Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Financial Markets and Portfolio Management
Published in: Financial Markets and Portfolio Management 4/2021

15-04-2021

Have trend-following signals in commodity futures markets become less reliable in recent years?

Author: Benjamin R. Auer

Published in: Financial Markets and Portfolio Management | Issue 4/2021

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Various trend-following trading rules have been shown to be valuable for predicting market directions and thus the formulation of investment strategies. However, recent equity market research has provided striking evidence that the predictive power of such rules appears to diminish over time due to increased investor attention and lowered arbitrage barriers. Given that trend-following rules are also very successful and have been widely used in futures markets, we analyze whether a similar effect can be observed for commodity futures contracts. Using a trend regression approach based on time-varying success ratios, we detect significantly higher predictive accuracy for cross-sectional than for time-series strategies. In addition, with the exception of a few commodities, we find no significant trending behavior in trading rule reliability. These results, which are robust in a variety of settings, indicate strong momentum stability in futures markets and justify the application of this class of trading rules in commodity futures investing.
previous article Covid-19 and smart beta
next article Matthew F. Dixon, Igor Halperin, and Paul Bilokon: Machine learning in finance from theory to practice

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Footnotes
1
Moskowitz et al. (2012) alternatively predict time-series continuation and reversal via regressions of (a) scaled returns on past scaled returns and (b) scaled returns on past return signs.
 
2
Time-series momentum is a timing strategy, whereas cross-sectional momentum is a selection strategy.
 
3
Furthermore, futures contracts (and futures-based momentum portfolios) are excellent diversifiers and inflation hedges, especially when they are actively managed (see Gorton and Rouwenhorst 2006; Erb and Harvey 2006; Miffre and Rallis 2007; Miffre and Fernandez-Perez 2015).
 
4
Transaction costs in futures markets range from 0.0004 to 0.033% (see Fleming et al. 1996; Locke and Venkatesch 1997), which is much less than the conservative 0.5% estimate of Jegadeesh and Titman (1993) or the more realistic 2.3% estimate of Lesmond et al. (2004) for the equity market.
 
5
For an excellent review of additional techniques to strengthen traditional momentum signals, see Miffre (2016). Also note that Fuertes et al. (2015) introduce a very intuitive method of forming bivariate and trivariate portfolios (via combined ranking scores) which might set an important standard for future research.
 
6
Because the properties of the corresponding returns have been extensively documented (see, for example, Auer 2015; Zhang et al. 2018), we omit descriptive statistics illustrating non-normality and serial correlation. However, they are available upon request.
 
7
In contrast, Dow Jones UBS commodity indices have a slightly different rollover, from the sixth to the tenth business day (see Bianchi et al. 2015a).
 
8
Miffre and Rallis (2007) show that profitability declines with rising holding period length. They even document negative (zero) average returns over horizons of 18–24 months (beyond 24 months).
 
9
Similar to Szakmary et al. (2010), we do not form one momentum portfolio based on all commodities but base our analysis on individual securities. Our cross-sectional ranking simply serves the purpose of generating winner/loser signals which may be compared with the actual winner/loser position in the holding period.
 
10
The value of w is different from typical stock market settings because this way the strategies generate neutral signals in about one-third of the time and are thus comparable to the cross-sectional strategy outlined above.
 
11
Note that Narayan et al. (2015) calculate moving averages based on returns instead of prices.
 
12
In a related area of research, Narayan et al. (2013) find that commodity futures are better predictors for spot markets when daily data are used instead of monthly data.
 
13
Strobel and Auer (2018) emphasize that alternatively conducting trend regressions based on strategy returns leads to very similar trend conclusions because success ratios and strategy returns are naturally linked.
 
14
The observable distinct results for Brent and WTI crude oil are not surprising because their time-series characteristics are quite different (see Tian and Lai 2019).
 
15
We would not expect levels very close to one because past returns are unlikely to be able to forecast unforeseeable outside events related to climate phenomena (affecting, for example, wheat prices) or crisis-related investor behavior (influencing, for example, a safe haven asset like gold).
 
16
For a detailed empirical analysis of the reasons why momentum strategies behave differently in stock and futures markets, see Chevallier et al. (2013).
 
17
Detailed results are available from the authors upon request.
 
18
Adding more futures to the winner or loser sides enhances risk diversification at the cost of lowering the dispersion of returns between the best and worst performing futures and thus the profitability of the strategy.
 
19
Adaptive averages have also received attention. They seek to identify and adopt changing market conditions via an efficiency ratio derived from the notion of fractal efficiency and a method close to rescaled range analysis (see Ellis and Parbery 2005). However, the corresponding new trading rules leave the classic VMA framework.
 
Literature
Auer, B.: Does the choice of performance measure influence the evaluation of commodity investments? Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 38, 142–150 (2015)CrossRef
Auer, B., Rottmann, H.: Have capital market anomalies worldwide attenuated in the recent era of high liquidity and trading activity? J. Econ. Bus. 103, 61–79 (2019)CrossRef
Bajgrowicz, P., Scaillet, O.: Technical trading revisited: false discoveries, persistence tests and transaction costs. J. Financ. Econ. 106(3), 473–491 (2012)CrossRef
Bianchi, R., Drew, M., Fan, J.: Combining momentum with reversal in commodity futures. J. Bank. Finance 59, 423–444 (2015a)CrossRef
Bianchi, R., Drew, M., Fan, J.: Microscopic momentum in commodity futures. Griffith University Discussion Papers Finance No. 2015-10 (2015b)
Bianchi, R., Drew, M., Fan, J.: Commodities momentum: a behavioral perspective. J. Bank. Finance 72, 133–150 (2016)CrossRef
Brock, W., Lakonishok, J., LeBaron, B.: Simple technical trading rules and the stochastic properties of stock returns. J. Finance 47(5), 1731–1764 (1992)CrossRef
Chevallier, J., Gatumel, M., Ielpo, F.: Understanding momentum in commodity markets. Appl. Econ. Lett. 20(15), 1383–1402 (2013)CrossRef
Chordia, T., Subrahmanyam, A., Tong, Q.: Have capital market anomalies attenuated in the recent era of high liquidtiy and trading activity? J. Account. Econ. 58(1), 41–58 (2014)CrossRef
Clare, A., Seaton, J., Smith, P., Thomas, S.: Trend following, risk parity and momentum in commodity futures. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 31, 1–12 (2014)CrossRef
de Groot, W., Karstanje, D., Zhou, W.: Exploiting commodity momentum along the futures curves. J. Bank. Finance 48, 79–93 (2014)CrossRef
Ellis, C., Parbery, S.: Is smarter better? A comparison of adaptive, and simple moving average trading strategies. Res. Int. Bus. Finance 19(3), 399–411 (2005)CrossRef
Erb, C., Harvey, C.: The strategic and tactical value of commodity futures. Financ. Anal. J. 62(2), 69–97 (2006)CrossRef
Fama, E., French, K.: Dissecting anomalies. J. Finance 63(4), 1653–1678 (2008)CrossRef
Fama, E., French, K.: Size, value, and momentum in international stock returns. J. Financ. Econ. 105(3), 457–472 (2012)CrossRef
Fifield, S., Power, D., Knipe, D.: The performance of moving average rules in emerging stock markets. Appl. Financ. Econ. 18(19), 1515–1532 (2008)CrossRef
Fleming, J., Ostdiek, B., Whaley, R.: Trading costs and the relative rates of price discovery in stock, futures, and option markets. J. Futures Mark. 16(4), 353–387 (1996)CrossRef
Foltice, B., Langer, T.: Profitable momentum trading strategies for individual investors. Financ. Mark. Portf. Manag. 29, 85–113 (2015)CrossRef
Fong, W., Wong, W., Lean, H.: International momentum strategies: a stochastic dominance approach. J. Financ. Mark. 8(1), 89–109 (2005)CrossRef
Fuertes, A., Miffre, J., Fernandez-Perez, A.: Commodity strategies based on momentum, term structure and idiosyncratic volatility. J. Futures Mark. 35(3), 274–295 (2015)CrossRef
Fuertes, A., Miffre, J., Rallis, G.: Tactical allocation in commodity futures markets: combining momentum and term structure signals. J. Bank. Finance 34(10), 2530–2548 (2010)CrossRef
Georgopoulou, A., Wang, J.: The trend is your friend: time-series momentum strategies across equity and commodity markets. Rev. Finance 21(4), 1557–1592 (2017)CrossRef
Gorton, G., Rouwenhorst, K.: Facts and fantasies about commodity futures. Financ. Anal. J. 62(2), 47–68 (2006)CrossRef
Hendershott, T., Jones, C., Menkveld, A.: Does algorithmic trading improve liquidity? J. Finance 66(1), 1–33 (2011)CrossRef
Hong, H., Yogo, M.: What does futures market interest tell us about the macroeconomy and asset prices? J. Financ. Econ. 105(3), 473–490 (2012)CrossRef
Irwin, S., Yoshimaru, S.: Managed futures, positive feedback trading, and futures price volatility. J. Futures Mark. 19(7), 759–776 (1999)CrossRef
Jacobs, H.: What explains the dynamics of 100 anomalies? J. Bank. Finance 57, 65–85 (2015)CrossRef
Jacobs, H., Müller, S.: Anomalies across the globe: once public, no longer existent? J. Financ. Econ. 135(1), 213–230 (2020)CrossRef
Jegadeesh, N., Titman, S.: Returns to buying winners and selling losers: implications for stock market efficiency. J. Finance 48(1), 65–91 (1993)CrossRef
Jegadeesh, N., Titman, S.: Profitability of momentum strategies: an evaluation of alternative explanations. J. Finance 56(2), 699–720 (2001)CrossRef
Katusiime, L., Shamsuddin, A., Agbola, F.: Foreign exchange market efficiency and profitability of tradingrules: evidence from a developing country. Int. Rev. Econ. Finance 35, 315–332 (2015)CrossRef
Kavajecz, K., Odders-White, E.: Technical analysis and liquidity provision. Rev. Financ. Stud. 17(4), 1043–1071 (2004)CrossRef
Kho, B.: Time-varying risk premia, volatility, and technical trading rule profits: evidence from foreign currency futures markets. J. Financ. Econ. 41(2), 249–290 (1996)CrossRef
Korajczyk, R., Sadka, R.: Are momentum profits robust to trading costs? J. Finance 59(3), 1039–1082 (2004)CrossRef
Lesmond, D., Schill, M., Zhou, C.: The illusory nature of momentum profits. J. Financ. Econ. 71(2), 349–380 (2004)CrossRef
Locke, P., Venkatesch, P.: Futures market transaction costs. J. Futures Mark. 17(2), 229–245 (1997)CrossRef
Lubnau, T., Todorova, N.: Trading on mean-reversion in energy futures markets. Energy Econ. 51, 312–319 (2015)CrossRef
Lukac, L., Brorsen, B., Irwin, S.: A test of futures market disequilibrium using twelve different technical trading systems. Appl. Econ. 20(5), 623–639 (1988)CrossRef
Marshall, B., Cahan, R., Cahan, J.: Can commodity futures be profitably traded with quantitative market timing strategies? J. Bank. Finance 32(9), 1810–1819 (2008)CrossRef
McLean, R., Pontiff, J.: Does academic research destroy stock return predictability? J. Finance 71(1), 5–32 (2016)CrossRef
Miffre, J.: Long-short commodity investing: a review of the literature. J. Commod. Mark. 1(1), 3–13 (2016)CrossRef
Miffre, J., Fernandez-Perez, A.: The case for long-short commodity investing. J. Altern. Invest. 18(1), 92–104 (2015)CrossRef
Miffre, J., Rallis, G.: Momentum strategies in commodity futures markets. J. Bank. Finance 31(6), 1863–1886 (2007)CrossRef
Morana, C.: A semiparametric approach to short-term oil price forecasting. Energy Econ. 23(3), 325–338 (2001)CrossRef
Moskowitz, T., Ooi, Y., Pedersen, L.: Time series momentum. J. Financ. Econ. 104(2), 228–250 (2012)CrossRef
Narayan, P., Ahmed, H., Narayan, S.: Do momentum-based trading strategies work in the commodity futures markets? J. Futures Mark. 35(9), 868–891 (2015)CrossRef
Narayan, P., Narayan, S., Sharma, S.: An analysis of commodity markets: what gain for investors? J. Bank. Finance 37(10), 3878–3889 (2013)CrossRef
Olson, D.: Have trading rule profits in the currency markets declined over time? J. Bank. Finance 28(1), 85–105 (2004)CrossRef
Park, C., Irwin, S.: The profitability of technical trading rules in US futures markets: a data snooping free test. AgMAS Project Research Report 2005-04 (2005)
Park, C., Irwin, S.: A reality check on technical trading rule profits in the U.S. futures markets. J. Futures Mark. 30(7), 633–659 (2010)
Park, C., Irwin, S.: What do we know about the profitability of technical analysis? J. Econ. Surv. 21(4), 786–826 (2007)
Pindyck, R., Rubinfeld, D.: Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. McGraw-Hill, Singapore (1998)
Rachev, S., Jas̆ić, T., Stoyanov, S., Fabozzi, F.: Momentum strategies based on reward-risk stock selection criteria. J. Bank. Finance 31(8), 2325–2346 (2007)
Ratner, M., Leal, R.: Tests of technical trading strategies in the emerging equity markets of Latin America and Asia. J. Bank. Finance 23(12), 1887–1905 (1999)CrossRef
Rosillo, R., de la Fuente, D., Brugos, J.: Technical analysis and the Spanish stock exchange: testing the RSI, MACD, momentum and stochastic rules using Spanish market companies. Appl. Econ. 45(12), 1541–1550 (2013)CrossRef
Shen, Q., Szakmary, A., Sharma, S.: An examination of momentum strategies in commodity futures markets. J. Futures Mark. 27(3), 227–256 (2007)CrossRef
S&P Dow Jones Indices: S&P GSCI Methodology. McGraw Hill Financial, New York (2016)
Strobel, M., Auer, B.: Does the predictive power of variable moving average rules vanish over time and can we explain such tendencies? Int. Rev. Econ. Finance 53, 168–184 (2018)CrossRef
Swinkels, L.: Momentum investing: a survey. J. Asset Manag. 5, 120–143 (2004)CrossRef
Szakmary, A., Shen, Q., Sharma, S.: Trend-following trading strategies in commodity futures: a re-examination. J. Bank. Finance 34(2), 409–426 (2010)CrossRef
Taylor, N.: The rise and fall of technical trading rule success. J. Bank. Finance 40, 286–302 (2014)CrossRef
Taylor, S.: Stock index and price dynamics in the UK and the US: new evidence from a trading rule and statistical analysis. Eu. J. Finance 6(1), 39–69 (2000)CrossRef
Tian, H., Lai, W.: The causes of stage expansion of WTI/Brent spread. Pet. Sci. 16, 1493–1505 (2019)CrossRef
Wang, C., Yu, M.: Trading activity and price reversals in futures markets. J. Bank. Finance 28(6), 1337–1361 (2004)CrossRef
Wang, S., Yu, L., Lai, K.: A novel hybrid AI system framework for crude oil price forecasting. In: Shi, Y., Xu, W., Chen, Z. (eds.) Data Min. Knowl. Manag., pp. 233–242. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2004)
Yao, Y.: Momentum, contrarian, and the January seasonality. J. Bank. Finance 36(10), 2757–2769 (2012)CrossRef
Zaremba, A.: Strategies based on momentum and term structure in financialized commodity markets. Bus. Econ. Res. J. 7(1), 31–46 (2016)CrossRef
Zhang, H., Auer, B., Vortelinos, D.: Performance ranking (dis)similarities in commodity markets. Glob. Finance J. 35, 115–137 (2018)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Have trend-following signals in commodity futures markets become less reliable in recent years?
Author
Benjamin R. Auer
Publication date
15-04-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Financial Markets and Portfolio Management / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1934-4554
Electronic ISSN: 2373-8529
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-021-00385-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Financial Markets and Portfolio Management 4/2021 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

COVID-19’s impact on real estate markets: review and outlook

OriginalPaper

Covid-19 and smart beta

OriginalPaper

Analyst herding and firm-level investor sentiment

Book Review

Matthew F. Dixon, Igor Halperin, and Paul Bilokon: Machine learning in finance from theory to practice