Top

Journal of Inequalities and Applications

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research

Hermite–Hadamard’s trapezoid and mid-point type inequalities on a disk

Authors: M. Rostamian Delavar, S. S. Dragomir, M. De La Sen

Published in: Journal of Inequalities and Applications | Issue 1/2019

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Patentsearch

Off

Abstract

Some trapezoid and mid-point type inequalities related to the Hermite–Hadamard inequality on the disk of center $C=(a,b)$ and radius R, $D(C,R)\subseteq \mathbb{R}^{2}$, are investigated. It is shown that the estimated value obtained in the trapezoid and mid-point type inequalities has a relation with the integral of the partial derivative of the considered function on $\partial (C,R)$, the boundary of $D(C,R)$.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

1 Introduction

Let $f: I\subseteq \mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ be a convex mapping defined on the interval I of real numbers and $a, b\in I$ with $a < b$. The following double inequality

$$ f \biggl(\frac{a+b}{2} \biggr) (b-a)\leq \int _{a}^{b}f(x)\,dx\leq (b-a) \frac{f(a)+f(b)}{2}, $$

(1)

is known in the literature as Hermite–Hadamard inequality for convex mappings. For more results and generalization about (1), see [1, 5‐11] and the references therein.

An interesting problem in (1) is estimating the difference between the right term and the integral of f on $[a,b]$ and also estimating the difference between the left term and the integral of f on $[a,b]$.

In [3], the authors have obtained an estimation for the difference between the right term of (1) and the integral of f as follows.

Theorem 1.1

Let $f : I^{\circ }\subseteq \mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ be a differentiable mapping on $I^{\circ }, a, b\in I^{\circ }$ with $a < b$. If $|f'|$ is convex on $[a, b]$, then the following inequality holds:

$$ \biggl\vert \int _{a}^{b}f(x)\,dx-(b-a)\frac{f(a)+f(b)}{2} \biggr\vert \leq \frac{1}{8}(b-a)^{2} \bigl( \bigl\vert f'(a) \bigr\vert + \bigl\vert f'(b) \bigr\vert \bigr). $$

(2)

As we can see in Theorem 1.1, the estimation value is in connection with the absolute value of the derivative of the considered function on the boundary points of the corresponding interval $[a,b]$. In fact the striped area shown in Fig. 1, which is equivalent to the difference between the area of trapezoid $abcd$ and the area under the graph of f, is estimated in (2) as well. Due to this geometric property, we call inequality (2) trapezoid type inequalities related to the Hermite–Hadamard inequality.

Also in [4], the author obtained an estimation for the difference between the left term of (1) and the integral of f:

Theorem 1.2

([4])

Let $f : I^{\circ }\subseteq \mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ be a differentiable mapping on $I^{\circ }$, $a, b\in I^{ \circ }$ with $a < b$. If $|f'|$ is convex on $[a, b]$, then we have

$$ \biggl\vert \int _{a}^{b}f(x)\,dx-(b-a)f \biggl( \frac{a+b}{2} \biggr) \biggr\vert \leq \frac{1}{8}(b-a)^{2} \bigl( \bigl\vert f'(a) \bigr\vert + \bigl\vert f'(b) \bigr\vert \bigr). $$

(3)

According to (3), the striped area shown in Fig. 2, which is in fact equivalent to the difference between the area under the graph of f and the area of rectangle $abcd$, is estimated. Due to this geometric property, we call inequality (3) mid-point type inequalities related to the Hermite–Hadamard inequality.

Now let us consider a point $C=(a, b)\in \mathbb{R}^{2}$ and the disk $D(C,R)$ centered at the point C and having the radius $R > 0$. The following inequality has been obtained in [2], which is a Hermite–Hadamard inequality related to convex functions defined on the disk $D(C,R)$ in $\mathbb{R}^{2}$.

Theorem 1.3

If the mapping $f: D(C,R)\to \mathbb{R}$ is convex on $D(C,R)$, then one has the inequality

$$ f(C)\leq \frac{1}{\pi R^{2}} \iint _{D(C,R)}f (x,y)\,dx\,dy\leq \frac{1}{2 \pi R} \int _{\partial (C,R)}f(\gamma )\, dl(\gamma ), $$

(4)

where $\partial (C,R)$ is the circle centered at the point $C=(a,b)$ with radius R. The above inequalities are sharp.

Motivated by the above-mentioned works, we investigate the trapezoid and mid-point type inequalities related to (4). We show that on a disk $D(C,R)$, these kinds of estimations have a relation with the integral of $|\frac{\partial f}{\partial r}|$ (in polar coordinates) on $\partial (C,R)$, the boundary of the disk $D(C,R)$, provided that $|\frac{\partial f}{\partial r}|$ is convex with respect to the variable $r\in [0,R]$.

2 Main results

The first result of this section is the trapezoid type inequality related to (4).

Theorem 2.1

Consider a set $I\subset \mathbb{R}^{2}$ with $D(C,R)\subset I^{ \circ }$. Suppose that the mapping $f:D(C,R)\to \mathbb{R}$ has continuous partial derivatives in the disk $D(C,R)$ with respect to the variables r and θ in polar coordinates. If, for any constant $\theta \in [0,2\pi ]$, the function $|\frac{\partial f}{\partial r} |$ is convex with respect to the variable r on $[0,R]$, then

$$ \biggl\vert \frac{1}{2\pi R} \int _{\partial (C,R)}f(\gamma )\,dl(\gamma )-\frac{1}{ \pi R^{2}} \iint _{D(C,R)}f (x,y)\,dx\,dy \biggr\vert \leq \frac{1}{6\pi } \int _{\partial (C,R)} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \biggr\vert ( \gamma )\,dl( \gamma ). $$

(5)

Proof

For a constant $\theta \in [0,2\pi ]$, if we consider

$$ x(r)=a+r\cos \theta $$

and

$$ y(r)=b+r\sin \theta , $$

then we have $([\dot{x}(r)]^{2}+[\dot{y}(r)]^{2} )^{ \frac{1}{2}}= (\sin ^{2}(\theta )+\cos ^{2}(\theta ) )^{ \frac{1}{2}}=1$, where ẋ, ẏ are the derivatives of x, y, respectively, with respect to the variable r on $[0,R]$. So, by the use of integration by parts, we have the following equalities:

$$\begin{aligned} & \int _{0}^{R} \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} (a+r\cos\theta ,b+r \sin \theta )r^{2} \,dr=r^{2} f (a+r\cos\theta ,b+r\sin\theta ) \bigg|_{0}^{R} \\ &\quad {}-2 \int _{0}^{R} f (a+r\cos\theta ,b+r\sin\theta )r\, dr=R^{2}f (a+R\cos\theta ,b+R\sin\theta ) \\ &\quad {}-2 \int _{0}^{R} f (a+r\cos\theta ,b+r\sin\theta )r\, dr. \end{aligned}$$

(6)

The integration of (6) with respect to θ on $[0,2\pi ]$ implies that

$$\begin{aligned} &R^{2} \int _{0}^{2\pi }f (a+R\cos\theta ,b+R\sin\theta )\, d \theta -2 \int _{0}^{2\pi } \int _{0}^{R}f (a+r\cos\theta ,b+r\sin\theta )r\, dr \, d \theta \\ &\quad = \int _{0}^{2\pi } \int _{0}^{R}\frac{\partial f}{\partial r} (a+r\cos \theta ,b+r \sin\theta )r^{2} \, dr\, d\theta . \end{aligned}$$

Since $|\frac{\partial f}{\partial r}|$ is convex with respect to the variable r on $[0,R]$ for any $\theta \in [0,2\pi ]$, then

$$\begin{aligned} & \biggl\vert R^{2} \int _{0}^{2\pi }f (a+R\cos\theta ,b+R\sin\theta )\, d \theta -2 \int _{0}^{2\pi } \int _{0}^{R}f (a+r\cos\theta ,b+r\sin\theta )r\, dr \, d\theta \biggr\vert \\ &\quad \leq \int _{0}^{2\pi } \int _{0}^{R} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \biggr\vert (a+r\cos\theta ,b+r\sin\theta )r^{2} \, dr\, d\theta \\ &\quad = \int _{0}^{2\pi } \int _{0}^{R} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \biggr\vert \biggl(\frac{r}{R} (a+R\cos\theta ,b+R\sin\theta )+ \biggl(1- \frac{r}{R} \biggr) (a,b ) \biggr)r^{2} \, dr\, d\theta \\ &\quad \leq \int _{0}^{2\pi } \int _{0}^{R}\frac{r^{3}}{R} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \biggr\vert (a+R\cos\theta ,b+R\sin\theta )\, dr\, d\theta \\ &\qquad {}+ \int _{0}^{2\pi } \int _{0}^{R}r^{2} \biggl(1- \frac{r}{R} \biggr) \biggl\vert \frac{ \partial f}{\partial r} \biggr\vert (C )\,dr \,d\theta \\ &\quad =\frac{R^{3}}{4} \int _{0}^{2\pi } \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \biggr\vert (a+R\cos\theta ,b+R\sin\theta )\, d\theta+\frac{\pi R^{3}}{6} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \biggr\vert (C ). \end{aligned}$$

(7)

Now, consider the curve $\gamma : [0, 2\pi ] \to \mathbb{R}^{2}$ given by

$$ \gamma : \textstyle\begin{cases} x(\theta )=a+R\cos \theta, \\ y(\theta )=b+R\sin \theta , \end{cases}\displaystyle \quad \theta \in [0,2\pi ]. $$

Then $\gamma ([0, 2\pi ] ) =\partial (C,R)$, and we write (integrating with respect to arc length)

$$\begin{aligned} \int _{\partial (C,R)} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \biggr\vert ( \gamma )\,dl(\gamma )&= \int _{0}^{2\pi } \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \biggr\vert \bigl(x(\theta ),y(\theta ) \bigr) \bigl(\bigl[\dot{x}(\theta ) \bigr]^{2}+\bigl[\dot{y}( \theta )\bigr]^{2} \bigr)^{\frac{1}{2}}\, d\theta \\ &=R \int _{0}^{2\pi } \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \biggr\vert (a+R\cos \theta ,b+R\sin\theta )\, d\theta. \end{aligned}$$

(8)

From (7) and (8) we obtain

(9)

Also using the convexity of $|\frac{\partial f}{\partial r}|$ in (4) we have

$$\begin{aligned} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \biggr\vert (C )&\leq \frac{1}{ \pi R^{2}} \int _{0}^{2\pi } \int _{0}^{R} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \biggr\vert (a+r\cos\theta ,b+r\sin\theta )\,dr\,d\theta \\ &\leq \frac{1}{2\pi R} \int _{\partial (C,R)} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{ \partial r} \biggr\vert ( \gamma )\,dl(\gamma ). \end{aligned}$$

(10)

So by replacing (10) in (9) we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} & \biggl\vert R \int _{\partial (C,R)}f(\gamma )\,dl(\gamma )-2 \int _{0}^{2\pi } \int _{0}^{R}f (a+r\cos\theta ,b+r\sin\theta )r\,dr \,d\theta \biggr\vert \\ &\quad \leq \frac{R^{2}}{3} \int _{\partial (C,R)} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{ \partial r} \biggr\vert ( \gamma )\,dl(\gamma ). \end{aligned}$$

(11)

Finally dividing (11) with $2\pi R^{2}$ we get

$$\begin{aligned} \biggl\vert \frac{1}{2\pi R} \int _{\partial (C,R)}f(\gamma )\,dl(\gamma )-\frac{1}{ \pi R^{2}} \iint _{D(C,R)}f (x,y)\,dx\,dy \biggr\vert \leq \frac{1}{6\pi } \int _{\partial (C,R)} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \biggr\vert ( \gamma )\,dl( \gamma ). \end{aligned}$$

□

Example 2.2

Consider the bifunction $f(x,y)=R-\sqrt{(x-a)^{2}+(y-b)^{2}}$ defined on the disk $D(C,R)$. In polar coordinates we have that

$$ f(a+r\cos\theta ,b+r\sin \theta )=R-r $$

for $0\leq r\leq R$, $\theta \in [0,2\pi ]$ and specially $f(a+R\cos \theta ,b+R\sin \theta )=0$ for all $\theta \in [0,2\pi ]$. So

$$\begin{aligned} & \biggl\vert \frac{1}{2\pi R} \int _{\partial (C,R)}f(\gamma )\,dl(\gamma )-\frac{1}{ \pi R^{2}} \iint _{D(C,R)}f (x,y)\,dx\,dy \biggr\vert \\ &\quad =\frac{1}{\pi R^{2}} \iint _{D(C,R)}f (x,y)\,dx\,dy=\frac{1}{ \pi R^{2}} \int _{0}^{2\pi } \int _{0}^{R} (R-r)r\,dr\,d\theta = \frac{R}{3}. \end{aligned}$$

(12)

On the other hand, it is not hard to see that $|\frac{\partial f}{ \partial r}|(a+R\cos\theta ,b+R\sin\theta )=1$ for all $\theta \in [0,2 \pi ]$, and so

$$ \frac{1}{6\pi } \int _{\partial (C,R)} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \biggr\vert ( \gamma )\,dl(\gamma )=\frac{R}{3}. $$

(13)

Then identities (12) and (13) show that inequality (5) is sharp.

The following result is the mid-point type inequality related to (4).

Theorem 2.3

$$ \biggl\vert \frac{1}{\pi R^{2}} \iint _{D(C,R)}f (x,y)\,dx\,dy-f(C) \biggr\vert \leq \frac{2}{3\pi } \int _{\partial (C,R)} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{ \partial r} \biggr\vert ( \gamma )\,dl(\gamma ). $$

(14)

Proof

As we have seen in the proof of Theorem 2.1, for a constant $\theta \in [0,2\pi ]$, if we consider $x(r)=a+r\cos \theta $ and $y(r)=b+r\sin \theta $, then we have $([\dot{x}(r)]^{2}+[\dot{y}(r)]^{2} )^{\frac{1}{2}}=1$. So from fundamental theorem of calculus we have

$$ \int _{0}^{R} \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} (a+r\cos\theta ,b+r \sin \theta ) \,dr=f (a+R\cos\theta ,b+R\sin\theta )-f(C). $$

Hence

$$\begin{aligned} & \int _{0}^{2\pi } \int _{0}^{R}\frac{\partial f}{\partial r} (a+r\cos \theta ,b+r \sin\theta )\,dr\,d\theta \\ &\quad = \int _{0}^{2\pi }f (a+R\cos\theta ,b+R\sin\theta )\,d \theta -2 \pi f(C), \end{aligned}$$

which implies that

$$ \int _{0}^{2\pi } \int _{0}^{R}\frac{\partial f}{\partial r} (a+r\cos \theta ,b+r \sin\theta )\,dr\,d\theta =\frac{1}{R} \int _{\partial (C,R)}f( \gamma )\,dl(\gamma )-2\pi f(C). $$

(15)

Now from (15) we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} & \biggl\vert \frac{1}{2\pi R} \int _{\partial (C,R)}f(\gamma )\,dl(\gamma )-f(C) \biggr\vert \\ &\quad \leq \frac{1}{2\pi } \int _{0}^{2\pi } \int _{0}^{R} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \biggr\vert (a+r\cos\theta ,b+r\sin\theta )\,dr\,d\theta. \end{aligned}$$

Since $|\frac{\partial f}{\partial r}|$ is convex, then it follows that

$$\begin{aligned} & \biggl\vert \frac{1}{2\pi R} \int _{\partial (C,R)}f(\gamma )\,dl(\gamma )-f(a,b) \biggr\vert \\ &\quad \leq \frac{1}{2\pi } \biggl[ \int _{0}^{2\pi } \int _{0}^{R} \biggl\vert \frac{ \partial f}{\partial r} \biggr\vert \biggl(\frac{r}{R} (a+R\cos\theta ,b+R\sin \theta )+ \biggl(1-\frac{r}{R} \biggr) (a,b ) \biggr)\,dr\,d\theta \biggr] \\ &\quad \leq \frac{1}{2\pi } \biggl[ \int _{0}^{2\pi } \int _{0}^{R}\frac{r}{R} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \biggr\vert (a+R\cos\theta ,b+R\sin \theta )\,dr\,d\theta \\ &\qquad {}+ \int _{0}^{2\pi } \int _{0}^{R} \biggl(1-\frac{r}{R} \biggr) \biggl\vert \frac{ \partial f}{\partial r} \biggr\vert (C )\,dr\,d\theta \biggr] \\ &\quad = \frac{1}{4 \pi } \int _{\partial (C,R)} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \biggr\vert ( \gamma )\,dl(\gamma )+\frac{R}{2} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \biggr\vert (C). \end{aligned}$$

(16)

From the triangle inequality and (16) we get

$$\begin{aligned} & \biggl\vert \frac{1}{\pi R^{2}} \int _{0}^{2\pi } \int _{0}^{R}f (a+r\cos \theta ,b+r\sin\theta )\,dr \,d\theta -f(C) \biggr\vert \\ &\quad \leq \frac{1}{4\pi } \int _{\partial (C,R)} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{ \partial r} \biggr\vert ( \gamma )\,dl(\gamma )+\frac{R}{2} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{ \partial r} \biggr\vert (C) \\ &\qquad {}+ \biggl\vert \frac{1}{\pi R^{2}} \int _{0}^{2\pi } \int _{0}^{R}f (a+r\cos \theta ,b+r\sin\theta )r\,dr \,d\theta -\frac{1}{2\pi R} \int _{\partial (C,R)}f(\gamma )\,dl(\gamma ) \biggr\vert . \end{aligned}$$

(17)

Since $|\frac{\partial f}{\partial r}|$ satisfies the Hermite–Hadamard inequality (4), then

$$ \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \biggr\vert (C)\leq \frac{1}{2\pi R} \int _{\partial (C,R)} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \biggr\vert ( \gamma )\,dl( \gamma ). $$

So, by replacing (5) and the inequality in (17) above, we obtain

□

Remark 2.4

If the functions f and $|\frac{\partial f}{\partial r} |$ are convex on $D(C,R)$, then by the use of inequalities (5), (14), and (4) we have

$$ 0\leq \frac{1}{\pi R^{2}} \iint _{D(C,R)}f (x,y)\,dx\,dy-f(C)\leq \frac{2}{3 \pi } \int _{\partial (C,R)} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \biggr\vert ( \gamma )\,dl(\gamma ) $$

and

$$ 0\leq \frac{1}{2\pi R} \int _{\partial (C,R)}f(\gamma )\,dl(\gamma )-\frac{1}{ \pi R^{2}} \iint _{D(C,R)}f (x,y)\,dx\,dy\leq \frac{1}{6\pi } \int _{\partial (C,R)} \biggl\vert \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \biggr\vert ( \gamma )\,dl( \gamma ). $$

Example 2.5

There exists a function satisfying all the conditions of Remark 2.4 as well. Consider the function $f(x,y)=x^{2}+y^{2}$ with $(x,y)\in \mathbb{R}^{2}$ defined on a disk $D((0,0),R)$. It is clear that $f(r,\theta )=r^{2}$ and $|\frac{\partial f}{\partial r} |=2r$, which is equivalent to $f(x,y)=2\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}}$ with $(x,y)\in \mathbb{R}^{2}$ defined on a disk $D ((0,0),R )$. As we can see in Fig. 3, the functions f and $|\frac{\partial f}{ \partial r} |$ are convex.

Acknowledgements

Author M. De La Sen is grateful to the Spanish Government for funding received from the European Fund of Regional Development FEDER through Grant DPI2015-64766-R and to UPV/EHU for Grant PGC 17/33.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

previous article Nontrivial solutions for an integral boundary value problem involving Riemann–Liouville fractional derivatives

next article Adaptive wavelet estimations for the derivative of a density in GARCH-type model

Alomari, M., Darus, M., Kirmaci, U.S.: Refinements of Hadamard-type inequalities for quasi-convex functions with applications to trapezoidal formula and to special means. Comput. Math. Appl. 59, 225–232 (2010) MathSciNetCrossRef

Dragomir, S.S.: On Hadamard’s inequality on a disk. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 1(1), Article 2 (2000) MathSciNetMATH

Dragomir, S.S., Agarwal, R.P.: Two inequalities for differentiable mappings and applications to special means of real numbers and to trapezoidal formula. Appl. Math. Lett. 11, 91–95 (1998) MathSciNetCrossRef

Kirmaci, U.S.: Inequalities for differentiable mappings and applications to special means of real numbers and to midpoint formula. Appl. Math. Comput. 147(1), 137–146 (2004) MathSciNetMATH

Pearce, C.E.M., Pecaric, J.E.: Inequalities for differentiable mappings with application to special means and quadrature formula. Appl. Math. Lett. 13, 51–55 (2000) MathSciNetCrossRef

Rostamian Delavar, M., De La Sen, M.: Some generalizations of Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities. SpringerPlus 5, 1661 (2016) CrossRef

Rostamian Delavar, M., Dragomir, S.S.: On η-convexity. Math. Inequal. Appl. 20, 203–216 (2017) MathSciNetMATH

Sarikaya, M.Z., Saglam, A., Yildirim, H.: On some Hadamard-type inequalities for h-convex functions. J. Math. Inequal. 2, 335–341 (2008) MathSciNetCrossRef

Wasowicz, S., Witkowski, A.: On some inequality of Hermite–Hadamard type. Opusc. Math. 32(3), 591–600 (2012) MathSciNetCrossRef

10.

Yang, G.S.: Inequalities of Hadamard type for Lipschitzian mappings. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 260, 230–238 (2001) MathSciNetCrossRef

11.

Yang, G.S., Hwang, D.Y., Tseng, K.L.: Some inequalities for differentiable convex and concave mappings. Comput. Math. Appl. 47, 207–216 (2004) MathSciNetCrossRef

Title: Hermite–Hadamard’s trapezoid and mid-point type inequalities on a disk
Authors: M. Rostamian Delavar
S. S. Dragomir
M. De La Sen
Publication date: 01-12-2019
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Published in: Journal of Inequalities and Applications / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1029-242X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-019-2061-3

Springer Professional

Hermite–Hadamard’s trapezoid and mid-point type inequalities on a disk

Abstract

Publisher’s Note

1 Introduction

2 Main results

Acknowledgements

Availability of data and materials

Competing interests

Publisher’s Note

Premium Partner

Springer Professional

Abstract

Publisher’s Note

1 Introduction

2 Main results

Acknowledgements

Availability of data and materials

Competing interests

Publisher’s Note

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

On extended interpolative Ćirić–Reich–Rus type F-contractions and an application

Well-posedness of the stochastic Boussinesq equation driven by Levy processes

Exponential stability analysis of nonlinear systems with bounded gain error

A new proof of the Orlicz–Lorentz centroid inequality

The Minkowski inequality involving generalized k-fractional conformable integral

On submultiplicative constants of an algebra

Premium Partner