Skip to main content
Top

2016 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

11. Improving Compliance: Jus Cogens and International Economic Law

Author : Thomas Cottier

Published in: Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2015

Publisher: T.M.C. Asser Press

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The relationship of jus cogens and international economic law has largely remained unexplored, despite close linkages at the inception of jus cogens when slave trade and slavery was banned. The paper expounds the potential of international economic law for the realisation and enforcement of jus cogens, in particular of core labour standards and basic human rights. The right to protect ordre public values in international trade and investment law by means of import restrictions and conditioning investment by host states, respectively, provides an important basis to enforce values protected by jus cogens. However, recourse to process and production methods (PPMs) and conditionalities does not reach jus cogens in a comprehensive manner, and additional remedies need to be developed in international economic law, in particular relating to corporate social responsibility and finance and monetary affairs. Questioning the fundamental civil law distinction of jus cogens and jus dispositivum, the paper submits to conceive jus cogens as a matter of Common Concern of Humankind and to conceptualise protection and enforcement under this emerging doctrine, obliging states to cooperate but also take unilateral action if necessary.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
1945 Charter of the United Nations, 557 UNTS 143.
 
2
Müller and Wildhaber 2001 at 104–105. They state that jus cogens amounts to an expression of protecting international order public and fundamental human rights.
 
3
Shaw 2014, at 88 ff; Shelton 2006, at 291, 297–298 and 302 ff.
 
4
de Schutter 2014, at 87 ff.
 
5
Nieto-Navia 2001, at 8–9, 15 ff and 20–21; Frowein 2009, at 443 ff.
 
6
1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1155 UNTS 331. See also Crawford 2012, at 591 ff; Shelton 2006, at 298 ff.
 
7
d’Aspremont 2016.
 
8
Nieto-Navia 2001, at 9 ff and 15 ff; Stephan 2011, at 1077–1078, 1096 ff and 1104.
 
9
Frowein 2009, at 443–444.
 
10
Marceau 2002, at 799; but see Costello and Foster 2016.
 
11
Shaw 2014, at 88 ff; de Schutter 2014, at 91; Nieto-Navia 2001, at 1, 18 and 20 ff.
 
12
The Swiss Constitution bars popular initiatives violating peremptory norms of public international law. Article 139(3) of the Constitution stipulates the following: ‘3. If the initiative fails to comply with the requirements of consistency of form, and of subject matter, or if it infringes mandatory provisions of international law, the Federal Assembly shall declare it to be invalid in whole or in part.’
In a populist initiative launched in 2015 by the national-conservative Peoples’ Party (SVP/UDC) seeking to redefine the relationship between international law and domestic law away from monism to dualism, the respect of mandatory norms of international law is not questioned. The Initiative is called ‘Schweizer Recht statt fremde Richter (Selbstbestimmungsinitiative)’, to be translated into ‘Swiss Law instead of Foreign Judges (Self-determination Initiative)’. Volksinitiative ‘Schweizer Recht statt fremde Richter (Selbstbestimmungsinitiative)’. www.​svp.​ch/​kampagnen/​uebersicht/​selbstbestimmung​sinitiative/​um-was-geht-es/​. Accessed 10 June 2015. This is particularly relevant in relation to the principle of non-refoulement in the law of refugees and penal extradition. There is controversy as to whether Article 139 entails a notion of jus cogens in constitutional law which may deviate from international law, or whether it refers to public international law. The absence of a catalogue and qualification of peremptory norms in the Constitution means that reference is made to international law. The provision is further informed by the obligation to respect international law, and thus clearly respect minimal standards in international law. The constitution may adopt a more expansive list of what is considered jus cogens for the purpose of constitutional law.
 
13
Nieto-Navia 2001, at 18 ff.
 
14
Article 41 of International Law Commission, Draft articles on the responsibility of states for internationally wrongful acts, with commentaries, 53rd session of the ILC, UN Doc. A/56/10, 2001.
 
15
Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v Spain), ICJ, Second phase, Judgment of 5 February 1970, paras 33–36.
 
16
de Schutter 2014, at 91 ff.
 
17
Cottier 1998, at 336–350; Palmeter and Mavroidis 2004, at 300 ff.
 
18
Nadakavukaren Schefer and Cottier, at 123 ff.
 
19
In the United Kingdom, the Slavery Abolition Act was adopted in 1833 (much due to the effort of Zackary Macaulay and William Wilberforce). Encyclopedia Britannica, William Wilberforce. http://​www.​britannica.​com/​EBchecked/​topic/​643460/​William-Wilberforce. Accessed 10 May 2015. See also Ferguson 2003, at 116–118.
 
20
Shelton 2006, at 294; Weissbrodt and Anti-Slavery International 2002, at 12 ff.
 
21
McCrudden 1999, at 5–6; Crawford 2012, at 591 ff.
 
22
Nieto-Navia 2001, at 2 ff.
 
23
The US is not a contracting state to the VCLT. It signed the Convention in 1970, but refrained from adopting and ratifying the instrument while accepting most of its provisions to amount to customary international law. Shelton 2006, at 298 ff.; Nieto-Navia 2001, at 9.
 
24
Cottier 2009, at 16 ff., 23 ff.
 
25
Petersmann 2012, at 288 ff.; 475 ff.; Shelton 2006, at 292, 306–307 and 317 ff.
 
26
Klabbers et al. 2009, at 153 ff.
 
27
See Vadi 2016.
 
28
Petersmann 2012, at 35 ff.; Cottier 2011, at 503 ff.
 
29
van den Bossche 2008, at 38–37; Cottier and Oesch 2005, at 350 ff. and 382 ff.
 
30
1994 General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 1867 UNTS 187.
 
31
Cottier and Oesch 2005, at 552 ff.
 
32
WTO Ministerial Conferences, Official Documents of the Geneva Ministerial, 2011. https://​www.​wto.​org/​english/​thewto_​e/​minist_​e/​min11_​e/​official_​doc_​e.​htm. Accessed 8 May 2015.
 
33
Cottier and Oesch 2005, at 58 and 412 ff.; van den Bossche 2008, at 331 and 381; Conrad 2011, at 20 ff.; Holzer 2014.
 
34
European CommunitiesMeasures Prohibiting the Importation and Marketing of Seal Products (European Communities v. Canada), WTO, Appellate Body Reports, WT/DS400/AB/R and WT/DS401/AB/R, 22 May 2014, paras 2.152–163, 5.3, 5.10 and 5.12.
 
35
The Appellate Body held the following: ‘Finally, we note that, in USShrimp, the Appellate Body stated that it would not “pass upon the question of whether there is an implied jurisdictional limitation in Article XX(g), and if so, the nature or extent of that limitation”. The Appellate Body explained that, in the specific circumstances of that case, there was “a sufficient nexus between the migratory and endangered marine populations involved and the United States for purposes of Article XX(g)”. As set out in the preamble of the Basic Regulation, the EU Seal Regime is designed to address seal hunting activities occurring “within and outside the Community” and the seal welfare concerns of “citizens and consumers” in EU member States. The participants did not address this issue in their submissions on appeal. Accordingly, while recognising the systemic importance of the question of whether there is an implied jurisdictional limitation in Article XX(a), and, if so, the nature or extent of that limitation, we have decided in this case not to examine this question further.’ Ibid., para 5.173.
 
36
United States—Measures Affecting the Cross-Border Supply of Gambling and Betting Services (Antigua and Barbuda v. United States), WTO, Appellate Body Report, WT/D5285/AB/R, 7 April 2005, paras 51, 72 and 103.
 
37
1994 WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, 1868 UNTS 120. van den Bossche 2008, at 806 ff.; Cottier and Oesch 2005, at 750 ff.; Conrad 2011, at 52 ff. and 374 ff.
 
38
See United States—Measures concerning the Importation, Marketing and Sale of Tuna and Tuna Products, WTO, Appellate Body Report, WT/DS381/AB/R, 16 May 2012, paras 282–297.
 
39
WTO, Technical information on technical barriers to trade. www.​wto.​org/​english/​tratop_​e/​tbt_​e/​tbt_​info_​e.​htm. Accessed 3 May 2015.
 
40
Conrad 2011, at 65 ff. and 425 ff. In relation to labour standards, see Denkers 2008, at 111–141.
 
41
See International Law Commission, Fragmentation of international law: difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of international law, Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, 58th session, UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.682, 13 April 2006; Collins 2011, at 137 and 153 ff.
 
42
Marceau 2002, at 799.
 
43
Article 3.2 of the 1994 Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes, 1869 UNTS 401.
 
44
See Marceau 2002, at 756, 778 (n76 and n78), 795, 796 and 802. While conflicts between WTO law and jus cogens are unlikely and can be avoided by means of interpretation and application, jus cogens prevails in case of conflict, removing the application of WTO norms inconsistent with jus cogens. As Marceu put it, ‘[i]n the case of jus cogens, the inconsistent WTO provision is automatically invalidated.’ Ibid., at 802.
 
45
Hughes and Haworth 2011, at 23 ff.
 
46
Ibid.; Elliott and Freeman 2003, at 11–12. See also ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, 86th session of the International Labour Conference, 18 June 1998.
 
47
Humbert 2009, at 114 ff.; Weissbrodt and Anti-Slavery International 2002, at 3; Smith 2005, at 461 ff.
 
48
Kaufmann 2007, at 78–79, 87 ff. and 92 ff.; Gross and Compa 2009, at 7 ff.; Denkers 2008, at 111 ff.
 
49
Kaufmann 2007, at 234 ff.
 
50
Ibid., at 238 ff. and 250 ff.; China—Measures Affecting Trading Rights and Distribution Services for Certain Publications and Audiovisual Entertainment Products (China v. United States), WTO, Appellate Body Report, WT/DS363/AB/R, 21 December 2009.
 
51
van den Bossche 2008, at 615–616 and 650–651.
 
52
Shelton 2006, at 301 ff.
 
53
1994 General Agreement on Tariffs in Services, 1869 UNTS 183.
 
54
Cottier and Oesch 2005, at 428 ff.; van den Bossche 2008, at 615 ff.
 
55
1992 North American Free Trade Agreement, 32 ILM 289.
 
56
Kofi Addo 2015, at 216 ff.; Kaufmann 2007, at 188 ff.
 
57
Cottier 2002; Jackson 2006, at 20 ff.
 
58
Breining-Kaufmann 2005, at 95 ff.
 
59
See Marceau 2002.
 
60
Pauwelyn 2005, at 212 ff.
 
61
Called the National Security Exception and UN Sanctions. Cottier and Oesch 2005, at 468 ff.; van den Bossche 2008, at 664 ff.
 
62
Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited, at 3 and 32; Nieto-Navia 2001, at 14; Shelton 2006, at 314.
 
63
Marceau 2002, at 756 and 795 ff.
 
64
Nadakavukaren Schefer and Cottier 2015, at 127 ff.
 
65
Hilpold 2015, at 2 ff. and 16 ff.; Nadakavukaren Schefer and Cottier 2015, at 16 ff.
 
66
Valenti 2014, at 27 ff.; Barbieri 2014, at 131 ff.
 
67
Perfetti 2014, at 308 ff.
 
68
Cottier and Oesch 2005, at 969 ff.
 
69
Dimsey 2013, at 161 ff.
 
70
United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Guiding principles on business and human rights: implementing the United Nations ‘protect, respect and remedy’ framework, HR/PUB/11/04, 2011, at 3 ff.
 
71
Nadakavukaren Schefer and Cottier 2015, at 125 ff.; Gass 2013, at 137 ff.; Wilske and Obel 2013, at 180 ff.; Tamada 2015, at 107 ff.
 
72
Polanco Lazo 2015, at 430 ff.
 
73
Section 1504 Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Pub.L. 111-203, H.R. 4173; Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC Text with EEA relevance; Directive 2013/50/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 amending Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market, Directive 2003/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading and Commission Directive 2007/14/EC laying down detailed rules for the implementation of certain provisions of Directive 2004/109/EC Text with EEA relevance. See Reilkoff 2014, at 2435 ff.; and Mattfess 2012.
 
74
OECD 2011, at 30, 34, 48–49, 61, 71 and 85 ff.
 
75
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Investment and Enterprise Responsibility Review, UNCTAD/DIAE/ED/2010/1, August 2010, at 31 and 34 ff.; United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Guiding principles on business and human rights: implementing the United Nations ‘protect, respect and remedy’ framework, HR/PUB/11/04, 2011, at 13 ff.
 
76
For a detailed discussion, see Cottier and Wermelinger 2014, at 86 ff.
 
77
1994 Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 1869 UNTS 299 (TRIPs Agreement).
 
78
Article 41 TRIPs Agreement.
 
79
Nike Inc. was condemned to pay damages for false information on labour practices in Vietnam, based upon the State of California unfair competition act. The US Supreme Court denied certiorari: Kasky v. Nike, Inc., California Supreme Court, 45 P 3d 243 (Cal. 2002); and Kasky v. Nike, Inc., US Supreme Court, 539 U.S. 654 (2003). For further information, see Cottier and Jevtic 2009, at 669 ff.; Cherry and Sneirson 2011, at 1028 ff.; Besmer 2006, at 279 ff.
 
80
Cottier and Wermelinger 2014, at 86 ff.
 
81
Howse 2014, at 317 ff.
 
82
Marceau and Maughan 2014, at 358 ff.
 
83
Philip Alston, Special Rapporteur, Report of the Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, 70th session of the GA, UN Doc. A/70/274, 4 August 2015.
 
84
Shelton 2006, at 292, 305, 317 and 321–322.
 
85
Nieto-Navia 2001, at 2.
 
86
Shaw 2014, at 5, 69 ff., 595 ff. and 654 ff.
 
87
Cottier and Oesch 2005, at 143 ff.; van den Bossche 2008, at 235 ff.
 
88
Shaw 2014, at 73 and 83–84.
 
89
Nieto-Navia 2001, at 14.
 
90
For a detailed discussion, see Cottier et al. 2014, at 3 ff.
 
91
1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 1771 UNTS 107.
 
92
1992 Convention on Biological Diversity, 1760 UNTS 79.
 
93
Preamble para 3 of the 2001 International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, 2400 UNTS 303.
 
94
2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, 2368 UNTS 1.
 
95
Cottier et al. 2014, at 19 and 25.
 
96
Nadakavukaren Schefer and Cottier 2015, at 6 ff.
 
97
Ibid., at 14 ff.; Cottier et al. 2014, at 5 ff.
 
98
Shaw 2014, at 86–87.
 
99
Cottier et al. 2014, at 20 ff.
 
100
Nieto-Navia 2001, at 2–3.
 
101
Cottier et al. 2014, at 5 ff.
 
102
Nadakavukaren Schefer and Cottier 2015, at 136–137; Bellamy 2015, at 38 ff.
 
Literature
go back to reference Barbieri M (2014) Sovereign wealth funds as protected investors under BITs and the safeguard of the national security of host states. In: Sacerdoti G, Acconci P, Valenti M, de Luca A (eds) General interests of host states in international investment law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 130–162CrossRef Barbieri M (2014) Sovereign wealth funds as protected investors under BITs and the safeguard of the national security of host states. In: Sacerdoti G, Acconci P, Valenti M, de Luca A (eds) General interests of host states in international investment law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 130–162CrossRef
go back to reference Bellamy AJ (2015) The responsibility to protect, a wide or narrow conception? In: Hilpold P (ed) The responsibility to protect (R2P). Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 38–59 Bellamy AJ (2015) The responsibility to protect, a wide or narrow conception? In: Hilpold P (ed) The responsibility to protect (R2P). Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 38–59
go back to reference Besmer V (2006) The legal character of private codes of conduct: more than just a pseudo-formal gloss on corporate social responsibility. Hastings Bus Law J 2:279–306 Besmer V (2006) The legal character of private codes of conduct: more than just a pseudo-formal gloss on corporate social responsibility. Hastings Bus Law J 2:279–306
go back to reference Breining-Kaufmann C (2005) The legal matrix of human rights and trade Law: state obligations versus private rights and obligations. In: Cottier T, Pauwelyn J, Bürgi E (eds) Human rights and international trade. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 95–136CrossRef Breining-Kaufmann C (2005) The legal matrix of human rights and trade Law: state obligations versus private rights and obligations. In: Cottier T, Pauwelyn J, Bürgi E (eds) Human rights and international trade. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 95–136CrossRef
go back to reference Cherry M, Sneirson JF (2011) Beyond profit: rethinking corporate social responsibility and greenwashing after the BP oil disaster. Tulane Law Rev 85:983–1011 Cherry M, Sneirson JF (2011) Beyond profit: rethinking corporate social responsibility and greenwashing after the BP oil disaster. Tulane Law Rev 85:983–1011
go back to reference Collins H (2011) Theories of rights as justifications for labour law. In: Davidov G, Langille B (eds) The idea of labour law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 137–155CrossRef Collins H (2011) Theories of rights as justifications for labour law. In: Davidov G, Langille B (eds) The idea of labour law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 137–155CrossRef
go back to reference Conrad CR (2011) Process and production methods (PPMs) in WTO Law. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef Conrad CR (2011) Process and production methods (PPMs) in WTO Law. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
go back to reference Costello C, Foster M (2016) Non-refoulement as custom and jus cogens? Putting the prohibition to the test. Neth Yearb Int Law 46:273–327 Costello C, Foster M (2016) Non-refoulement as custom and jus cogens? Putting the prohibition to the test. Neth Yearb Int Law 46:273–327
go back to reference Cottier T (1998) Dispute settlement in the World Trade Organization: characteristics and structural implications for the European Union. Common Market Law Rev 35:325–378CrossRef Cottier T (1998) Dispute settlement in the World Trade Organization: characteristics and structural implications for the European Union. Common Market Law Rev 35:325–378CrossRef
go back to reference Cottier T (2002) Trade and human rights: a relationship to discover. J Int Econ Law 5:111–132CrossRef Cottier T (2002) Trade and human rights: a relationship to discover. J Int Econ Law 5:111–132CrossRef
go back to reference Cottier T (2009) The legitimacy of WTO law. In: Yueh L (ed) The law and economics of globalisation. New challenges for a world flux. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 11–48 Cottier T (2009) The legitimacy of WTO law. In: Yueh L (ed) The law and economics of globalisation. New challenges for a world flux. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 11–48
go back to reference Cottier T (2011) Towards a five storey house. In: Joerges C, Petersmann E-U (eds) Constitutionalism, multilevel trade governance and international economic law. Hart, Oxford, pp 495–532 Cottier T (2011) Towards a five storey house. In: Joerges C, Petersmann E-U (eds) Constitutionalism, multilevel trade governance and international economic law. Hart, Oxford, pp 495–532
go back to reference Cottier T, Jevtic A (2009) The protection against unfair competition in WTO law: status, potential and prospects. In: Drexl J, Hilty RM, Boy L, Godt C and Remiche B (eds) Technology and competition—Technologie et concurrence. Contributions in honour of Hans Ullrich—Mélanges en l’honneur de Hans Ullrich. Larcier, Bruxelles, pp 669–695 Cottier T, Jevtic A (2009) The protection against unfair competition in WTO law: status, potential and prospects. In: Drexl J, Hilty RM, Boy L, Godt C and Remiche B (eds) Technology and competition—Technologie et concurrence. Contributions in honour of Hans Ullrich—Mélanges en l’honneur de Hans Ullrich. Larcier, Bruxelles, pp 669–695
go back to reference Cottier T, Oesch M (2005) International trade regulation. Staempfli Publishers and Cameron May, London Cottier T, Oesch M (2005) International trade regulation. Staempfli Publishers and Cameron May, London
go back to reference Cottier T et al (2014) The principle of common concern and climate change. Archiv des Völkerrechts 52:293–324CrossRef Cottier T et al (2014) The principle of common concern and climate change. Archiv des Völkerrechts 52:293–324CrossRef
go back to reference Cottier T, Wermelinger G (2014) Implementing and enforcing corporate social responsibility: the potential of unfair competition rules in international law. In: Hilty RM, Henning-Bodewig F (eds) Corporate social responsibility. Verbindliche Standards des Wettbewerbsrechts? Springer, Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London, pp 81–97 Cottier T, Wermelinger G (2014) Implementing and enforcing corporate social responsibility: the potential of unfair competition rules in international law. In: Hilty RM, Henning-Bodewig F (eds) Corporate social responsibility. Verbindliche Standards des Wettbewerbsrechts? Springer, Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London, pp 81–97
go back to reference Crawford J (2012) Brownlie’s principles of public international law, 8th edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef Crawford J (2012) Brownlie’s principles of public international law, 8th edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef
go back to reference d’Aspremont J (2016) Jus cogens as a social construct without pedigree. Neth Yearb Int Law 46:85–114 d’Aspremont J (2016) Jus cogens as a social construct without pedigree. Neth Yearb Int Law 46:85–114
go back to reference de Schutter O (2014) International human rights law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge de Schutter O (2014) International human rights law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
go back to reference Denkers J (2008) The World Trade Organization and import bans in response to violations of fundamental labor rights. Intersentia, Antwerp Denkers J (2008) The World Trade Organization and import bans in response to violations of fundamental labor rights. Intersentia, Antwerp
go back to reference Dimsey M (2013) Foreign direct investment and the alleviation of poverty: is investment arbitration falling short of its goals? In: Nadakavukaren Schefer K (ed) Poverty and the international economic legal system, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 159–176 Dimsey M (2013) Foreign direct investment and the alleviation of poverty: is investment arbitration falling short of its goals? In: Nadakavukaren Schefer K (ed) Poverty and the international economic legal system, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 159–176
go back to reference Elliott KA, Freeman RB (2003) Can labor standards improve under globalization? Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC Elliott KA, Freeman RB (2003) Can labor standards improve under globalization? Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC
go back to reference Ferguson N (2003) Empire: how Britain made the modern world. Penguin Books, London Ferguson N (2003) Empire: how Britain made the modern world. Penguin Books, London
go back to reference Frowein JA (2009) Ius cogens. In: Wolfrum R (ed) The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 443–446 Frowein JA (2009) Ius cogens. In: Wolfrum R (ed) The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 443–446
go back to reference Gass JJ (2013) Introductory note: arbitration, insurance, investment, corruption, and poverty. In: Nadakavukaren Schefer K (ed) Poverty and the international economic legal system, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 137–143 Gass JJ (2013) Introductory note: arbitration, insurance, investment, corruption, and poverty. In: Nadakavukaren Schefer K (ed) Poverty and the international economic legal system, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 137–143
go back to reference Gross JA, Compa L (2009) Human rights in labor and employment relations: international and domestic perspectives. ILR Press, Ithaca Gross JA, Compa L (2009) Human rights in labor and employment relations: international and domestic perspectives. ILR Press, Ithaca
go back to reference Hilpold P (2015) From humanitarian intervention to the responsibility to protect. In: Hilpold P (ed) The responsibility to protect (R2P). Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 1–37 Hilpold P (2015) From humanitarian intervention to the responsibility to protect. In: Hilpold P (ed) The responsibility to protect (R2P). Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 1–37
go back to reference Holzer K (2014) Carbon-related border adjustment and WTO law. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, CheltenhamCrossRef Holzer K (2014) Carbon-related border adjustment and WTO law. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, CheltenhamCrossRef
go back to reference Howse R (2014) Towards an equitable integration of monetary and financial matters, trade and sustainable development. In: Cottier T, Lastra RM, Tietje C, Satragno L (eds) The rule of law in monetary affairs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 285–325CrossRef Howse R (2014) Towards an equitable integration of monetary and financial matters, trade and sustainable development. In: Cottier T, Lastra RM, Tietje C, Satragno L (eds) The rule of law in monetary affairs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 285–325CrossRef
go back to reference Hughes S, Haworth N (2011) The International Labour Organisation (ILO). Routledge, Abingdon Hughes S, Haworth N (2011) The International Labour Organisation (ILO). Routledge, Abingdon
go back to reference Humbert F (2009) The challenge of child labour in international law. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef Humbert F (2009) The challenge of child labour in international law. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
go back to reference Jackson JH (2006) Reflections on the possible research agenda for exploring the relationship between human rights norms and international trade rules. In: Abbott F, Cottier T, Breining-Kaufmann C (eds) International trade and human rights: foundations and conceptual issues. Michigan University Press, Ann Arbor, pp 19–28 Jackson JH (2006) Reflections on the possible research agenda for exploring the relationship between human rights norms and international trade rules. In: Abbott F, Cottier T, Breining-Kaufmann C (eds) International trade and human rights: foundations and conceptual issues. Michigan University Press, Ann Arbor, pp 19–28
go back to reference Kaufmann C (2007) Globalisation and labour rights. Hart Publishing, Oxford Kaufmann C (2007) Globalisation and labour rights. Hart Publishing, Oxford
go back to reference Klabbers J, Peters A, Ulfstein G (2009) The constitutionalization of international law. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef Klabbers J, Peters A, Ulfstein G (2009) The constitutionalization of international law. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef
go back to reference Kofi A (2015) Core labour standards and international trade. Springer, Heidelberg Kofi A (2015) Core labour standards and international trade. Springer, Heidelberg
go back to reference Marceau G (2002) WTO dispute settlement and human rights. Eur J Int Law 13:753–814CrossRef Marceau G (2002) WTO dispute settlement and human rights. Eur J Int Law 13:753–814CrossRef
go back to reference Marceau GZ, Maughan J (2014) The WTO dispute settlement mechanism in matters involving exchange rates and trade. In: Cottier T, Lastra RM, Tietje C, Satragno L (eds) The rule of law in monetary affairs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 358–383CrossRef Marceau GZ, Maughan J (2014) The WTO dispute settlement mechanism in matters involving exchange rates and trade. In: Cottier T, Lastra RM, Tietje C, Satragno L (eds) The rule of law in monetary affairs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 358–383CrossRef
go back to reference McCrudden C (1999) International economic law and the pursuit of human rights: a framework for discussion of the legality of ‘selective purchasing’ laws under the WTO government procurement agreement. J Int Econ Law 2:3–48CrossRef McCrudden C (1999) International economic law and the pursuit of human rights: a framework for discussion of the legality of ‘selective purchasing’ laws under the WTO government procurement agreement. J Int Econ Law 2:3–48CrossRef
go back to reference Müller JP, Wildhaber L (2001) Praxis des Völkerrechts. 3rd edn. Staempfli Publishers, Bern Müller JP, Wildhaber L (2001) Praxis des Völkerrechts. 3rd edn. Staempfli Publishers, Bern
go back to reference Nadakavukaren Schefer K, Cottier T (2015) Responsibility to protect (R2P) and the emerging principle of common concern. In: Hilpold P (ed) The responsibility to protect (R2P). Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 123–142 Nadakavukaren Schefer K, Cottier T (2015) Responsibility to protect (R2P) and the emerging principle of common concern. In: Hilpold P (ed) The responsibility to protect (R2P). Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 123–142
go back to reference Palmeter D, Mavroidis PC (2004) Dispute settlement in the World Trade Organization, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef Palmeter D, Mavroidis PC (2004) Dispute settlement in the World Trade Organization, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
go back to reference Pauwelyn J (2005) Human rights in WTO dispute settlement. In: Cottier T, Pauwelyn J, Bürgi E (eds) Human rights and international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford Pauwelyn J (2005) Human rights in WTO dispute settlement. In: Cottier T, Pauwelyn J, Bürgi E (eds) Human rights and international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford
go back to reference Perfetti A (2014) Ensuring the consistency of the EU investment policy within the EU external action: the relevance of non-trade values. In: Sacerdoti G, Acconci P, Valenti M, de Luca A (eds) General interests of host states in international investment law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 308–324CrossRef Perfetti A (2014) Ensuring the consistency of the EU investment policy within the EU external action: the relevance of non-trade values. In: Sacerdoti G, Acconci P, Valenti M, de Luca A (eds) General interests of host states in international investment law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 308–324CrossRef
go back to reference Petersmann E-U (2012) International economic law in the 21st century. Hart Publishing, Oxford Petersmann E-U (2012) International economic law in the 21st century. Hart Publishing, Oxford
go back to reference Polanco Lazo R (2015) The changing role of the home and the host state in investor-state arbitration: some conclusions. In: Lalani S and Polanco Lazo R (eds) The role of the state in investor-state arbitration, Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 430–436 Polanco Lazo R (2015) The changing role of the home and the host state in investor-state arbitration: some conclusions. In: Lalani S and Polanco Lazo R (eds) The role of the state in investor-state arbitration, Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 430–436
go back to reference Reilkoff T (2014) Legislating corporate social responsibility: expanding social disclosure through the resource extraction disclosure rule. Minn Law Rev 98:2435–2478 Reilkoff T (2014) Legislating corporate social responsibility: expanding social disclosure through the resource extraction disclosure rule. Minn Law Rev 98:2435–2478
go back to reference Shaw MN (2014) International law, 7th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Shaw MN (2014) International law, 7th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
go back to reference Shelton D (2006) Normative hierarchy in international law. Am J Int Law 100:291–323 Shelton D (2006) Normative hierarchy in international law. Am J Int Law 100:291–323
go back to reference Smith A (2005) Child labor: the Pakistani effort to end a scourge upon humanity: is it enough? San Diego Int Law J 6:461–494 Smith A (2005) Child labor: the Pakistani effort to end a scourge upon humanity: is it enough? San Diego Int Law J 6:461–494
go back to reference Stephan PB (2011) The political economy of jus cogens. Vanderbilt J Trans Law 44:1073–1104 Stephan PB (2011) The political economy of jus cogens. Vanderbilt J Trans Law 44:1073–1104
go back to reference Tamada D (2015) Host states as claimants: corruption allegations. In: Lalani S, Polanco Lazo R (eds) The role of the state in investor-state arbitration, Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 103–122 Tamada D (2015) Host states as claimants: corruption allegations. In: Lalani S, Polanco Lazo R (eds) The role of the state in investor-state arbitration, Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 103–122
go back to reference Vadi V (2016) Jus cogens in international investment law and arbitration. Neth Yearb Int Law 46:357–388 Vadi V (2016) Jus cogens in international investment law and arbitration. Neth Yearb Int Law 46:357–388
go back to reference Valenti M (2014) The protection of general interests of host states in the application of the fair and equitable treatment standard. In: Sacerdoti G et al (eds) General interests of host states in international investment law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 26–57CrossRef Valenti M (2014) The protection of general interests of host states in the application of the fair and equitable treatment standard. In: Sacerdoti G et al (eds) General interests of host states in international investment law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 26–57CrossRef
go back to reference van den Bossche P (2008) The law and policy of the World Trade Organization, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef van den Bossche P (2008) The law and policy of the World Trade Organization, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
go back to reference Weissbrodt D, Anti-Slavery International (2002) Abolishing slavery and its contemporary forms. United Nations, New York and Geneva Weissbrodt D, Anti-Slavery International (2002) Abolishing slavery and its contemporary forms. United Nations, New York and Geneva
go back to reference Wilske S, Obel W (2013) The ‘corruption objection’ to jurisdiction in investment arbitration: does it really protect the poor? In: Nadakavukaren Schefer K (ed) Poverty and the international economic legal system, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 177–188 Wilske S, Obel W (2013) The ‘corruption objection’ to jurisdiction in investment arbitration: does it really protect the poor? In: Nadakavukaren Schefer K (ed) Poverty and the international economic legal system, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 177–188
Metadata
Title
Improving Compliance: Jus Cogens and International Economic Law
Author
Thomas Cottier
Copyright Year
2016
Publisher
T.M.C. Asser Press
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-114-2_11