Skip to main content
Top

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Influence of Configuration of Stone Columns on Combined Footings Resting on Reinforced Earth Beds

Author : Priti Maheshwari

Published in: Geotechnical Applications

Publisher: Springer Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This work deals with the deformation analysis of combined footings resting on geosynthetic and stone column improved ground and subjected to symmetrically placed column loads. Simple mathematical model has been proposed which idealizes a combined footing as a beam. Just below the footing, there is the presence of a granular fill layer which has been modeled as a Pasternak shear layer. Geosynthetic layer, idealized as an elastic extensible membrane, has been placed in between this granular soil layer. There is an existence of a soft soil layer below geosynthetic-reinforced granular fill layer improved by stone columns. Stone columns and the soft soil layer have been represented by Winkler springs and Kelvin-Voigt body respectively. Nonlinear behavior of granular fill, stone columns and the soft soil has been considered in the analysis employing hyperbolic constitutive relationships. Governing differential equations have been derived and solution of these has been obtained with the help of appropriate boundary and continuity conditions. Finite difference method has been adopted for solving the model of footing-geosynthetic-reinforced granular fill-stone column reinforced soft soil system. Parametric study has been conducted to study the influence of configuration of stone columns. Five column loads have been considered. These results have been presented in the form of non-dimensional charts which can be used for deciding the optimum configuration of the stone columns in such soil-footing system. It has been seen that both these parameters, i.e., diameter and spacing of stone columns significantly influence the response of combined footing. The deflection of footing has been found to reduce with reduction in spacing to diameter ratio (s/d) of stone columns. The ratio, s/d has been found to possess an optimum value of 2.5–3.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Alamgir, M., Miura, N., Poorooshasb, H. B., & Madhav, M. R. (1996). Deformation analysis of soft ground reinforced by columnar inclusions. Computers and Geotechnics, 18(4), 267–290.CrossRef Alamgir, M., Miura, N., Poorooshasb, H. B., & Madhav, M. R. (1996). Deformation analysis of soft ground reinforced by columnar inclusions. Computers and Geotechnics, 18(4), 267–290.CrossRef
go back to reference Balaam, N. P., & Booker, J. R. (1981). Analysis of rigid rafts supported by granular piles. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 5, 379–403.CrossRef Balaam, N. P., & Booker, J. R. (1981). Analysis of rigid rafts supported by granular piles. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 5, 379–403.CrossRef
go back to reference Deb, Kousik, Chandra, S., & Basudhar, P. K. (2010). Analysis of extensible geosynthetics and stone column-reinforced soil. Ground Improvement, 163(4), 231–236.CrossRef Deb, Kousik, Chandra, S., & Basudhar, P. K. (2010). Analysis of extensible geosynthetics and stone column-reinforced soil. Ground Improvement, 163(4), 231–236.CrossRef
go back to reference Deb, Kousik, Sivakugan, N., Chandra, S., & Basudhar, P. K. (2007). Generalized model for geosynthetic-reinforced granular fill-soft soil with stone columns. International Journal of Geomechanics, ASCE, 7(4), 266–276.CrossRef Deb, Kousik, Sivakugan, N., Chandra, S., & Basudhar, P. K. (2007). Generalized model for geosynthetic-reinforced granular fill-soft soil with stone columns. International Journal of Geomechanics, ASCE, 7(4), 266–276.CrossRef
go back to reference Ghosh, C., & Madhav, M. R. (1994). Settlement response of a reinforced shallow earth bed. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 13, 643–656.CrossRef Ghosh, C., & Madhav, M. R. (1994). Settlement response of a reinforced shallow earth bed. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 13, 643–656.CrossRef
go back to reference Madhav, M. R., & Poorooshasb, H. B. (1988). A new model for geosynthetic reinforced soil. Computers and Geotechnics, 6(4), 277–290.CrossRef Madhav, M. R., & Poorooshasb, H. B. (1988). A new model for geosynthetic reinforced soil. Computers and Geotechnics, 6(4), 277–290.CrossRef
go back to reference Maheshwari, Priti, Basudhar, P. K., & Chandra, S. (2004). Analysis of beams on reinforced granular beds. Geosynthetics International, 11(6), 470–480.CrossRef Maheshwari, Priti, Basudhar, P. K., & Chandra, S. (2004). Analysis of beams on reinforced granular beds. Geosynthetics International, 11(6), 470–480.CrossRef
go back to reference Maheshwari, Priti, & Khatri, Shubha. (2012). Generalized model for footings on geosynthetic—reinforced granular fill—stone column improved soft soil system. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 6(4), 403–414.CrossRef Maheshwari, Priti, & Khatri, Shubha. (2012). Generalized model for footings on geosynthetic—reinforced granular fill—stone column improved soft soil system. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 6(4), 403–414.CrossRef
go back to reference Shahu, J. T., Madhav, M. R., & Hayashi, S. (2000). Analysis of soft ground-granular pile-granular mat system. Computers and Geotechnics, 27(1), 45–62.CrossRef Shahu, J. T., Madhav, M. R., & Hayashi, S. (2000). Analysis of soft ground-granular pile-granular mat system. Computers and Geotechnics, 27(1), 45–62.CrossRef
go back to reference Shukla, S. K., & Chandra, S. (1994). A generalized mechanical model for geosynthetic-reinforced foundation soil. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 13, 813–825.CrossRef Shukla, S. K., & Chandra, S. (1994). A generalized mechanical model for geosynthetic-reinforced foundation soil. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 13, 813–825.CrossRef
go back to reference Yin, J. H. (1997). Modelling geosynthetic-reinforced granular fills over soft soil. Geosynthetics International, 4(2), 165–185.CrossRef Yin, J. H. (1997). Modelling geosynthetic-reinforced granular fills over soft soil. Geosynthetics International, 4(2), 165–185.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Influence of Configuration of Stone Columns on Combined Footings Resting on Reinforced Earth Beds
Author
Priti Maheshwari
Copyright Year
2019
Publisher
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0368-5_3