Top

Quality of Life Research

Published in:

19-11-2018 | Review

How depressed is “depressed”? A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis of optimal cut points for the Beck Depression Inventory revised (BDI-II)

Authors: Michael von Glischinski, Ruth von Brachel, Gerrit Hirschfeld

Published in: Quality of Life Research | Issue 5/2019

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Introduction

The Beck Depression Inventory revised (BDI-II) is widely used tool to screen for depression. The aim of the present study was to systematically review and synthesize studies that determined optimal cut points for the BDI-II.

Method

We identified 27 studies that tried to identify optimal cut points for the BDI-II. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS criteria. Cut points and their variability were analyzed descriptively, via simulation and synthesized with a diagnostic meta-analysis. Analysis was performed on all studies and subgroups based on the setting (psychiatric, somatic, healthy).

Results

Cut points identified as optimal ranged from 10 to 25 across all studies. Simulation-based estimations of the variability inherent in studies show that much of the between-study differences may be attributed to random fluctuations. Diagnostic meta-analysis across all studies revealed that a cut point of 14.5 (95% CI 12.75–16.44) is optimal, yielding a sensitivity of 0.86 and a specificity of 0.78. Analyses within the different settings suggest using sample-specific cut points, specifically 18.18 in psychiatric settings, and 12.9 in primary care settings and healthy populations.

Conclusion

Most studies aimed at determining optimal cut points fail to acknowledge that reported results are only estimates and subject to random fluctuations resulting in conflicting recommendations for practitioners. Taking into account these fluctuations, we find that practitioners should use different cut points to screen for depression in primary care and healthy populations (a score of 13 and higher indicates depression) and psychiatric settings (a score of 19 and higher indicates depression). Methods to describe this variability and meta-analysis to synthesize findings across studies should be used more widely.

next article Patient-reported outcomes in stroke clinical trials 2002–2016: a systematic review

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

Adachi, Y., Aleksic, B., Nobata, R., Suzuki, T., Yoshida, K., Ono, Y., & Ozaki, N. (2012). Combination use of Beck Depression Inventory and two-question case-finding instrument as a screening tool for depression in the workplace. British Medical Journal Open, 2(3), e000596. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000596.CrossRef

Balogun, R. A., Turgut, F., Balogun, S. A., Holroyd, S., & Abdel-Rahman, E. M. (2011). Screening for depression in elderly hemodialysis patients. Nephron Clinical Practice, 118(2), c72–c77. https://doi.org/10.1159/000320037.CrossRefPubMed

Beard, C., Millner, A. J., Forgeard, M. J., Fried, E. I., Hsu, K. J., Treadway, M. T., … Björgvinsson, T. (2016). Network analysis of depression and anxiety symptom relationships in a psychiatric sample. Psychological Medicine, 46(16), 3359–3369.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). BDI-II: Beck Depression Inventory manual (2nd ed.). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.

Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. … STARD Group. (2015). STARD 2015: An updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ, 351, h5527.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Dutton, G. R., Grothe, K. B., Jones, G. N., Whitehead, D., Kendra, K., & Brantley, P. J. (2004). Use of the Beck Depression Inventory-II with African American primary care patients. General Hospital Psychiatry, 26(6), 437–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2004.06.002.CrossRefPubMed

Ferrari, A. J., Charlson, F. J., Norman, R. E., Patten, S. B., Freedman, G., Murray, C. J., … Whiteford, H. A. (2013). Burden of depressive disorders by country, sex, age, and year: Findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. PLoS Medicine, 10(11), e1001547.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Fried, E. I., & Nesse, R. M. (2015). Depression sum-scores don’t add up: Why analyzing specific depression symptoms is essential. BMC Medicine, 13(1), 1.CrossRef

Hasin, D. S., Sarvet, A. L., Meyers, J. L., Saha, T. D., Ruan, W. J., Stohl, M., & Grant, B. F. (2018). Epidemiology of adult DSM-5 major depressive disorder and its specifiers in the United States. JAMA Psychiatry, 75(4), 336–346.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Hirschfeld, G., & do Brasil, P. E. A. A. (2014). A simulation study into the performance of “optimal” diagnostic thresholds in the population: “Large” effect sizes are not enough. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(4), 449–453.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Kamenov, K., Caballero, F. F., Miret, M., Leonardi, M., Sainio, P., Tobiasz-Adamczyk, B., … Cabello, M. (2016). Which are the most burdensome functioning areas in depression? A cross-national study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1342.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Leeflang, M. M. G., Moons, K. G. M., Reitsma, J. B., & Zwinderman, A. H. (2008). Bias in sensitivity and specificity caused by data-driven selection of optimal cutoff values: Mechanisms, magnitude, and solutions. Clinical Chemistry, 54(4), 729–737.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Lemmens, L., Arntz, A., Peeters, F., Hollon, S. D., Roefs, A., & Huibers, M. J. H. (2015). Clinical effectiveness of cognitive therapy v. interpersonal psychotherapy for depression: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Psychological Medicine, 45(10), 2095–2110.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Low, G. D., & Hubley, A. M. (2007). Screening for depression after cardiac events using the Beck Depression Inventory-II and the Geriatric Depression Scale. Social Indicators Research, 82(3), 527–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-9049-3.CrossRef

15.

McDowell, I. (2006). Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University.CrossRef

16.

Mitchell, A. J., Vaze, A., & Rao, S. (2009). Clinical diagnosis of depression in primary care: A meta-analysis. The Lancet, 374(9690), 609–619.CrossRef

17.

Osman, A., Barrios, F. X., Gutierrez, P. M., Williams, J. E., & Bailey, J. (2008). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II in nonclinical adolescent samples. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64(1), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20433.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Reitsma, J. B., Glas, A. S., Rutjes, A. W. S., Scholten, R. J. P. M., Bossuyt, P. M., & Zwinderman, A. H. (2005). Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58(10), 982–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Reitsma, J. B., Rutjes, A. W. S., Khan, K. S., Coomarasamy, A., & Bossuyt, P. M. (2009). A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(8), 797–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.02.005.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Revicki, D., Hays, R. D., Cella, D., & Sloan, J. (2008). Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(2), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Schulte-van Maaren, Y. W. M., Carlier, I. V. E., Zitman, F. G., van Hemert, A. M., de Waal, M. W. M., van der Does, A. J. W., … Giltay, E. J. (2013). Reference values for major depression questionnaires: The Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 149(1–3), 342–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2013.02.009.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Seignourel, P. J., Green, C., & Schmitz, J. M. (2008). Factor structure and diagnostic efficiency of the BDI-II in treatment-seeking substance users. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 93(3), 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.10.016.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Steinhauser, S., Schumacher, M., & Rücker, G. (2016). Modelling multiple thresholds in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0196-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Strober, L. B., & Arnett, P. A. (2015). Depression in multiple sclerosis: The utility of common self-report instruments and development of a disease-specific measure. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 37(7), 722–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2015.1063591.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Subica, A. M., Fowler, J. C., Elhai, J. D., Frueh, B. C., Sharp, C., Kelly, E. L., & Allen, J. G. (2014). Factor structure and diagnostic validity of the Beck Depression Inventory–II with adult clinical inpatients: Comparison to a gold-standard diagnostic interview. Psychological Assessment, 26(4), 1106.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Wang, D., Tian, L., & Zhao, Y. (2017). Smoothed empirical likelihood for the Youden index. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 115, 1–10.CrossRef

27.

Wang, Y.-P., & Gorenstein, C. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: A comprehensive review. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 35(4), 416–431. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2012-1048.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Whiting, P. F., Rutjes, A. W. S., Westwood, M. E., Mallett, S., & QUADAS-2 Steering Group (2013). A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(10), 1093–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.05.014.CrossRefPubMed

Title: How depressed is “depressed”? A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis of optimal cut points for the Beck Depression Inventory revised (BDI-II)
Authors: Michael von Glischinski
Ruth von Brachel
Gerrit Hirschfeld
Publication date: 19-11-2018
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Published in: Quality of Life Research / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2050-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Introduction

Method

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

Patient-reported outcomes in stroke clinical trials 2002–2016: a systematic review

Effects of a simple home exercise program and vitamin D supplementation on health-related quality of life after a hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial

Trajectories of perceived social support in acute coronary syndrome

Development of a person-centered conceptual model of perceived fatigability

A Norwegian 15D value algorithm: proposing a new procedure to estimate 15D value algorithms

Mild cognitive impairment in combination with comorbid diabetes mellitus and hypertension is negatively associated with health-related quality of life among older persons in Taiwan