Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Identifying Interaction and Awareness Services in Mobile Collaborative Applications Read chapter Read first chapter

2022 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

How Arousing Benefits and Ethical Misgivings Affect AI-Based Dating App Adoption: The Roles of Perceived Autonomy and Perceived Risks

Authors : Zhuang Ma, Woon Kian Chong, Linpei Song

Published in: Design, Operation and Evaluation of Mobile Communications

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

AI-based applications (apps) have presented tremendous ethical challenges such as AI biases and privacy breaches, leading to the issue of privacy paradox. The paradox is more salient for dating apps than ordinary shopping apps, as data breaches in dating apps could relate to users’ close social circles such as families and colleagues, suggesting more serious ethical and even legal consequences. Given the limited attention to user’ arousal-ethics paradox, we developed and empirically examined a conceptual framework regarding how the arousing benefits of dating apps, users’ ethical misgivings, users’ perceived autonomy and perceived risks collectively affect their adoption of dating apps. Survey data from 319 construction workers confirmed that arousing benefits are associated with users’ perceived autonomy, which leads to dating apps adoption. In contrast, users’ ethical misgivings, associated with perceived risks, are negatively related to dating app adoption. This study contributes to the interdisciplinary field of privacy paradox that involves big data, artificial intelligence, user experience, and ethics by examining ethical consumption and practical suggestions to AI-based dating app developers.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Research on the Construction of the Quality Maturity Evaluation in the Product R&D Phase
next chapter The Surprise of Underestimation: Analyzing the Effects and Predictors of the Accuracy of Estimated Smartphone Use
Literature
1.
Chen, Q., Zhang, M., Zhao, X.: Analysing customer behaviour in mobile app usage. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 117, 425–438 (2017)CrossRef
2.
Du, S., Xie, C.: Paradoxes of artificial intelligence in consumer markets: ethical challenges and opportunities. J. Bus. Res. 129, 961–974 (2021)CrossRef
3.
Chong, W.K., Ma, Z.: The quality of user experiences for mobile recommendation systems: an end-user perspective. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 121, 1063–1081 (2021)CrossRef
4.
Pham, A., et al.: HideMyApp: Hiding the Presence of Sensitive Apps on Android (2019)
5.
Rowe, F.: Contact tracing apps and values dilemmas: a privacy paradox in a neo-liberal world. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 55, 102178 (2020)CrossRef
6.
Albury, K., Burgess, J., Light, B., Race, K., Wilken, R.: Data cultures of mobile dating and hook-up apps: emerging issues for critical social science research. Big Data Soc. 4, 1–11 (2017)CrossRef
7.
Ryu, S., Park, Y.: How consumers cope with location-based advertising (LBA) and personal information disclosure: the mediating role of persuasion knowledge, perceived benefits and harms, and attitudes toward LBA. Comput. Hum. Behav. 112, 106450 (2020)CrossRef
8.
Pentina, I., Zhang, L., Bata, H., Chen, Y.: Exploring privacy paradox in information-sensitive mobile app adoption: a cross-cultural comparison. Comput. Hum. Behav. 65, 409–419 (2016)CrossRef
9.
Chopdar, P.K., Korfiatis, N., Sivakumar, V.J., Lytras, M.D.: Mobile shopping apps adoption and perceived risks: a cross-country perspective utilizing the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Comput. Hum. Behav. 86, 109–128 (2018)CrossRef
10.
Wilken, R., Burgess, J., Albury, K.: Dating apps and data markets: a political economy of communication approach. Dating Apps Data Markets: A Political, pp. 1–40 (2019)
11.
Heilweil, B.R.: Tinder may not get you a date. It will get your data, pp. 1–9 (2022)
12.
Marinos, S.: Tinder craze: a casual sex cesspool or a swipe right for true love? Her. Sun. (2014, online). Accessed 12 Dec 2021
13.
Lutz, C., Ranzini, G.: Where dating meets data: investigating social and institutional privacy concerns on tinder. Soc. Media Soc. 3, 1–12 (2017)
14.
Ameen, N., Hosany, S., Paul, J.: The personalisation-privacy paradox: consumer interaction with smart technologies and shopping mall loyalty. Comput. Hum. Behav. 126, 106976 (2022)CrossRef
15.
Dinev, T., Hart, P.: An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Inf. Syst. Res. 17, 61–80 (2006)CrossRef
16.
Yang, S., Wang, K.: The influence of information sensitivity compensation on privacy concern and behavioral intention. ACM SIGMIS Database Adv. Inf. Syst. 40, 38–51 (2009)
17.
Dienlin, T., Trepte, S.: Is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? An in-depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 45, 285–297 (2015)CrossRef
18.
Timmermans, E., De Caluwé, E.: Development and validation of the Tinder Motives Scale (TMS). Comput. Hum. Behav. 70, 341–350 (2017)CrossRef
19.
Blackwell, C., Birnholtz, J., Abbott, C.: Seeing and being seen: co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app. New media Soc. 17, 1117–1136 (2015)CrossRef
20.
Hsieh, S.H., Lee, C.T., Tseng, T.H.: Branded app atmospherics: examining the effect of pleasure–arousal–dominance in brand relationship building. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 60, 102482 (2021)CrossRef
21.
Lee, Y.-K., Park, J.-H., Chung, N., Blakeney, A.: A unified perspective on the factors influencing usage intention toward mobile financial services. J. Bus. Res. 65, 1590–1599 (2012)CrossRef
22.
Wünderlich, N.V., Wangenheim, F.V., Bitner, M.J.: High tech and high touch: a framework for understanding user attitudes and behaviors related to smart interactive services. J. Serv. Res. 16, 3–20 (2013)CrossRef
23.
Connolly, R., Bannister, F.: Consumer trust in Internet shopping in Ireland: towards the development of a more effective trust measurement instrument. J. Inf. Technol. 22, 102–118 (2007)CrossRef
24.
Harden, K.P., Tucker-Drob, E.M.: Individual differences in the development of sensation seeking and impulsivity during adolescence: further evidence for a dual systems model. Dev. Psychol. 47, 739–746 (2011)CrossRef
25.
Blanthorne, C., Kaplan, S.: An egocentric model of the relations among the opportunity to underreport, social norms, ethical beliefs, and underreporting behavior. Account. Organ. Soc. 33, 684–703 (2008)CrossRef
26.
Rauschnabel, P.A., He, J., Ro, Y.K.: Antecedents to the adoption of augmented reality smart glasses: a closer look at privacy risks. J. Bus. Res. 92, 374–384 (2018)CrossRef
27.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., Podsakoff, N.P.: Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88, 879–903 (2003)CrossRef
28.
Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W.: Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 103, 411 (1988)CrossRef
29.
Hair, J.F.: Multivariate data analysis (2009)
30.
Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18, 39–50 (1981)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
How Arousing Benefits and Ethical Misgivings Affect AI-Based Dating App Adoption: The Roles of Perceived Autonomy and Perceived Risks
Authors
Zhuang Ma
Woon Kian Chong
Linpei Song
Copyright Year
2022
Book
Design, Operation and Evaluation of Mobile Communications

Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05013-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-05014-5

Copyright Year: 2022

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05014-5_13