Skip to main content
Top
Published in:
Cover of the book

Open Access 2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Industry 4.0 and BIM: Do They Share the Same Objectives?

Authors : Laurent Joblot, Christophe Danjou, Robert Pellerin, Samir Lamouri

Published in: Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing III

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
download
DOWNLOAD
print
PRINT
insite
SEARCH
loading …

Abstract

In recent years, many changes have been taking place within the construction sector which is much more prone to innovate than in the past. New forms of processes are emerging with the introduction of digital technologies. This article aims to shed light on recent scientific advances that link Industry 4.0 to this sector. To this end, a review of articles published over the past 10 years reporting experiences and gains from 4.0 technologies applied to construction was conducted. It turns out that recent technological developments have brought new functionalities and new perspectives to companies. Some of these were not initially claimed with the sole deployment of a BIM approach. These new opportunities have ultimately raised questions as to whether and how they could impact the speed at which a digital transformation of the sector could take place.

1 Context of the Study

The construction industry plays a key role in the global economy. Despite its importance, it is still described as less productive and innovative than other sectors. However, this situation seems to be changing and several actors have recognized the need to innovate to ensure their competitiveness. New forms of work are emerging thanks to the introduction of technologies linked to Industry 4.0 (Ind4.0). In France and Quebec, several large companies have already adopted such technologies (BIM, virtual and augmented reality, prefabrication, the Internet of Things (IoT), additive manufacturing, robotization, etc.), but their implementation is still in its infancy, particularly among small businesses. These solutions must be encouraged in order to create a true digital transformation of construction. However, companies are still reluctant, not always knowing how to proceed or prioritize and what these technologies can actually bring to them.
In order to help various partners (French and Canadian companies), we felt it necessary to shed light on recent scientific advances that link Industry 4.0 and the construction sector. Several questions emerged at the beginning of our study in June 2019. The one we will try to answer here is, “What is the relationship between Industry 4.0 and BIM? Do these concepts share the same objectives when applied to the construction sector?” To answer this question, in the following section we will first present the strategy of the systematic literature review conducted on these questions. A synthesis of the 58 selected articles is then presented in part 3. Part 4 proposes then a deeper analysis of the content, and finally the conclusion sheds light on these recent functionalities and industrial opportunities. Some of these have not been previously when it came to exploiting the BIM model alone.

2 Research Methodology

To characterize the contributions of Ind4.0 in the construc tion sector, we first provide a review of the studies on this subject published prior to June 2019. To do so, we have analyzed the scientific publications using the SCOPUS database1 and post-2010 studies. The query focuses on title, abstract and author keywords on terms related to the construction sector and Ind4.0 in the broadest sense. This initial work made it possible to filter the available publications and to highlight 347 documents. In order to respond to our issue, we chose to study in detail only the articles using “allow or target or objective or aim or goal” in the title, abstract or keywords. This additional filter made it possible to keep only articles that openly claimed an intention or purpose. The 68 articles that responded to this new query and that could provide clarification to our partners are detailed and analyzed in the following section.

3 Content of the Selected Papers

After an in-depth study of the selected articles, 10 turned out to be irrelevant. The technologies tested and the experiments carried out ultimately led to many advances presented in these articles and listed in Table 1 below2:
Table 1.
List of recognized purposes and gains.
Improve management of resources and reduce project duration and payment disputes
Monitoring of planning/creation of a “knowledge/experience” database
Improve performance/increase collaboration
Increase interoperability
Continuous and integrated information exchange and sharing
Ease the transfer of architectural shapes into reality
Improve real-time monitoring/discover mismatch between the real discharging place and the target/collect data for construction organizing optimization/quantify logistic density
Increase sustainable development/ease management of production/production optimization (3D printers)/optimize production to survive in the global market
Deliver greater value/addressing sustainability/zero carbon and enhanced resilience objectives
High performance mobile mapping enables a paradigm shift in the way buildings are designed, tested, built, maintained and refurbished
(Precast concrete and 3D printing) increase creativity and thermal characteristics
Enhance communication/increase ability to manage communication
Accelerate (more accurate) data acquisition (real time)/reduce time for data analysis
Reduce complexity and uncertainty/enhance information exchange
Transform and facilitate construction operations
More sustainable approach
Increase competitiveness thanks to BIM implantation
Organize information, processes, people, and/or firms
Mass-customisation/Modularisation
Increase productivity
Reduction of conflicts/improve project collaboration
Improve the management of complexity of information flow
Achieve goals of construction projects
Real-time construction progression monitoring
Provide simulation and optimization to the current processes
Ensure the efficient operation of the workflow, project and financial management systems
ICT creation of business value (not only productivity enhancements but also, competitive advantage, inventory reduction, new organizational capability among other factors)
Improve decision-making based/on visualizations and simulations/improved information sharing and transparency/improve efficiently and effectively
Ensures faster delivery of projects and services to clients
More feedback/mass customized product creation
Improve planning/creation of a “knowledge/experience” database
Reduces information losses/helping to reduce waste of time and resources
Reducing wastes of resources
Drives internal and external innovation
Receive/send data in almost real-time/Automated Construction/increase ability to simulate, analyze, and optimize production
Reduction of construction time and production costs/development of sustainable built environment
Reduce the amount of construction rework
Reduction carbon emissions
Rapid data acquisition/progress control
reduction of the direct or indirect costs
Improved performance
Increase safety
Track concrete trucks with RFID technologies and Building information modelling to reduce quantity of cement and wastes
Support the improvement sustainability of the construction sector, namely, in environmental terms
Enhance the level of incorporation of 4,0 concepts to achieve sustainable development
Improvements and automatize design choices in terms of construction issues
Increase cooperation
Monitoring the ambient vibration
Energy use tracking
Improve training
Numerous overlaps and convergences were thus revealed. For example, items in bold in the table had an environmental intent. The following section therefore seeks to define what might be the “major families” of advances brought about by Industry 4.0 technologies in the construction sector.

4 Analysis

All of the studies selected aimed to highlight the contributions of digital technologies or approaches to the construction sector. They can be grouped and summarized in the following table. The first one, Table 2, presents the main gains noted on at least six occasions during our review and generally credited to the BIM approaches (as we had noticed in a completely different study relative to the BIM Maturity Model [2]).
Table 2.
First set of observed gains.
Productivity or efficiency
Sustainability approach
Cost profit
Cooperation, collaboration or interoperability
Information
Quality
26 times
13 times
11 times
8 times
8 times
6 times
However, the summary in Table 3 reveals six of the most frequently achieved “original” improvements to be credited to technologies such as IoT [3], drones [4], and 3D printing [5], the latter facilitating, for example, prefabrication. Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing are presented as solutions of interest in the improvement of feedback or in the automation of choices [6, 7].
Table 3.
New improvements and prospects.
Real-time track monitoring data acquisition
Optimization, simulation (real time)
Customisation, Pre-fabrication
Resource management and optimization
Feedback
Production control
12 times
7 times
5 times
4 times
4 times
3 times
This final synthesis makes it possible to highlight new functions to open, in detail, new perspectives for construction companies. Indeed, more and more real-time monitoring is being studied and used. These follow-ups of objects and participants now make real-time simulations and optimization possible (for example, for flows, time or resources) [8, 9]. The monitoring of planning and the creation of a knowledge and experience database are also being tested and could be generalized [10]. These elements are therefore likely to provide new sources of interest or questioning of companies… Whereas BIM is only occasionally used by less than one third of French companies [11].
Finally, this observation opens up new research perspectives, which are described in more detail in the last part of this article.

5 Conclusions and Perspectives

This literature review first confirmed that 4.0 technologies, generally associated with the manufacturing sector, are already benefiting from some precursors of the construction industry. Among the hundreds of studies conducted by academics and companies in this sector, the sixty or so analyzed here have confirmed that the reasons for the existence of BIM (i.e., to improve productivity, communication, quality, or to reduce costs) is reinforced by all of these complementary technologies. The latter, which is increasingly robust and accessible due to their massive diffusion, also make it possible to obtain new and promising functionalities or gains, such as real-time data acquisition to increase reactivity or to optimize process and simulations. As we recall, this exceeded the expectations that had initially been set during the deployment of BIM. However, the companies we met and worked with are still hesitant and limited in terms of financial resources. This analysis now needs to be continued, and for us to become even more proactive. This is why, as with ongoing studies concerning the complementarity between LEAN and Ind4.0 [12], we will attempt to answer the following nested research questions in future collaborative work:
i.
Do the skills acquired by companies in deploying and operating BIM provide easier access to new “4.0” functionalities and gains summarized in Table 3?
 
ii.
Conversely, will the acquisition and mastery of new “4.0” technologies facilitate BIM implementation?
 
iii.
Will the two approaches soon be inseparable, BIM becoming the equivalent of the digital twin as defined by Grieves et al. for the construction sector (as already suggested by many companies today [13]) [14]?
 
iv.
…or will they remain without real mutual effects?
 
In order to answer these questions, in early 2020, we have begun major studies and support work with one of France’s leading construction companies involved in numerous rehabilitation and new construction programs in the area around Paris.
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Footnotes
1
Query used: ((TITLE-ABS(“construct* indus*” OR “indus* construct*” OR “build* indus*” OR “indus* build*” OR “innovat* construct*” OR “innovat* build*” OR “construct* site*” OR “building system*” OR “construction sector*”) OR AUTHKEY(“construct* indus*” OR “indus* construct*” OR “build* indus*” OR “indus* build*” OR “innovat* construct*” OR “innovat* build*” OR “construct* site*” OR “building system*” OR “construction sector*”) OR (TITLE(“BIM” OR “building information model*”) OR ABS (“BIM” OR “building information model*”) OR AUTHKEY(“BIM” OR "building information model*”))) AND ((TITLE(“indus* 4.0” OR “build* 4.0” OR “techno* 4.0” OR “revolution* 4.0” OR “construct* 4.0”) OR ABS(“indus* 4.0” OR “build* 4.0” OR “techno* 4.0” OR “revolution* 4.0” OR “construct* 4.0”) OR AUTHKEY (“indus* 4.0” OR “build* 4.0” OR “techno* 4.0” OR “revolution* 4.0” OR “construct* 4.0”) OR TITLE (“digiti*” OR “digitali*” OR “digit* construct*” OR “digit* build*”).
 
2
Upon request, the corresponding author can send all of the references that were selected for this study.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kagermann, H., Lukas, W.-D., Wahlster, W.: Industrie 4.0: Mit dem Internet der Dinge auf dem Weg zur 4. industriellen Revolution, VDI nachrichten, vol. 13, p. 2011 (2011) Kagermann, H., Lukas, W.-D., Wahlster, W.: Industrie 4.0: Mit dem Internet der Dinge auf dem Weg zur 4. industriellen Revolution, VDI nachrichten, vol. 13, p. 2011 (2011)
4.
go back to reference Tezel, B.A., Aziz, Z.U.H.: From conventional to IT based visual management: a conceptual discussion for lean construction. ITcon 22, 220–246 (2017) Tezel, B.A., Aziz, Z.U.H.: From conventional to IT based visual management: a conceptual discussion for lean construction. ITcon 22, 220–246 (2017)
7.
go back to reference Trani, M.L., Cassano, M., Todaro, D.: Standard information for construction equipment in a relational database. In: présenté à ISEC 2017 - 9th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference: Resilient Structures and Sustainable Construction (2017) Trani, M.L., Cassano, M., Todaro, D.: Standard information for construction equipment in a relational database. In: présenté à ISEC 2017 - 9th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference: Resilient Structures and Sustainable Construction (2017)
14.
go back to reference Grieves, M., Vickers, J.: Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In: Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems, pp. 85–113 (2017). Springer Grieves, M., Vickers, J.: Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In: Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems, pp. 85–113 (2017). Springer
Metadata
Title
Industry 4.0 and BIM: Do They Share the Same Objectives?
Authors
Laurent Joblot
Christophe Danjou
Robert Pellerin
Samir Lamouri
Copyright Year
2021
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70566-4_65

Premium Partners