Skip to main content
Top

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

6. Heterogeneous Multiple Criteria Group Decision Analysis

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to develop the deviation modeling method to deal with the heterogeneous MCGDM problems with incomplete weight information in which the decision information is expressed as real numbers, interval numbers, linguistic variables, IFNs, HFEs and HFLTSs. The most characteristic of the deviation modeling method is that it does not unify the heterogeneous information but directly calculates the distances to the PIS and NIS. Compared with Li et al. (2010b)’s method, the advantages of the developed method are that (1) it can accommodate more complicated decision data, including IFNs, HFEs and HFLTSs; (2) it utilizes the maximization deviation model to determine objectively the weights of the criteria for each expert, which avoids the subjective randomness of selecting the weights; (3) it can consider fully the consistency between the opinions of the individual experts and the group, thus the final decision results derived by it are more persuasive.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Bordogna, G., & Pasi, G. (1993). A fuzzy linguistic approach generalizing boolean information retrieval: A model and its evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44, 70–82.CrossRef Bordogna, G., & Pasi, G. (1993). A fuzzy linguistic approach generalizing boolean information retrieval: A model and its evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44, 70–82.CrossRef
go back to reference Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1977). Goal programming and multiple objective optimizations: Part 1. European Journal of Operational Research, 1, 39–54.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1977). Goal programming and multiple objective optimizations: Part 1. European Journal of Operational Research, 1, 39–54.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
go back to reference Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, 1–9.CrossRefMATH Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, 1–9.CrossRefMATH
go back to reference Cheng, S., Chan, C. W., & Huang, G. H. (2003). An integrated multi-criteria decision analysis and inexact mixed integer linear programming approach for solid waste management. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 16, 543–554.CrossRef Cheng, S., Chan, C. W., & Huang, G. H. (2003). An integrated multi-criteria decision analysis and inexact mixed integer linear programming approach for solid waste management. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 16, 543–554.CrossRef
go back to reference Delgado, M., Vila, M., & Voxman, W. (1998). A fuzziness measure for fuzzy numbers: Applications. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 94, 205–216.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Delgado, M., Vila, M., & Voxman, W. (1998). A fuzziness measure for fuzzy numbers: Applications. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 94, 205–216.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
go back to reference Feng, B., & Lai, F. J. (2014). Multi-attribute group decision making with aspirations: A case study. Omega, 44, 136–147.CrossRef Feng, B., & Lai, F. J. (2014). Multi-attribute group decision making with aspirations: A case study. Omega, 44, 136–147.CrossRef
go back to reference González-Pachón, J., Diaz-Balteiro, L., & Romero, C. (2014). How to combine inconsistent ordinal and cardinal preferences: A satisficing modelling approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 67, 168–172.CrossRef González-Pachón, J., Diaz-Balteiro, L., & Romero, C. (2014). How to combine inconsistent ordinal and cardinal preferences: A satisficing modelling approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 67, 168–172.CrossRef
go back to reference Herrera, F., Martınez, L., & Sánchez, P. J. (2005). Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 166, 115–132.CrossRefMATH Herrera, F., Martınez, L., & Sánchez, P. J. (2005). Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 166, 115–132.CrossRefMATH
go back to reference Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefMATH Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefMATH
go back to reference Li, D. F., Huang, Z. G., & Chen, G. H. (2010). A systematic approach to heterogeneous multiattribute group decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 59, 561–572.CrossRef Li, D. F., Huang, Z. G., & Chen, G. H. (2010). A systematic approach to heterogeneous multiattribute group decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 59, 561–572.CrossRef
go back to reference Liu, H. B., & Rodríguez, R. M. (2014). A fuzzy envelope for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application to multicriteria decision making. Information Sciences, 258, 220–238.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Liu, H. B., & Rodríguez, R. M. (2014). A fuzzy envelope for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application to multicriteria decision making. Information Sciences, 258, 220–238.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
go back to reference Ma, J., Lu, J., & Zhang, G. Q. (2010). Decider: A fuzzy multi-criteria group decision support system. Knowledge-Based Systems, 23, 23–31.CrossRef Ma, J., Lu, J., & Zhang, G. Q. (2010). Decider: A fuzzy multi-criteria group decision support system. Knowledge-Based Systems, 23, 23–31.CrossRef
go back to reference Martínez, L., Liu, J., Ruan, D., & Yang, J. B. (2007). Dealing with heterogeneous information in engineering evaluation processes. Information Sciences, 177, 1533–1542.CrossRef Martínez, L., Liu, J., Ruan, D., & Yang, J. B. (2007). Dealing with heterogeneous information in engineering evaluation processes. Information Sciences, 177, 1533–1542.CrossRef
go back to reference Rodriguez, R. M., Martinez, L., & Herrera, F. (2012). Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 20, 109–119.CrossRef Rodriguez, R. M., Martinez, L., & Herrera, F. (2012). Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 20, 109–119.CrossRef
go back to reference Rodríguez, R. M., Martı́nez, L., & Herrera, F. (2013). A group decision making model dealing with comparative linguistic expressions based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Information Sciences, 241, 28–42.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Rodríguez, R. M., Martı́nez, L., & Herrera, F. (2013). A group decision making model dealing with comparative linguistic expressions based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Information Sciences, 241, 28–42.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
go back to reference Wan, S. P., & Li, D. F. (2014). Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy programming method for heterogeneous multiattribute group decision making with Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy truth degrees. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22, 300–312.CrossRef Wan, S. P., & Li, D. F. (2014). Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy programming method for heterogeneous multiattribute group decision making with Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy truth degrees. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22, 300–312.CrossRef
go back to reference Wang, Y. M. (1998). Using the method of maximizing deviations to make decision for multi-indices. System Engineering and Electronics, 7, 31. Wang, Y. M. (1998). Using the method of maximizing deviations to make decision for multi-indices. System Engineering and Electronics, 7, 31.
go back to reference Wei, G. W. (2008). Maximizing deviation method for multiple attribute decision making in intuitionistic fuzzy setting. Knowledge-Based Systems, 21, 833–836.CrossRef Wei, G. W. (2008). Maximizing deviation method for multiple attribute decision making in intuitionistic fuzzy setting. Knowledge-Based Systems, 21, 833–836.CrossRef
go back to reference Wu, Z. B., & Chen, Y. H. (2007). The maximizing deviation method for group multiple attribute decision making under linguistic environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 158, 1608–1617.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Wu, Z. B., & Chen, Y. H. (2007). The maximizing deviation method for group multiple attribute decision making under linguistic environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 158, 1608–1617.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
go back to reference Xu, Z. S. (2010). A deviation-based approach to intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 19, 57–76.CrossRef Xu, Z. S. (2010). A deviation-based approach to intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 19, 57–76.CrossRef
go back to reference Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Information Sciences, Part I, II, III, 8, 9, 199–249, 301–357, 143–180. Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Information Sciences, Part I, II, III, 8, 9, 199–249, 301–357, 143–180.
go back to reference Zhang, G. Q., & Lu, J. (2003). An integrated group decision-making method dealing with fuzzy preferences for alternatives and individual judgments for selection criteria. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12, 501–515. Zhang, G. Q., & Lu, J. (2003). An integrated group decision-making method dealing with fuzzy preferences for alternatives and individual judgments for selection criteria. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12, 501–515.
go back to reference Zhang, X. L., Xu, Z. S., & Wang, H. (2015). Heterogeneous multiple criteria group decision making with incomplete weight information: A deviation modeling approach. Information Fusion, 25, 25–62.MathSciNetCrossRef Zhang, X. L., Xu, Z. S., & Wang, H. (2015). Heterogeneous multiple criteria group decision making with incomplete weight information: A deviation modeling approach. Information Fusion, 25, 25–62.MathSciNetCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Heterogeneous Multiple Criteria Group Decision Analysis
Authors
Xiaolu Zhang
Zeshui Xu
Copyright Year
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42001-1_6

Premium Partner