of Forest Management

Authors: Bernhard Wolfslehner, Rupert Seidl

Published in: Environmental Management | Issue 6/2010

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The decision-making environment in forest management (FM) has changed drastically during the last decades. Forest management planning is facing increasing complexity due to a widening portfolio of forest goods and services, a societal demand for a rational, transparent decision process and rising uncertainties concerning future environmental conditions (e.g., climate change). Methodological responses to these challenges include an intensified use of ecosystem models to provide an enriched, quantitative information base for FM planning. Furthermore, multi-criteria methods are increasingly used to amalgamate information, preferences, expert judgments and value expressions, in support of the participatory and communicative dimensions of modern forestry. Although the potential of combining these two approaches has been demonstrated in a number of studies, methodological aspects in interfacing forest ecosystem models (FEM) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) are scarcely addressed explicitly. In this contribution we review the state of the art in FEM and MCDA in the context of FM planning and highlight some of the crucial issues when combining ecosystem and preference modeling. We discuss issues and requirements in selecting approaches suitable for supporting FM planning problems from the growing body of FEM and MCDA concepts. We furthermore identify two major challenges in a harmonized application of FEM-MCDA: (i) the design and implementation of an indicator-based analysis framework capturing ecological and social aspects and their interactions relevant for the decision process, and (ii) holistic information management that supports consistent use of different information sources, provides meta-information as well as information on uncertainties throughout the planning process.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Alho JM, Kangas J (1997) Analysing uncertainties in experts’ opinions of forest plan performance. Forest Science 43:521–528 Alho JM, Kangas J (1997) Analysing uncertainties in experts’ opinions of forest plan performance. Forest Science 43:521–528
go back to reference Alho JM, Kangas J, Kolehmainen O (1996) Uncertainty in expert predictions of the ecological consequences of forest plans. Applied Statistics 45:1–14CrossRef Alho JM, Kangas J, Kolehmainen O (1996) Uncertainty in expert predictions of the ecological consequences of forest plans. Applied Statistics 45:1–14CrossRef
go back to reference Al-Shemmeri T, Al-Kloub B, Pearman A (1997) Model choice in multicriteria decision aid. European Journal of Operational Research 97:550–560CrossRef Al-Shemmeri T, Al-Kloub B, Pearman A (1997) Model choice in multicriteria decision aid. European Journal of Operational Research 97:550–560CrossRef
go back to reference Ananda J, Herath G (2009) A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning. Ecological Economics 68:2535–2548CrossRef Ananda J, Herath G (2009) A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning. Ecological Economics 68:2535–2548CrossRef
go back to reference Ascough JC II, Maier HR, Ravalico JK, Strudley MW (2008) Future research challenges for incorporation of uncertainty in environmental and ecological decision-making. Ecological Modelling 219:383–399CrossRef Ascough JC II, Maier HR, Ravalico JK, Strudley MW (2008) Future research challenges for incorporation of uncertainty in environmental and ecological decision-making. Ecological Modelling 219:383–399CrossRef
go back to reference Battaglia M, Sands PJ (1998) Process-based forest productivity models and their application in forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 102:13–32CrossRef Battaglia M, Sands PJ (1998) Process-based forest productivity models and their application in forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 102:13–32CrossRef
go back to reference Belton V, Stewart TJ (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 372 pp Belton V, Stewart TJ (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 372 pp
go back to reference Bigler C, Bugmann H (2004) Assessing the performance of theoretical and empirical tree mortality models using tree-ring series of Norway spruce. Ecological Modelling 174:225–239CrossRef Bigler C, Bugmann H (2004) Assessing the performance of theoretical and empirical tree mortality models using tree-ring series of Norway spruce. Ecological Modelling 174:225–239CrossRef
go back to reference Borchers JG (2005) Accepting uncertainty, assessing risk: decision quality in managing wildfire, forest resource values, and new technology. Forest Ecology and Management 211:36–46CrossRef Borchers JG (2005) Accepting uncertainty, assessing risk: decision quality in managing wildfire, forest resource values, and new technology. Forest Ecology and Management 211:36–46CrossRef
go back to reference Bormann BT, Kiester AR (2004) Options forestry. Acting on uncertainty. Journal of Forestry 102(4):22–27 Bormann BT, Kiester AR (2004) Options forestry. Acting on uncertainty. Journal of Forestry 102(4):22–27
go back to reference Bouyssou D, Marchant T, Pirlot M, Tsoukias A, Vincke P (2006) Evaluation and decision models with multiple criteria. Stepping stones for the analyst. Springer, New York, 445 pp Bouyssou D, Marchant T, Pirlot M, Tsoukias A, Vincke P (2006) Evaluation and decision models with multiple criteria. Stepping stones for the analyst. Springer, New York, 445 pp
go back to reference Bugmann H, Lindner M, Lasch P, Flechsig M, Ebert B, Cramer W (2000) Scaling issues in forest succession models. Climatic Change 44:265–289CrossRef Bugmann H, Lindner M, Lasch P, Flechsig M, Ebert B, Cramer W (2000) Scaling issues in forest succession models. Climatic Change 44:265–289CrossRef
go back to reference Bunnell FL, Boyland M (2003) Decision-support systems: it’s the question not the model. Journal for Nature Conservation 10:269–279CrossRef Bunnell FL, Boyland M (2003) Decision-support systems: it’s the question not the model. Journal for Nature Conservation 10:269–279CrossRef
go back to reference Busing RT, Mailly D (2004) Advances in spatial, individual-based modeling of forest dynamics. Journal of Vegetation Science 15:831–842 Busing RT, Mailly D (2004) Advances in spatial, individual-based modeling of forest dynamics. Journal of Vegetation Science 15:831–842
go back to reference Choo EU, Schoner B, Wedley WC (1999) Interpretation of criteria weights in multicriteria decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering 37:527–541CrossRef Choo EU, Schoner B, Wedley WC (1999) Interpretation of criteria weights in multicriteria decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering 37:527–541CrossRef
go back to reference Crookston NL, Dixon GE (2005) The forest vegetation simulator: a review of its structure, content, and applications. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 49:60–80CrossRef Crookston NL, Dixon GE (2005) The forest vegetation simulator: a review of its structure, content, and applications. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 49:60–80CrossRef
go back to reference De Steiguer JE, Liberti L, Schuler A, Hansen B (2003) Multi-criteria decision models for forestry and natural resources management: an annotated bibliography. GTR-NE 307. USDA Forest Service, Delaware, 37 pp De Steiguer JE, Liberti L, Schuler A, Hansen B (2003) Multi-criteria decision models for forestry and natural resources management: an annotated bibliography. GTR-NE 307. USDA Forest Service, Delaware, 37 pp
go back to reference Diaz-Balteiro L, Romero C (2008) Making forestry decisions with multiple criteria: a review and an assessment. Forest Ecology and Management 255:3222–3241CrossRef Diaz-Balteiro L, Romero C (2008) Making forestry decisions with multiple criteria: a review and an assessment. Forest Ecology and Management 255:3222–3241CrossRef
go back to reference Duinker PN (2001) Criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management in Canada: progress and problems in integrating science and politics at the local level. In: Franc A, Laroussinie O, Karjalainen T (eds) Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management at the forest management unit level. EFI Proceedings No 38. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, pp 7–29 Duinker PN (2001) Criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management in Canada: progress and problems in integrating science and politics at the local level. In: Franc A, Laroussinie O, Karjalainen T (eds) Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management at the forest management unit level. EFI Proceedings No 38. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, pp 7–29
go back to reference ECOBAS (2009) Register of ecological models (REM). A meta-database for existing mathematical models in ecology. University of Kassel, Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences. http://ecobas.org/. Accessed on 24 January 2009 ECOBAS (2009) Register of ecological models (REM). A meta-database for existing mathematical models in ecology. University of Kassel, Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences. http://​ecobas.​org/​. Accessed on 24 January 2009
go back to reference Failing L, Gregory R (2003) Ten common mistakes in designing biodiversity indicators for forest policy. Journal of Environmental Management 68:121–132 Failing L, Gregory R (2003) Ten common mistakes in designing biodiversity indicators for forest policy. Journal of Environmental Management 68:121–132
go back to reference Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25:739–755CrossRef Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25:739–755CrossRef
go back to reference Fürstenau C, Badeck FW, Lasch P, Lexer MJ, Lindner M, Mohr P, Suckow F (2007) Multiple-use forest management in consideration of climate change and the interests of stakeholder groups. European Jorunal of Forest Research 126:225–239CrossRef Fürstenau C, Badeck FW, Lasch P, Lexer MJ, Lindner M, Mohr P, Suckow F (2007) Multiple-use forest management in consideration of climate change and the interests of stakeholder groups. European Jorunal of Forest Research 126:225–239CrossRef
go back to reference Gordon JC, Lyons J (1997) The emerging role of science and scientists in ecosystem management. In: Kohm KA, Franklin JF (eds) Creating a forestry for the 21st century. The science of ecosystem management. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 447–453 Gordon JC, Lyons J (1997) The emerging role of science and scientists in ecosystem management. In: Kohm KA, Franklin JF (eds) Creating a forestry for the 21st century. The science of ecosystem management. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 447–453
go back to reference Gough AD, Innes JL, Allen SD (2008) Development of common indicators of sustainable forest management. Ecological Indicators 8:425–430CrossRef Gough AD, Innes JL, Allen SD (2008) Development of common indicators of sustainable forest management. Ecological Indicators 8:425–430CrossRef
go back to reference Gregory R, Failing L, Ohlson D, McDaniels TL (2006) Some pitfalls of an overemphasis on science in environmental risk management decisions. Journal of Risk Research 9:717–735CrossRef Gregory R, Failing L, Ohlson D, McDaniels TL (2006) Some pitfalls of an overemphasis on science in environmental risk management decisions. Journal of Risk Research 9:717–735CrossRef
go back to reference Grimm V, Railsback SF (2005) Individual-based modelling and ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 428 pp Grimm V, Railsback SF (2005) Individual-based modelling and ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 428 pp
go back to reference Guitouni A, Martel JM (1998) Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. European Journal of Operational Research 109:501–521CrossRef Guitouni A, Martel JM (1998) Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. European Journal of Operational Research 109:501–521CrossRef
go back to reference Hajkowicz SA (2008) Supporting multi-stakeholder environmental decisions. Journal of Environmental Management 88:607–614CrossRef Hajkowicz SA (2008) Supporting multi-stakeholder environmental decisions. Journal of Environmental Management 88:607–614CrossRef
go back to reference Hasenauer H (2006) Concepts within growth modelling. In: Hasenauer H (ed) Sustainable forest management. Growth models for Europe. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–18CrossRef Hasenauer H (2006) Concepts within growth modelling. In: Hasenauer H (ed) Sustainable forest management. Growth models for Europe. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–18CrossRef
go back to reference Hickey GM, Innes JL, Kozak RA, Bull GQ, Vertinsky I (2005) Monitoring and information reporting for sustainable forest management: an international multiple case study analysis. Forest Ecology and Management 209:237–259CrossRef Hickey GM, Innes JL, Kozak RA, Bull GQ, Vertinsky I (2005) Monitoring and information reporting for sustainable forest management: an international multiple case study analysis. Forest Ecology and Management 209:237–259CrossRef
go back to reference Hobbs NT (2003) Challenges and opportunities in integrating ecological knowledge across scales. Forest Ecology and Management 181:223–238CrossRef Hobbs NT (2003) Challenges and opportunities in integrating ecological knowledge across scales. Forest Ecology and Management 181:223–238CrossRef
go back to reference Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. www.ipcc.ch. Accessed on 24 January 2009 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. www.​ipcc.​ch. Accessed on 24 January 2009
go back to reference Janssen R (1992) Multiobjective decision support for environmental management. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 232 pp Janssen R (1992) Multiobjective decision support for environmental management. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 232 pp
go back to reference Johnson KN, Bettinger P, Kline J, Spies TA, Lennette M, Lettman G, Garber-Yonts B, Larsen T (2007) Simulating forest structure, timber production, and socioeconomic effects in a multi-owner province. Ecological Applications 17:34–47CrossRef Johnson KN, Bettinger P, Kline J, Spies TA, Lennette M, Lettman G, Garber-Yonts B, Larsen T (2007) Simulating forest structure, timber production, and socioeconomic effects in a multi-owner province. Ecological Applications 17:34–47CrossRef
go back to reference Kangas A, Kangas J (2004) Probability, possibility and evidence: approaches to consider risk and uncertainty in forestry decision analysis. Forest Policy and Economics 6:169–188CrossRef Kangas A, Kangas J (2004) Probability, possibility and evidence: approaches to consider risk and uncertainty in forestry decision analysis. Forest Policy and Economics 6:169–188CrossRef
go back to reference Kangas A, Kangas J (2005) Multiple criteria decision support in forest management—the approach, methods applied, and experiences gained. Forest Ecology and Management 207:133–143CrossRef Kangas A, Kangas J (2005) Multiple criteria decision support in forest management—the approach, methods applied, and experiences gained. Forest Ecology and Management 207:133–143CrossRef
go back to reference Kant S (2003) Extending the boundaries of forest economics. Forest Policy and Economics 5:39–56CrossRef Kant S (2003) Extending the boundaries of forest economics. Forest Policy and Economics 5:39–56CrossRef
go back to reference Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, others (2001) Environment and development: sustainability science. Science 2001:641–642CrossRef Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, others (2001) Environment and development: sustainability science. Science 2001:641–642CrossRef
go back to reference Keane RE, Austin M, Field C, Huth A, Lexer MJ, Peters D, Solomon A, Wyckoff P (2001) Tree mortality in gap models: application to climate change. Climatic Change 51:509–540CrossRef Keane RE, Austin M, Field C, Huth A, Lexer MJ, Peters D, Solomon A, Wyckoff P (2001) Tree mortality in gap models: application to climate change. Climatic Change 51:509–540CrossRef
go back to reference Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1993) Decisions with multiple objectives, preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 569 pp Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1993) Decisions with multiple objectives, preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 569 pp
go back to reference Kimmins JP, Blanco JA, Seely B, Welham C, Scoullar K (2008) Complexity in modelling forest ecosystems: how much is enough? Forest Ecology and Management 256:1646–1658CrossRef Kimmins JP, Blanco JA, Seely B, Welham C, Scoullar K (2008) Complexity in modelling forest ecosystems: how much is enough? Forest Ecology and Management 256:1646–1658CrossRef
go back to reference Kurttila M, Muinonen E, Leskinen P, Kilpeläinen H, Pykäläinen J (2009) An approach for examining the effects of preferential uncertainty on the contents of forest management plan at stand and holding level. European Journal of Forest Research 128:37–50CrossRef Kurttila M, Muinonen E, Leskinen P, Kilpeläinen H, Pykäläinen J (2009) An approach for examining the effects of preferential uncertainty on the contents of forest management plan at stand and holding level. European Journal of Forest Research 128:37–50CrossRef
go back to reference Landsberg J (2003) Modelling forest ecosystems: state of the art, challenges, and future directions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33:385–397CrossRef Landsberg J (2003) Modelling forest ecosystems: state of the art, challenges, and future directions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33:385–397CrossRef
go back to reference Landsberg JJ, Waring RH (1997) A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use efficiency, carbon balance and partitioning. Forest Ecology and Management 95:209–228CrossRef Landsberg JJ, Waring RH (1997) A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use efficiency, carbon balance and partitioning. Forest Ecology and Management 95:209–228CrossRef
go back to reference Larocque GR, Bhatti JS, Boutin R, Chertov O (2008) Uncertainty analysis in carbon cycle models of forest ecosystems: research needs and development of a theoretical framework to estimate error propagation. Ecological Modelling 219:400–412CrossRef Larocque GR, Bhatti JS, Boutin R, Chertov O (2008) Uncertainty analysis in carbon cycle models of forest ecosystems: research needs and development of a theoretical framework to estimate error propagation. Ecological Modelling 219:400–412CrossRef
go back to reference Lasch P, Badeck FW, Suckow F, Lindner M, Mohr P (2005) Model-based analysis of management alternatives at stand and regional level in Brandenburg (Germany). Forest Ecology and Management 207:59–74CrossRef Lasch P, Badeck FW, Suckow F, Lindner M, Mohr P (2005) Model-based analysis of management alternatives at stand and regional level in Brandenburg (Germany). Forest Ecology and Management 207:59–74CrossRef
go back to reference Lexer MJ, Vacik H, Palmetzhofer D, Oitzinger G (2005) A decision support tool to improve forestry extension services for small private landowners in southern Austria. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 49:81–102CrossRef Lexer MJ, Vacik H, Palmetzhofer D, Oitzinger G (2005) A decision support tool to improve forestry extension services for small private landowners in southern Austria. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 49:81–102CrossRef
go back to reference Liski J, Palosuo T, Peltoniemi M, Sievänen R (2005) Carbon and decomposition model Yasso for forest soils. Ecological Modelling 189:168–182CrossRef Liski J, Palosuo T, Peltoniemi M, Sievänen R (2005) Carbon and decomposition model Yasso for forest soils. Ecological Modelling 189:168–182CrossRef
go back to reference Loehle C (1997) A hypothesis testing framework for evaluating ecosystem model performance. Ecological Modelling 97:153–165CrossRef Loehle C (1997) A hypothesis testing framework for evaluating ecosystem model performance. Ecological Modelling 97:153–165CrossRef
go back to reference Loehle C, MacCracken JG, Runde D, Hicks L (2002) Forest Management at Landscape Scales. Solving the problems. Journal of Forestry 100(6):25–33 Loehle C, MacCracken JG, Runde D, Hicks L (2002) Forest Management at Landscape Scales. Solving the problems. Journal of Forestry 100(6):25–33
go back to reference Lootsma FA (1999) Multi-criteria decision analysis via ratio and difference judgments. Applied optimization, vol 29. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 285 pp Lootsma FA (1999) Multi-criteria decision analysis via ratio and difference judgments. Applied optimization, vol 29. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 285 pp
go back to reference Mäkelä A, Landsberg J, Ek AR, Burk TE, Ter-Mikaelian M, Agren GI, Oliver CD, Puttonen P (2000) Process-based models for forest ecosystem management: current state of the art and challenges for practical implementation. Tree Physiology 20:289–298 Mäkelä A, Landsberg J, Ek AR, Burk TE, Ter-Mikaelian M, Agren GI, Oliver CD, Puttonen P (2000) Process-based models for forest ecosystem management: current state of the art and challenges for practical implementation. Tree Physiology 20:289–298
go back to reference Maser C, Bormann BT, Brookes MH, Kiester AR, Weigand JF (1994) Sustainable forestry through adaptive ecosystem management is an open-ended experiment. In: Maser C (ed) Sustainable forestry: philosophy, science, and economics. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, pp 303–340 Maser C, Bormann BT, Brookes MH, Kiester AR, Weigand JF (1994) Sustainable forestry through adaptive ecosystem management is an open-ended experiment. In: Maser C (ed) Sustainable forestry: philosophy, science, and economics. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, pp 303–340
go back to reference McCool SF, Stankey GH (2004) Indicators of sustainability: challenges and opportunities at the interface of science and policy. Environmental Management 33:294–305CrossRef McCool SF, Stankey GH (2004) Indicators of sustainability: challenges and opportunities at the interface of science and policy. Environmental Management 33:294–305CrossRef
go back to reference McMurtrie RE, Landsberg JJ (1993) Using a simulation model to evaluate the effects of water and nutrients on the growth and carbon partitioning of Pinus radiata. Forest Ecology and Management 52:243–260CrossRef McMurtrie RE, Landsberg JJ (1993) Using a simulation model to evaluate the effects of water and nutrients on the growth and carbon partitioning of Pinus radiata. Forest Ecology and Management 52:243–260CrossRef
go back to reference Meitner MJ, Sheppard SRJ, Cavens D, Gandy R, Picard P, Harshaw H, Harrison D (2005) The multiple roles of environmental data visualization in evaluating alternative forest management strategies. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 49:192–205CrossRef Meitner MJ, Sheppard SRJ, Cavens D, Gandy R, Picard P, Harshaw H, Harrison D (2005) The multiple roles of environmental data visualization in evaluating alternative forest management strategies. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 49:192–205CrossRef
go back to reference Mendoza GA, Martins H (2006) Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: a critical review of methods and new modeling paradigms. Forest Ecology and Management 230:1–22CrossRef Mendoza GA, Martins H (2006) Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: a critical review of methods and new modeling paradigms. Forest Ecology and Management 230:1–22CrossRef
go back to reference Mendoza GA, Prabhu R (2000) Multiple criteria decision making approaches to assessing forest sustainability using criteria and indicators: a case study. Forest Ecology and Management 131:107–126CrossRef Mendoza GA, Prabhu R (2000) Multiple criteria decision making approaches to assessing forest sustainability using criteria and indicators: a case study. Forest Ecology and Management 131:107–126CrossRef
go back to reference Mendoza GA, Prabhu R (2003) Qualitative multi-criteria approaches to assessing indicators of sustainable forest resource management. Forest Ecology and Management 174:329–343CrossRef Mendoza GA, Prabhu R (2003) Qualitative multi-criteria approaches to assessing indicators of sustainable forest resource management. Forest Ecology and Management 174:329–343CrossRef
go back to reference Mendoza GA, Prabhu R (2005) Combining participatory modeling and multi-criteria analysis for community-based forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 207:145–156CrossRef Mendoza GA, Prabhu R (2005) Combining participatory modeling and multi-criteria analysis for community-based forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 207:145–156CrossRef
go back to reference Mendoza GA, Macoun P, Prabhu R, Sukadri D, Purnomo H, Hartanto H (1999) Guidelines for applying multi-criteria analysis to the assessment of criteria and indicators. Center for International Forestry Research, Jakarta, 82 pp Mendoza GA, Macoun P, Prabhu R, Sukadri D, Purnomo H, Hartanto H (1999) Guidelines for applying multi-criteria analysis to the assessment of criteria and indicators. Center for International Forestry Research, Jakarta, 82 pp
go back to reference Miina J, Eerikäinen K, Hasenauer H (2006) Modeling forest regeneration. In: Hasenauer H (ed) Sustainable forest management. Growth models for Europe. Springer, Berlin, pp 93–110CrossRef Miina J, Eerikäinen K, Hasenauer H (2006) Modeling forest regeneration. In: Hasenauer H (ed) Sustainable forest management. Growth models for Europe. Springer, Berlin, pp 93–110CrossRef
go back to reference Mintzberg H, Raisinghani D, Theoret A (1976) The structure of unstructured decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly 21:246–275CrossRef Mintzberg H, Raisinghani D, Theoret A (1976) The structure of unstructured decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly 21:246–275CrossRef
go back to reference Mladenoff DJ (2004) LANDIS and forest landscape models. Ecological Modelling 180:7–19CrossRef Mladenoff DJ (2004) LANDIS and forest landscape models. Ecological Modelling 180:7–19CrossRef
go back to reference Mollaghasemi M, Pet-Edwards J (1997) Technical briefing: making multiple-objective decisions. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, 91 pp Mollaghasemi M, Pet-Edwards J (1997) Technical briefing: making multiple-objective decisions. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, 91 pp
go back to reference Mowrer HT (2000) Uncertainty in natural resource decision support systems: sources, interpretation, and importance. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 27:139–154CrossRef Mowrer HT (2000) Uncertainty in natural resource decision support systems: sources, interpretation, and importance. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 27:139–154CrossRef
go back to reference Munda G (2005) Measuring sustainability: a multi-criterion framework. Environment, Development and Sustainability 7:117–134CrossRef Munda G (2005) Measuring sustainability: a multi-criterion framework. Environment, Development and Sustainability 7:117–134CrossRef
go back to reference Nelson J (2003) Forest-level models and challenges for their successful application. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33:422–429CrossRef Nelson J (2003) Forest-level models and challenges for their successful application. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33:422–429CrossRef
go back to reference Ness B, Urbel-Piirsalu E, Anderberg S, Olsson L (2007) Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics 60:498–508CrossRef Ness B, Urbel-Piirsalu E, Anderberg S, Olsson L (2007) Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics 60:498–508CrossRef
go back to reference Niemeijer D (2002) Developing indicators for environmental policy: data-driven and theory-driven approaches examined by example. Environmental Science and Policy 5:91–103CrossRef Niemeijer D (2002) Developing indicators for environmental policy: data-driven and theory-driven approaches examined by example. Environmental Science and Policy 5:91–103CrossRef
go back to reference Pearce D, Putz FE, Vanclay JK (2003) Sustainable forestry in the tropics: panacea or folly? Forest Ecology and Management 172:229–247CrossRef Pearce D, Putz FE, Vanclay JK (2003) Sustainable forestry in the tropics: panacea or folly? Forest Ecology and Management 172:229–247CrossRef
go back to reference Peng C (2000) Understanding the role of forest simulation models in sustainable forest management. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20:481–501CrossRef Peng C (2000) Understanding the role of forest simulation models in sustainable forest management. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20:481–501CrossRef
go back to reference Peng C, Liu J, Dang Q, Apps MJ, Jiang H (2002) TRIPLEX: a generic hybrid model for predicting forest growth and carbon and nitrogen dynamics. Ecological Modelling 153:109–130CrossRef Peng C, Liu J, Dang Q, Apps MJ, Jiang H (2002) TRIPLEX: a generic hybrid model for predicting forest growth and carbon and nitrogen dynamics. Ecological Modelling 153:109–130CrossRef
go back to reference Porté A, Bartelink HH (2002) Modelling mixed forest growth: a review of models for forest management. Ecological Modelling 150:141–188CrossRef Porté A, Bartelink HH (2002) Modelling mixed forest growth: a review of models for forest management. Ecological Modelling 150:141–188CrossRef
go back to reference Prabhu R, Colfer CJP, Venkateswarlu P, Tan LC, Soekmadi R, Wollenberg E (1996) Testing criteria and indicators for the sustainable management of forests. Phase I. Final Report. Center for International Forestry Research, Jakarta, 217 pp Prabhu R, Colfer CJP, Venkateswarlu P, Tan LC, Soekmadi R, Wollenberg E (1996) Testing criteria and indicators for the sustainable management of forests. Phase I. Final Report. Center for International Forestry Research, Jakarta, 217 pp
go back to reference Pretzsch H (2001) Modellierung des Waldwachstums. Parey, Berlin, 341 pp Pretzsch H (2001) Modellierung des Waldwachstums. Parey, Berlin, 341 pp
go back to reference Pretzsch H, Grote R, Reineking B, Rötzer T, Seifert S (2008) Models for forest ecosystem management: a European perspective. Annals of Botany 101:1065–1087CrossRef Pretzsch H, Grote R, Reineking B, Rötzer T, Seifert S (2008) Models for forest ecosystem management: a European perspective. Annals of Botany 101:1065–1087CrossRef
go back to reference Price DT, Zimmermann NE, van der Meer PJ, Lexer MJ, Leadley P, Jorritsma ITM, Schaber J, Clark DF, Lasch P, McNulty S, Wu J, Smith B (2001) Regeneration in gap models: priority issues for studying forest responses to climate change. Climatic Change 51:475–508CrossRef Price DT, Zimmermann NE, van der Meer PJ, Lexer MJ, Leadley P, Jorritsma ITM, Schaber J, Clark DF, Lasch P, McNulty S, Wu J, Smith B (2001) Regeneration in gap models: priority issues for studying forest responses to climate change. Climatic Change 51:475–508CrossRef
go back to reference Pukkala T (ed) (2002) Multi-objective forest planning. Managing forest ecosystems, vol 6. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 207 pp Pukkala T (ed) (2002) Multi-objective forest planning. Managing forest ecosystems, vol 6. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 207 pp
go back to reference Pukkala T (2006) The use of multi-criteria decision analysis and multi-objective optimisation in forest planning. In: Hasenauer H (ed) Sustainable forest management: growth models for Europe. Springer, Berlin, pp 263–284CrossRef Pukkala T (2006) The use of multi-criteria decision analysis and multi-objective optimisation in forest planning. In: Hasenauer H (ed) Sustainable forest management: growth models for Europe. Springer, Berlin, pp 263–284CrossRef
go back to reference Rametsteiner E (2001) SFM indicators as tools in political and economic context: actual and potential roles. In: Raison RJ, Brown AG, Flinn DW (eds) Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management. IUFRO Research Series, vol 7. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 107–130 Rametsteiner E (2001) SFM indicators as tools in political and economic context: actual and potential roles. In: Raison RJ, Brown AG, Flinn DW (eds) Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management. IUFRO Research Series, vol 7. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 107–130
go back to reference Rauscher HM (1999) Ecosystem management decision support for federal forests in the United States: a review. Forest Ecology and Management 114:173–197CrossRef Rauscher HM (1999) Ecosystem management decision support for federal forests in the United States: a review. Forest Ecology and Management 114:173–197CrossRef
go back to reference Rauscher HM, Lloyd FT, Loftis DL, Twery MJ (2000) A practical decision-analysis process for forest ecosystem management. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 27:195–226CrossRef Rauscher HM, Lloyd FT, Loftis DL, Twery MJ (2000) A practical decision-analysis process for forest ecosystem management. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 27:195–226CrossRef
go back to reference Rauscher HM, Schmoldt DL, Vacik H (2007) Information and knowledge management in support of sustainable forestry: a review. In: Reynolds KM, Thomson AJ, Köhl M, Shannon MA, Ray D, Rennolls K (eds) Sustainable forestry: from monitoring and modelling to knowledge management and policy science. CABI Publishing, Oxfordshire, pp 439–460CrossRef Rauscher HM, Schmoldt DL, Vacik H (2007) Information and knowledge management in support of sustainable forestry: a review. In: Reynolds KM, Thomson AJ, Köhl M, Shannon MA, Ray D, Rennolls K (eds) Sustainable forestry: from monitoring and modelling to knowledge management and policy science. CABI Publishing, Oxfordshire, pp 439–460CrossRef
go back to reference Renolls K, Tomé M, McRoberts RE, Vanclay JK, LeMay V, Guan BT, Gertner GZ (2007) Potential contribution of statistics and modelling to sustainable forest management: review and synthesis. In: Reynolds KM, Thomson AJ, Köhl M, Shannon MA, Ray D, Rennolls K (eds) Sustainable forestry: from monitoring and modelling to knowledge management and policy science. CABI Publishing, Oxfordshire, pp 314–341CrossRef Renolls K, Tomé M, McRoberts RE, Vanclay JK, LeMay V, Guan BT, Gertner GZ (2007) Potential contribution of statistics and modelling to sustainable forest management: review and synthesis. In: Reynolds KM, Thomson AJ, Köhl M, Shannon MA, Ray D, Rennolls K (eds) Sustainable forestry: from monitoring and modelling to knowledge management and policy science. CABI Publishing, Oxfordshire, pp 314–341CrossRef
go back to reference Reynolds KM, Johnson KN, Gordon SN (2003) The science/policy interface in logic-based evaluation of forest ecosystem sustainability. Forest Policy and Economics 5:433–446CrossRef Reynolds KM, Johnson KN, Gordon SN (2003) The science/policy interface in logic-based evaluation of forest ecosystem sustainability. Forest Policy and Economics 5:433–446CrossRef
go back to reference Reynolds KM, Twery M, Lexer MJ, Vacik H, Ray D, Shao G, Borges JG (2008) Decision support systems in forest management. In: Burstein F, Holsapple CW (eds) Handbook on decision support systems, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 499–533CrossRef Reynolds KM, Twery M, Lexer MJ, Vacik H, Ray D, Shao G, Borges JG (2008) Decision support systems in forest management. In: Burstein F, Holsapple CW (eds) Handbook on decision support systems, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 499–533CrossRef
go back to reference Robinson AP, Ek AR (2003) Description and validation of a hybrid model of forest growth and stand dynamics for the Great Lakes region. Ecological Modelling 170:73–104CrossRef Robinson AP, Ek AR (2003) Description and validation of a hybrid model of forest growth and stand dynamics for the Great Lakes region. Ecological Modelling 170:73–104CrossRef
go back to reference Running SW, Hunt ER Jr (1993) Generalization of a forest ecosystem process model for other biomes, BIOME-BGC, and an application for global scale models. In: Ehleringer JR, Field C (eds) Scaling physiological processes leaf to globe. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 141–158 Running SW, Hunt ER Jr (1993) Generalization of a forest ecosystem process model for other biomes, BIOME-BGC, and an application for global scale models. In: Ehleringer JR, Field C (eds) Scaling physiological processes leaf to globe. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 141–158
go back to reference Schelhaas MJ, Kramer K, Peltola H, van der Werf DC, Wijdeven SMJ (2007) Introducing tree interactions in wind damage simulation. Ecological Modelling 207:197–209CrossRef Schelhaas MJ, Kramer K, Peltola H, van der Werf DC, Wijdeven SMJ (2007) Introducing tree interactions in wind damage simulation. Ecological Modelling 207:197–209CrossRef
go back to reference Scheller RM, Domingo JB, Sturtevant BR, Williams JS, Rudy A, Gustafson EJ, Mladenoff DJ (2007) Design, development, and application of LANDIS-II, a spatial landscape simulation model with flexible temporal and spatial resolution. Ecological Modelling 201:409–419CrossRef Scheller RM, Domingo JB, Sturtevant BR, Williams JS, Rudy A, Gustafson EJ, Mladenoff DJ (2007) Design, development, and application of LANDIS-II, a spatial landscape simulation model with flexible temporal and spatial resolution. Ecological Modelling 201:409–419CrossRef
go back to reference Searcy C, McCartney D, Karapetrovic S (2008) Identifying priorities for action in corporate sustainable development indicator programs. Business Strategy and the Environment 17:137–148CrossRef Searcy C, McCartney D, Karapetrovic S (2008) Identifying priorities for action in corporate sustainable development indicator programs. Business Strategy and the Environment 17:137–148CrossRef
go back to reference Seely B, Nelson J, Wells R, Peter B, Meitner M, Anderson A, Harshaw H, Sheppard S, Bunnell FL, Kimmins H, Harrison D (2004) The application of a hierarchical, decision-support system to evaluate multi-objective forest management strategies: a case study in northeastern British Columbia, Canada. Forest Ecology and Management 199:283–305 Seely B, Nelson J, Wells R, Peter B, Meitner M, Anderson A, Harshaw H, Sheppard S, Bunnell FL, Kimmins H, Harrison D (2004) The application of a hierarchical, decision-support system to evaluate multi-objective forest management strategies: a case study in northeastern British Columbia, Canada. Forest Ecology and Management 199:283–305
go back to reference Seidl R, Lexer MJ, Jäger D, Hönninger K (2005) Evaluating the accuracy and generality of a hybrid forest patch model. Tree Physiology 25:939–951 Seidl R, Lexer MJ, Jäger D, Hönninger K (2005) Evaluating the accuracy and generality of a hybrid forest patch model. Tree Physiology 25:939–951
go back to reference Seidl R, Baier P, Rammer W, Schopf A, Lexer MJ (2007a) Modelling tree mortality by bark beetle infestation in Norway spruce forests. Ecological Modelling 206:383–399CrossRef Seidl R, Baier P, Rammer W, Schopf A, Lexer MJ (2007a) Modelling tree mortality by bark beetle infestation in Norway spruce forests. Ecological Modelling 206:383–399CrossRef
go back to reference Seidl R, Rammer W, Jäger D, Currie WS, Lexer MJ (2007b) Assessing trade-offs between carbon sequestration and timber production within a framework of multi-purpose forestry in Austria. Forest Ecology and Management 248:64–79CrossRef Seidl R, Rammer W, Jäger D, Currie WS, Lexer MJ (2007b) Assessing trade-offs between carbon sequestration and timber production within a framework of multi-purpose forestry in Austria. Forest Ecology and Management 248:64–79CrossRef
go back to reference Seidl R, Schelhaas MJ, Lindner M, Lexer MJ (2009) Modelling bark beetle disturbances in a large scale forest scenario model to assess climate change impacts and evaluate adaptive. Regional Environmental Change 9:101–119CrossRef Seidl R, Schelhaas MJ, Lindner M, Lexer MJ (2009) Modelling bark beetle disturbances in a large scale forest scenario model to assess climate change impacts and evaluate adaptive. Regional Environmental Change 9:101–119CrossRef
go back to reference Siebenhüner B, Barth V (2005) The role of computer modelling in participatory integrated assessments. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25:367–389CrossRef Siebenhüner B, Barth V (2005) The role of computer modelling in participatory integrated assessments. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25:367–389CrossRef
go back to reference Spangenberg J (2008) Second order governance: learning processes to identify indicators. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15:125–139CrossRef Spangenberg J (2008) Second order governance: learning processes to identify indicators. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15:125–139CrossRef
go back to reference Spash CL, Vatn A (2006) Transferring environmental value estimates: issues and alternatives. Ecological Economics 60:379–388CrossRef Spash CL, Vatn A (2006) Transferring environmental value estimates: issues and alternatives. Ecological Economics 60:379–388CrossRef
go back to reference Stage AR (2003) How forest models are connected to reality: evaluation criteria for their use in decision support. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33:410–421CrossRef Stage AR (2003) How forest models are connected to reality: evaluation criteria for their use in decision support. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33:410–421CrossRef
go back to reference Stankey GH, Clark RN, Bliss J (2003) Fostering compatible forest resource management: the conditional nature of social acceptability. In: Monserud RA, Haynes RW, Johnson AC (eds) Compatible forest management. Managing forest ecosystems, vol 8. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 453–480 Stankey GH, Clark RN, Bliss J (2003) Fostering compatible forest resource management: the conditional nature of social acceptability. In: Monserud RA, Haynes RW, Johnson AC (eds) Compatible forest management. Managing forest ecosystems, vol 8. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 453–480
go back to reference Stankey GH, Clark RN, Bormann BT (2005) Adaptive management of natural resources: theory, concepts, and management institutions. PNW-GTR-654. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, 73 pp Stankey GH, Clark RN, Bormann BT (2005) Adaptive management of natural resources: theory, concepts, and management institutions. PNW-GTR-654. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, 73 pp
go back to reference Sturtevant BR, Fall A, Kneeshaw DD, Simon NPP, Papaik MJ, Berninger K, Doyon F, Morgan DG, Messier C (2007) A toolkit modeling approach for sustainable forest management. Ecology and Society 12(2), article no. 7 Sturtevant BR, Fall A, Kneeshaw DD, Simon NPP, Papaik MJ, Berninger K, Doyon F, Morgan DG, Messier C (2007) A toolkit modeling approach for sustainable forest management. Ecology and Society 12(2), article no. 7
go back to reference Sverdrup H, Stjernquist I (eds) (2002) Developing principles and models for sustainable forestry in Sweden. Managing forest ecosystems, vol 5. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 480 pp Sverdrup H, Stjernquist I (eds) (2002) Developing principles and models for sustainable forestry in Sweden. Managing forest ecosystems, vol 5. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 480 pp
go back to reference Tarp P, Helles F (1995) Multi-criteria decision-making in forest management planning: an overview. Journal of Forest Economics 1:273–306 Tarp P, Helles F (1995) Multi-criteria decision-making in forest management planning: an overview. Journal of Forest Economics 1:273–306
go back to reference Triantaphyllou E, Shu B, Nieto Sanchez SN, Ray T (1998) Multi-criteria decision making: an operations research approach. In: Webster JG (ed) Encyclopedia of electrical and electronics engineering, vol 15. Wiley, New York, pp 175–186 Triantaphyllou E, Shu B, Nieto Sanchez SN, Ray T (1998) Multi-criteria decision making: an operations research approach. In: Webster JG (ed) Encyclopedia of electrical and electronics engineering, vol 15. Wiley, New York, pp 175–186
go back to reference Twery MJ, Knopp PD, Thomasma SA, Rauscher HM, Nute DE, Potter WD, Maier F, Wang J, Dass M, Uchiyama H, Glende A, Hoffman RE (2005) NED-2: a decision support system for integrated forest ecosystem management. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 49:24–43CrossRef Twery MJ, Knopp PD, Thomasma SA, Rauscher HM, Nute DE, Potter WD, Maier F, Wang J, Dass M, Uchiyama H, Glende A, Hoffman RE (2005) NED-2: a decision support system for integrated forest ecosystem management. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 49:24–43CrossRef
go back to reference Urban DL, Acevedo MF, Garman SL (1999) Scaling fine-scale processes to large-scale patterns using models derived from models: meta-models. In: Mladenoff DJ, Baker WL (eds) Spatial modelling of forest landscape change: approaches and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 70–98 Urban DL, Acevedo MF, Garman SL (1999) Scaling fine-scale processes to large-scale patterns using models derived from models: meta-models. In: Mladenoff DJ, Baker WL (eds) Spatial modelling of forest landscape change: approaches and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 70–98
go back to reference Vacik H, Wolfslehner B, Seidl R, Lexer MJ (2007) Integrating the DPSIR-approach and the Analytic Network Process for the assessment of forest management strategies. In: Reynolds KM, Thomson AJ, Köhl M, Shannon MA, Ray D, Rennolls K (eds) From monitoring and modelling to knowledge management and policy science. CABI Publishing, Oxfordshire, pp 393–410CrossRef Vacik H, Wolfslehner B, Seidl R, Lexer MJ (2007) Integrating the DPSIR-approach and the Analytic Network Process for the assessment of forest management strategies. In: Reynolds KM, Thomson AJ, Köhl M, Shannon MA, Ray D, Rennolls K (eds) From monitoring and modelling to knowledge management and policy science. CABI Publishing, Oxfordshire, pp 393–410CrossRef
go back to reference van der Sluijs JP (2002) A way out of the credibility crisis of models used in integrated environmental assessment. Futures 34:133–146CrossRef van der Sluijs JP (2002) A way out of the credibility crisis of models used in integrated environmental assessment. Futures 34:133–146CrossRef
go back to reference van der Sluijs JP, Janssen PHM, Petersen AC, Kloprogge P, Risbey JS, Tuinstra W, Ravetz JR (2004) RIVM/MNP Guidance for Uncertainty Assessment and Communication: Tool Catalogue for Uncertainty Assessment. RIVM/MNP Guidance for Uncertainty Assessment and Communication Series, vol 4, 60 pp, ISBN 90-393-3797-7 van der Sluijs JP, Janssen PHM, Petersen AC, Kloprogge P, Risbey JS, Tuinstra W, Ravetz JR (2004) RIVM/MNP Guidance for Uncertainty Assessment and Communication: Tool Catalogue for Uncertainty Assessment. RIVM/MNP Guidance for Uncertainty Assessment and Communication Series, vol 4, 60 pp, ISBN 90-393-3797-7
go back to reference van der Sluijs JP, Craye M, Funtowicz S, Kloprogge P, Ravetz J, Risbey J (2005) Combining quantitative and qualitative measures of uncertainty in model-based environmental assessment: the NUSAP system. Risk Analysis 25:481–492CrossRef van der Sluijs JP, Craye M, Funtowicz S, Kloprogge P, Ravetz J, Risbey J (2005) Combining quantitative and qualitative measures of uncertainty in model-based environmental assessment: the NUSAP system. Risk Analysis 25:481–492CrossRef
go back to reference von Teuffel K, Hein S, Kotar M, Preuhsler EP, Puumalainen J, Weinfurter P (2006) End user needs and requirements. In: Hasenauer H (ed) Sustainable forest management. Growth models for Europe. Springer, Berlin, pp 19–38CrossRef von Teuffel K, Hein S, Kotar M, Preuhsler EP, Puumalainen J, Weinfurter P (2006) End user needs and requirements. In: Hasenauer H (ed) Sustainable forest management. Growth models for Europe. Springer, Berlin, pp 19–38CrossRef
go back to reference von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W (1986) Decision analysis and behavioural research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 604 pp von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W (1986) Decision analysis and behavioural research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 604 pp
go back to reference Walker WE, Harremoës P, Rotmans J, van der Sluijs JP, van Asselt MBA, Janssen P, Krayer von Krauss MP (2003) Defining uncertainty. A conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integrated Assessment 4:5–17CrossRef Walker WE, Harremoës P, Rotmans J, van der Sluijs JP, van Asselt MBA, Janssen P, Krayer von Krauss MP (2003) Defining uncertainty. A conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integrated Assessment 4:5–17CrossRef
go back to reference Walters CJ, Holling CS (1990) Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71:2060–2068CrossRef Walters CJ, Holling CS (1990) Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71:2060–2068CrossRef
go back to reference Wang S (2004) One hundred faces of sustainable forest management. Forest Policy and Economics 6:205–213CrossRef Wang S (2004) One hundred faces of sustainable forest management. Forest Policy and Economics 6:205–213CrossRef
go back to reference Wolfslehner B, Vacik H (2008) Evaluating sustainable forest management strategies with the Analytic Network Process in a Pressure-State-Response-Framework. Journal of Environmental Management 88:1–10CrossRef Wolfslehner B, Vacik H (2008) Evaluating sustainable forest management strategies with the Analytic Network Process in a Pressure-State-Response-Framework. Journal of Environmental Management 88:1–10CrossRef
go back to reference Wolfslehner B, Vacik H, Lexer MJ (2005) Application of the Analytic Network Process in multi-criteria analysis of sustainable forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 207:157–170CrossRef Wolfslehner B, Vacik H, Lexer MJ (2005) Application of the Analytic Network Process in multi-criteria analysis of sustainable forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 207:157–170CrossRef
go back to reference Woltjer M, Rammer W, Brauner M, Seidl R, Mohren GMJ, Lexer MJ (2008) Coupling a 3D patch model and a rockfall module to assess rockfall protection in mountain forests. Journal of Environmental Management 87:373–388CrossRef Woltjer M, Rammer W, Brauner M, Seidl R, Mohren GMJ, Lexer MJ (2008) Coupling a 3D patch model and a rockfall module to assess rockfall protection in mountain forests. Journal of Environmental Management 87:373–388CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Harnessing Ecosystem Models and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Support of Forest Management
Authors
Bernhard Wolfslehner
Rupert Seidl
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Environmental Management / Issue 6/2010
Print ISSN: 0364-152X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1009
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9414-5

Other articles of this Issue 6/2010

Environmental Management 6/2010 Go to the issue