Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Review of Managerial Science 4/2018

10-05-2017 | Original Paper

In search for the ideal coopetition partner: an experimental study

Authors: Sascha Kraus, Fabian Meier, Thomas Niemand, Ricarda B. Bouncken, Paavo Ritala

Published in: Review of Managerial Science | Issue 4/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Coopetition (collaboration between competitors) has the potential to provide major benefits or losses to participating firms. Entering a partnership with a competitor is a strategic decision with potential long-term consequences rendering the choice of partner of key importance. Existing research has investigated partner’s strategic attributes, but not how the inter-organizational factors between coopetiting firms affect partner selection and on which layers those effects occur. We use a vignette study for reducing this gap, representing the first experimental study on the field of coopetition research. The results from our study from 874 evaluations of potential coopetition partnerships by key informants from Austria, Germany, Liechtenstein and Switzerland offer insights into how the possible partner’s role, resource alignment and the planned activity affect partner selection. The findings suggest that the partner’s role in the markets—i.e. whether it is a direct or an indirect competitor—is critical in partner selection. The planned activity and resource configuration is also found to influence the evaluation of possible coopetition partners. Overall, the results of this first experimental study in coopetition research provide important implications to both theory and practice.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Aguinis H, Bradley KJ (2014) Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organ Res Methods 17(4):351–371 Aguinis H, Bradley KJ (2014) Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organ Res Methods 17(4):351–371
go back to reference Akdoğan AA, Doğan NÖ, Cingöz A (2015) Coopetition as a business Strategy: determining the effective partner selection criteria using Fuzzy AHP. Int Rev Manag Bus Res 4(1):137 Akdoğan AA, Doğan NÖ, Cingöz A (2015) Coopetition as a business Strategy: determining the effective partner selection criteria using Fuzzy AHP. Int Rev Manag Bus Res 4(1):137
go back to reference Alexander CS, Becker HJ (1978) The use of vignettes in survey research. Public Opin Q 42(1):93–104 Alexander CS, Becker HJ (1978) The use of vignettes in survey research. Public Opin Q 42(1):93–104
go back to reference Alves J, Meneses R (2015) Partner selection in co-opetition: a three step model. J Res Mark Entrep 17(1):23–35 Alves J, Meneses R (2015) Partner selection in co-opetition: a three step model. J Res Mark Entrep 17(1):23–35
go back to reference Atzmüller C, Steiner PM (2010) Experimental vignette studies in survey research. Methodology 6(3):128–138 Atzmüller C, Steiner PM (2010) Experimental vignette studies in survey research. Methodology 6(3):128–138
go back to reference Bagshaw M, Bagshaw C (2001) Co-opetition applied to training: a case study. Ind Commer Train 33(5):175–177 Bagshaw M, Bagshaw C (2001) Co-opetition applied to training: a case study. Ind Commer Train 33(5):175–177
go back to reference Baruch Y, Lin C-P (2012) All for one, one for all: coopetition and virtual team performance. Technol Forecast Soc Change 79(6):1155–1168 Baruch Y, Lin C-P (2012) All for one, one for all: coopetition and virtual team performance. Technol Forecast Soc Change 79(6):1155–1168
go back to reference Baumard P (2009) An asymmetric perspective on coopetitive strategies. Int J Entrep Small Bus 8(1):6–22 Baumard P (2009) An asymmetric perspective on coopetitive strategies. Int J Entrep Small Bus 8(1):6–22
go back to reference Bengtsson M, Kock S (2000) “Coopetition” in business Networks—to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Ind Mark Manag 29(5):411–426 Bengtsson M, Kock S (2000) “Coopetition” in business Networks—to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Ind Mark Manag 29(5):411–426
go back to reference Bengtsson M, Kock S (2014) Coopetition: Quo vadis? Past accomplishments and future challenges. Ind Mark Manag 43(2):180–188 Bengtsson M, Kock S (2014) Coopetition: Quo vadis? Past accomplishments and future challenges. Ind Mark Manag 43(2):180–188
go back to reference Bengtsson M, Hinttu S, Kock S (2003) Relationships of cooperation and competition between competitors. Paper presented at Work-in-Progress Paper submitted to the 19th Annual IMP Conference, Lugano, Switzerland Bengtsson M, Hinttu S, Kock S (2003) Relationships of cooperation and competition between competitors. Paper presented at Work-in-Progress Paper submitted to the 19th Annual IMP Conference, Lugano, Switzerland
go back to reference Bengtsson M, Wilson T, Kock S, Nisuls J, Söderqvist A (2010) Co-opetition: a source of international opportunities in Finnish SMEs. Compet Rev Int Bus J 20(2):111–125 Bengtsson M, Wilson T, Kock S, Nisuls J, Söderqvist A (2010) Co-opetition: a source of international opportunities in Finnish SMEs. Compet Rev Int Bus J 20(2):111–125
go back to reference Bleeke J, Ernst D (1990) The way to win in cross-border alliances. Harvard Bus Rev 69(6):127–135 Bleeke J, Ernst D (1990) The way to win in cross-border alliances. Harvard Bus Rev 69(6):127–135
go back to reference Bonel E, Rocco E (2007) Coopeting to survive; surviving coopetition. Int Stud Manag Organ 37(2):70–96 Bonel E, Rocco E (2007) Coopeting to survive; surviving coopetition. Int Stud Manag Organ 37(2):70–96
go back to reference Bouncken RB, Fredrich V (2012) Coopetition: performance implications and management antecedents. Int J Innov Manag 16(5):12500281–125002828 Bouncken RB, Fredrich V (2012) Coopetition: performance implications and management antecedents. Int J Innov Manag 16(5):12500281–125002828
go back to reference Bouncken RB, Fredrich V (2016a) Good fences make good neighbors? Directions and safeguards in alliances on business model innovation. J Bus Res 69(11):5196–5202 Bouncken RB, Fredrich V (2016a) Good fences make good neighbors? Directions and safeguards in alliances on business model innovation. J Bus Res 69(11):5196–5202
go back to reference Bouncken RB, Fredrich V (2016b) Learning in coopetition: alliance orientation, network size, and firm types. J Bus Res 69(5):1753–1758 Bouncken RB, Fredrich V (2016b) Learning in coopetition: alliance orientation, network size, and firm types. J Bus Res 69(5):1753–1758
go back to reference Bouncken RB, Kraus S (2013) Innovation in knowledge-intensive industries: the double-edged sword of coopetition. J Bus Res 66(10):2060–2070 Bouncken RB, Kraus S (2013) Innovation in knowledge-intensive industries: the double-edged sword of coopetition. J Bus Res 66(10):2060–2070
go back to reference Bouncken R, Gast J, Kraus S, Bogers M (2015) Coopetition: a systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions. Rev Manag Sci 9(3):577–601 Bouncken R, Gast J, Kraus S, Bogers M (2015) Coopetition: a systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions. Rev Manag Sci 9(3):577–601
go back to reference Bouncken R, Clauß T, Fredrich V (2016a) Product innovation through coopetition in alliances: singular or plural governance? Ind Mark Manag 53:77–90 Bouncken R, Clauß T, Fredrich V (2016a) Product innovation through coopetition in alliances: singular or plural governance? Ind Mark Manag 53:77–90
go back to reference Bouncken RB, Plüschke BD, Pesch R, Kraus S (2016b) Entrepreneurial orientation in vertical alliances: joint product innovation and learning from allies. Rev Manag Sci 10(2):381–409 Bouncken RB, Plüschke BD, Pesch R, Kraus S (2016b) Entrepreneurial orientation in vertical alliances: joint product innovation and learning from allies. Rev Manag Sci 10(2):381–409
go back to reference Bouncken RB, Fredrich V, Ritala P, Kraus S (2017) Coopetition in new product development alliances: advantages and tensions for incremental and radical innovation. Br J Manag. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12213 Bouncken RB, Fredrich V, Ritala P, Kraus S (2017) Coopetition in new product development alliances: advantages and tensions for incremental and radical innovation. Br J Manag. doi:10.​1111/​1467-8551.​12213
go back to reference Brandenburger A, Nalebuff B (1996) Co-opetition, 1st edn. Doubleday, New York Brandenburger A, Nalebuff B (1996) Co-opetition, 1st edn. Doubleday, New York
go back to reference Brolos A (2009) Innovative coopetition: the strength of strong ties. Int J Entrep Small Bus 8(1):110–134 Brolos A (2009) Innovative coopetition: the strength of strong ties. Int J Entrep Small Bus 8(1):110–134
go back to reference Bucklin LP, Sengupta S (1993) Organizing successful co-marketing alliances. J Mark 57(2):32–46 Bucklin LP, Sengupta S (1993) Organizing successful co-marketing alliances. J Mark 57(2):32–46
go back to reference Chen M-J (1996) Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: toward a theoretical integration. Acad Manag Rev 21(1):100–134 Chen M-J (1996) Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: toward a theoretical integration. Acad Manag Rev 21(1):100–134
go back to reference Chen H-M, Tseng C-H (2005) The performance of marketing alliances between the tourism industry and credit card issuing banks in Taiwan. Tour Manag 26(1):15–24 Chen H-M, Tseng C-H (2005) The performance of marketing alliances between the tourism industry and credit card issuing banks in Taiwan. Tour Manag 26(1):15–24
go back to reference Chiambaretto P, Fernandez A-S (2016) The evolution of coopetitive and collaborative alliances in an alliance portfolio: the Air France case. Ind Mark Manag 57:75–85 Chiambaretto P, Fernandez A-S (2016) The evolution of coopetitive and collaborative alliances in an alliance portfolio: the Air France case. Ind Mark Manag 57:75–85
go back to reference Clarke-Hill C, Li H, Davies B (2003) The paradox of co-operation and competition in strategic alliances: towards a multi-paradigm approach. Manag Res News 26(1):1–20 Clarke-Hill C, Li H, Davies B (2003) The paradox of co-operation and competition in strategic alliances: towards a multi-paradigm approach. Manag Res News 26(1):1–20
go back to reference Covin JG, Eggers F, Kraus S, Cheng C-F, Chang M-L (2016) Marketing-related resources and radical innovativeness in family and non-family firms: a configurational approach. J Bus Res 69(12):5620–5627 Covin JG, Eggers F, Kraus S, Cheng C-F, Chang M-L (2016) Marketing-related resources and radical innovativeness in family and non-family firms: a configurational approach. J Bus Res 69(12):5620–5627
go back to reference Croson R, Anand J, Agarwal R (2007) Using experiments in corporate strategy research. Eur Manag Rev 4(3):173–181 Croson R, Anand J, Agarwal R (2007) Using experiments in corporate strategy research. Eur Manag Rev 4(3):173–181
go back to reference Cummings JL, Holmberg SR (2012) Best-fit alliance partners: the use of critical success factors in a comprehensive partner selection process. Long Range Plan 45(2):136–159 Cummings JL, Holmberg SR (2012) Best-fit alliance partners: the use of critical success factors in a comprehensive partner selection process. Long Range Plan 45(2):136–159
go back to reference Cygler J, Dębkowska K (2015) Coopetition effect determinants: competitor’s size, geographical scope, market and technological positions. Organizacija 48(4):219–231 Cygler J, Dębkowska K (2015) Coopetition effect determinants: competitor’s size, geographical scope, market and technological positions. Organizacija 48(4):219–231
go back to reference Czakon W, Dana LP (2013) Coopetition at work: how firms shaped the airline industry. J Soc Manag 11(2):32–61 Czakon W, Dana LP (2013) Coopetition at work: how firms shaped the airline industry. J Soc Manag 11(2):32–61
go back to reference Czernek K, Czakon W (2016) Trust-building processes in tourist coopetition: the case of a Polish region. Tour Manag 52:380–394 Czernek K, Czakon W (2016) Trust-building processes in tourist coopetition: the case of a Polish region. Tour Manag 52:380–394
go back to reference Dacin MT, Hitt MA, Levitas E (1997) Selecting partners for successful international alliances: examination of US and Korean firms. J World Bus 32(1):3–16 Dacin MT, Hitt MA, Levitas E (1997) Selecting partners for successful international alliances: examination of US and Korean firms. J World Bus 32(1):3–16
go back to reference Dahl J (2014) Conceptualizing coopetition as a process: an outline of change in cooperative and competitive interactions. Ind Mark Manag 43(2):272–279 Dahl J (2014) Conceptualizing coopetition as a process: an outline of change in cooperative and competitive interactions. Ind Mark Manag 43(2):272–279
go back to reference Das TK, Teng B-S (2001) A risk perception model of alliance structuring. J Int Manag 7(1):1–29 Das TK, Teng B-S (2001) A risk perception model of alliance structuring. J Int Manag 7(1):1–29
go back to reference Dorn S, Schweiger B, Albers S (2016) Levels, phases and themes of coopetition: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Eur Manag J 34(5):484–500 Dorn S, Schweiger B, Albers S (2016) Levels, phases and themes of coopetition: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Eur Manag J 34(5):484–500
go back to reference Dussauge P, Garrette B (1997) Anticipating the evolutions and outcomes of strategic alliances between rival firms. Int Stud Manag Organ 27(4):104–126 Dussauge P, Garrette B (1997) Anticipating the evolutions and outcomes of strategic alliances between rival firms. Int Stud Manag Organ 27(4):104–126
go back to reference Dussauge P, Garrette B, Mitchell W (2000) Learning from competing partners: outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia. Strateg Manag J 21(2):99–126 Dussauge P, Garrette B, Mitchell W (2000) Learning from competing partners: outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia. Strateg Manag J 21(2):99–126
go back to reference Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategy and source of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23:660–679 Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategy and source of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23:660–679
go back to reference Elmuti D, Kathawala Y (2001) An overview of strategic alliances. Manag Decis 39(3):205–218 Elmuti D, Kathawala Y (2001) An overview of strategic alliances. Manag Decis 39(3):205–218
go back to reference Finch J (1987) The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology 22(1):105–114 Finch J (1987) The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology 22(1):105–114
go back to reference Fisher RA (1935) The design of experiments, 1st edn. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh Fisher RA (1935) The design of experiments, 1st edn. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh
go back to reference Fowler FJ (1993) Survey research methods. Sage, Newbury Park Fowler FJ (1993) Survey research methods. Sage, Newbury Park
go back to reference Ganguli S (2007) Coopetition models in the context of modern business. Icfai J Mark Manag 6(4):6–16 Ganguli S (2007) Coopetition models in the context of modern business. Icfai J Mark Manag 6(4):6–16
go back to reference Garraffo F, Rocco E (2009) Competitor analysis and interfirm coopetition. In: Dagnino G, Rocco E (eds) Coopetition strategy. Theory, experiments and cases. Routledge, Abington, pp 44–63 Garraffo F, Rocco E (2009) Competitor analysis and interfirm coopetition. In: Dagnino G, Rocco E (eds) Coopetition strategy. Theory, experiments and cases. Routledge, Abington, pp 44–63
go back to reference Gast J, Filser M, Gundolf K, Kraus S (2015) Coopetition research: towards a better understanding of past trends and future directions. Int J Entrep Small Bus 24(4):492–521 Gast J, Filser M, Gundolf K, Kraus S (2015) Coopetition research: towards a better understanding of past trends and future directions. Int J Entrep Small Bus 24(4):492–521
go back to reference Geringer JM (1991) Strategic determinants of partner selection criteria in international joint ventures. J Int Bus Stud 22(1):41–62 Geringer JM (1991) Strategic determinants of partner selection criteria in international joint ventures. J Int Bus Stud 22(1):41–62
go back to reference Gimeno J (2004) Competition within and between networks: the contingent effect of competitive embeddedness on alliance formation. Acad Manag J 47(6):820–842 Gimeno J (2004) Competition within and between networks: the contingent effect of competitive embeddedness on alliance formation. Acad Manag J 47(6):820–842
go back to reference Gnyawali DR, Park BJR (2009) Co-opetition and technological innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: a multilevel conceptual model. J Small Bus Manag 47(3):308–330 Gnyawali DR, Park BJR (2009) Co-opetition and technological innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: a multilevel conceptual model. J Small Bus Manag 47(3):308–330
go back to reference Gnyawali DR, Park BJR (2011) Co-opetition between giants: collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Res Policy 40(5):650–663 Gnyawali DR, Park BJR (2011) Co-opetition between giants: collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Res Policy 40(5):650–663
go back to reference Gnyawali DR, He J, Madhavan R (2006) Impact of co-opetition on firm competitive behavior: an empirical examination. J Manag 32(4):507–530 Gnyawali DR, He J, Madhavan R (2006) Impact of co-opetition on firm competitive behavior: an empirical examination. J Manag 32(4):507–530
go back to reference Gnyawali DR, Madhavan R, He J, Bengtsson M (2016) The competition–cooperation paradox in inter-firm relationships: a conceptual framework. Ind Mark Manag 53:7–18 Gnyawali DR, Madhavan R, He J, Bengtsson M (2016) The competition–cooperation paradox in inter-firm relationships: a conceptual framework. Ind Mark Manag 53:7–18
go back to reference Golden BR (1992) Research notes. The past is the past—or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Acad Manag J 35(4):848–860 Golden BR (1992) Research notes. The past is the past—or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Acad Manag J 35(4):848–860
go back to reference Håkansson H, Snehota I (1995) Developing relationships in business networks. Routledge, London Håkansson H, Snehota I (1995) Developing relationships in business networks. Routledge, London
go back to reference Harbison JR, Pekar PJ (1998) Smart alliances: a practical guide to repeatable success. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco Harbison JR, Pekar PJ (1998) Smart alliances: a practical guide to repeatable success. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
go back to reference Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econom J Econom Soc 47(1):153–161 Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econom J Econom Soc 47(1):153–161
go back to reference Hitt MA, Tyler BB, Hardee C, Park D (1995) Understanding strategic intent in the global marketplace. Acad Manag Executive 9(2):12–19 Hitt MA, Tyler BB, Hardee C, Park D (1995) Understanding strategic intent in the global marketplace. Acad Manag Executive 9(2):12–19
go back to reference Hitt MA, Dacin MT, Levitas E, Arregle J-L, Borza A (2000) Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Acad Manag J 43(3):449–467 Hitt MA, Dacin MT, Levitas E, Arregle J-L, Borza A (2000) Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Acad Manag J 43(3):449–467
go back to reference Hox JJ, Kreft IG, Hermkens PL (1991) The analysis of factorial surveys. Sociol Methods Res 19(4):493–510 Hox JJ, Kreft IG, Hermkens PL (1991) The analysis of factorial surveys. Sociol Methods Res 19(4):493–510
go back to reference Hyman MR, Steiner SD (1996) The vignette method in business ethics research: current uses and recommendations. In: Stuart E, Ortinau D, Moore E (eds) Marketing: moving toward the 21st century. Winthrop University School of Business Administration, Rock Hill, pp 261–265 Hyman MR, Steiner SD (1996) The vignette method in business ethics research: current uses and recommendations. In: Stuart E, Ortinau D, Moore E (eds) Marketing: moving toward the 21st century. Winthrop University School of Business Administration, Rock Hill, pp 261–265
go back to reference Kogut B (1989) The stability of joint ventures: reciprocity and competitive rivalry. J Ind Econ 38(2):183–198 Kogut B (1989) The stability of joint ventures: reciprocity and competitive rivalry. J Ind Econ 38(2):183–198
go back to reference Kraus S, Ambos CT, Eggers F, Cesinger B (2015) Distance and perceptions of risk in internationalization decisions. J Bus Res 68(7):1501–1505 Kraus S, Ambos CT, Eggers F, Cesinger B (2015) Distance and perceptions of risk in internationalization decisions. J Bus Res 68(7):1501–1505
go back to reference Kraus S, Meier F, Niemand T (2016) Experimental methods in entrepreneurship research: the status quo. Int J Entrep Behav Res 22(6):958–983 Kraus S, Meier F, Niemand T (2016) Experimental methods in entrepreneurship research: the status quo. Int J Entrep Behav Res 22(6):958–983
go back to reference Kreft IG, de Leeuw J (1998) Introducing multilevel modeling, 1st edn. Sage Publications Ltd, London Kreft IG, de Leeuw J (1998) Introducing multilevel modeling, 1st edn. Sage Publications Ltd, London
go back to reference Lado AA, Boyd NG, Hanlon SC (1997) Competition, cooperation, and the search for economic rents: a syncretic model. Acad Manag Rev 22(1):110–141 Lado AA, Boyd NG, Hanlon SC (1997) Competition, cooperation, and the search for economic rents: a syncretic model. Acad Manag Rev 22(1):110–141
go back to reference Laine A (2002) Hand in hand with the enemy—defining a competitor from a new perspective. Paper presented at The European Academy of Management, 2nd Annual Conference on Innovative Research in Management, Stockholm, Sweden Laine A (2002) Hand in hand with the enemy—defining a competitor from a new perspective. Paper presented at The European Academy of Management, 2nd Annual Conference on Innovative Research in Management, Stockholm, Sweden
go back to reference Levy M, Loebbecke C, Powell P (2003) SMEs, co-opetition and knowledge sharing: the role of information systems. Eur J Inf Syst 12(1):3–17 Levy M, Loebbecke C, Powell P (2003) SMEs, co-opetition and knowledge sharing: the role of information systems. Eur J Inf Syst 12(1):3–17
go back to reference Lindström T, Polsa P (2016) Coopetition close to the customer—a case study of a small business network. Ind Mark Manag 53:207–215 Lindström T, Polsa P (2016) Coopetition close to the customer—a case study of a small business network. Ind Mark Manag 53:207–215
go back to reference Luo Y (2004) A coopetition perspective of MNC–host government relations. J Int Manag 10(4):431–451 Luo Y (2004) A coopetition perspective of MNC–host government relations. J Int Manag 10(4):431–451
go back to reference Luo Y (2005) Toward coopetition within a multinational enterprise: a perspective from foreign subsidiaries. J World Bus 40(1):71–90 Luo Y (2005) Toward coopetition within a multinational enterprise: a perspective from foreign subsidiaries. J World Bus 40(1):71–90
go back to reference Luo Y (2007) A coopetition perspective of global competition. J World Bus 42(2):129–144 Luo Y (2007) A coopetition perspective of global competition. J World Bus 42(2):129–144
go back to reference Madhavan R, Gnyawali DR, He J (2004) Two’s company, three’s a crowd? Triads in cooperative-competitive networks. Acad Manag J 47(6):918–927 Madhavan R, Gnyawali DR, He J (2004) Two’s company, three’s a crowd? Triads in cooperative-competitive networks. Acad Manag J 47(6):918–927
go back to reference Mariani MM (2007) Coopetition as an emergent strategy: empirical evidence from an Italian consortium of opera houses. Int Stud Manag Organ 37(2):97–126 Mariani MM (2007) Coopetition as an emergent strategy: empirical evidence from an Italian consortium of opera houses. Int Stud Manag Organ 37(2):97–126
go back to reference Martin E (2004) Vignettes and respondent debriefing for questionnaire design and evaluation. In: Presser S, Rothgeb JM, Couper MP, Lessler JT, Martin E, Martin J, Singer E (eds) Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 149–172 Martin E (2004) Vignettes and respondent debriefing for questionnaire design and evaluation. In: Presser S, Rothgeb JM, Couper MP, Lessler JT, Martin E, Martin J, Singer E (eds) Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 149–172
go back to reference Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4(2):133–142 Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4(2):133–142
go back to reference Nalebuff BJ, Brandenburger AM (1997) Co-opetition: competitive and cooperative business strategies for the digital economy. Strategy Leadersh 25(6):28–33 Nalebuff BJ, Brandenburger AM (1997) Co-opetition: competitive and cooperative business strategies for the digital economy. Strategy Leadersh 25(6):28–33
go back to reference Nielsen B, Nielsen S (2011) The role of top management team international orientation in international strategic decision-making: the choice of foreign entry mode. J World Bus 46(2):185–193 Nielsen B, Nielsen S (2011) The role of top management team international orientation in international strategic decision-making: the choice of foreign entry mode. J World Bus 46(2):185–193
go back to reference Osarenkhoe A (2010) A coopetition strategy: a study of inter-firm dynamics between competition and cooperation. Bus Strategy Ser 11(6):343–362 Osarenkhoe A (2010) A coopetition strategy: a study of inter-firm dynamics between competition and cooperation. Bus Strategy Ser 11(6):343–362
go back to reference Padula G, Dagnino GB (2007) Untangling the rise of coopetition: the intrusion of competition in a cooperative game structure. Int Stud Manag Organ 37(2):32–52 Padula G, Dagnino GB (2007) Untangling the rise of coopetition: the intrusion of competition in a cooperative game structure. Int Stud Manag Organ 37(2):32–52
go back to reference Park SH, Russo MV (1996) When competition eclipses cooperation: an event history analysis of joint venture failure. Manag Sci 42(6):875–890 Park SH, Russo MV (1996) When competition eclipses cooperation: an event history analysis of joint venture failure. Manag Sci 42(6):875–890
go back to reference Pinheiro J, Bates D (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer Science & Business Media, New York Pinheiro J, Bates D (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer Science & Business Media, New York
go back to reference Porter ME (1990a) The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Bus Rev 68(2):73–93 Porter ME (1990a) The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Bus Rev 68(2):73–93
go back to reference Porter ME (1990b) Compete, don’t collaborate. Economist 9:17–19 Porter ME (1990b) Compete, don’t collaborate. Economist 9:17–19
go back to reference Rigtering C, Kraus S, Eggers F, Jensen SH (2014) A comparative analysis of the entrepreneurial orientation/growth relationship in service firms and manufacturing firms. Serv Ind J 34(4):275–294 Rigtering C, Kraus S, Eggers F, Jensen SH (2014) A comparative analysis of the entrepreneurial orientation/growth relationship in service firms and manufacturing firms. Serv Ind J 34(4):275–294
go back to reference Ritala P (2009) Is coopetition different from cooperation? The impact of market rivalry on value creation in alliances. Int J Intellect Property Manag 3(1):39–55 Ritala P (2009) Is coopetition different from cooperation? The impact of market rivalry on value creation in alliances. Int J Intellect Property Manag 3(1):39–55
go back to reference Ritala P (2012) ‘Coopetition strategy—when is it successful? Empirical evidence on innovation and market performance. Br J Manag 23(3):307–324 Ritala P (2012) ‘Coopetition strategy—when is it successful? Empirical evidence on innovation and market performance. Br J Manag 23(3):307–324
go back to reference Ritala P, Hurmelinna-Laukkanen P (2013) Incremental and radical innovation in coopetition: the role of absorptive capacity and appropriability. J Prod Innov Manag 30(1):154–169 Ritala P, Hurmelinna-Laukkanen P (2013) Incremental and radical innovation in coopetition: the role of absorptive capacity and appropriability. J Prod Innov Manag 30(1):154–169
go back to reference Ritala P, Tidström A (2014) Untangling the value-creation and value-appropriation elements of coopetition strategy: a longitudinal analysis on the firm and relational levels. Scand J Manag 30(4):498–515 Ritala P, Tidström A (2014) Untangling the value-creation and value-appropriation elements of coopetition strategy: a longitudinal analysis on the firm and relational levels. Scand J Manag 30(4):498–515
go back to reference Ritala P, Golnam A, Wegmann A (2014) Coopetition-based business models: the case of Amazon.com. Ind Mark Manag 43(2):236–249 Ritala P, Golnam A, Wegmann A (2014) Coopetition-based business models: the case of Amazon.com. Ind Mark Manag 43(2):236–249
go back to reference Ritala P, Kraus S, Bouncken R (2016) Introduction to coopetition and innovation: contemporary topics and future research opportunities. Int J Technol Manag 71(1/2):1–9 Ritala P, Kraus S, Bouncken R (2016) Introduction to coopetition and innovation: contemporary topics and future research opportunities. Int J Technol Manag 71(1/2):1–9
go back to reference Rossi PH, Anderson AB (1982) The factorial survey approach: an introduction. In: Rossi PH, Nock SL (eds) Measuring social judgments: the factorial survey approach. Sage, Beverly Hills Rossi PH, Anderson AB (1982) The factorial survey approach: an introduction. In: Rossi PH, Nock SL (eds) Measuring social judgments: the factorial survey approach. Sage, Beverly Hills
go back to reference Rusko R (2011) Exploring the concept of coopetition: a typology for the strategic moves of the Finnish forest industry. Ind Mark Manag 40(2):311–320 Rusko R (2011) Exploring the concept of coopetition: a typology for the strategic moves of the Finnish forest industry. Ind Mark Manag 40(2):311–320
go back to reference Schmiele A, Sofka W (2007) Internationalizing R&D co-opetition: dress for the dance with the devil. ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, No. 07-045 Schmiele A, Sofka W (2007) Internationalizing R&D co-opetition: dress for the dance with the devil. ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, No. 07-045
go back to reference Shah RH, Swaminathan V (2008) Factors influencing partner selection in strategic alliances: the moderating role of alliance context. Strateg Manag J 29(5):471–494 Shah RH, Swaminathan V (2008) Factors influencing partner selection in strategic alliances: the moderating role of alliance context. Strateg Manag J 29(5):471–494
go back to reference Solesvik MZ, Westhead P (2010) Partner selection for strategic alliances: case study insights from the maritime industry. Ind Manag Data Syst 110(6):841–860 Solesvik MZ, Westhead P (2010) Partner selection for strategic alliances: case study insights from the maritime industry. Ind Manag Data Syst 110(6):841–860
go back to reference Tomski P (2011) The horizons of coopetition: the analysis of the selected aspects of application. Manag Organ Syst Res 59:131–147 Tomski P (2011) The horizons of coopetition: the analysis of the selected aspects of application. Manag Organ Syst Res 59:131–147
go back to reference Walley K (2007) Coopetition: an introduction to the subject and an agenda for research. Int Stud Manag Organ 37(2):11–31 Walley K (2007) Coopetition: an introduction to the subject and an agenda for research. Int Stud Manag Organ 37(2):11–31
go back to reference Wilkinson I, Young L (2002) On cooperating: firms, relations and networks. J Bus Res 55(2):123–132 Wilkinson I, Young L (2002) On cooperating: firms, relations and networks. J Bus Res 55(2):123–132
go back to reference Zaheer A, McEvily B, Perrone V (1998) Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organ Sci 9(2):141–158 Zaheer A, McEvily B, Perrone V (1998) Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organ Sci 9(2):141–158
go back to reference Zakrzewska-Bielawska A (2013) Coopetition in high-technology firms: resource-based determinants. In: Zaharim A, Rodrigues R (eds) Recent advances in management, marketing and finances. WSEAS Press, Cambridge, pp 51–56 Zakrzewska-Bielawska A (2013) Coopetition in high-technology firms: resource-based determinants. In: Zaharim A, Rodrigues R (eds) Recent advances in management, marketing and finances. WSEAS Press, Cambridge, pp 51–56
go back to reference Zakrzewska-Bielawska A (2015) Coopetition? Yes, but who with? The selection of coopetition partners by high-tech firms. J Am Acad Bus 20(2):159–166 Zakrzewska-Bielawska A (2015) Coopetition? Yes, but who with? The selection of coopetition partners by high-tech firms. J Am Acad Bus 20(2):159–166
go back to reference Zineldin M (2004) Co-opetition: the organisation of the future. Mark Intell Plan 22(7):780–790 Zineldin M (2004) Co-opetition: the organisation of the future. Mark Intell Plan 22(7):780–790
Metadata
Title
In search for the ideal coopetition partner: an experimental study
Authors
Sascha Kraus
Fabian Meier
Thomas Niemand
Ricarda B. Bouncken
Paavo Ritala
Publication date
10-05-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Review of Managerial Science / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1863-6683
Electronic ISSN: 1863-6691
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0237-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Review of Managerial Science 4/2018 Go to the issue