Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Environmental Earth Sciences 1/2015

01-01-2015 | Original Article

Inaccuracy introduced by LiDAR-generated cross sections and its impact on 1D hydrodynamic simulations

Authors: M. Podhoranyi, D. Fedorcak

Published in: Environmental Earth Sciences | Issue 1/2015

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

High-quality topographic data is an essential prerequisite for any hydrologic simulation. In recent years, LiDAR measurements have been used as a reliable method for obtaining such data even though it has its own flaws. This article focuses on analysis of error introduced by LiDAR-based elevation scanning due to the fact that the near-IR laser beam (1,064 nm) cannot penetrate water masses. Such error may affect derived structures (cross sections) and it influences hydrodynamic simulations as well. Motivation for our research was mainly the insufficient amount of measured cross sections on tributary channels in our study area (Moravian-Silesian Region) and evaluation/correction of error dragged into hydrodynamic modeling when LiDAR-based cross sections are used instead. In our article, we compared two data sets of cross sections: real cross sections created from direct measurements of the river channel and cross sections of the same river channel extracted from LiDAR (9 cross sections, 0.2 m LiDAR DEM resolution, gauge stations and floodplains data were used). As it was expected, the inaccuracies between these two cross-section data sets radically affected the results of the HEC-RAS simulation in the study area (the confluence of rivers Olše and Stonávka). Some known methods for depth estimation and flow area estimation were used for correction of these errors and as a conclusion of the study a recommendation is presented: inaccuracies introduces by LiDAR’s inability to penetrate water masses must be taken into account and must be corrected according to the catchment-specific conditions. We also showed that double-linear depth estimation method works well when dealing with low-flow conditions in upland catchment study area.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Bales JD, Wagner CR (2009) Sources of uncertainty in flood inundation maps. J Flood Risk Manag 2:139–147CrossRef Bales JD, Wagner CR (2009) Sources of uncertainty in flood inundation maps. J Flood Risk Manag 2:139–147CrossRef
go back to reference Bates PD (2003) Remote sensing and flood inundation modeling. Hydrol Process 18(13):2593–2597CrossRef Bates PD (2003) Remote sensing and flood inundation modeling. Hydrol Process 18(13):2593–2597CrossRef
go back to reference Casas A, Benito G, Thorndycraft VR, Rico M (2006) The topographic data source of digital terrain models as a key element in the accuracy of hydraulic flood modeling. Earth Surf Proc Land 31: 444–456 Casas A, Benito G, Thorndycraft VR, Rico M (2006) The topographic data source of digital terrain models as a key element in the accuracy of hydraulic flood modeling. Earth Surf Proc Land 31: 444–456
go back to reference Charlton ME, Large ARG, Fuller IC (2003) Application of airborne LiDAR in river environments: the River Coquet, Northumberland, UK. Earth Surf Proc Land 28:299–306CrossRef Charlton ME, Large ARG, Fuller IC (2003) Application of airborne LiDAR in river environments: the River Coquet, Northumberland, UK. Earth Surf Proc Land 28:299–306CrossRef
go back to reference Chen W, Li X, Wang Y, Liu S (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using LiDAR and DMC data: a case study in the Three Gorges area, China. Environ Earth Sci 70:673–685CrossRef Chen W, Li X, Wang Y, Liu S (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using LiDAR and DMC data: a case study in the Three Gorges area, China. Environ Earth Sci 70:673–685CrossRef
go back to reference Chust G, Grande M, Galparsoro I, Uriarte A, Borja A (2010) Capabilities of the bathymetric Hawk Eye LiDAR for coastal habitat mapping: a case study within a Basque estuary. Estuar Coast Shelf S 89:200–213CrossRef Chust G, Grande M, Galparsoro I, Uriarte A, Borja A (2010) Capabilities of the bathymetric Hawk Eye LiDAR for coastal habitat mapping: a case study within a Basque estuary. Estuar Coast Shelf S 89:200–213CrossRef
go back to reference Dal Cin C, Moens L, Dierickx PH, Bastin G, Zech Y (2005) An integrated approach for realtime floodmap forecasting on the Belgian Meuse river. Nat Hazards 36:237–256CrossRef Dal Cin C, Moens L, Dierickx PH, Bastin G, Zech Y (2005) An integrated approach for realtime floodmap forecasting on the Belgian Meuse river. Nat Hazards 36:237–256CrossRef
go back to reference Foyle AM, Naber MD (2012) Decade-scale coastal bluff retreat from LiDAR data: lake Erie coast of NW Pennsylvania, USA. Environ Earth Sci 66:1999–2012CrossRef Foyle AM, Naber MD (2012) Decade-scale coastal bluff retreat from LiDAR data: lake Erie coast of NW Pennsylvania, USA. Environ Earth Sci 66:1999–2012CrossRef
go back to reference Froidevaux M, Higgins ChW, Simeonov V, Ristori P, Pardyjak E, Serikov I, Calhoun R, Bergh HVD, Parlange MB (2013) A Raman lidar to measure water vapor in the atmospheric boundary layer. Adv Water Resour 51:345–356CrossRef Froidevaux M, Higgins ChW, Simeonov V, Ristori P, Pardyjak E, Serikov I, Calhoun R, Bergh HVD, Parlange MB (2013) A Raman lidar to measure water vapor in the atmospheric boundary layer. Adv Water Resour 51:345–356CrossRef
go back to reference Gichamo ZG, Popescu I, Jonoski A, Solomatine DP (2012) River Cross-section extraction from ASTER global DEM for flood modeling. Environ Modell Softw 31:37–46CrossRef Gichamo ZG, Popescu I, Jonoski A, Solomatine DP (2012) River Cross-section extraction from ASTER global DEM for flood modeling. Environ Modell Softw 31:37–46CrossRef
go back to reference Hilldale RC, Raff D (2008) Assessing the ability of airborne LiDAR to map river bathymetry. Earth Surf Proc Land 33:773–783CrossRef Hilldale RC, Raff D (2008) Assessing the ability of airborne LiDAR to map river bathymetry. Earth Surf Proc Land 33:773–783CrossRef
go back to reference Horritt MS, Bates PD (2002) Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation. J Hydrol 268(1–4):87–99CrossRef Horritt MS, Bates PD (2002) Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation. J Hydrol 268(1–4):87–99CrossRef
go back to reference Hromadka TV II, Whitley RJ, Jordan N, Meyer T (2010) Manning’s equation and two-dimensional flow analogs. J Hydrol 389:177–185CrossRef Hromadka TV II, Whitley RJ, Jordan N, Meyer T (2010) Manning’s equation and two-dimensional flow analogs. J Hydrol 389:177–185CrossRef
go back to reference Huang Ch, Peng Y, Lang M, Yeo IY, McCarty G (2014) Wetland inundation mapping and change monitoring using Landsat and airborne LiDAR data. Remote Sens Environ 141:231–242CrossRef Huang Ch, Peng Y, Lang M, Yeo IY, McCarty G (2014) Wetland inundation mapping and change monitoring using Landsat and airborne LiDAR data. Remote Sens Environ 141:231–242CrossRef
go back to reference Infante M, Marsico A, Pennetta L (2012) Some results of coastal defences monitoring by ground laser scanning technology. Environ Earth Sci 67:2449–2458CrossRef Infante M, Marsico A, Pennetta L (2012) Some results of coastal defences monitoring by ground laser scanning technology. Environ Earth Sci 67:2449–2458CrossRef
go back to reference Irish JL, White TE (1998) Coastal engineering applications of high-resolution LiDAR bathymetry. Coast Eng 35:47–71CrossRef Irish JL, White TE (1998) Coastal engineering applications of high-resolution LiDAR bathymetry. Coast Eng 35:47–71CrossRef
go back to reference Le Coz M, Delclaux F, Genthon P, Favreau G (2009) Assessment of digital elevation model (DEM) aggregation methods for hydrological modelling: lake Chad basin, Africa. Comput Geosci 35:1661–1670CrossRef Le Coz M, Delclaux F, Genthon P, Favreau G (2009) Assessment of digital elevation model (DEM) aggregation methods for hydrological modelling: lake Chad basin, Africa. Comput Geosci 35:1661–1670CrossRef
go back to reference Liu Ch, Zhao Ch, Xia J, Sun Ch, Wang R, Liu T (2011) An instream ecological flow method for data-scarce regulated rivers. J Hydrol 398(1–2):17–25CrossRef Liu Ch, Zhao Ch, Xia J, Sun Ch, Wang R, Liu T (2011) An instream ecological flow method for data-scarce regulated rivers. J Hydrol 398(1–2):17–25CrossRef
go back to reference Marcus WA, Fonstad MA (2008) Optical remote mapping of rivers at sub-meter resolutions and watershed extents. Earth Surf Proc Land 33:4–24CrossRef Marcus WA, Fonstad MA (2008) Optical remote mapping of rivers at sub-meter resolutions and watershed extents. Earth Surf Proc Land 33:4–24CrossRef
go back to reference Mason DC, Horritt MS, Hunter NM, Bates PD (2007) Use of fused airborne scanning laser altimetry and digital map data for urban flood modeling. Hydrol Process 21:1436–1447CrossRef Mason DC, Horritt MS, Hunter NM, Bates PD (2007) Use of fused airborne scanning laser altimetry and digital map data for urban flood modeling. Hydrol Process 21:1436–1447CrossRef
go back to reference Mersel MK, Smith LC, Andreadis KM, Durand MT (2013) Estimation of river depth from remotely sensed hydraulic relationships. Water Resour Res 49:3165–3179CrossRef Mersel MK, Smith LC, Andreadis KM, Durand MT (2013) Estimation of river depth from remotely sensed hydraulic relationships. Water Resour Res 49:3165–3179CrossRef
go back to reference Merwade VM, Maidment DR, Hodges BR (2005) Geospatial representation of river channels. J Hydraul Eng 10(3):243–251CrossRef Merwade VM, Maidment DR, Hodges BR (2005) Geospatial representation of river channels. J Hydraul Eng 10(3):243–251CrossRef
go back to reference Merwade V, Cook A, Coonrod J (2008) GIS techniques for creating river terrain models for hydrodynamic modeling and flood inundation mapping. Environ Modell Softw 23:1300–1311CrossRef Merwade V, Cook A, Coonrod J (2008) GIS techniques for creating river terrain models for hydrodynamic modeling and flood inundation mapping. Environ Modell Softw 23:1300–1311CrossRef
go back to reference Mukherjee S, Joshi PK, Mukherjee S, Ghosh A, Garg RD, Mukhopadhyay A (2013) Evaluation of vertical accuracy of open source digital elevation model (DEM). Int J Appl Earth Obs 21:205–217CrossRef Mukherjee S, Joshi PK, Mukherjee S, Ghosh A, Garg RD, Mukhopadhyay A (2013) Evaluation of vertical accuracy of open source digital elevation model (DEM). Int J Appl Earth Obs 21:205–217CrossRef
go back to reference Quadros ND, Collier PA, Fraser CS (2008) Integration of bathymetric and topographic LIDAR: a preliminary investigation. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 37:1299–1304 Quadros ND, Collier PA, Fraser CS (2008) Integration of bathymetric and topographic LIDAR: a preliminary investigation. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 37:1299–1304
go back to reference Sanders BF (2007) Evaluation of on-line DEMs for flood inundation modeling. Adv Water Resour 30:1831–1843CrossRef Sanders BF (2007) Evaluation of on-line DEMs for flood inundation modeling. Adv Water Resour 30:1831–1843CrossRef
go back to reference Smeeckaert J, Mallet C, David N, Checata N, Ferraz A (2013) Large-scale classification of water areas using airborne topographic lidar data. Remote Sens Environ 138:134–148CrossRef Smeeckaert J, Mallet C, David N, Checata N, Ferraz A (2013) Large-scale classification of water areas using airborne topographic lidar data. Remote Sens Environ 138:134–148CrossRef
go back to reference Tarekegn TH, Haile AT, Rientjes T, Reggiani P, Alkema D (2010) Assessment of an ASTER-generated DEM for 2D hydrodynamic flood modelling. Int J Appl Earth Obs 12:457–465CrossRef Tarekegn TH, Haile AT, Rientjes T, Reggiani P, Alkema D (2010) Assessment of an ASTER-generated DEM for 2D hydrodynamic flood modelling. Int J Appl Earth Obs 12:457–465CrossRef
go back to reference Tinkham WT, Smith AMS, Marshall HP, Link TE, Falkowski MJ, Winstral AH (2014) Quantifying spatial distribution of snow depth errors from LiDAR using Random Forest. Remote Sens Environ 141:105–115CrossRef Tinkham WT, Smith AMS, Marshall HP, Link TE, Falkowski MJ, Winstral AH (2014) Quantifying spatial distribution of snow depth errors from LiDAR using Random Forest. Remote Sens Environ 141:105–115CrossRef
go back to reference Tsubaki R, Kawahara Y (2013) The uncertainty of local flow parameters during inudation flow over complex topographies with elevation errors. J Hydrol 486:71–87CrossRef Tsubaki R, Kawahara Y (2013) The uncertainty of local flow parameters during inudation flow over complex topographies with elevation errors. J Hydrol 486:71–87CrossRef
go back to reference Vatankhah AR (2011) Direct integration of gradually varied flow equation in parabolic channels. Flow Meas Instrum 22:235–241CrossRef Vatankhah AR (2011) Direct integration of gradually varied flow equation in parabolic channels. Flow Meas Instrum 22:235–241CrossRef
go back to reference Westaway RM, Lane SN, Hicks DM (2001) Airborne remote sensing of clear water, shallow, gravel-bed rivers using digital photogrammetry and image analysis. Photogramm Eng Rem S 67:1271–1281 Westaway RM, Lane SN, Hicks DM (2001) Airborne remote sensing of clear water, shallow, gravel-bed rivers using digital photogrammetry and image analysis. Photogramm Eng Rem S 67:1271–1281
Metadata
Title
Inaccuracy introduced by LiDAR-generated cross sections and its impact on 1D hydrodynamic simulations
Authors
M. Podhoranyi
D. Fedorcak
Publication date
01-01-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Environmental Earth Sciences / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1866-6280
Electronic ISSN: 1866-6299
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3390-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Environmental Earth Sciences 1/2015 Go to the issue